Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diverse land-uses shape new bird communities in a changing rural region

Biodiversity and Conservation volume 28, pages 3479–3496 (2019)Cite this article

Abstract

Rural landscape change as a consequence of human population growth is a major challenge for nature conservation in the twenty-first century. Rural regions are globally experiencing change driven by diverse factors, including agricultural intensification, new agricultural commodities, residential development, and land abandonment. Understanding how different land-use trajectories affect biodiversity is critical for making informed decisions for the conservation of species in modified environments. We examined the impact of different land-uses on bird communities in the western Strzelecki Ranges, a formerly forested but now rural region in south-east Australia. We selected 25 study landscapes, each 1 km2, representing seven land-uses typical of rural regions: townships, lifestyle properties (low-density acreages or hobby farms), dairy farming, beef grazing, horticulture, tree plantation and natural forest. Terrestrial birds were systematically surveyed at 10 sites in each study landscape and the results pooled to represent the whole landscape. We recorded 80 native and 8 exotic species of birds, of which 46 species were classified a priori as forest species typical of the region. Different trajectories of land-use have generated variation in landscape structure, with a primary gradient of change from forest to rural townships. The composition of bird communities and the richness of four species-response groups showed marked differences across land-use types. The mean richness of forest species, for example, was greatest in natural forest land-use (30.0 species) and lowest in dairy farming land-use (14.5 species). Key lessons from this study include: (1) these diverse land-uses, typical of rural regions, are creating novel assemblages of birds that differ from that of the former forested environment; (2) land-use in this region is dynamic and so further re-assortment of bird communities can be expected through time; (3) despite such change, a component of the original forest avifauna persists, even in highly modified landscapes; and (4) each land-use type offers opportunities for nature conservation while also meeting the needs of people and agricultural production.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

39,95 €

Price includes VAT (Netherlands)

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Abrams JB, Gosnell H, Gill NJ, Klepeis PJ (2012) Re-creating the rural, reconstructing nature: an international literature review of the environmental implications of amenity migration. Conserv Soc 10:270–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett GW, Ford HA, Recher HF (1994) Conservation of woodland birds in a fragmented rural landscape. Pac Conserv Biol 1:245–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett G, Silcocks A, Barry S, Cunningham R, Poulter R (2003) The new atlas of Australian birds (1998-2001). Birds Australia, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Beilin R, Lindborg R, Stenseke M, Pereira HM, Llausàs A, Slätmo E, Cerqueira Y, Navarro L, Rodrigues P, Reichelt N, Munro N, Queiroz C (2014) Analysing how drivers of agricultural land abandonment affect biodiversity and cultural landscapes using case studies from Scandinavia, Iberia and Oceania. Land Use Policy 36:60–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buijs AE, Pedroli B, Luginbühl Y (2006) From hiking through farmland to farming in a leisure landscape: changing social perceptions of the European landscape. Landsc Ecol 21:375–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale S (2018) Urban bird community composition influenced by size of urban green spaces, presence of native forest, and urbanization. Urban Ecosyst 21:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environment Land Water and Planning, West Gippsland Catchment Management Authority, and North Central Catchment Management Authority (2007) VicVeg online: the Strzelecki Ranges Bioregion within the West Gippsland CMA. VicVeg Project. www.vicveg.net.au/vvCommunities2.aspx

  • Donald PF, Green RE, Heath MF (2001) Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 268:25–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis EC, Ramankutty N (2008) Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world. Front Ecol Environ 6:439–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elms AW (1920a) A fiery summer. In: Korumburra and District Historical Society Inc. (ed) The land of the lyre bird: a story of early settlement in the Great Forest of South Gippsland. Korumburra and District Historical Society Inc., Drouin, pp 302–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Elms FP (1920b) Animal, bird, and insect life in the scrub. In: Korumburra and District Historical Society Inc. (ed) The land of the lyre bird: a story of early settlement in the Great Forest of South Gippsland. Korumburra and District Historical Society Inc., Drouin, pp 34–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Farr CM, Pejchar L, Reed SE (2017) Subdivision design and stewardship affect bird and mammal use of conservation developments. Ecol Appl 27:1236–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Mueller ND, O’Connell C, Ray DK, West PC, Balzer C, Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Hill J, Monfreda C, Polasky S, Rockstrom J, Sheehan J, Siebert S, Tilman D, Zaks DPM (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478:337–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ford HA, Barrett GW, Saunders DA, Recher HF (2001) Why have birds in the woodlands of Southern Australia declined? Biol Conserv 97:71–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Melbourne

