Skip to main content

Exploring the international trade in African snakes not listed on CITES: highlighting the role of the internet and social media

Abstract

Globally, there is an extensive trade in snakes for pets, especially in the European and North American markets. This trade includes many African snakes, but few of these are present on CITES appendices, suggesting little regulation of this international trade. In this study, we assess the status of this unregulated trade, by analyzing export lists and private seller advertisements, collected by correspondence, monitoring and recording social media and online forums. Furthermore, by engaging with African exporters, we map the distribution of trading hubs involved in the international trade of African snakes. We show that the African snake trade is extensive and involves rare and range-restricted species, including species on the IUCN red list of threatened species. Furthermore, the internet and social media are shown to play an increasing role in the trade of exotic reptiles. We found 2.269 wild caught live African snakes from 42 species, present in 15 African countries, to have been advertised for sale between 2013 and 2017. Traded species were predominately venomous and the 23 most traded species were not CITES listed. Three main hubs for the live snake trade occur on the African mainland: Tanzania, Togo, and Egypt. By using publicly available data we demonstrate an extensive trade in snake species where basic biological knowledge and conservation status is often missing and the sustainability of this trade is questionable. To tackle this potentially detrimental trade we recommend detailed investigations aiming to understand current threats to snakes, especially focusing on species not regulated by international conventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Allendorf F, England PR, Luikart G, Ritchie P, Ryman N (2008) Genetic effects of harvest on wild animal populations. Trends Ecol Evol 23:327–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.02.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Altherr S (2014) Stolen wildlife. Why the EU needs to tackle smuggling of nationally protected species. Report by Pro Wildlife. Munich. https://www.prowildlife.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/2014_Stolen-Wildlife-Report.pdf

  3. Altmann M, Kolby JE (2017) Trends in US imports of amphibians in light of the potential spread of chytrid fungus, Batrachochytrium Dendrobatidis (Bd), and implications for conservation. Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy 20:226–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/13880292.2017.1403796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Annorbah ND, Collar JN, Marsden SJ (2016) Trade and Habitat Change Virtually Eliminate the Grey Parrot Psittacus Erithacus from Ghana. Edited by Colleen Downs. Ibis 158:82–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ashley S, Brown S, Ledford J, Martin J, Nash A, Terry A, Tristan T, Warwick C (2014) Morbidity and Mortality of Invertebrates, Amphibians, Reptiles, and Mammals at a Major Exotic Companion Animal Wholesaler. J Appl Anim Welfare Sci 17:308–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2014.918511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Auliya M (2003) Hot trade in cool creatures: A review of the live reptile trade in the European Union in the 1990s with a focus on Germany. TRAFFIC Europe, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  7. Auliya M, Altherr S, Ariano-Sanchez D, Baard EH, Brown C, Brown RM, Cantu J et al (2016) Trade in Live Reptiles, Its Impact on Wild Populations, and the Role of the European Market. Biol Cons 204:103–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baker SE, Cain R, Van Kesteren F, Zommers ZA, D’cruze N, Macdonald DW (2013) Rough trade: animal welfare in the global wildlife trade. Bioscience 63:928–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bergin D, Atoussi S, Waters S (2018) Online Trade of Barbary Macaques Macaca Sylvanus in Algeria and Morocco. Biodiversity and Conservation 27. Springer Netherlands: 531–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1434-5

  10. Böhm M, Collen B, Baillie JEM, Bowles P, Chanson J, Cox N, Hammerson G et al (2013) The Conservation Status of the World’s Reptiles. Biol Cons 157:372–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Meng H, Carr J, Beraducci J, Bowles P, et al. (2016) Tanzania’s reptile biodiversity: distribution, threats and climate change vulnerability. Biol Conserv 204: 72–82. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320716301318

