Advertisement

The same old mistakes in aquaculture: the newly-available striped catfish Pangasianodon hypophthalmus is on its way to putting Brazilian freshwater ecosystems at risk

  • Diego A. Z. Garcia
  • André L. B. Magalhães
  • Jean R. S. Vitule
  • Armando C. R. Casimiro
  • Dilermando P. Lima-Junior
  • Almir M. Cunico
  • Marcelo F. G. Brito
  • Miguel Petrere-Junior
  • Ângelo A. Agostinho
  • Mário L. Orsi
Commentary
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Invasive species

Abstract

In the state of São Paulo in southeastern Brazil, a dangerous decree allows the culture of hybrids and non-native extralimital fish species in the Paraná and East Atlantic River basins. We recorded the illegal importation and sale of the non-native striped catfish Pangasianodon hypophthalmus in northeastern, central-western, southeastern, and southern areas of the country. This species is already consumed across Brazil and is cultivated for ornamental purposes. Besides escapes from fish farms and ‘fish and pays’, P. hypophthalmus can reach natural environments through aquarium dumping and ornamental ponds, motivated by its large size that reach after being sold at small size. The species has been introduced in many countries, and if established in Brazil, could put native Brazilian biodiversity and ecosystems at risk. Although importing specimens of P. hypophthalmus is prohibited by law, Decree 62.243/2016 in the state of São Paulo creates a new opportunity for invasion. In fact, once a novel fish species is moved to a new continent, it is irrational to supposed that it will stay static just in the area for which it was intended. In general, the fish disperse in the novel area on their own, by escapes from captivity or deliberate and illicit releases by persons or associations. The unwise attitude of Brazilian decision-makers and lay people in their attempt to develop aquaculture with non-native species goes against the objectives of responsible aquaculture based in native species.

Keywords

Alien dispersion Aquaculture Aquarium dumping Biological invasions Legislation Propagule pressure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Valter M. Azevedo-Santos and anonymous reviewers for suggesting manuscript improvements and to Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for scholarship and financial support.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MOV 21170 kb)

References

  1. Agostinho AA, Gomes LC, Pelicice FM (2007) Ecologia e manejo de recursos pesqueiros em reservatórios do Brasil. Eduem, MaringáGoogle Scholar
  2. Agostinho AA, Suzuki HI, Fugi R, Alves DC, Tonella LH, Espínola LA (2015) Ecological and life history traits of Hemiodus orthonops in the invasion process: looking for clues at home. Hydrobiology 746:415–430.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-2030-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali H, Haque MM, Belton B (2013) Striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus, Sauvage, 1878) aquaculture in Bangladesh: an overview. Aquac Res 44:950–965.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2012.03101.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alimentando os Pangasius e as Carpas (2018) Ângelus Amadeus. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYfHu6Ww3fU&t=43s. Accessed 4 July 2018
  5. Assis DAS, Cavalcante SS, Brito MFG (2014) Avaliação do comércio de peixes ornamentais de água doce em Aracaju, Sergipe. Magistra 26:213–220Google Scholar
  6. Associação Brasileira de Piscicultura (2017) Paraná é o maior produtor de peixes em cativeiro do Brasil. https://www.bemparana.com.br/noticia/508184/parana-e-o-maior-produtor-de-peixes-em-cativeiro-do-brasil. Accessed 25 June 2017
  7. Azevedo-Santos VM, Rigolin-Sá O, Pelicice FM (2011) Growing, losing or introducing? Cage aquaculture as a vector for the introduction of nonnative fish in Furnas Reservoir, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Neotrop Ichthyol 9:915–919.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252011000400024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Azevedo-Santos VM, Pelicice FM, Lima DP Jr, Magalhães ALB, Orsi ML, Vitule JRS, Agostinho AA (2015) How to avoid fish introductions in Brazil: education and information as alternatives. Nat Conserv 13:123–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncon.2015.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Azevedo-Santos VM, Fearnside PM, Oliveira CS et al (2017) Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in Brazil. Biodivers Conserv 26:1745–1752.