Skip to main content
Log in

The conservation status of Texas groundwater invertebrates

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biodiversity conservation requires an objective and consistent method for evaluating the conservation status of species. Conservation status assessments can identify conservation priorities and can highlight data gaps, effective conservation strategies, and groups of taxa that are underrepresented in conservation efforts relative to charismatic flagship and umbrella species. Groundwater invertebrates have a suite of traits that make them inherently vulnerable. But they go largely unnoticed by the general public and conservation practitioners, and comprehensive conservation status assessments are lacking for most species. In this article, the conservation status of all sixty-nine described groundwater-obligate invertebrates recorded from Texas, U.S.A. was assessed using NatureServe methodology. Some of the smallest taxa (e.g. copepods, ostracods, and mites) are too poorly known to evaluate their conservation status. Species restricted to springs were generally more at risk than species in other groundwater habitats, and beetles and snails were the most imperiled taxonomic groups. Most species faced low or medium severity threats, and only seven percent faced high or very high magnitude threats. Threat level varied among aquifers and among sites within aquifers and was primarily dependent on human population density and the adequacy of regulatory mechanisms protecting groundwater quality and quantity. Regardless of threat severity, fifty-five percent of evaluated species were ranked as imperiled or critically imperiled, largely due to extreme small-range endemism. Relative to other regions, Texas’ groundwater fauna is not unique in terms of rarity and threat, suggesting that as an ecological group, groundwater-obligate species are probably among the world’s most imperiled taxa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Anaya R (2001) An overview of the Edwards-trinity aquifer system, central-west Texas. In: Mace RE, Mullican III WF, Angle ES (eds) Aquifers of West Texas. Texas Water Development Board Report, 356, 100–119

  • Arponen A (2012) Prioritizing species for conservation planning. Biodivers Conserv 21:875–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asmyhr MG, Hose G, Graham P, Stow AJ (2014) Fine-scale genetics of subterranean syncarids. Freshw Biol 59:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avramov M (2014) Sensitivity and stress of groundwater invertebrates to toxic pollution and changes in temperature. Dissertation, Technischen Universität München

  • Barton Springs Edwards Aquifer Conservation District (2013) District Management Plan. Austin, Texas. http://bseacd.org/about-us/governing-documents/

  • Boghici R (2011) Changes in water levels in Texas, 1995–2005. Texas Water Development Board Report 379. Austin, Texas

  • Böhm M, Collen B, Baillie JEM, Bowles P, Chanson J, Cox N, Hammerson G, Hoffmann M, Livingstone SR, Ram M et al (2013) The conservation status of the world’s reptiles. Biol Conserv 157:372–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brune G (2002) Springs of Texas, vol one. Texas AandM University Press, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso P, Borges PAV, Triantis KA, Ferrández MA, Martín JL (2011) Adapting the IUCN red list criteria for invertebrates. Biol Conserv 144:2432–2440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausnitzer V, Kalkman VJ, Ram M, Collen B, Baillie JEM, Bedjanič M, Darwall WRT, Dijkstra K-DB, Dow R, Hawking J et al (2009) Odonata enter the biodiversity crisis debate: the first global assessment of an insect group. Biol Conserv 142:1864–1869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colson-Proch C, Morales S, Hervant F, Konecny L, Moulin C, Duady CJ (2010) First cellular approach of the effects of global warming on groundwater organisms: a study of the HSP70 gene expression. Cell Stress Chaperones 15:259–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Culver DC, Pipan T (2009) The biology of caves and other subterranean habitats. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Culver DC, Master LL, Christman MC, Hobbs HH III (2000) Obligate cave fauna of the 48 contiguous United States. Conserv Biol 14:386–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culver DC, Christman MC, Elliott WR, Hobbs HH III, Reddell JR (2003) The North American obligate cave fauna: regional patterns. Biodivers Conserv 12:441–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culver DC, Christman MC, Sket B, Trontelj P (2004) Sampling adequacy in an extreme environment: species richness patterns in Slovenian caves. Biodivers Conserv 13:1209–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danielopol DL, Griebler C, Gunatilaka A, Notenboom J (2003) Present state and future prospects for groundwater ecosystems. Environ Conserv 30:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datry T, Malard F, Gibert J (2005) Response of invertebrate assemblages to increased groundwater recharge rates in a phreatic aquifer. J North Am Benthol Soc 24:461–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dole-Olivier M-J, Castellarini F, Coineau N, Galassi DMP, Martin P, Mori N, Valdecasas A, Gibert J (2009) Towards an optimal sampling strategy to assess groundwater biodiversity: comparison across six European regions. Freshw Biol 54:777–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drummond SP, Wilson KA, Meijaard E, Watts M, Dennis R, Christy L, Possingham HP (2010) Influence of a threatened-species focus on conservation planning. Conserv Biol 24:441–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata Z-I, Knowler DJ, Lévêque C, Naiman RJ, Prieur-Richard A-H, Soto D, Stiassny MLJ, Sullivan CA (2006) Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev 81:163–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard SM, Halse SA, Williams MR, Scanlon MD, Cocking J, Barron HJ (2009) Exploring the relationship between sampling efficiency and short-range endemism for groundwater fauna in the Pilbara region, Western Australia. Freshw Biol 54:885–901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards Aquifer Authority (2013) Hydrologic data report for 2012. Report No. 13-01. San Antonio, Texas. http://www.edwardsaquifer.org/scientific-research-and-data/hydrologic-data-reports