  12. Bush ER, Baker SE, Macdonald DW (2014) Global Trade in Exotic Pets 2006-2012. Conserv Biol 28:663–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Carpenter AI, Rowcliffe MJ, Watkinson AR (2004) The Dynamics of the Global Trade in Chameleons. Biol Cons 120:291–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. CITES Appendices I, II and III (2017). Accessible here (https://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/app/2017/E-Appendices-2017-10-04.pdf)

  15. Dobiey M, Vogel G (2007) Venomous Snakes of Africa. Giftschlangen Afrikas, Edition Chimaira

    Google Scholar 

  16. Eur-lex.europa.eu accessed on 9/7-2018 for decision on Atheris desaixi and Bitis worthingtoni: (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32017R0160&rid=1)

  17. European Commission (2016). EU Action Plan against Wildlife Trafficking. Luxembourg. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/cites/pdf/WAP_EN_WEB.PDF. Accessed 2 July 2018

  18. Franklinos LHV, Lorch JM, Bohuski E, Rodriguez-Ramos Fernandez J, Wright ON, Fitzpatrick L, Petrovan S et al (2017) Emerging fungal pathogen Ophidiomyces ophiodiicola in wild European snakes. Sci Rep 7:3844. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03352-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Graham A, Marais J (2007) A guide to the reptiles of Southern Africa. Struik, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hansen S, Amy L, Li A, Joly D, Mekaru S, Brownstein JS (2012) Digital surveillance: a novel approach to monitoring the illegal wildlife trade. PLoS ONE 7:e51156. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hardi R, Babocsay G, Tappe D, Sulyok M, Bodó I, Rózsa L (2017) Armillifer-infected snakes sold at congolese bushmeat markets represent an emerging zoonotic threat. EcoHealth 14:743–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-017-1274-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Harris M (2002) Assessment of the status of seven reptile species in Togo. Report for the European Union

  23. Jensen T (2017) Snakes of Africa exploitation and conservation. Aalborg University. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32700.95361/2

  24. Johnson JD, Mata-Silva V, Wilson LD (2015) A conservation reassessment of the Central American herpetofauna based on the EVS measure. Amphib Reptile Conserv 9:1–94

    Google Scholar 

  25. Karesh WB (2005) Wildlife trade and global disease emergence. Emerg Infect Dis J 11:1000–1002. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1107.050194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Leader-Williams N, Tibanyenda RK (1996) The live bird trade in Tanzania. IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lorch JM, Knowles S, Lankton JS, Michell K, Edwards JL, Kapfer JM, Staffen RA et al (2016) Snake fungal disease: an emerging threat to wild snakes. Philos Trans Royal Soc. 371:20150457. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Luiselli L, Bonnet X, Rocco M, Amori G (2012) Conservation implications of rapid shifts in the trade of wild African and Asian pythons. Biotropica 44:569–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2011.00842.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Menegon M, Loader SP, Marsden SJ, Branch WR, Davenport TRB, Ursenbacher S (2014) The genus Atheris (Serpentes: Viperidae) in East Africa: phylogeny and the role of rifting and climate in shaping the current pattern of species diversity. Mol Phylogenet Evol 79:12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.06.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Minton SA (1996) Bites by non-native venomous snakes in the United States. Wilderness Environ Med 7:297–303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Moorhouse TP, Balaskas M, D’Cruze NC, Macdonald DW (2017) Information could reduce consumer demand for exotic pets. Conserv Lett 10:337–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Morgan J, Chng S (2017) Rising internet-based trade in the critically endangered ploughshare tortoise Astrochelys yniphora in Indonesia highlights need for improved enforcement of CITES. Oryx. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003060531700031X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nijman V (2010) An overview of international wildlife trade from Southeast Asia. Biodivers Conserv 19:1101–1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9758-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Penner J, Fruteau C, Range F, Rödel M (2008) Finding a needle in a haystack: new methods of locating and working with rhinoceros vipers (Bitis Rhinoceros). Herpetol Rev 39:310–314

