Abstract
Accurately detecting the magnitude and direction of population trends provides essential information for conservation management. There are numerous local and international long-term waterbird monitoring programmes with substantial variation in how frequently surveys are conducted. We aimed to assess how temporal frequency of waterbird surveys influence three aspects of population trends: (1) level of uncertainty around estimates of long-term trends; (2) frequency, duration and overlap of significant short-term increases or declines in trend trajectory; and (3) differences between estimated change in population size measured over four different time periods. Data from 28 years of surveys at a waste water treatment facility in South Africa were used to model the population trend of 41 waterbird species. We used generalised additive mixed-models to compare significance and magnitude of population change trends between monthly and biannual surveys. Direction and shape of species trends were similar between protocols although uncertainty around trends was generally lower when monthly data were used. The number of significant trend trajectories, the majority of which were declines, was higher in monthly models. Temporal overlap of periods of significant change of trends of the two protocols averaged 30%. However, both sampling protocols offered similar conclusions about long-term change in population size of species. General patterns differed conspicuously among species, although groups of species showed similar trajectories of population change. We conclude that biannual surveys are appropriate if the goal is to assess general patterns of population change. However, if management action relies on understanding the significance of population trajectories, surveys at a finer temporal scale are required, especially for species showing a pattern of unpredictable movement. Trade-offs between logistical constraints and statistical rigour as well as species identity need to be carefully considered for the design of long-term monitoring programmes of waterbirds.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Amano T, Székely T, Koyama K et al (2010) A framework for monitoring the status of populations: an example from wader populations in the East Asian-Australasian flyway. Biol Conserv 143:2238–2247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.010
Amano T, Okamura H, Carrizo SF, Sutherland WJ (2012) Hierarchical models for smoothed population indices: the importance of considering variations in trends of count data among sites. Ecol Indic 13:243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.008
Atkinson PW, Austin GE, Rehfisch MM et al (2006) Identifying declines in waterbirds: the effects of missing data, population variability and count period on the interpretation of long-term survey data. Biol Conserv 130:549–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.01.018
Barlow KE, Briggs PA, Haysom KA et al (2015) Citizen science reveals trends in bat populations: the National Bat Monitoring Programme in Great Britain. Biol Conserv 182:14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.022
Barnard P, Altwegg R, Ebrahim I, Underhill LG (2016) Early warning systems for biodiversity in southern Africa—how much can citizen science mitigate imperfect data? Biol Conserv 208:183–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.011
Brooks SP, Freeman SN, Greenwood JJD et al (2008) Quantifying conservation concern—Bayesian statistics, birds and the red lists. Biol Conserv 141:1436–1441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.009
Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B et al (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 80–(328):1164–1168. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187512
Clemens RS, Rogers DI, Hansen BD et al (2016) Continental-scale decreases in shorebird populations in Australia. Emu 116:119–135. https://doi.org/10.1071/MU15056
Crewe T, Barry K, Davidson P, Lepage D (2012) Coastal waterbird population trends in the Strait of Georgia 1999–2011: results from the first 12 years of the British Columbia Coastal Waterbird Survey. Br Columbia Birds 22:8–35
Crewe TL, Taylor PD, Lepage D et al (2016) Quantifying regional variation in population trends using migrating counts. J Wildl Manage 80:245–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.1003
Cumming GS, Paxton M, King J, Beuster H (2012) Foraging guild membership explains variation in waterbird responses to the hydrological regime of an arid-region flood-pulse river in Namibia. Freshw Biol 57:1202–1213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02789.x
Cumming GS, Ndlovu M, Mutumi GL, Hockey PAR (2013) Responses of an African wading bird community to resource pulses are related to foraging guild and food-web position. Freshw Biol 58:79–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12040
Dirzo R, Young HS, Galetti M et al (2014) Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science 80–(345):401–406. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251817
Fedy BC, Aldridge CL (2011) The importance of within-year repeated counts and the influence of scale on long-term monitoring of sage-grouse. J Wildl Manage 75:1022–1033. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.155
Fewster RM, Buckland ST, Siriwardena GM, Stephen R (2000) Analysis of population trends for farmland birds using generalized additive models. Ecology 81:1970–1984