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gailly R, Paquet J-Y, Titeux N, Claessens H, Dufrêne M (2017) Effects of the conversion of intensive grasslands into Christmas tree plantations on bird assemblages. Agric Ecosyst Environ 247:91–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnett ST, Duursma DE, Ehmke G, Guay P-J, Stewart A, Szabo JK, Weston MA, Bennett S, Crowley GM, Drynan D, Dutson G, Fitzherbert K, Franklin DC (2015) Biological, ecological, conservation and legal information for all species and subspecies of Australian bird. Sci Data 2:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons P, Boak M (2002) The value of paddock trees for regional conservation in an agricultural landscape. Ecol Manag Restor 3:205–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill N, Klepeis P, Chisholm L (2010) Stewardship among lifestyle oriented rural landowners. J Environ Plan Manag 53:317–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall M, Nimmo D, Bennett AF (2016) At the crossroads: does the configuration of roadside vegetation affect woodland bird communities in rural landscapes? PLoS ONE 11:e0155219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen AJ, Brown DG (2005) Land-use change in rural America: rates, drivers, and consequences. Ecol Appl 15:1849–1850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanspach J, Fischer J, Stott J, Stagoll K (2011) Conservation management of eastern Australian farmland birds in relation to landscape gradients. J Appl Ecol 48:523–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslem A, Bennett AF (2008a) Birds in agricultural mosaics: the influence of landscape pattern and countryside heterogeneity. Ecol Appl 18:185–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslem A, Bennett AF (2008b) Countryside elements and the conservation of birds in agricultural environments. Agric Ecosyst Environ 125:191–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Harris JA (2009) Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. Trends Ecol Evol 24:599–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Valentine LE, Standish RJ, Jackson ST (2018) Movers and stayers: novel assemblages in changing environments. Trends Ecol Evol 33:116–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodara K, Poggio SL (2016) Frogs taste nice when there are few mice: do dietary shifts in barn owls result from rapid farming intensification? Agric Ecosyst Environ 230:42–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes J (2006) Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: gaps in the research agenda. J Rural Stud 22:142–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaac B, Cooke R, Ierodiaconou D, White J (2014) Does urbanization have the potential to create an ecological trap for Powerful Owls (Ninox strenua)? Biol Conserv 176:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jetz W, Wilcove DS, Dobson AP (2007) Projected impacts of climate and land-use change on the global diversity of birds. PLoS Biol 5:1211–1219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Le Viol I, Jiguet F, Brotons L, Herrando S, Lindström Å, Pearce-Higgins JW, Reif J, Van Turnhout C, Devictor V (2012) More and more generalists: two decades of changes in the European avifauna. Biol Let 8:780–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J (2006) Habitat fragmentation and landscape change: an ecological and conservation synthesis. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Northrop-Mackie AR, Montague-Drake R, Crane M, Michael D, Okada S, Gibbons P (2012) Not all kinds of revegetation are created equal: revegetation type influences bird assemblages in threatened Australian woodland ecosystems. PLoS ONE 7:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Llausàs A, Buxton M, Beilin R (2015) Spatial planning and changing landscapes: a failure of policy in peri-urban Victoria, Australia. J Environ Plan Manag 59:1304–1322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low T (2002) The new nature. Penguin, Camberwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck GW, Smallbone LT (2011) The impact of urbanization on taxonomic and functional similarity among bird communities. J Biogeogr 38:894–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangan AM, Pejchar L, Werner SJ (2017) Bird use of organic apple orchards: frugivory, pest control and implications for production. PLoS ONE 12:e0183405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maron M, Rhodes JR, Gibbons P (2013) Calculating the benefit of conservation actions. Conserv Lett 6:359–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro NT, Fischer J, Barrett G, Wood J, Leavesley A, Lindenmayer DB (2011) Bird’s response to revegetation of different structure and floristics: are “restoration plantings” restoring bird communities? Restor Ecol 19:223–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron D, Chan KMA, Daily GC, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Lonsdorf E, Naidoo R, Ricketts TH, Shaw M (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7:4–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann JL, Griffiths GH, Foster CW, Holloway GJ (2016) The heterogeneity of wooded-agricultural landscape mosaics influences woodland bird community assemblages. Landsc Ecol 31:1833–1848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Guillaume Blanchet F, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Henry M, Stevens H, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2017) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.4-3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan

