Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPA): a case study at Rothera Point providing tools and perspectives for the implementation of the ASPA network

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Antarctica is considered among the world’s last great wildernesses, but its current network of Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPAs) is inadequate, unrepresentative and at risk, needing urgent expansion due to the vulnerability of Antarctica to increasing threats from climate change and human activities. Among the existing ASPAs, no. 129 Rothera Point is unique because its designation related specifically to the monitoring of the impacts associated with the neighbouring Rothera Research Station, operated by the United Kingdom. The station is located on Adelaide Island (Antarctic Peninsula) in Antarctic Conservation Biogeographic Region 3 (ACBR3). We aim here to: (1) provide an improved description of the botanical values of the ASPA, and detailed vegetation mapping as for the establishment of future monitoring, (2) assess the representativeness of the ASPA vegetation within a wider geographical context encompassing Marguerite Bay and Adelaide Island and, (3) use this case study as a contribution to the ongoing discussion within the Antarctic Treaty System on the future development of the continent-wide ASPA network. Even though this specific ASPA was not initially designated for its biodiversity value, a higher species richness was recorded within the ASPA than outside the protected area on Rothera Point. Within the local geographic context, based on the available data, Rothera Point is characterized by high biodiversity and, above all, Léonie Island exhibits the greatest floristic richness within Marguerite Bay and Adelaide Island, being a biodiversity hot-spot of exceptional value. This case study emphasizes the continued existence of significant knowledge gaps relating to Antarctic terrestrial biodiversity, and the urgent need for large-scale assessment of the biological values of Antarctica, as one of the main challenges for the implementation of a robust and representative system of protected areas in terrestrial Antarctica, to protect this global natural heritage in the face of current and predicted future environmental change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ATCM (1991) Protocol on environmental protection to the antarctic treaty. Antarctic Treaty Secretariat, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • ATS Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area (ASPA) No. 117 (2017a). http://www.ats.aq/documents/recatt/att613_e.pdf. Accessed March 2018

  • ATS Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area (ASPA) No. 129 (2017b). http://www.ats.aq/documents/recatt/att614_e.pdf. Accessed March 2018

  • Bokhorst S, Huiskes A, Convey P et al (2008) Climate change effects on soil arthropod communities from the Falkland Islands and the Maritime Antarctic. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1547–1556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cannone N, Seppelt R (2009) A preliminary floristic classification of Northern and Southern Victoria Land vegetation (Continental Antarctica). Antarct Sci 20:553–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannone N, Guglielmin M, Convey P, Worland MR, Favero Longo SE (2016) Vascular plant changes in extreme environments: effects of multiple drivers. Clim Chang 134:651–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannone N, Corinti T, Malfasi F et al (2017) Moss survival through in situ cryptobiosis after six centuries of glacier burial. Sci Rep 7:4438

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chong CW, Pearce DA, Convey P et al (2012) The identification of environmental parameters which could influence soil bacterial community composition on the Antarctic Peninsula—a statistical approach. Antarct Sci 24:249–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chown SL, Lee JE, Hughes KA et al (2012) Challenges to the future conservation of the Antarctic. Science 337:158–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chown SL, Clarke A, Fraser CI et al (2015) The changing form of Antarctic biodiversity. Nature 522:431–438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chown SL, Brooks CM, Terauds A et al (2017) Antarctica and the strategic plan for biodiversity. PLoS Biol 15:e2001656

