Abstract
Linear infrastructure such as pipelines and power lines is ubiquitous and responsible for loss of habitats and disruption of landscape connectivity. We reviewed published research to answer the following questions: (1) Which organisms are commonly used to indicate impacts of pipelines and power lines to biodiversity? (2) How do pipelines and power lines impact biodiversity? and (3) How are these impacts mitigated? Studies of pipelines most often used mammals and plants as bioindicators, whereas studies of power lines focused largely on birds and plants. A myriad of impacts were identified, including the mortality of plants during construction, changes to the structure and composition of plant and animal communities that resulted from construction, the creation of open and shrubby corridors within intact forests, and collisions and electrocutions of birds with power lines. However, in most studies baseline data were not collected, so magnitudes of the impacts are often unknown. Mitigation in many studies was mentioned only in the discussion as a way to reduce impacts, but mitigation techniques were rarely tested directly. We outline considerations when selecting bioindicators—research that takes a community- or ecosystem-level approach will more fully determine the scope of impacts of linear infrastructure than the historical approach of focusing on populations of select bioindicators. Mitigation strategies must ultimately result from appropriate baseline studies, scientific data collection and analyses, and be implemented within an adaptive management strategy.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Abraham S (2002) National transmission grid study. Report from U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC
Agbagwa IO, Ndukwu BC (2014) Oil and gas pipeline construction-induced forest fragmentation and biodiversity loss in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Nat Resour 5:698–718
Alonso A, Dallmeier F, Servat G (2013) Monitoring biodiversity: lesson from a trans-Andean megaproject. Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press, Washington, DC
Anderson SH, Mann K, Shugart HH (1977) The effect of transmission-line corridors on bird populations. Am Midl Nat 97:216–221
Avian Power Line Interaction Committee (APLIC) (2006) Suggested practices for avian protection on power lines: state of the art in 2006. Edison Electric Institute, The California Energy Commission, Washington, DC, Sacramento, CA
Barrientos R, Ponce C, Palacín C, Martín CA, Martín B, Alonso JC (2012) Wire marking results in a small but significant reduction in avian mortality at power lines: a BACI designed study. PLoS ONE 7:e32569
Bartzke GS, May R, Bevanger K, Stokke S, Røskaft E (2014) The effects of power lines on ungulates and implications for power line routing and rights-of-way management. Int J Biodivers Conserv 6:647–662
Beley JR, Ditsworth TM, Butt SM, Johnson CD (1982) Arthropods, plants and transmission lines in Arizona: community dynamics during secondary succession in a pinyon-juniper chaparral habitat. Southwest Nat 55:325–333
Benítez-López A, Alkemade R, Verweij PA (2010) The impacts of roads and other infrastructure on mammal and bird populations: a meta- analysis. Biol Conserv 143:1307–1316
Berg Å, Ahrné K, Öckinger E, Svensson R, Wissman J (2013) Butterflies in semi-natural pastures and power-line corridors—effects of flower richness, management, and structural vegetation characteristics. Insect Conserv Diver 6:369–657
Boshoff AF, Minnie JC, Tambling CJ, Michael MD (2011) The impact of power line-related mortality on the Cape Vulture Gyps coprotheres in a part of its range, with an emphasis on electrocution. Bird Conserv Int 21:311–327
Breece GA, Ward BJ (1996) Utility terrestrial biodiversity issues. Environ Manage 20:799–803
Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme (2012) Standard on biodiversity offsets. Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme, Washington, DC
Butt SM, Beley JR, Ditsworth TM, Johnson CD, Balda RP (1980) Arthropods, plants and transmission lines in Arizona: community dynamics during secondary succession in a desert grassland. J Environ Manage 11:267–284
Carruthers DR, Jakimchuk RD (1987) Migratory movements of the Nelchina caribou herd in relation to the trans-Alaska pipeline. Wildl Soc Bull 15:414–420
Central Intelligence Agency (2013) The world factbook. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/resources/the-world-factbook/index.html. Accessed 10 March 2016
