Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patterns and correlates of plant diversity differ between common and rare species in a neotropical dry forest

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Determining which factors affect species richness is important for conservation theory and practice. However, richness of common and rare species may be affected by different factors. We use an extensive inventory of woody plants from a tropical dry forest landscape in Yucatan, Mexico to assess the unique effects of environmental variables, spatial dependence of sampling sites, forest stand age and the combined effect of all groups of variables on species richness of woody plants with different levels of rarity (common, intermediate, rare, very rare)—according to their abundance, habitat specificity and spatial distribution range in the landscape. Analyzing separately common species and those with different levels of rarity uncovered contrasting patterns and correlates of species richness that were not apparent when focusing on all woody plants. In particular, richness of common and intermediate species was influenced mainly by environmental factors, whereas richness of very rare species was affected mostly by the unique effect of spatial dependence of sampling sites, suggesting a main role of environmental filtering and dispersal limitation, respectively. However, common and very rare species also responded inversely to some landscape metrics, revealing contrasting environmental preferences of these groups of species. These contrasting results suggest different underlying mechanisms and the need for very different conservation strategies. Therefore, basic and applied research on tropical forest biodiversity should consider separately species with different levels of rarity, focusing on which factors control variation in each level, and paying special attention to very rare species, generally the most specious and vulnerable to local extinction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Ankli A, Sticher O, Heinrich M (1999) Medical ethnobotany of the Yucatec Maya: Healers’consensus as a quantitive criterion. Econ Bot 53:144–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Mandujano S (2006) Forest fragmentation modifies habitat quality for Alouatta palliata. Int J Primatol 27:1079–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bautista-Zúniga F, Batllori-Sampedro E, Ortiz-Pérez M, Palacio-Aponte G, Castillo-González M, Colunga-Garcia-Marín P, Larqué-Saavedra A (2003) Geoformas, agua y suelo en la Península de Yucatán. Naturaleza y sociedad en el área maya. Pasado, presente y futuro. CICY, Mérida, pp 21–36

  • Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P (1992) Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borcard D, Legendre P, Avois-Jacquet C, Tuomisto H (2004) Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple scales. Ecology 85:1826–1832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown S, Lugo AE (1990) Tropical secondary forests. J Trop Ecol 6:1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JB (1987) Introducion to remote sensing. The Guilford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao A, Jost L (2012) Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by completeness rather than size. Ecology 93:2533–2547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chazdon RL (2008) Chance and determinism in tropical forest succession. In: Carson WP, Schnitzer SA (eds) Tropical forest community ecology. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, pp 384–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy JM et al (2012) Patterns and correlates of tropical dry forest structure and composition in a highly replicated chronosequence in Yucatan, Mexico. Biotropica 44:151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finegan B (1996) Pattern and process in neotropical secondary rain forests: the first 100 years of succession. Trends Ecol Evol 11:119–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flores SJ, Carvajal EI (1994) Descripción de los tipos de vegetación de la península de Yucatán. In: Gómes-Pompa A et al (eds) Etnoflora Yucatanense. Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser RH (1998) Vertebrate species richness at the mesoscale: relative roles of energy and heterogeneity. Global Ecol Biogeogr 7:215–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (1994) Rarity, vol 13. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • González-Cruz G, García-Frapolli E, Casas A, Dupuy JM (2015) Responding to disturbances: lessons from a Mayan social-ecological system. International Journal of the Commons 9:831–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2011) Estimating species richness. In: Magurran AE, McGill BJ (eds) Biological diversity: frontiers in measurement and assessment. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 39–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Guariguata MR, Ostertag R (2001) Neotropical secondary forest succession: changes in structural and functional characteristics. Forest Ecol Manag 148:185–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson EJ (1998) Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1:143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargis CD, Bissonette JA, David JL (1998) The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landscape Ecol 13:167–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper JL (1981) The meanings of rarity. In: Synge H (ed) The biological aspects of rare plant conservation. Wiley, New York, pp 189–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Heegaard E, Gjerde I, Sætersdal M (2013) Contribution of rare and common species to richness patterns at local scales. Ecography 36:937–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Stefanoni JL, Dupuy JM (2008) Effects of landscape patterns on species density and abundance of trees in a tropical subdeciduous forest of the Yucatan Peninsula. Forest Ecol Manag 255:3797–3805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Stefanoni JL, Pineda JB, Valdes-Valadez G (2006) Comparing the use of indigenous knowledge with classification and ordination techniques for assessing the species composition and structure of vegetation in a tropical forest. Environ Manag 37:686–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Stefanoni JL, Dupuy JM, Tun-Dzul F, May-Pat F (2011) Influence of landscape structure and stand age on species density and biomass of a tropical dry forest across spatial scales. Landscape Ecol 26:355–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill JL, Curran PJ (2003) Area, shape and isolation of tropical forest fragments: effects on tree species diversity and implications for conservation. J Biogeogr 30:1391–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston MA (1999) Local processes and regional patterns: appropriate scales for understanding variation in the diversity of plants and animals. Oikos 86:393–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1959) Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals? Am Nat 93:145–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jetz W, Rahbek C (2002) Geographic range size and determinants of avian species richness. Science 297:1548–1551