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1316-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barletta M, Jaureguizar AJ, Baigun C, Fontoura NF, Agostinho AA, Almeida-Val VM, Val AL, Torres RA, Jimenes-Segura LF, Giarrizzo T, Fabré NN, Batista VS, Lasso C, Taphorn DC, Costa MF, Chaves PT, Vieira JP, Corrêa MF (2010) Fish and aquatic habitat conservation in South America: a continental overview with emphasis on neotropical systems. J Fish Biol 76:2118–2176.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02684.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Barthem RB, Goulding M, Leite RG, Canas C, Forsberg B, Venticinque E, Petry P, Ribeiro MLB, Chuctaya J, Mercado A (2017) Goliath catfish spawning in the far western Amazon confirmed by the distribution of mature adults, drifting larvae and migrating juveniles. Sci Rep 7:41784.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41784 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Barua SP, Khan MMH, Ali Reza AHM (2001) The status of alien invasive species in Bangladesh and their impact on the ecosystems. In: Balakrishna P (ed) Report of workshop on alien invasive species, GBF-SSEA. IUCN Regional Biodiversity Programme, Asia, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  13. Baska F, Voronin VN, Eszterbauer E, Müller L, Marton S, Molnár K (2009) Occurrence of two myxosporean species, Myxobolus hakyi sp. n. and Hoferellus pulvinatus sp. n., in Pangasianodon hypophthalmus fry imported from Thailand to Europe as ornamental fish. Parasitol Res 105:1391–1398.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-009-1567-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Braga RR, Gómez-Aparicio L, Heger T, Vitule JRS, Jeschke JM (2018) Structuring evidence for invasional meltdown: broad support but with biases and gaps. Biol Invasions 20:923–936.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1582-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Britton JR, Orsi ML (2012) Non-native fish in aquaculture and sport fishing in Brazil: economic benefits versus risks to fish diversity in the upper River Paraná Basin. Rev Fish Biol Fish 22:555–565.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-012-9254-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bush SR, Duijf M (2011) Searching for (un)sustainability in pangasius aquaculture: a political economy of quality in European retail (Themed Issue: New Feminist Political Ecologies). Geoforum 42:185–196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.12.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carvalho FR, Casatti L, Manzotti AR, Ravazzi DCW (2015) First record of Arapaima gigas (Schinz, 1822) (Teleostei: Osteoglossomorpha), the “pirarucu”, in the upper Paraná River basin, Southeast Brazil. Check List 11:1–4.  https://doi.org/10.15560/11.5.1729 Google Scholar
  18. Casal CMV (2006) Global documentation of fish introductions: the growing crisis and recommendations for action. Biol Invasions 8:3–11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-0231-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Casimiro ACR, Garcia DAZ, Vidotto-Magnoni AP, Vitule JRS, Orsi ML (2016) Biodiversity: is there light for native fish assemblages at the end of the Anthropocene tunnel? J Fish Biol 89:48–49.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12847 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Casimiro ACR, Garcia DAZ, Vidotto-Magnoni AP, Britton JR, Agostinho AA, Almeida FS, Orsi ML (2018) Escapes of non-native fish from flooded aquaculture facilities: the case of Paranapanema River, southern Brazil. Zool 35:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.3897/zoologia.35.e14638 Google Scholar
  21. Cassemiro FAS, Bailly D, Graça WJ, Agostinho AA (2018) The invasive potential of tilapias (Osteichthyes, Cichlidae) in the Americas. Hydrobiol 817:133–154.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-017-3471-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chamberlain TK (1947) There is no ‘Universal’ pondfish. Prog Fish Cult 9:78–83.  https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8640(1947)9%5b78:TINUP%5d2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cunico AM, Vitule JRS (2014) First records of the European catfish, Silurus glanis Linnaeus, 1758 in the Americas (Brazil). BioInvasions Rec 3:117–122.  https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2014.3.2.10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Daga VS, Skóra F, Padial AA, Abilhoa V, Gubiani EA, Vitule JRS (2015) Homogenization dynamics of the fish assemblages in Neotropical reservoirs: comparing the roles of introduced species and their vectors. Hydrobiology 746:327–347.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-2032-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Davidson A (1975) Fish and fish dishes of Laos. Imprimerie Nationale Vientiane, ParisGoogle Scholar
  26. Duggan IC, Rixon CAM, MacIsaac HJ (2006) Popularity and propagule pressure: determinants of introduction and establishment of aquarium fish. Biol Invasions 8:377–382.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-004-2310-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. FAO (2017) Regional review on status and trends in aquaculture development in Latin America and the Caribbean—2015, by Carlos Wurmann G. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1135/3, RomeGoogle Scholar
  28. Forneck SC, Dutra FM, Zacarkim CE, Cunico AM (2016) Invasion risks by non-native freshwater fishes due to aquaculture activity in a Neotropical stream. Hydrobiology 773:193–205.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2699-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Frehse FA, Braga RR, Nocera GA, Vitule JRS (2016) Non-native species and invasion biology in a megadiverse country: scientometric analysis and ecological interactions in Brazil. Biol Invasions 18:3713–3725.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1260-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Freitas MC (2012) Caracterização da cadeia produtiva de peixes ornamentais de águas continentais nos estados do Ceará e Pernambuco. Thesis, Universidade Federal do CearáGoogle Scholar
  31. Froese R, Pauly D (2017) FishBase. World Wide Web Electronic Publication. http://www.fishbase.org. Accessed 21 June 2017
  32. Fuller PL, Nico LG, Williams JD (1999) Nonindigenous fish introduced into inland waters of the United States. American Fisheries Society, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  33. Gargur P, Marinho SAM, Brito MFG (2018) Influence of food type, amount, and frequencies on the larviculture of pacamã catfish Lophiosilurus alexandri. J Appl Aquacult 30:125–136.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10454438.2017.1406418 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Guerrero RD (1997) Freshwater fishes of the Philippines: how many are there? In Symposia on the inventory and assessment of species diversity in the Philippines, Quezon CityGoogle Scholar
  35. Instituto Hórus de Desenvolvimento e Conservação Ambiental (2017) Análise de risco de Pangasius hypophthalmus. http://www.institutohorus.org.br/index.php?modulo=inf_an%E1lise_risco_peixes. Accessed 25 Nov 2017
  36. Jayaneththi HB (2015) Record of iridescent shark catfish Pangasianodon hypophthalmus Sauvage, 1878 (Siluriformes: Pangasiidae) from Madampa-Lake in Southwest Sri Lanka. Ruhuna J Sci 6:63–68.  https://doi.org/10.4038/rjs.v6i2.12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Khamees NR, Ali AH, Abed JM, Adday TK (2013) First record of striped catfish Pangasianodon hypophthalmus (Sauvage, 1878) (Pisces: Pangasiidae) from inland waters of Iraq. Basrah J Agric Sci 26:184–197Google Scholar
  38. Lakra WS, Singh AK (2010) Risk analysis and sustainability of Pangasianodon hypophthalmus culture in India. Aquac Asia 15:34–37Google Scholar
  39. Lima Junior DP, Pelicice FM, Vitule JRS, Agostinho AA (2012) Aquicultura, Política e Meio Ambiente no Brasil: novas Propostas e Velhos Equívocos. Nat Conserv 10:88–91.  https://doi.org/10.4322/natcon.2012.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lima Junior DP, Lima LB, Vitule JRS, Orsi ML, Azevedo-Santos VM (2014) Modificação das diretrizes do CONAMA nº413/2009 sobre licenciamento ambiental da aquicultura: retirando os “obstáculos normativos” para a criação de espécies não nativas em águas brasileiras. Boletim ABLimno 40:3–11Google Scholar
  41. Lima Junior DP, Magalhães ALB, Pelicice FM, Vitule JRS, Azevedo-Santos VM, Orsi ML, Simberloff D, Agostinho AA (2018) Aquaculture expansion in Brazilian freshwaters against the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Ambio 47:427–440.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-1001-z PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Lima LB, Oliveira FJM, Giacomini HC, Lima-Junior DP (2018) Expansion of aquaculture parks and the increasing risk of non-native species invasions in Brazil. Rev Aquac 10:111–122.  https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Little DC, Bush SR, Belton B, Thanh Phuong N, Young JA, Murray FJ (2012) Whitefish wars: pangasius, politics and consumer confusion in Europe. Mar Policy 36:738–745.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2011.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Magalhães ALB (2015) Presence of prohibited fishes in the Brazilian aquarium trade: effectiveness of laws, management options and future prospects. J Appl Ichthyol 31:170–172.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12491 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Magalhães ALB, Jacobi CM (2013) Invasion risks posed by ornamental freshwater fish trade to southeastern Brazilian rivers. Neotrop Ichthyol 11:433–441.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252013005000003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Magalhães ALB, Jacobi CM (2017) Colorful invasion in permissive Neotropical ecosystems: establishment of ornamental non-native poeciliids of the genera Poecilia/Xiphophorus (Cyprinodontiformes: Poeciliidae) and management alternatives. Neotrop Ichthyol 15:e160094.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-20160094 Google Scholar