Child KN (1973) The reactions of barren-ground caribou (Rangifer tarandus granti) to simulated pipeline and pipeline crossing structures at Prudhoe Bay, Alaska. Cooperative Research Unit, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska
Cornwell G, Hochbaum HA (1971) Collisions with wires: a source of anatid mortality. Wilson Bull 83:305–306
Dallmeier F, Langstroth R, Davis G, Pace A, de la Cruz A, Alonso A (2013) Biodiversity monitoring and assessment framework for an infrastructure megaproject in the Peruvian Andes. In: Alonso A, Dallmeier F, Servat G (eds) Monitoring biodiversity: lesson from a trans-Andean megaproject. Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press, Washington, DC, pp 21–32
Desserud P, Gates CC, Adams B, Revel RD (2010) Restoration of foothills rough fescue grassland following pipeline disturbance in southwestern Alberta. J Environ Manage 91:2763–2770
Dixon A, Rahman MdL, Galtbalt B, Gunga A, Sugarsaikhan B, Batbayar N (2017) The problem of raptor electrocution in Asia: case studies from Mongolia and China. J Nat Conserv 23:520–529
Dumas BC, Holmstead GL, Kerr MJJ, Carpenter LB (2003) Effects of road and rights-of-way on botanical resources. Technical Report Appendix E.3.3-4, Idaho Power Company
Dunne BM, Quinn MS (2009) Effectiveness of above-ground pipeline mitigation for moose (Alces alces) and other large mammals. Biol Conserv 142:332–343
Elsinger ME (2009) Reclamation status of plains rough fescue grasslands at Rumsey Block after well site and pipeline disturbance. University of Alberta, Thesis
European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (2012) Excel attachment “YS & AR 2012 Table 1 operational data 2012” of: Yearly Statistics & Adequacy Retrospect 2012. Report from ENTSOE, Brussels, Belgium. p. 62
Ferrer M, Hiraldo F (1991) Evaluation of management techniques for the Spanish imperial eagle. Wildl Soc Bull 19:436–442
Follmann EH, Hechtel JL (1990) Bears and pipeline construction in Alaska. Arctic 43:103–109
Forman RTT, Alexander LE (1998) Roads and their major ecological effects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:207–231
Forrester JA, Leopold DJ, Hafner SD (2005) Maintaining critical habitat in a heavily managed landscape: effects of power line corridor management on Karner blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis) habitat. Restor Ecol 13:488–498
Goldingjay RL, Whelan RJ (1997) Powerline easements: do they promote edge effects in eucalypt forest for small mammals? Wildl Res 24:737–744
Goosem M, Turton SM (2006) Weed incursions along roads and powerlines in the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area. Rainforest Cooperative Research Centre, Cairns, Australia
Hallinan T (1922) Bird interference on high tension electric transmission lines. Auk 39:573
Hamdan LJ, Gillevet PM, Pohlman JW, Sikaroodi M, Greinert J, Coffin RB (2011) Diversity and biogeochemical structuring of bacterial communities across the Porangahau ridge accretionary prism, New Zealand. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 77:518–532
Hessing MB, Johnson CD (1982) Disturbance and revegetation of Sonoran Desert vegetation in an Arizona powerline corridor. J Range Manag 35:254–258
Hiatt HD, Olson TE, Fisher JC (1995) Reseeding four sensitive plant species in California and Nevada. In: Roundy BA, McArthur ED, Haley JS, Mann DK (eds) Proceedings: Wildland Shrub and Arid Land Restoration Symposium. Las Vegas, pp 94–98
Hunting K (2002) A roadmap for PIER research on avian collisions with power lines in California. Technical report P500-02-071F. Sacramento: California Energy Commission
Imperial Oil Resources Ventures Limited (2004) Environmental impact statement for the Mackenzie gas project. http://www.mackenziegasproject.com/theProject/regulatoryProcess/applicationSubmission/Applicationscope/EIS.html#two. Accessed 9 March 2016
Jenkins AR, Smallie JJ, Diamond M (2010) Avian collisions with power lines: a global review of causes and mitigation with a South African perspective. Bird Conserv Int 20:263–278
Johnson WC, Schreiber RK, Burgess RL (1979) Diversity of small mammals in a powerline right-of-way and adjacent forest in East Tennessee. Am Midl Nat 101:231–235
Johnson CD, Ditsworth TM, Beley JR, Butt SM, Balda RP (1981) Arthropods, plants and transmission lines in Arizona: secondary succession in a Sonoran desert habitat. J Environ Manag 13:151–163