    Google Scholar 

  35. Phelps T (2010) Old world vipers : a natural history of the Azemiopinae and Viperinae. Edition Chimaira

  36. Reed RN (2005) An ecological risk assessment of nonnative boas and pythons as potentially invasive species in the United States. Risk Anal 25:753–766. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00621.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Robinson JE, Griffiths RA, John FAVS et al (2015) Dynamics of the global trade in live reptiles: shifting trends in production and consequences for sustainability. Biol Conserv 184:42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Roe D (2002) Making a killing or making a living: wildlife trade, trade controls, and rural livelihoods (No. 6). IIED

  39. Rosen GE, Smith KF (2010) Summarizing the evidence on the international trade in illegal wildlife. EcoHealth 7(1):24–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sajeva M, Augugliaro C, Smith MJ, Oddo E (2013) Regulating internet trade in CITES species. Conserv Biol 27:429–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12019

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Schaper A, Desel H, Ebbecke M, Haro LD, Deters M, Hentschel H, Hermanns-Clausen M, Langer C (2009) Bites and stings by exotic pets in Europe: an 11 year analysis of 404 cases from Northeastern Germany and Southeastern France. Clin Toxicol 47:39–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Schlaepfer MA, Hoover C, Dodd CK (2005) Challenges in evaluating the impact of the trade in amphibians and reptiles on wild populations. Bioscience 55:256–264. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055%5b0256:CIETIO%5d2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Segniagbeto GH (2016) Study on Four Species of Fauna Subject to International Trade in Togo. Report for the European Union

  44. Sodeinde OA, Soewu DA (1999) Pilot study of the traditional medicine trade in Nigeria. Traffic Bulletin, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  45. Spawls S, Joger U (2010) Atheris Ceratophora. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2010: e.T178563A7571666 http://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2010-4.RLTS.T178563A7571666.en

  46. Steinmetz M, Pütsch M, Bisschopinck T (1998) Transport mortality during the import of wild caught birds and reptiles to Germany: an investigation (including a study on pre-export-conditions in the United Republic of Tanzania). BfN, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sy EY (2018) Utilisation of facebook to trade live reptiles in the Philippines. Traffic Bulletin, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tolley K, Alexander G, Branch WR, Bowles P, Maritz B (2016) Conservation Status and threats for african reptiles. Biol Cons 204:63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Toudonou CA (2015) Ball python Python regius. Case Species Rep, CITES

    Google Scholar 

  50. Uetz P (2016) The reptile database. http://reptile-database.reptarium.cz. Accessed 20 July 2016

  51. Uetz P (2017) The reptile database. http://reptile-database.reptarium.cz. Accessed 8 Feb 2017

  52. Vaglica V, Sajeva M, McGough HN, Hutchison D, Russo C, Gordon AD, Ramarosandratana AV, Stuppy W, Smith MJ (2017) Monitoring internet trade to inform species conservation actions. Endanger Species Res 32:223–235. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Warrell DA (2009) Commissioned article: management of exotic snakebites. Int J Med 102:593–601. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcp075

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Westphal M, Browne M, Mackinnon K, Noble I (2007) The link between international trade and the global distribution of invasive alien species. Biol Invasions 10:391–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-007-9138-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Sandra Altherr from Pro Wildlife for her insight into the reptile trade, and Andrea Rehmsmeier for discussions on illegal trade in reptiles. A special thanks to Michalis Mihalitsis and two anonymous reviewers for invaluable comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timm Juul Jensen.

Additional information

This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Biodiversity exploitation and use.

Communicated by Dirk Sven Schmeller.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 220 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jensen, T.J., Auliya, M., Burgess, N.D. et al. Exploring the international trade in African snakes not listed on CITES: highlighting the role of the internet and social media. Biodivers Conserv 28, 1–19 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1632-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Unregulated harvest
  • CITES
  • Pet trade
  • Reptile
  • IUCN red list