  • Phalan B, Balmford A, Green RE, Scharlemann JPW (2011) Minimising the harm to biodiversity of producing more food globally. Food Policy 36:S62–S71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polyakov M, Pannell DJ, Pandit R, Tapsuwan S, Park G (2016) Valuing environmental assets on rural lifestyle properties. Agric Resour Econ Rev 42:159–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queiroz C, Beilin R, Folke C, Lindborg R (2014) Farmland abandonment: threat or opportunity for biodiversity conservation? A global review. Front Ecol Environ 12:288–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Stewart SI, Fried JS, Holcomb SS, McKeefry JF (2005) The wildland-urban interface in the United States. Ecol Appl 15:799–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford JQ, Bennett AF (2005) Terrestrial avifauna of the Gippsland Plain and Strzelecki Ranges, Victoria, Australia: insights from atlas data. Wildl Res 32:531–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramankutty N, Foley JA, Norman J, McSweeney K (2002) The global distribution of cultivable lands: current patterns and sensitivity to possible climate change. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 11:377–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recher HF (1988) Counting terrestrial birds: use and application of census procedures in Australia. Aust Zool Rev 1:25–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol 5:18–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shire of Korumburra (ed) (1972) The land of the lyre bird: a story of early settlement in the Great Forest of South Gippsland. Wilke & Co Ltd, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorice MG, Kreuter UP, Wilcox BP, Fox WE (2014) Changing landowners, changing ecosystem? Land-ownership motivations as drivers of land management practices. J Environ Manag 133:144–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (2012) Biodiversity and environmental sustainability amid human domination of global ecosystems. Daedalus 141:108–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort BL (2011) Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:20260–20264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Clark M, Williams DR, Kimmel K, Polasky S, Packer C (2017) Future threats to biodiversity and pathways to their prevention. Nature 546:73–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T, Tylianakis JM, Rand TA, Didham RK, Fahrig L, Batáry P, Bengtsson J, Clough Y, Crist TO, Dormann CF, Ewers RM, Fründ J, Holt RD, Holzschuh A, Klein AM, Kleijn D, Kremen C, Landis DA, Laurance W, Lindenmayer D, Scherber C, Sodhi N, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C, van der Putten WH, Westphal C (2012) Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes: eight hypotheses. Biol Rev 87:661–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Heezik Y, Smyth A, Mathieu R (2008) Diversity of native and exotic birds across an urban gradient in a New Zealand city. Landsc Urban Plan 87:223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villard M-A, Trzcinski MK, Merriam G (1999) Fragmentation effects on forest birds: relative influence of woodland cover and configuration on landscape occupancy. Conserv Biol 13:774–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson SJ, Luck GW, Spooner PG, Watson DM (2014) Land-use change: incorporating the frequency, sequence, time span, and magnitude of changes into ecological research. Front Ecol Environ 12:241–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang ZS, Cai JM, Sliuzas R (2010) Agro-tourism enterprises as a form of multi-functional urban agriculture for peri-urban development in China. Habitat Int 34:374–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zasada I (2011) Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture: a review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy 28:639–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol 1:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of many landholders and volunteers involved in this project. This research was supported by a PhD scholarship (La Trobe University) and the Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment; and undertaken with approval from La Trobe University Animal Ethics (permit AEC15-21) and National Parks Act 1975 (permit 10007348). We also thank two anonymous reviewers for comments which improved this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology, Environment and Evolution, School of Life Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia

    Cara E. Sambell, Greg J. Holland, Angie Haslem & Andrew F. Bennett

  2. Research Centre for Future Landscapes, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia

    Cara E. Sambell, Greg J. Holland, Angie Haslem & Andrew F. Bennett

  3. Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia

    Andrew F. Bennett

Authors
  1. Cara E. Sambell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Greg J. Holland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Angie Haslem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrew F. Bennett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cara E. Sambell.

Additional information

Communicated by Ailsa J. McKenzie.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 55 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sambell, C.E., Holland, G.J., Haslem, A. et al. Diverse land-uses shape new bird communities in a changing rural region. Biodivers Conserv 28, 3479–3496 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01833-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01833-5

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Landscape change
  • Biodiversity
  • Agriculture
  • Urbanisation
  • Land management

Search

Navigation