Current understanding of invasive species impacts cannot be ignored: potential publication biases do not invalidate findings

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Castro-Díez P, Godoy O, Alonso A et al (2013) What explains variation in the impacts of exotic plant invasions on the nitrogen cycle? A meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 17:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Essl F, Dullinger S, Rabitsch W et al (2011) Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt. P Natl Acad Sci USA 108:203–207. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011728108/-/DCSupplemental/pnas.201011728SI.pdf

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gallardo B, Clavero M, Sánchez MI, Vilà M (2016) Global ecological impacts of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Glob Change Biol 22:151–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guerin GR, Martín-Forés I, Sparrow B et al (2017) The biodiversity impacts of non-native species should not be extrapolated from biased single-species studies. Biodivers Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1439-0

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hulme PE, Pyšek P, Jarošík V et al (2013) Bias and error in understanding plant invasion impacts. Trends Ecol Evol 28:212–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jackson MC (2015) Interactions among multiple invasive animals. Ecology 96:2035–2041

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuebbing SE, Nuñez MA (2015) Negative, neutral, and positive interactions among nonnative plants: patterns, processes, and management implications. Glob Change Biol 21:926–934. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuebbing SE, Nuñez MA (2016) Invasive non-native plants have a greater effect on neighbouring natives than other non-natives. Nat Plants. https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuebbing SE, Simberloff D (2015) Missing the bandwagon: nonnative species impacts still concern managers. NeoBiota 25:73–86. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.25.8921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liao C, Peng R, Luo Y et al (2008) Altered ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycles by plant invasion: a meta-analysis. New Phytol 177:706–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02290.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Paolucci EM, MacIsaac HJ, Ricciardi A (2013) Origin matters: alien consumers inflict greater damage on prey populations than do native consumers. Divers Distrib 19:988–995. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parker IM, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Goodell K, Wonham M, Kareiva PM, Williamson MH, Von Holle B, Moyle PB, Byers JE, Goldwasser L (1999) Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol Invasions 1:3–19. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010034312781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Peltzer DA, Bellingham PJ, Kurokawa H et al (2009) Punching above their weight: low-biomass non-native plant species alter soil properties during primary succession. Oikos 118:1001–1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17244.x

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Pergl J et al (2008) Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 23:237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.02.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Hulme PE et al (2012) A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Glob Change Biol 18:1725–1737. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02636.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ricciardi A, Ryan R (2017) The exponential growth of invasive species denialism. Biol Invasions. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1561-7

    Google Scholar 

  17. Richardson DM, Ricciardi A (2013) Misleading criticisms of invasion science: a field guide. Divers Distrib 19:1461–1467. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M et al (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distrib 6:93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosenthal R (1979) The “File Drawer Problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychol Bull 86:638–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Simberloff D, Martin J-L, Genovesi P et al (2013) Impacts of biological invasions: what’s what and the way forward. Trends Ecol Evol 28:58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Twardochleb LA, Olden JD, Larson ER (2013) A global meta-analysis of the ecological impacts of nonnative crayfish. Freshw Sci 32:1367–1382. https://doi.org/10.1899/12-203.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. van Kleunen M, Weber E, Fischer M (2010) A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecol Lett 13:235–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01418.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Essl F et al (2015) Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. Nature 525:100–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M et al (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Lett 14:702–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Young AM, Larson BMH (2011) Clarifying debates in invasion biology A survey of invasion biologists. Environ Res 111:893–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2011.06.006

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara E. Kuebbing.

Additional information

This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Invasive species.

Communicated by David Hawksworth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuebbing, S.E., Nuñez, M.A. Current understanding of invasive species impacts cannot be ignored: potential publication biases do not invalidate findings. Biodivers Conserv 27, 1545–1548 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1527-9

Download citation