  47. Magalhães ALB, Orsi ML, Pelicice FM, Azevedo-Santo VM, Vitule JRS, Lima-Junior DP, Brito MFG (2017) Small size today, aquarium dumping tomorrow: sales of juvenile non-native large fish as an important threat in Brazil. Neotrop Ichthyol 15:e170033.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-20170033 Google Scholar
  48. Mäkinen T, Weyl OLF, Van der Walt KA, Swartz ER (2013) First record of an introduction of the giant pangasius, Pangasius sanitwongsei Smith 1931, into an African river. Afr Zool 48:388–391.  https://doi.org/10.3377/004.048.0209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Murk AJ, Rietjens IMCM, Bush SR (2018) Perceived versus real toxicological safety of pangasius catfish: a review modifying market perspectives. Rev Aquac 10:123–134.  https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Myers GS (1947) Foreign introductions of North American Fishes. Prog Fish Cult 9:177–180.  https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8640(1947)9%5b177:FIONAF%5d2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. National Fisheries Institute (2017) NFI Top Ten List, a Familiar School of Fish. http://www.aboutseafood.com. Accessed 27 June 2017
  52. Naylor RL, Williams SL, Strong DR (2001) Aquaculture—a gateway for exotic species. Science 294:1655–1656.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1064875 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Ng PKL, Chou LM, Lam TJ (1993) The status and impact of introduced freshwater animals in Singapore. Biodivers Conserv 64:19–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(93)90379-F Google Scholar
  54. Nuñez MA, Pauchard A (2010) Biological invasions in developing and developed countries: does one model fit all? Biol Invasions 12:707–714.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9517-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Orsi ML, Agostinho AA (1999) Introdução de espécies de peixes por escapes acidentais de tanques de cultivo em rios da Bacia do Rio Paraná, Brasil. Rev Bras Zool 16:557–560.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81751999000200020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ortega JCG, Júlio HF Jr, Gomes LC, Agostinho AA (2015) Fish farming as the main driver of fish introductions in Neotropical reservoirs. Hydrobiology 746:147–158.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-2025-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Padial AA, Agostinho AA, Azevedo-Santos VM, Frehse FA, Lima-Junior DP, Magalhães ALB, Mormul RP, Pelicice FM, Bezerra LAV, Orsi ML, Petrere-Junior M, Vitule JRS (2017) The “Tilapia Law” encouraging non-native fishes threatens Amazonian River basins. Biodivers Conserv 26:243–246.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1229-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pangasius Gigantes Lago Artificial (2018) Paulo Santana. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lhhUtGUEZo. Accessed 04 July 2018
  59. Peixe pangasius, pego no pesqueiro monte negro (2018) Renan pesca esportiva. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uyw2lJcqI4. Accessed 04 July 2018
  60. Pelicice FM, Vitule JRS, Lima DP Jr, Orsi ML, Agostinho AA (2014) A serious new threat to Brazilian freshwater ecosystems: the naturalization of nonnative fish by decree. Conserv Lett 7:55–60.  https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pelicice FM, Azevedo-Santos VM, Vitule JRS, Orsi ML, Lima Junior DP, Magalhães ALB, Pompeu PS, Petrere M Jr, Agostinho AA (2017) Neotropical freshwater fishes imperilled by unsustainable policies. Fish Fish 18:1119–1133.  https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12228 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pesca Esportiva - Peixe PANGA no Pesqueiro Santa Helena (2018) Pesqueiro Santa Helena Ribeirão Pires SP. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHD76VTI-bE. Accessed 04 July 2018
