Skip to main content

Contrasting bobcat values

Abstract

Ecotourism enhances conservation management, promotes non-consumptive use of wildlife, and increases local community resources over that of select individuals when compared with consumptive uses such as hunting or trapping. The bobcat is a cryptic mesocarnivore widely exploited for pelts across North America, and a species increasingly contributing to ecotourism. Here, we report a conservative, non-consumptive economic value of US$308,105 for a single bobcat in Yellowstone National Park in northwest Wyoming for the 2015–2016 winter season, a figure nearly 1000 times greater than exploitive values of US$315.17 per bobcat trapped or hunted in Wyoming in the same season (US$130.53 per bobcat harvested in revenue earned by the state of Wyoming in trapping license sales + US$184.64 per pelt sold by successful trappers and hunters). In 2016, tourism was the second largest industry in Wyoming and generated US$3.2 billion. Our case study emphasizes that current bobcat regulatory policies across North America do not reflect current cultural values, inclusive of both consumptive and non-consumptive use of wildlife. Therefore, we recommend range-wide regulatory changes to ensure bobcat management is not just sustainable in terms of harvest, but that all people have access to shared resources held in trust.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Bruskotter JT, Wilson RS (2014) Determining where the wild things will be: using psychological theory to find tolerance for large carnivores. Conserv Lett 7:158–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Buckley RC, Morrison C, Castley JG (2016) Net effects of ecotourism on threatened species survival. PLoS ONE 11:e0147988

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chapron G et al (2014) Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes. Science 346:1517–1519

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Feldpausch-Parker AM, Parker ID, Vidon ES (2017) Privileging consumptive use: a critique of ideology, power, and discourse in the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation. Conserv Soc 15:33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gese EM (2001) Monitoring of terrestrial carnivore populations. In: Gittleman JL, Funk SM, MacDonald DW, Wayne RK (eds) Carnivore conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 372–396

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hausmann A, Slotow R, Fraser I, Di Minin E (2017) Ecotourism marketing alternative to charismatic megafauna can also support biodiversity conservation. Anim Conserv 20:91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kelly M, Morin D, Lopez-Gonzalez CA (2016) Lynx rufus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T12521A50655874. http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/12521/0. Accessed 29 March 2017

  8. Lemelin RH (2007) Finding beauty in the dragon: the role of dragonflies in recreation and tourism. J Ecotour 6:139–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lindsey PA, Alexander R, Mills MGL, Romañach S, Woodroffe R (2007) Wildlife viewing preferences of visitors to protected areas in South Africa: implications for the role of ecotourism in conservation. J Ecotour 6:19–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lindsey PA, Havemann CP, Lines R, Palazy L, Price AE, Retief TA, Rhebergen T, Van der Waal C (2013) Determinants of persistence and tolerance of carnivores on Namibian ranches: implications for conservation on Southern African private lands. PLoS ONE 8:e52458

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Mossaz A, Buckley RC, Castley JG (2015) Ecotourism contributions to conservation of African big cats. J Nat Conserv 28:112–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nowell K, Jackson P (1996) Wild cats: status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  13. Organ JF, Geist V, Mahoney SP, Williams S, Krausman PR, Batcheller GR, Decker TA, Carmichael R, Nanjappa P, Regan R, Medellin RA, Cantu R, McCabe RE, Craven S, Vecellio GM, Decker DJ (2012) The North American model of wildlife conservation. The Wildlife Society Technical Review 12-04. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  14. Penteriani V, López-Bao JV, Bettega C, Dalerum F, del Mar Delgado M, Jerina K, Kojola I, Krofel M, Ordiz A (2017) Consequences of brown bear viewing tourism: a review. Biol Conserv 206:169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Roberts NM, Crimmins SM (2010) Bobcat population status and management in North America: evidence of large-scale population increase. J Fish Wildl Manage 1:169–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Selier SAJ, Di Minin E (2015) Monitoring required for effective sustainable use of wildlife. Anim Conserv 18:131–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sheridan G, Lanka B, Tessmann S (2016) Annual report of small game, upland game birds, migratory game birds, furbearer, wild turkey, and falconry harvest 2015. Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Cheyenne

    Google Scholar 

  18. Upper Snake River Trappers of Idaho (2017) Fur sales results. http://www.uppersnakerivertrappersofidaho.org/sales.html. Accessed 8 April 2017

  19. Wildlife Management Institute (2016) Wyoming Game and Fish Department programmatic evaluation. Wildlife Management Institute, Gardeners

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wolfe ML, Gese EM, Terletzky P, Stoner DC, Aubry LM (2016) Evaluation of harvest indices for monitoring cougar survival and abundance. J Wildl Manage 80:27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wyoming Office of Tourism. 2017 Year in review. http://www.travelwyoming.com/sites/default/site-files/files/uploads/industry/YearInReview%20Final.pdf. Accessed 8 April 2017

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Scully family for financial support of this project.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Mark Elbroch.

Additional information

This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Biodiversity exploitation and use.

Communicated by David Hawksworth.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 94 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elbroch, L.M., Robertson, L., Combs, K. et al. Contrasting bobcat values. Biodivers Conserv 26, 2987–2992 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1397-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ecotourism
  • Hunting
  • Furbearers
  • Non-consumptive use
  • Regulation
  • Trapping