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coetzee BWT, Convey P, Chown SL (2017) Expanding the protected area network in Antarctica is urgent and readily achievable. Conserv Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Convey P (2011) Antarctic terrestrial biodiversity in a changing world. Polar Biol 34:1629–1641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Convey P, Smith RIL (1997) The terrestrial arthropod fauna and its habitats in northern Marguerite Bay and Alexander Island, maritime Antarctic. Antarct Sci 9:12–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Convey P, Gibson J, Hillenbrand CD et al (2008) Antarctic terrestrial life—challenging the history of the frozen continent? Biol Rev 83:103–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Convey P, Chown S, Clarke A et al (2014) The spatial structure of Antarctic biodiversity. Ecol Monogr 84:203–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies BJ, Hambrey MJ, Smellie JL et al (2012) Antarctic Peninsula Ice Sheet evolution during the Cenozoic Era. Quat Sci Rev 31:30–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favero-Longo SE, Cannone N, Worland MR et al (2011) Changes in lichen diversity and community structure with fur seal population increase on Signy Island, South Orkney Islands. Antarct Sci 23:65–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favero-Longo SE, Worland MR, Convey P et al (2012) Primary succession of lichen and bryophyte communities following glacial recession on Signy Island, South Orkney Islands, Maritime Antarctic. Antarct Sci 24:323–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenot Y, Chown SL, Whinam J et al (2005) Biological invasions in the Antarctic: impacts and implications. Biol Rev 80:45–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell PT, Convey P, Fleming AH, Peat HJ, Hughes KA (2011) Detecting and mapping vegetation distribution on the Antarctic Peninsula from remote sensing data. Polar Biol 34:273–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green TGA, Sancho LG, Pintado A et al (2011) Functional and spatial pressures on terrestrial vegetation in Antarctica forced by global warming. Polar Biol 34:1643–1656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guglielmin M, Worland R, Convey P et al (2012) Schmidt hammer studies in the maritime Antarctic: application to dating Holocene deglaciation and estimating the effects of macrolichens on rock weathering. Geomorphology 155:34–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guglielmin M, Dalle Fratte M, Cannone N (2014) Permafrost warming and vegetation changes in continental Antarctica. Environ Res Lett 9:045001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guglielmin M, Convey P, Malfasi F et al (2016) Glacial fluctuations since the ‘Medieval Warm Period’ at Rothera Point (western Antarctic Peninsula). Holocene 26:154–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson DA, Roberts SJ, Smith JA et al (2013) Late Quaternary environmental changes in Marguerite Bay, Antarctic Peninsula, inferred from lake sediments and raised beaches. Quat Sci Rev 68:216–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes KA, Pertierra L (2016) Evaluation of non-native species policy development and implementation within the Antarctic Treaty area. Biol Conserv 200:149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes KA, Fretwell P, Rae J et al (2011) Untouched Antarctica: mapping a finite and diminishing environmental re source. Antarct Sci 23:537–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes KA, Pertierra LR, Walton DWH (2013) Area protection in Antarctica: how can conservation and scientific research goals be managed compatibly? Environ Sci Policy 31:120–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes KA, Ireland LC, Convey P et al (2016) Assessing the effectiveness of specially protected areas for conservation of Antarctica’s botanical diversity. Conserv Biol 30:113–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ochyra R, Bednarek-Ochyra H, Smith RIL (2008) The moss flora of Antarctica. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Øvstedal DO, Smith RIL (2001) Lichens of Antarctica and South Georgia. A guide to their identification and ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Fernandez J, Marc O, Nyvlt D, et al. Paraglacial response since the Last Glacial Maximum in the Antarctic Peninsula region. Land Degr Dev (submitted)

  • Sadowsky A, Ott S (2012) Photosynthetic symbionts in Antarctic terrestrial ecosystems: the physiological response of lichen photobionts to drought and cold. Symbiosis 58:81–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seppelt RD, Türk R, Green ATG et al (2010) Lichen and moss communities of Botany Bay, Granite Harbour, Ross Sea, Antarctica. Antarct Sci 22:691–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw JD, Terauds A, Riddle MJ et al (2014) Antarctica’s protected areas are inadequate, unrepresentative and at risk. PLoS Biol 12:e1001888

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (ver. 4.5). Ithaca, New York

  • Terauds A, Lee JR (2016) Antarctic biogeography revisited: updating the Antarctic Conservation Biogeographic Regions. Div Distrib 22:836–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terauds A, Chown SL, Morgan FJ et al (2012) Conservation biogeography of the Antarctic. Div Distrib 18:726–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tin T, Fleming ZL, Hughes KA et al (2009) Impacts of local human activities on the Antarctic environment. Antarct Sci 21:3–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank PNRA (Progetto Nazionale di Ricerca in Antartide, Project 2013/C1.01; Project PNRA16_00224) and NERC (Natural Environment Research Council, core funding to BAS ‘Biodiversity, Evolution and Adaptation’ Team) for providing funding and BAS (British Antarctic Survey) for logistic support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Cannone.

Additional information

Communicated by David Hawksworth.

This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Biodiversity protection and reserves.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 88 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cannone, N., Convey, P. & Malfasi, F. Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPA): a case study at Rothera Point providing tools and perspectives for the implementation of the ASPA network. Biodivers Conserv 27, 2641–2660 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1559-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1559-1

Keywords

Navigation