  63. Phan LT, Bui TM, Nguyen TTT, Gooley GJ, Ingram BA, Nguyen HV, Nguyen PT, De Silva SS (2009) Current status of farming practices of striped catfish, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Aquaculture 296:227–236.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.08.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Phuong NT, Oanh DTH (2009) Striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) aquaculture in Viet Nam: an unprecedented development within a decade. In: De Silva SS, Davy FB (eds) Success stories in Asian aquaculture. Springer, NACA and IDRC, Dordrecht, pp 133–149Google Scholar
  65. Reis RE, Albert JS, Di Dario F, Mincarone MM, Petry P, Rocha LA (2016) Fish biodiversity and conservation in South America. J Fish Biol 89:12–47.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Sampaio FDF, Freire CA, Sampaio TVM, Vitule JRS, Fávaro LF (2015) The precautionary principle and its approach to risk analysis and quarantine related to the trade of marine ornamental fishes in Brazil. Mar Policy 51:163–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/jmarpol201408003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sandilyan S (2016) Occurrence of ornamental fishes: a looming danger for Inland fish diversity of India. Curr Sci 110:2099–2104.  https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v110/i11/2099-2104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Santa Catarina. Fundação do Meio Ambiente (FATMA) (2016) Lista comentada de espécies exóticas invasoras no estado de Santa Catarina: espécies que ameaçam a diversidade biológica. FATMA, FlorianópolisGoogle Scholar
  69. Seafood Brasil (2015) Vem aí a enxurrada de panga: Vietnã assume compromisso e é liberado pelo MPA. http://seafoodbrasil.com.br/vem-ai-enxurrada-de-panga-vietna-assume-compromisso-e-e-liberado-pelo-mpa/. Accessed 20 Nov 2017
  70. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca Y Alimentación (2017) Prohíben introducción y cultivo de basa en México. http://www.gob.mx/sagarpa/tamaulipas/articulos/prohiben-introduccion-y-cultivo-de-basa-en-mexico?idiom=es. Accessed 23 June 2018
  71. Simberloff D (2009) The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:81–102.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Simberloff D, Von Holle B (1999) Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol Invasions 1:21–32.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010086329619 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Singh AK, Lakra WS (2010) Risk analysis and sustainability of Pangasianodon hypophthalmus culture in India. Gener Biodivers 15:34–37Google Scholar
  74. Singh AK, Lakra WS (2011) Risk and benefit assessment of alien fish species of the aquaculture and aquarium trade into India. Rev Aquac 3:3–18.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-5131.2010.01039.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Singh AK, Lakra WS (2012) Culture of Pangasianodon hypophthalmus into India: impacts and present scenario. Pak J Biol Sci 15:19–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Snovsky G, Golani D (2012) The occurrence of an aquarium escapee, Pangasius hypophthalmus (Sauvage, 1878), (Osteichthys, Siluriformes, Pangasiidae) in Lake Kinneret (Sea of Galilee), Israel. BioInvasions Rec 1:101–103.  https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2012.1.2.03 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Srivastava SC, Verma P, Verma AK, Singh AK (2014) Assessment for possible metal contamination and human health risk of Pangasianodon hypophthalmus (Sauvage, 1878) farming, India. Int J Fish Aquat Stud 1:176–181Google Scholar
  78. Thuy DT, Kania P, Buchmann K (2010) Infection status of zoonotic trematode metacercariae in Sutchi catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) in Vietnam: associations with season, management and host age. Aquaculture 302:19–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tófoli RM, Alves GHZ, Dias RM, Gomes LC (2016) Brazil’s Amazonian fish at risk by decree. Science 353:229.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag2922 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Tonella LH, Fugi R, Vitorino OB Jr, Suzuki HI, Gomes LC, Agostinho AA (2018) Importance of feeding strategies on the long-term success of fish invasions. Hydrobiology 817:239–252.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-017-3404-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Townsend CR, Winterbourn MJ (1992) Assessment of the environmental risk posed by an exotic fish: the proposed introduction of Channel Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) to New Zealand. Conserv Biol 6:273–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tuckett QM, Ritch JL, Lawson KM, Hill JE (2016) Implementation and enforcement of best management practices for Florida ornamental aquaculture with an emphasis on nonnative species. N Am J Aquac 78:113–124.