Abstract
Birdwatching is one of the fastest growing subsectors of ecotourism, and can contribute substantial income to the local economy in areas with high bird diversity. The Białowieża Forest (BF) is one of the most popular places to watch birds in Europe and is visited by thousands of birdwatchers every year. They are attracted by its particularly high diversity of bird species, many associated with the BF’s old-growth characteristics, including sizable populations of almost all European woodpeckers. These species are threatened by logging activities that are being undertaken on the assumption that forestry is important for the local economy. Our aim was to compare the revenue from birdwatchers with the revenue from other tourists visiting the BF to counter the economic justification for logging. Based on 165 responses to a structured questionnaire, our results show that one birdwatcher spends USD 64.6 per day on average, compared to USD 38.6 per day by other visitors to the BF. Birdwatchers also stay in the BF longer than other tourists (3.8 and 2.5 days on average, respectively). The total estimated local expenditure of approximately 14,000 birdwatchers in 2016 is almost USD 2.2 million. In contrast, since 2005, forest management and the sale of wood from the BF has led to economic losses each year, which we suggest would be further exacerbated by the impact of continued logging on birds and resultant inevitable decline in income from avitourism.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aulén G (1988) Ecology and distribution history of the white-backed woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos in Sweden. Report no 14. Department of Wildlife Ecology, SLU, Uppsala
Balmford A, Bruner A, Cooper P, Costanza R, Farber S, Green RE, Jenkins M, Jefferiss P, Jessamy V, Madden J, Munro K, Myers N, Naeem S, Paavola J, Rayment M, Rosendo S, Roughgarden J, Trumper K, Turner RK (2002) Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297:950–953. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1073947
Booth JE, Gaston KJ, Evans KL, Armsworth PR (2011) The value of species rarity in biodiversity recreation: a birdwatching example. Biol Conserv 144:2728–2732
Callaghan CT, Slater M, Major RE, Morrison M, Martin JM, Kingsford RT (2017) Travelling birds generate eco-travellers: the economic potential of vagrant birdwatching. Hum Dimens Wildl 4:1–12
Ciepiela GA, Kur-Kowalska M, Jankowska J (2015) Efekty ekonomiczne działalności agroturystycznej na przykładzie parków narodowych [The economic effects of the agrotouristic activity based on example of national parks]. Rocz Naukowe Stow Ekon Rol Agrobiz 17:14–23 (ln Polish)
Cocker M, Tipping D (2013) Birds and people. Random House, London
Collar NJ, Long AJ, Robles Gil P, Rojo J (2007) Birds and people: bonds in a timeless journey. CEMEX-Agrupación Sierra Madre-BirdLife International, Mexico City
Collins-Kreiner N, Malkinson D, Labinger Z, Shtainvarz R (2013) Are birders good for birds? Bird conservation through tourism management in the Hula Valley, Israel. Tour Manag 38:31–42
Connell J (2009) Birdwatching, twitching and tourism: towards an Australian perspective. Aust Geogr 40:203–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180902964942
Czeszczewik D, Walankiewicz W (2006) Logging affects the white-backed woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos distribution in the Białowieża forest. Ann Zool Fenn 43:221–227
Czeszczewik D, Zub K, Stański T, Sahel M, Kapusta A, Walankiewicz W (2015) Effects of forest management on bird assemblages in the Białowieża Forest, Poland. iForest 8:377–385. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1212-007
Edwards PET, Parsons GR, Myers KH (2011) The economic value of viewing migratory shorebirds on the Delaware Bay: an application of the single site travel cost model using on-site data. Hum Dimens Wildl 16:435–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2011.608180
Eubanks TL Jr, Stoll JR, Ditton RB (2004) Understanding the diversity of eight birder sub-populations: socio-demographic characteristics, motivations, expenditures and net benefits. J Ecotourism 3:151–172
Giergiczny M (2009) Rekreacyjna wartość Białowieskiego Parku Narodowego [The recreation value of the Białowieża National Park]. Ekon Środowisko 36:116–128 (in Polish, English Summary)
Glowinski SL (2008) Bird-watching, ecotourism, and economic development: a review of the evidence. Appl Res Econ Dev 5:65–77
Gołos P, Zając S (2007–2008) The role of forestry in the socio-economic development of Poland’s agricultural region (input-output analysis). Folia For Pol A 49/50: 69-80
http://www.lasy.gov.pl/pl/informacje/zakazy-wstepu-do-lasow. Accessed 7 Dec 2017
http://www.polskawliczbach.pl/gmina_Bialowieza. Accessed 7 Dec 2017
Kerlinger P (1993) Birding economics and birder demographics studies as conservation tools. In: Finch DM, Stangel PW (eds) Status and management of neotropical migratory birds: September 21–25, 1992, Estes Park, Colorado. Gen Tech Rep RM-229. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Fort Collins, pp 32–38. https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/22885