  • Elliott WR, Veni G (1994) The caves and karst of Texas: 1994 National Speleological Society convention guidebook. National Speleological Society, Huntsville

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber-Langendoen D, Nichols J, Master L, Snow K, Tomaino A, Bittman R, Hammerson G, Heidel B, Ramsay L, Teucher A, Young B (2012) NatureServe Conservation Status Assessments: Methodology for Assigning Ranks. Arlington, Virginia

  • Fahlquist L, Ardis AF (2004) Quality of water in the trinity and edwards aquifers, south-central Texas, 1996-98. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004–5201. Reston, Virginia

  • Ford AT, Cooke SJ, Goheen JR, Young TP (2017) Conserving megafauna or sacrificing biodiversity? Bioscience 67:193–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Game ET, Kareiva P, Possingham HP (2013) Six common mistakes in conservation priority setting. Conserv Biol 27:480–485

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gibert J, Culver DC, Dole-Olivier M-J, Malard F, Christman MC, Deharveng L (2009) Assessing and conserving groundwater biodiversity: synthesis and perspectives. Freshw Biol 54:930–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson T, Wada Y, Bierkens MFP, van Beek LPH (2012) Water balance of global aquifers revealed by groundwater footprint. Nature 488:197–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grammont PCd, Cuarón AD (2006) An evaluation of threatened species categorization systems used on the American continent. Conserv Biol 20:14–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green RT, Bertetti FP, McGinnis R, Prikryl J (2012) Measuring floodplain hydraulics of Seco Creek and Media River where they overlie the Edwards Aquifer. Final report on SwRI® project no. 20-16488, Edwards Aquifer Authority. San Antonio, Texas

  • Griebler C, Stein H, Kellermann C, Berkhoff S, Brielmann H, Schmidt S, Selesi D, Steube C, Fuchs A, Hahn HJ (2010) Ecological assessment of groundwater ecosystems—vision or illusion? Ecol Eng 36:1174–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock PJ, Boulton AJ (2009) Sampling groundwater fauna: efficiency of rapid assessment methods tested in bores in eastern Australia. Freshw Biol 54:902–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock PJ, Boulton AJ, Humphreys WF (2005) Aquifers and hyporheic zones: towards an ecological understanding of groundwater. Hydrogeol J 13:98–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey MS, Rix MG, Framenau VW, Hamilton ZR, Johnson MS, Teale RJ, Humphreys G, Humphreys WF (2011) Protecting the innocent: studying short-range endemic taxa enhances conservation outcomes. Invertebr Syst 25:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedin M (2015) High-stakes species delimitation in eyeless cave spiders (Cicurina, Dictynidae, Araneae) from central Texas. Mol Ecol 24:346–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holsinger JR, Longley G (1980) The subterranean amphipod crustacean fauna of an artesian well in Texas, vol 308. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hüppop K (2012) Adaptation to low food. In: White WB, Culver DC (eds) Encyclopedia of caves, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins BT, Engel AS, Nowlin WH, Schwartz BF (2016) Chemolithoautotrophy supports macroinvertebrate food webs and affects diversity and stability in groundwater communities. Ecology 97:1530–1542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Industrial Economics, Incorporated (2008) Economic analysis of critical habitat for the Devils River minnow. Final economic analysis, U.S. fish and Wildlife Service. Cambridge, Massachusetts

