Functional and taxonomic perspectives for understanding the underlying mechanisms of native and alien plant distributions
- 95 Downloads
Land-use changes often facilitate alien species invasion, impacting on biodiversity and ecosystem processes at the regional scale. Transport infrastructure is a potential corridor for biological invasion, but processes underlying invasion of alien species from human settlements along transport networks are uncertain. We surveyed alien and native plant species and their functional traits in roadside vegetation in Shiretoko National Park, Japan. The site is unique because there is a single invasion source (i.e., town). Vegetation, environmental and spatial factors were measured in 362 quadrats on two transects established along roads. Mean species richness within each quadrat (taxonomic α-diversity) was higher for alien assemblages, whereas mean functional richness (functional α-diversity) was higher for native assemblages. Alien species shared similar traits as generalists, which show lower functional diversity than specialists. Functional α-diversity of alien assemblages decreased with increasing distance from the source town, and the nestedness-resultant component of functional β-diversity of alien assemblages accounted for a relatively high proportion of their total functional β-diversity. Alien species with high dispersal ability were widely distributed, whereas other alien species were still limited to areas adjacent to the human settlement. Alien species showed a greater probability of having seed floss, lower percentage of perennial species, and lower seed dry mass than native species. Thus, alien species showed superior dispersal and competitive abilities compared with native species, and exclusion of all alien species is likely impractical. Consideration of functional traits may aid selection of alien species of particular concern for implementation of control and extermination measures.
KeywordsBeta diversity Functional trait Dispersal ability Transport infrastructure
This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (Grant No. 25712015) awarded to ASM. Logistical support for the field study was provided by the Shiretoko Foundation. We thank D. Koide, K. Nishizawa, S. Tatsumi, R. Kitagawa, Y. Takagi, M. Kasahara, S. Fujii, T. Ohgue, M. Maeda, and S. Qian for their assistance in this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Alston KP, Richardson DM (2006) The roles of habitat features, disturbance, and distance from putative source populations in structuring alien plant invasions at the urban/wildland interface on the Cape Peninsula, South Africa. Biol Conserv 132:183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.03.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Czech B, Krausman PR, Devers PK (2000) Economic associations among causes of species endangerment in the United States. Bioscience 50:593. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0593:EAACOS]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
- Fallon C, Borders B, Lee-mäder E, Black SH (2015) Milkweeds and monarchs in the Western US. A Xerces Society GuideGoogle Scholar
- Grotkopp E, Rejmánek M, Rost TL (2002) Toward a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: seedling growth and life-history strategies of 29 pine (Pinus) species. Am Nat 159:2002Google Scholar
- Heady HF (1977) Valley grassland. In: Barbour MG, Major J (eds) Terrestrial vegetation of California. Wiley, New York, pp 491–514Google Scholar
- Johnston FM, Pickering CM (2001) Alien plants in the Australian alps. Mt Res Dev 21:284–291. https://doi.org/10.1659/0276-4741(2001)021[0284:APITAA]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
- Lowe S, Browne M, Boudjelas S, De Poorter M (2000) 100 of the world’ s worst invasive alien species. Invasive Species Specialist Group, AucklandGoogle Scholar
- Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Hulme PE et al (2012) A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Glob Change Biol 18:1725–1737. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02636.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shiretoko World Natural Heritage Site Scientific Council (2013) A working report for the Ezo sika deer management. http://shiretoko-whc.com/data/meeting/ezoshika_wg/h25/shikawg_H2502_gijiroku.pdf. Accessed 6 Sept 2015
- Sullivan JJ, Timmins SM, Williams PA (2005) Movement of exotic plants into coastal native forests from gardens in northern New Zealand. N Z J Ecol 29:1–10Google Scholar
- The Forest Agency of Japan (2013) A Shiretoko white paper: annaul management report for Shiretoko World Natural Heritage Site. http://shiretoko-whc.com/data/research/annual_report/H25annual_report.pdf. Accessed 6 Sept 2015
- The Forest Agency of Japan (2014) A Shiretoko white paper: annaul management report for Shiretoko World Natural Heritage Site. http://dc.shiretoko-whc.com/data/research/annual_report/H26annual_report.pdf
- Vitousek PM, D’antonio CM, Loope LL et al (1997) Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. N Z J Ecol 12:1–16Google Scholar
- Williamson J, Harrison S (2002) Biotic and abiotic limits to the spread of exotic revegetation species. Ecol Appl 12:40–51. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0040:BAALTT]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar