Poverty not taste drives the consumption of protected species in Madagascar
Bushmeat consumption in Madagascar is increasingly acknowledged as one of the major threats to its wild vertebrates. Nevertheless, few studies have examined the drivers of the consumption of protected versus legally huntable wild species, or examined its variance across Madagascar’s protected and unprotected areas. This research provides a novel study of the consumption of protected, unprotected, and fish/eel species between forest types (deciduous and rainforest), as well as across a gradient of protected habitat (National Park, Reserve, Unprotected). Members of 1750 households were interviewed across four regions, including two national parks, two reserves, and two unprotected forests. Household demographic, socioeconomic, cultural, and geographic variables were explored as possible predictors of bushmeat consumption. We found that poorer households reported consuming greater quantities of protected species whereas wealthier households reported consuming greater quantities of fish and eel. Households located inside Andasibe-Mantadia National Park, Madagascar’s most visited protected area, reported consuming the greatest quantities of protected species. Interviewees’ most favoured meat was from livestock, and fish. The consumption pattern of wild species reflected interviewees’ stated preference for species that are either unlisted (e.g. tilapia fish) under Malagasy species protection laws, classified as pest (e.g. bushpig) and/or game species (e.g. tenrec). Most protected species (such as lemurs and carnivorans) were interviewees’ least favoured wild meats. Given the lack of cultural affinity, and low preference for the consumption of most protected species, our results suggest that improving accessibility to domestic meat is a promising strategy for reducing the consumption of protected species.
KeywordsBushmeat Food insecurity Poaching Hunting Illegal trade Protected areas
This study was funded by Megafaun, the Fossa Fund of Duisburg Zoo, and the Pollard Fund of Wadham College. A debt of gratitude is owed to the communities who graciously hosted us and participated in our research. Thank you to our hardworking field team, and the organisations that helped us, including Fanamby, Chances for Nature, and MICET. Thank you to the Madagascar National Parks and the Madagascar Government for granting the permission to conduct this research.
This study was funded by Megafaun, the Fossa Fund of Duisburg Zoo, and the Pollard Fund of Wadham College.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical clearance and research approval was Granted by The University of Oxford’s Central University Research Ethics Committee (Number: SSD/CUREC1A/14-010).
Informed consent was sought before interviews.
- Alkire S, Conconi A, Roche JM (2015a) Multidimensional Poverty Index 2015: brief methodological note and results. University of Oxford, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Allnutt TF, Asner GP, Golden CD, Powell GVN (2013) Mapping recent deforestation and forest disturbance in northeastern Madagascar Tropical Conservation. Science 6:1–15Google Scholar
- Bennett EL, Robinson JG (2000) Hunting of wildlife in tropical forests: implications for biodiversity and forest peoples. The World Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Borgerson C, Johnson SE, Louis EE, Holmes SM, Anjaranirina EJG, Randriamady HJ, Golden CD (2018a) The use of natural resources to improve household income, health, and nutrition within the forests of Kianjavato, Madagascar. Madag Conserv Dev. https://doi.org/10.4314/mcd.v13i1.6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Borgerson C, Vonona MA, Vonona T, Anjaranirina EJG, Lewis R, Ralainasolo F, Golden CD (2018b) An evaluation of the interactions among household economies, human health, and wildlife hunting in the Lac Alaotra wetland complex of Madagascar. Madag Conserv Dev 13:1Google Scholar
- Cinner JE (2007) The role of taboos in conserving coastal resources in Madagascar. Tradit Mar Res Manag Knowl Inf Bull 22:15–23Google Scholar
- Fa JE, Albrechtsen L, Brown D (2006) Bushmeat: the challenge of balancing human and wildlife needs in African moist tropical forests. In: Macdonald DW, Service K (eds) Key topics in conservation biology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 208–222Google Scholar
- Golden C, Comaroff J (2015a) The human health and conservation relevance of food taboos in northeastern Madagascar. Ecol Soc 20:2Google Scholar
- Golden CD, Rabehatonina JGC, Rakotosoa A, Moore M (2014b) Socio-ecological analysis of natural resource use in Betampona Strict Natural Reserve Madagascar. Conserv Dev 9:83–89Google Scholar
- Horning NR (2003) How rules affect conservation outcomes. In: Goodman SM, Benstead JP (eds) The natural history of Madagascar. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 146–153Google Scholar
- Hubbard ML, Casper RA, Lessler JT (1989) Respondents’ reactions to item count lists and randomized response. In: Proceedings of the survey research section’, American Statistical Association, Washington, DC pp 544–448Google Scholar
- IFAD (2016) Statistics. http://www.ruralpovertyportal.org/country/statistics/tags/madagascar. Accessed 14 June 2016
- Jenkins RK, Racey PA (2008) Bats as bushmeat in Madagascar. Madag Conserv Dev 3:1Google Scholar
- Martin AD, Quinn KM, Park JH (2017) Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) Package. R Package 1.3-9Google Scholar
- Miller JD (1984) A new survey technique for studying deviant behavior. George Washington University, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- MNP (2016) Ankarafantsika National Park. http://www.parcs-madagascar.com/aire-prot%C3%A9g%C3%A9e/parc-national-ankarafantsika. Accessed 8 Aug 2016
- Nicoll M (2003) The Natural History of Madagascar. Tenrec ecaudatus, Tenrec, Tandraka, Trandraka. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Rakotoarivelo AR, Razafimanahaka JH, Rabesihanaka S, Jones JPG, Jenkins RKB (2011) Laws and regulations on wildlife in Madagascar: progress and future needs. Madag Conserv Dev 6:37–44Google Scholar
- Randriamalala H, Liu Z (2010) Rosewood of Madagascar: between democracy and conservation. Madag Conserv Dev 5:11–22Google Scholar
- Randrianandianina BN, Andriamahaly LR, Harisoa FM, Nicoll ME (2003) The role of the protected areas in the management of the island’s biodiversity. In: Goodman SM, Benstead JP (eds) The natural history of Madagascar. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 1423–1432Google Scholar
- Razafimanahaka JH, Jenkins RKB, Andriafidison D, Randrianandrianina F, Rakotomboavonjy V, Keane A, Jones JPG (2012) Novel approach for quantifying illegal bushmeat consumption reveals high consumption of protected species in Madagascar. Oryx 46:584–592. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0030605312000579 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schwitzer C et al (2013) Lemurs of Madagascar: a strategy for their conservation 2013–2016 Bristol, UK: IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group Report, Bristol Conservation and Science Foundation, and Conservation InternationalGoogle Scholar
- UNEP-WCMC (2017) Global statistics from the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). UNEP-WCMC. Accessed 10 Nov 2017Google Scholar
- van Vliet N (2000) Livelihood alternatives for the unsustainable use of bushmeat. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity,Google Scholar
- Wilson EO (1999) The diversity of life. WW Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Zuur F, Savaliev A, Ieno E (2012) Zero Inflated Models and Generalized Linear Mixed Models with R. Highland Statistics Ltd, NewburghGoogle Scholar