Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 26, Issue 12, pp 2987–2992 | Cite as

Contrasting bobcat values

  • L. Mark ElbrochEmail author
  • Lisa Robertson
  • Kristin Combs
  • Jenny Fitzgerald
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Biodiversity exploitation and use


Ecotourism enhances conservation management, promotes non-consumptive use of wildlife, and increases local community resources over that of select individuals when compared with consumptive uses such as hunting or trapping. The bobcat is a cryptic mesocarnivore widely exploited for pelts across North America, and a species increasingly contributing to ecotourism. Here, we report a conservative, non-consumptive economic value of US$308,105 for a single bobcat in Yellowstone National Park in northwest Wyoming for the 2015–2016 winter season, a figure nearly 1000 times greater than exploitive values of US$315.17 per bobcat trapped or hunted in Wyoming in the same season (US$130.53 per bobcat harvested in revenue earned by the state of Wyoming in trapping license sales + US$184.64 per pelt sold by successful trappers and hunters). In 2016, tourism was the second largest industry in Wyoming and generated US$3.2 billion. Our case study emphasizes that current bobcat regulatory policies across North America do not reflect current cultural values, inclusive of both consumptive and non-consumptive use of wildlife. Therefore, we recommend range-wide regulatory changes to ensure bobcat management is not just sustainable in terms of harvest, but that all people have access to shared resources held in trust.


Ecotourism Hunting Furbearers Non-consumptive use Regulation Trapping 



We thank the Scully family for financial support of this project.

Supplementary material

10531_2017_1397_MOESM1_ESM.docx (95 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 94 kb)


  1. Bruskotter JT, Wilson RS (2014) Determining where the wild things will be: using psychological theory to find tolerance for large carnivores. Conserv Lett 7:158–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buckley RC, Morrison C, Castley JG (2016) Net effects of ecotourism on threatened species survival. PLoS ONE 11:e0147988CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Chapron G et al (2014) Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes. Science 346:1517–1519CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Feldpausch-Parker AM, Parker ID, Vidon ES (2017) Privileging consumptive use: a critique of ideology, power, and discourse in the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation. Conserv Soc 15:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gese EM (2001) Monitoring of terrestrial carnivore populations. In: Gittleman JL, Funk SM, MacDonald DW, Wayne RK (eds) Carnivore conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 372–396Google Scholar
  6. Hausmann A, Slotow R, Fraser I, Di Minin E (2017) Ecotourism marketing alternative to charismatic megafauna can also support biodiversity conservation. Anim Conserv 20:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kelly M, Morin D, Lopez-Gonzalez CA (2016) Lynx rufus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T12521A50655874. Accessed 29 March 2017
  8. Lemelin RH (2007) Finding beauty in the dragon: the role of dragonflies in recreation and tourism. J Ecotour 6:139–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lindsey PA, Alexander R, Mills MGL, Romañach S, Woodroffe R (2007) Wildlife viewing preferences of visitors to protected areas in South Africa: implications for the role of ecotourism in conservation. J Ecotour 6:19–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lindsey PA, Havemann CP, Lines R, Palazy L, Price AE, Retief TA, Rhebergen T, Van der Waal C (2013) Determinants of persistence and tolerance of carnivores on Namibian ranches: implications for conservation on Southern African private lands. PLoS ONE 8:e52458CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Mossaz A, Buckley RC, Castley JG (2015) Ecotourism contributions to conservation of African big cats. J Nat Conserv 28:112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nowell K, Jackson P (1996) Wild cats: status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Organ JF, Geist V, Mahoney SP, Williams S, Krausman PR, Batcheller GR, Decker TA, Carmichael R, Nanjappa P, Regan R, Medellin RA, Cantu R, McCabe RE, Craven S, Vecellio GM, Decker DJ (2012) The North American model of wildlife conservation. The Wildlife Society Technical Review 12-04. The Wildlife Society, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  14. Penteriani V, López-Bao JV, Bettega C, Dalerum F, del Mar Delgado M, Jerina K, Kojola I, Krofel M, Ordiz A (2017) Consequences of brown bear viewing tourism: a review. Biol Conserv 206:169–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Roberts NM, Crimmins SM (2010) Bobcat population status and management in North America: evidence of large-scale population increase. J Fish Wildl Manage 1:169–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Selier SAJ, Di Minin E (2015) Monitoring required for effective sustainable use of wildlife. Anim Conserv 18:131–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sheridan G, Lanka B, Tessmann S (2016) Annual report of small game, upland game birds, migratory game birds, furbearer, wild turkey, and falconry harvest 2015. Wyoming Game and Fish Department, CheyenneGoogle Scholar
  18. Upper Snake River Trappers of Idaho (2017) Fur sales results. Accessed 8 April 2017
  19. Wildlife Management Institute (2016) Wyoming Game and Fish Department programmatic evaluation. Wildlife Management Institute, GardenersGoogle Scholar
  20. Wolfe ML, Gese EM, Terletzky P, Stoner DC, Aubry LM (2016) Evaluation of harvest indices for monitoring cougar survival and abundance. J Wildl Manage 80:27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wyoming Office of Tourism. 2017 Year in review. Accessed 8 April 2017

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Mark Elbroch
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Lisa Robertson
    • 2
  • Kristin Combs
    • 2
  • Jenny Fitzgerald
    • 1
  1. 1.PantheraNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Wyoming UntrappedJacksonUSA
  3. 3.KellyUSA

Personalised recommendations