Kiessling F, Nefzger P, Nolasco JF, Kaintzyk U (2003) Overhead power lines: planning, design, construction. Springer, New York
Kilbane D, Graham B, Mulcahy R, Onder A, Pratt M (2008) Coral relocation for impact mitigation in Northern Qatar. Proceedings of the 11th international coral reef symposium. Ft Lauderdale, Florida, pp 1248-1252
King DI, Chandler RB, Collins JM, Peterson WR, Lautzenheiser TE (2009) Effects of width, edge and habitat on the abundance and nesting success of scrub–shrub birds in powerline corridors. Biol Conserv 142:2672–2680
Lammers WM, Collopy MW (2007) Effectiveness of avian predator perch deterrents on electric transmission lines. J Wildl Manag 71:2752–2758
Lathrop EW, Archbold EF (1980) Plant response to utility right of way construction in the Mojave Desert. Environ Manag 4:215–226
Lehman RN, Savidge JA, Kennedy PL (2010) Raptor electrocution rates for a utility in the intermountain western United States. J Wildl Manag 74:459–470
Lesbarrères D, Fahrig L (2012) Measures to reduce population fragmentation by roads: what has worked and how do we know? Trends Ecol Evol 27:374–380
Lewis LJ, Davenport J, Kelly TC (2002) A study of the impact of a pipeline construction on estuarine benthic invertebrate communities. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 55:213–221
Lewis LJ, Davenport J, Kelly TC (2003) A study of the impact of a pipeline construction on estuarine benthic invertebrate communities Part 2. Recolonization by benthic invertebrates after 1 year and response of estuarine birds. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 57:201–208
Loss SR, Will T, Marra PP (2014) Refining estimates of bird collision and electrocution mortality at power lines in the United States. PLoS ONE 9:e101565
Malcolm JM (1982) Bird collisions with a power transmission line and their relation to botulism at a Montana wetland. Wildl Soc Bull 10:297–304
Mandelik Y, Dayan T, Feitelson E (2005) Planning for biodiversity: the role of ecological impact assessment. Conserv Biol 19:1254–1261
Manville AM, II (2009) Towers, turbines, power lines, and buildings – steps being taken by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to avoid or minimize take of migratory birds at these structures. In: Ralph CJ, Rich TD (eds) Proceedings 4th international partners in flight conference. McAllen, Texas
McKenney B, Kiesecker J (2010) Policy development for biodiversity offsets: a review of offset frameworks. Environ Manag 45:165–176
McNeil R, Rodriguez SJR, Ouellet H (1985) Bird mortality at a power transmission line in northeastern Venezuela. Biol Conserv 31:153–165
Meehan AL, Haas CA (1997) Use of a powerline corridor by breeding and wintering birds in Giles County, Virginia. VA J Sci 48:259–264
Nekola J (2012) The impact of a utility corridor on terrestrial gastropod biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 21:781–795
Noel LE, Butcher MK, Cronin MA, Streever B (2006) Assessment of effects of an oil pipeline on caribou, Rangifer tarandus granti, use of riparian habitats in Arctic Alaska, 2001–2003. Can Field Nat 120:323–330
Novak D, Fryer G (2009) Restoration of the TMX - Anchor Loop project in Jasper National Park. Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on environmental concerns in rights-of-way management. Portland
Olson ER, Doherty JM (2012) The legacy of pipeline installation on the soil and vegetation of southeast Wisconsin wetlands. Ecol Eng 39:53–62
Ponce C, Alonso JC, Argandoña G, García Fernández A, Carrasco M (2010) Carcass removal by scavengers and search accuracy affect bird mortality estimates at power lines. Anim Conserv 13:603–612
Pullin AS, Knight TM, Stone DA, Charman K (2004) Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making? Biol Conserv 119:245–252
Rich AC, Dobkin DS, Niles LJ (1994) Defining forest fragmentation by corridor width: the influence of narrow forest-dividing corridors on forest-nesting birds in southern New Jersey. Conserv Biol 8:1108–1121
Rivera D, Mejías V, Jáuregui BM, Costa-Tenorio M, López-Archilla AI, Peco B (2014) Spreading topsoil encourages ecological restoration on embankments: soil fertility, microbial activity and vegetation cover. PLoS ONE 9:e101403
Rubino DL, Williams CE, Moriarity WJ (2002) Herbaceous layer contrast and alien plant occurrence in utility corridors and riparian forests of the Allegheny High Plateau. J Torr Bot Soc 129:125–135
Russell KN, Ikerd H, Droege S (2005) The potential conservation value of unmowed powerline strips for native bees. Biol Conserv 124:133–148