Lee C-K, Lee J-H, Mjelde JW, Scott D, Kim T-K (2009) Assessing the economic value of a public birdwatching interpretative service using a contingent valuation method. Int J Tour Res 11:583–593
Mikusiński G, Bubnicki JW, Churski M, Czeszczewik D, Walankiewicz W, Kuijper DPJ (2018) Is the impact of loggings in the last primeval lowland forest in Europe underestimated? The conservation issues of Białowieża Forest. Biol Conserv 227:266–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.09.001
Mild K, Stighäll K (2005) Åtgärdsprogram för bevarande av vitryggig hackspett (Dendrocopos leucotos) och dess livsmiljöer—Rapport 5486, Naturvårdsverket (in Swedish)
Nelsen G (2017) EU calls for immediate ban on logging in Poland’s Białowieża forest. The Guardian, July 13th. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jul/13/eu-calls-for-immediate-ban-on-logging-in-bialowieza-forest-poland
Niedziałkowski K, Blicharska M, Mikusiński G, Jędrzejewska B (2014) Why is it difficult to enlarge a protected area? Ecosystem services perspective on the conflict around the extension of the Białowieża National Park in Poland. Land Use Policy 38:314–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.12.002
Nilsson SG, Hedin J, Niklasson M (2001) Biodiversity and its assessment in boreal and nemoral forests. Scand J For Res 3:10–26
Paluch R (2012) Strict nature protection of Białowieża Forest—effectiveness and consequences. Zarządzanie Ochroną Przyrody Lasach 6:326–337 (in Polish, English summary)
Polish Ministry of Environment (2017) http://orka2.sejm.gov.pl/INT8.nsf/klucz/658C47EF/%24FILE/i12917-o1.pdf
Roberge J-M, Angelstam P, Villard A-M (2008) Specialised woodpeckers and naturalness in hemiboreal forests: deriving quantitative targets for conservation planning. Biol Conserv 141:997–1012
Schiermeier Q (2016) European Commission urges logging ban in ancient Białowieża Forest. Nature 547:267–268
Sekercioglu CH (2002) Impacts of birdwatching on human and avian communities. Environ Conserv 29:282–289. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892902000206
Sekercioglu CH (2003) Conservation through commodification. Birding 35:394–402
Steven R, Castley JG (2013) Tourism as a threat to critically endangered and endangered birds: global patterns and trends in conservation hotspots. Biodivers Conserv 22:1063–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0470-z
Steven R, Morrison C, Castley JG (2015) Birdwatching and avitourism: a global review of research into its participant markets, distribution and impacts, highlighting future research priorities to inform sustainable avitourism management. J Sustain Tour 23:1257–1276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2014.924955
Stokstad E (2017) Beetles are ravaging Europe’s oldest forest. Is logging the answer? Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar6719
Tomiałojć L, Wesołowski T (2005) The avifauna of the Białowieża Forest: a window into the past. Br Birds 98:174–193
Walankiewicz W, Czeszczewik D, Tumiel T, Stański T (2011) Woodpeckers abundance in the Bialowieza Forest: a comparison between deciduous, strictly protected and managed stands. Ornis Pol 52:161–168
Wesołowski T (2005) Virtual conservation: how the European Union is turning a blind eye to its vanishing primeval forests. Conserv Biol 19:1349–1358
Wesołowski T, Martin K (2018) Tree holes and hole-nesting birds in European and North American Forests. In: Mikusiński G, Roberge J-M, Fuller RJ (eds) Ecology and conservation of forest birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 79–134
Wesołowski T, Czeszczewik D, Rowiński P (2005) Effects of forest management on Three-toed Woodpecker Picoides tridactylus distribution in the Białowieża Forest (E Poland): conservation implications. Acta Ornithol 40:53–60
Wesołowski T, Czeszczewik D, Hebda G, Maziarz M, Mitrus C, Rowiński P (2015) 40 years of breeding bird community dynamics in a primeval temperate forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland). Acta Ornithol 50:95–120
Wesołowski T, Kujawa A, Bobiec A, Bohdan A, Buchholz L, Chylarecki P, Engel J, Falkowski M, Gutowski JM, Jaroszewicz B, Nowak S, Orczewska A, Mysłajek RW, Walankiewicz W (2016) Dispute over the future of the Białowieża Forest: myths and facts. A voice in the debate. Article 2:1–12. www.forestbiology.org
Więckowski M (2010) Tourism in the border-adjacent areas of Poland. Geogr Pol 83:67–81
Acknowledgements
We heartily thank the Białowieża National Park authorities for providing data on the number of tourists. This work was supported by the Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Poland (Theme No. 446/15/S financed from a science grant by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by David Hawksworth.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Biodiversity exploitation and use.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Czeszczewik, D., Ginter, A., Mikusiński, G. et al. Birdwatching, logging and the local economy in the Białowieża Forest, Poland. Biodivers Conserv 28, 2967–2975 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01808-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01808-6