  • International Boundary and Water Commission (2011) Monitoring station water quality data for San Felipe Creek at West Springs, near West Wells in Del Rio (2000–2011). https://www.ibwc.gov/CRP/monstats.htm. Accessed 8 May 2015

  • Issartel J, Hervant F, Voituron Y, Renault D, Vernon P (2005) Behavioural, ventilatory and respiratory responses of epigean and hypogean crustaceans to different temperatures. Comp Biochem Physiol Part A 141:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2016) The IUCN red list of threatened species, version 2016-3. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 18 Apr 2017

  • Jaffé R, Prous X, Zampaulo R, Giannini TC, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL, Maurity C, Oliveira G, Brandi IV, Siqueira JO (2016) Reconciling mining with the conservation of cave biodiversity: a quantitative baseline to help establish conservation priorities. PLoS ONE 11:e0168348

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PD, Bogan AE, Brown KM, Burkhead NM, Cordeiro JR, Garner JT, Hartfield PD, Lepitzki DAW, Mackie GL, Pip E et al (2013) Conservation status of freshwater gastropods of Canada and the United States. Fisheries 38:247–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanovic T, Eberhard SM, Perina G, Callan S (2013) Two new subterranean ameirids (Crustacea: Copepoda: Harpacticoida) expose weaknesses in the conservation of short-range endemics threatened by mining developments in Western Australia. Invertebr Syst 27:540–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kløve B, Ala-Aho P, Bertrand G, Gurdak JJ, Kupfersberger H, Kværner J, Muotka T, Mykrä H, Preda E, Rossi P et al (2014) Climate change impacts on groundwater dependent ecosystems. J Hydrol 518:250–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krejca JK, Weckerly B (2007) Detection probabilities of karst invertebrates. Final report, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. Austin, Texas

  • LBG-Guyton Associates (2010) Impact of San Felipe springs on the Rio Grande. Final report, Rio Grande Regional Water Authority. Weslaco, Texas

  • Longley G (1981) The Edwards aquifer: earth’s most diverse groundwater ecosystem? Int J Speleol 11:123–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas LK, Gompert Z, Gibson JR, Bell KL, Buerkle CA, Nice CC (2016) Pervasive gene flow across critical habitat for four narrowly endemic, sympatric taxa. Freshw Biol 61:933–946

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mercado-Salas NF, Morales-Vela B, Suarez-Morales E, Iliffe TM (2013) Conservation status of the inland aquatic crustaceans in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico: shortcomings of a protection strategy. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 23:939–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel G, Malard F, Deharveng L, Lorenzo TD, Sket B, Broyer CD (2009) Reserve selection for conserving groundwater biodiversity. Freshw Biol 54:861–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moring JB (2012) Water quality and the composition of fish and macroinvertebrate communities in the Devils and Pecos rivers in and upstream from the Amistad National Recreation Area, Texas, 2005-7. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2012-5038. Reston, Virginia

  • NatureServe (2017) NatureServe Explorer: an online encyclopedia of life [web application] version 7.0. http://explorer.natureserve.org. Accessed 18 Apr 2017

  • Nielsen-Gammon JW (2011) The changing climate of Texas. In: Schmandt J, North GR, Clarkson J (eds) The impact of global warming on Texas, 2nd edn. University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 39–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Nueces River Authority (2013) 2013 Basin summary report: San Antonio-Nueces Coastal Basin, Nueces River Basin, Nueces-Rio Grande Coastal Basin. http://www.nueces-ra.org/CP/CRP/

  • Ponder WF, Colgan DJ (2002) What makes a narrow-range taxon? Insights from Australian freshwater snails. Invertebr Syst 16:571–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reboleira ASPS, Borges PAV, Gonҫalves F, Serrano ARM, Oromi P (2011) The subterranean fauna of a biodiversity hotspot region—Portugal: an overview and its conservation. Int J Speleol 40:23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RECON Environmental, Inc, Hicks and Company, Zara Environmental LLC, BIOWEST (2012) Edwards Aquifer Recovery Implementation Program. Habitat Conservation Plan. http://www.eahcp.org/documents/Final%20HCP%20November%202012.pdf