Harebottle DM, Williams AJ, Weiss Y, Tong GB (2008) Waterbirds at Paarl Waste Water Treatment Works, South Africa, 1994–2004: seasonality, trends and conservation importance. Ostrich 79:147–163. https://doi.org/10.2989/ostrich.2008.79.2.4.578
Henry DAW, Ament JM, Cumming GS (2016) Exploring the environmental drivers of waterfowl movement in arid landscapes using first-passage time analysis. Mov Ecol 4:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-016-0073-x
Holt CA, Austin GE, Calbrade NA et al (2009) Waterbirds in the UK 2007/08: The Wetland Bird Survey. BTO/WWT/RSPB/JNCC, Thetford
Humbert JY, Mills LS, Horne JS, Dennis B (2009) A better way to estimate population trends. Oikos 118:1940–1946. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17839.x
Inger R, Gregory R, Duffy JP et al (2015) Common European birds are declining rapidly while less abundant species’ numbers are rising. Ecol Lett 18:28–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12387
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, 2nd edn. Gland, Switzerland
Kalejta-Summers B, Allan DG, Longrigg TD (2001a) Long-term trends, seasonal abundance and energy consumption of waterbirds at Rietvlei, Western Cape, South Africa, 1950–1997. Ostrich 72:63–79. https://doi.org/10.2989/00306520109485289
Kalejta-Summers B, McCarthy M, Underhill LG (2001b) Long-term trends, seasonal abundance and energy consumption of waterbirds at Strandfontein, Western Cape, South Africa, 1953–1993. Ostrich 72:80–95. https://doi.org/10.2989/00306520109485290
Kamp J, Oppel S, Heldbjerg H et al (2016) Unstructured citizen science data fail to detect long-term population declines of common birds in Denmark. Divers Distrib 22:1024–1035. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12463
Keith D, Akçakaya HR, Butchart SHM et al (2015) Temporal correlations in population trends: conservation implications from time-series analysis of diverse animal taxa. Biol Conserv 192:247–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.09.021
Knape J (2016) Decomposing trends in Swedish bird populations using generalized additive mixed models. J Appl Ecol 53:1852–1861. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12720
Marnewick MD, Retief EF, Theron NT et al (2015) Important bird and biodiversity areas of South Africa. BirdLife South Africa, Johannesburg
Piersma T, Lok T, Chen Y et al (2016) Simultaneous declines in summer survival of three shorebird species signals a flyway at risk. J Appl Ecol 53:479–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12582
Pimm SL, Jenkins CN, Abell R et al (2014) The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 344:1246752. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246752
Simmons RE, Kolberg H, Braby R, Erni B (2015) Declines in migrant shorebird populations from a winter-quarter perspective. Conserv Biol 29:877–887. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12493
Sullivan BL, Phillips T, Dayer AA et al (2016) Using open access observational data for conservation action: a case study for birds. Biol Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.04.031
Taylor PB, Navarro RA, Wren-Sargent M et al (1999) TOTAL CWAC Report: co-ordinated waterbird counts in South Africa, 1992–1997. University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Avian Demography Unit
Thomas HL, Hockey PAR, Cumming GS (2015) Solving the challenges of monitoring mobile populations: insights from studies of waterbirds in southern Africa. Ostrich 86:169–178. https://doi.org/10.2989/00306525.2015.1005720
Tulloch AIT, Possingham HP, Joseph LN et al (2013) Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs. Biol Conserv 165:128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.05.025
van Roomen M, Laursen K, van Turnhout C et al (2012) Signals from the Wadden sea: population declines dominate among waterbirds depending on intertidal mudflats. Ocean Coast Manag 68:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.04.004
Wetlands International (2012) Waterbird population estimates, 5th edn. Summary Report. Wetlands International, Wageningen
Wilson HB, Kendall BE, Fuller RA et al (2011a) Analyzing variability and the rate of decline of migratory shorebirds in Moreton Bay, Australia. Conserv Biol 25:758–766. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01670.x
Wilson HB, Kendall BE, Possingham HP (2011b) Variability in population abundance and the classification of extinction risk. Conserv Biol 25:747–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01671.x
Acknowledgements
The waterbird count data from the CWAC project were supplied by the Animal Demography Unit, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town. We would like to thank all the volunteers, including those from the Cape Bird Club, who participated in CWAC counts over the last four decades. We would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their insightful feedback on earlier versions of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Peter J. T. White.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henry, D.A.W., O’Connor, T.G. Survey frequency affects the estimates and conclusions of long-term changes in waterbird populations: a case study from a South African wetland. Biodivers Conserv 28, 3429–3443 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01828-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01828-2
Keywords
- Waterbirds
- Wetlands
- Trend analysis
- Generalised additive mixed-model
- Temporal frequency
- Abundance
- Count surveys