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1522055.2015.1121176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Valderrama M, Mojica JI, Villalba A, Ávila F (2016) Presencia del pez basa, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus (Sauvage, 1878) (Siluriformes: Pangasiidae), en la cuenca del río Magdalena, Colombia. Biota Colomb 17:98–104.  https://doi.org/10.21068/c2016.v17n02a13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Van Zalinge N, Sopha L, Bun NP, Kong H, Jørgensen JV (2002) Status of the Mekong Pangasianodon hypophthalmus resources, with special reference to the stock shared between Cambodia and Vietnam. MRC Technical Paper No. 1, Mekong River Commission, Phnom PenhGoogle Scholar
  85. Vitule JRS, Umbria SC, Aranha JMR (2006) Introduction of the African catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) into Southern Brazil. Biol Invasions 8:677–681.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-2535-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Vitule JRS, Freire CA, Simberloff D (2009) Introduction of nonnative freshwater fish can certainly be bad. Fish Fish 10:98–108.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00312.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Vitule JRS, Agostinho AA, Azevedo-Santos VM, Daga VS, Darwall WRT, Fitzgerald DB, Frehse FA, Hoeinghaus DJ, Lima-Junior DP, Magalhães ALB, Orsi ML, Padial AA, Pelicice FM, Petrere M Jr, Pompeu PS, Winemiller KO (2017a) We need better understanding about functional diversity and vulnerability of tropical freshwater fishes. Biodivers Conserv 26:757–762.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1258-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Vitule JRS, Da Costa APL, Frehse FA, Bezerra LAV, Occhi TVT, Daga VS, Padial AA et al (2017b) Comments on ‘Fish biodiversity and conservation in South America by Reis et al. (2016)’. J Fish Biol 90:1182–1190.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13239 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Welcomme RL (1988) International introductions of inland aquatic species. FAO Fisheries Technical Papers, RomeGoogle Scholar
  90. Weyl OLF, Daga VS, Ellender BR, Vitule JRS (2016) A review of Clarias gariepinus invasions in Brazil and South Africa. J Fish Biol 89:386–402.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12958 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Wiecaszek B, Kaeszka S, Sobecka E, Boeger W (2009) Asian pangasiids—an emerging problem for European inland waters? Systematic and parasitological aspects. Acta Ichthyol Piscat 39:131–138.  https://doi.org/10.3750/AIP2009.39.2.08 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zeena KV, Jameela Beevi KS (2013) Pangasianodon hypophthalmus (Sauvage, 1878)—an alien catfish in Muvattupuzha river, Kerala, India. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 110:160–161Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diego A. Z. Garcia
    • 1
  • André L. B. Magalhães
    • 2
  • Jean R. S. Vitule
    • 3
  • Armando C. R. Casimiro
    • 1
  • Dilermando P. Lima-Junior
    • 4
  • Almir M. Cunico
    • 5
  • Marcelo F. G. Brito
    • 6
  • Miguel Petrere-Junior
    • 7
  • Ângelo A. Agostinho
    • 8
  • Mário L. Orsi
    • 1
  1. 1.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas, Laboratório de Ecologia de Peixes e Invasões Biológicas, Departamento de Biologia Animal e VegetalUniversidade Estadual de LondrinaLondrinaBrazil
  2. 2.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Tecnologias para o Desenvolvimento SustentávelUniversidade Federal de São João Del ReiOuro BrancoBrazil
  3. 3.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação, Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação, Departamento de Engenharia Ambiental, Setor de TecnologiaUniversidade Federal do ParanáCuritibaBrazil
  4. 4.Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação de Ecossistemas AquáticosUniversidade Federal de Mato GrossoPontal do AraguaiaBrazil
  5. 5.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Aquicultura e Desenvolvimento Sustentável, Laboratório de Ecologia, Pesca e Ictiologia, Departamento de BiodiversidadeUniversidade Federal do ParanáPalotinaBrazil
  6. 6.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação, Departamento de BiologiaUniversidade Federal de SergipeSergipeBrazil
  7. 7.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sustentabilidade de Ecossistemas Costeiros e MarinhosUniversidade Santa CecíliaSantosBrazil
  8. 8.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais, Núcleo de Pesquisa em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aquicultura (NUPELIA)Universidade Estadual de MaringáMaringáBrazil

Personalised recommendations