  • Reidel A, Sagata K, Suhardjono YR, Tanzler R, Balke M (2013) Integrative taxonomy on the fast track – towards more sustainability in biodiversity research. Front Zool 10(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford KW, Shaw-Faulkner MG, DeLeon JL (2011) Spring hydrology of Colorado Bend State Park, Central Texas, vol 14. Stephen F. Austin State University Faculty Publications, Austin, pp 152–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamm JF, Poteet MF, Symstad AJ, Musgrove M, Long AJ, Mahler BJ, Norton PA (2015) Historical and projected climate (1901–2050) and hydrologic response of karst aquifers, and species vulnerability in south-central Texas and western South Dakota. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2014-5089. 10.3133/sir20145089

  • Stein H, Griebler C, Berkhoff S, Matzke D, Fuchs A, Hahn HJ (2012) Stygoregions—a promising approach to a bioregional classification of groundwater systems. Sci Rep 2:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stejneger L (1896) Description of a new genus and species of blind tailed batrachians from the subterranean waters of Texas. Proc US Natl Mus 18:619–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor CA, Schuster GA, Cooper JE, DiStefano RJ, Eversole AG, Hamr P, Hobbs HH III, Robison HW, Skelton CE, Thoma RF (2011) A reassessment of the conservation status of crayfishes of the United States and Canada after 10 + years of increased awareness. Fisheries 32:372–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (2016) Joint Groundwater Monitoring and Contamination Report-2015, Prepared by Texas Groundwater Protection Committee. SFR-056/15. Austin, Texas

  • Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (2012) Texas Conservation Action Plan 2012-2016: statewide/multi-region handbook. Austin, Texas. http://tpwd.texas.gov/landwater/land/tcap/. Accessed 18 Apr 2017

  • Texas Water Development Board (2010) Groundwater Management Areas: Desired future conditions submissions. http://www.twdb.texas.gov/groundwater/management_areas/index.asp. Accessed 18 Apr 2017

  • Texas Water Development Board (2016) 2016 Region Water Plan: population and water demand projections. http://www.twdb.texas.gov/waterplanning/data/projections/2017/popproj.asp. Accessed 18 Apr 2017

  • Tomlinson M, Boulton A (2010) Ecology and management of subsurface groundwater dependent ecosystems in Australia – a review. Mar Freshw Res 61:936–949

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trontelj P, Douady CJ, Fišer C, Gibert J, Gorički S, Lefébure T, Sket B, Zakšek V (2009) A molecular test for cryptic diversity in ground water: how large are the ranges of macro-stygobionts? Freshw Biol 54:727–744

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USFWS (2013) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; determination of endangered species status for six West Texas aquatic invertebrates. Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2012-0029; 4500030113. Federal Register 78: 41228–41258

  • White A, Pyke G (1996) Distribution and conservation status of the green and golden bell frog Litoria aurea in New South Wales. Aust Zool 30:177–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JD, Warren ML Jr, Cummings KS, Harris JL, Neves RJ (1993) Conservation status of freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 18:6–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong CM, Williams CE, Pittock J, Collier U, Schelle P (2007) World’s top 10 rivers at risk. World Wildlife Fund International, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong CI, Kromann JS, Hunt BB, Smith BA, Banner JL (2014) Investigating groundwater flow between Edwards and Trinity Aquifers in Central Texas. Groundwater 52:624–639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

James Reddell provided access to extensive records and museum specimens throughout the state. Randy Gibson (USFWS), Jean Krejca (Zara Environmental LLC), and Krista McDermid (Zara Environmental LLC) provided constructive feedback and information on unpublished records. Bob Gottfried (TPWD) provided instruction and feedback on use of the NatureServe rank calculator. Work on this project was partially funded through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Grant titled TX T-79-R-3, F16AF00688, under the authority of the State Wildlife Grant Program (CFDA#15.634) issued to Texas Parks and Wildlife Department.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin T. Hutchins.

Additional information

Communicated by Clinton Jenkins.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 25 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PDF 1559 kb)

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 2 and 3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hutchins, B.T. The conservation status of Texas groundwater invertebrates. Biodivers Conserv 27, 475–501 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1447-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1447-0

Keywords