Sergio F, Marchesi L, Pedrini P, Ferrer M, Penteriani V (2004) Electrocution alters the distribution and density of a top predator Bubo. J Appl Ecol 41:836–845
Silverman B, Horn DJ, Purrington FF, Gandhi KJK (2008) Oil pipeline corridor through an intact forest alters ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages in southeastern Ohio. Environ Entomol 37:725–733
Slater SJ, Smith JP (2010) Effectiveness of raptor perch deterrents on an electrical transmission line in southwestern Wyoming. J Wildl Manag 74:1080–1088
Smallidge PJ, Leopold DJ, Allen CM (1996) Community characteristics and vegetation management of Karner blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis) habitats on rights-of-way in east-central New York, USA. J Appl Ecol 33:1405–1419
Smith WT, Cameron RD (1985) Reactions of large groups of caribou to a pipeline corridor on the arctic coastal plain of Alaska. Arctic 38:53–57
Smith MB, Aborn DA, Gaudin TJ, Tucker JC (2008) Mammalian predator distribution around a transmission line. Southeast Nat 7:289–300
Söderman T (2006) Treatment of biodiversity issues in impact assessment of electricity power transmission lines: a Finnish case review. Environ Impact Assess Rev 26:319–338
Takatsuki S (1992) A case study on the effects of a transmission-line corridor on sika deer habitat use at the foothills of Mt Goyo, northern Honshu, Japan. Ecol Res 7:141–146
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC (2015) Resource report 3: fish, wildlife & vegetation. http://atlanticsunriseexpansion.com/regulatory/process/. Accessed 2 Sept 2015
Tubb R (2015) Pipeline & gas journal’s 2015 worldwide construction report. Pipeline & Gas Journal, 242. https://pgjonline.com/2015/02/16/pipeline-s-2015-worldwide-construction-report/. Accessed 10 March 2016
van der Heijden MGA, Bardgett RD, van Straalen NM (2008) The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 11:296–310
van der Ree R, Smith DJ, Grilo C (2015) Handbook of road ecology. Wiley, Chichester, UK
Van Dyke GD, Shem LM, Zimmerman RE (1994) Pipeline corridors through wetlands–impacts on plant communities: Mill Creek tributary crossing, Jefferson County, New York, 1992 Survey. Gas Research Institute Report 94/0423, Argonne National Laboratory, Illinois
Van Praagh B (2014) Esso pipeline replacement project-giant Gippsland earthworm survey report. Invert-Eco, Melbourne
Van Wilgenburg SL, Hobson KA, Bayne EM, Koper N (2013) Estimated avian nest loss associated with oil and gas exploration and extraction in the western Canadian sedimentary basin. Avian Conserv Ecol 8:9
Venter O, Brodeur NN, Nemiroff L, Belland B, Dolinsek IJ, Grant JWA (2006) Threats to endangered species in Canada. Bioscience 56:903–910
Vistnes I, Nellemann C, Jordhoy P, Strand O (2004) Effects of infrastructure on migration and range use of wild reindeer. J Wildl Manag 68:101–108
Waterhouse BR, Adair KL, Boyer S, Wratten SD (2014) Advanced mine restoration protocols facilitate early recovery of soil microbial biomass, activity and functional diversity. Basic Appl Ecol 15:599–606
Yahner RH, Bramble WC, Byrnes RR (2001) Response of amphibian and reptile populations to vegetation maintenance of an electric transmission line right-of-way. J Arbor 27:215–221
Yahner RH, Hutnik RJ, Liscinsky SA (2003) Long-term trends in bird populations on an electric transmission right-of-way. J Arbor 29:156–161
Acknowledgements
We thank Ashley Myers and Thea Mink for help with the literature search. This work was funded by USDA-NIFA (Award No. 2016-38831-25863), the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, and the Kitimat LNG Operating General Partnership.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Dirk Sven Schmeller.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
10531_2017_1341_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx
Online Appendix A Data from the primary literature elucidating the impact of pipelines and power lines on biodiversity and possible mitigation (XLSX 131 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Richardson, M.L., Wilson, B.A., Aiuto, D.A.S. et al. A review of the impact of pipelines and power lines on biodiversity and strategies for mitigation. Biodivers Conserv 26, 1801–1815 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1341-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1341-9
Keywords
- Bioindicator
- Ecosystem function
- Environmental impact assessment
- Linear infrastructure
- Mitigation hierarchy
- Right of way