Skip to main content
Log in

Long lasting breeding performance differences between wild-born and released females in a reinforced North African Houbara bustard (Chlamydotis undulata undulata) population: a matter of release strategy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The success of translocation programmes is reflected by the ability of translocated individuals to survive and reproduce in their new environment. However, it has previously been reported that translocated individuals have lower demographic performance than their wild-born conspecifics, due to management and individual factors (such as release conditions or age). Here, we study six breeding parameters in free-ranging females of the North African Houbara bustard (Chlamydotis undulata undulata) and compare these parameters between captive-bred released (n = 204) and wild-born (n = 101) birds, considering the age of individuals and the period of release (autumn versus spring). Our results indicate that (1) captive-bred released females successfully breed in the wild; (2) for three out of the six breeding parameters studied, released females show lower performances than wild-born females; but, (3) Although we observed consistently reduced breeding performances in 1 year old females relative to older females, we did not uncover any interaction between age and the origin of females, suggesting that the impairment of breeding parameters in released females is long lasting; and, (4) interestingly, this impairment of breeding parameters depends on the period of release, with lower breeding performances for spring releases compared to autumn releases. Overall, our study highlights the capacity of captive-bred females to reproduce in the wild, contributing to the dynamics of the population beyond their individual history. Our results also uncover complex variations of breeding parameters in translocated birds, but suggest that these differences can be minimized through an appropriate translocation strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Emirates Center for Wildlife Propagation (ECWP), a project of the International Fund for Houbara Conservation (IFHC). We are grateful to H.H. Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Chairman of the IFHC and H.E. Mohammed Al Bowardi, Deputy Chairman of IFHC, for their support. This study was conducted under the guidance of Reneco International Wildlife Consultants LLC., a consulting company managing ECWP. We are thankful to Dr. F. Lacroix, managing director, and G. Leveque, project director, for their supervision. We sincerely thank all ECWP staff from the Ecology division who participated in data collection. We are thankful to Pascale Reding and Grégoire Liénart for producing our study area map. We are grateful to Doug Armstrong and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive comments on the manuscript, as well as to Dr Thomas Martin for improving the English text.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Léo Bacon.

Additional information

Communicated by Jan C Habel.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 68 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bacon, L., Robert, A. & Hingrat, Y. Long lasting breeding performance differences between wild-born and released females in a reinforced North African Houbara bustard (Chlamydotis undulata undulata) population: a matter of release strategy. Biodivers Conserv 28, 553–570 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1651-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1651-6

Keywords

Navigation