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lebrija-Trejos E, Bongers F, Pérez-García EA, Meave JA (2008) Successional change and resilience of a very dry tropical deciduous forest following shifting agriculture. Biotropica 40:422–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebrija-Trejos E, Pérez-García EA, Meave JA, Bongers F, Poorter L (2010) Functional traits and environmental filtering drive community assembly in a species-rich tropical system. Ecology 91:386–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Fortin MJ (1989) Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Plant Ecol 80:107–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Dale MRT, Fortin MJ, Gurevitch J, Hohn M, Myers D (2002) The consequences of spatial structure for the design and analysis of ecological field surveys. Ecography 25:601–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibold MA (2008) Ecology: return of the niche. Nature 454:39–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lennon JJ, Koleff P, Greenwood JJD, Gaston KJ (2004) Contribution of rarity and commonness to patterns of species richness. Ecol Lett 7:81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennon JJ, Beale CM, Reid CL, Kent M, Pakeman RJ (2011) Are richness patterns of common and rare species equally well explained by environmental variables? Ecography 34:529–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Martínez JO, Sanaphre-Villanueva L, Dupuy JM, Hernández-Stefanoni JL, Meave JA, Gallardo-Cruz JA (2013) β-Diversity of functional groups of woody plants in a tropical dry forest in Yucatan. PLoS ONE 8:e73660. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073660

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mazerrolle MJ, Villard MA (1999) Patch characteristics and landscape context as predictor of species presence and abundance: a review. Ecoscience 6:117–124

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps

  • Miranda F (1958) Rasgos fisiográficos de la península de Yucatán. In: Beltrán E (ed) Los recursos naturales del sureste y su aprovechamiento. Instituto mexicano de recursos naturales no renovables, D.F., México, pp 161–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Mora C, Robertson DR (2005) Causes of latitudinal gradients in species richness: a test with fishes of the tropical eastern Pacific. Ecology 86:1771–1782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz D (1981) Seven forms of rarity. In: Synge H (ed) The biological aspects of rare plant conservation. Wiley, pp 205–217

  • Ricklefs RE (1977) Environmental heterogeneity and plant species diversity: a hypothesis. Am Nat 111:376–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shmida A, Wilson MV (1985) Biological determinants of species diversity. J Biogeogr 12:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siqueira T, Bini LM, Roque FO, Marques Couceiro SR, Trivinho-Strixino S, Cottenie K (2012) Common and rare species respond to similar niche processes in macroinvertebrate metacommunities. Ecography 35:183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šizling AL, Šizlingová E, Storch D, Reif J, Gaston KJ (2009) Rarity, commonness, and the contribution of individual species to species richness patterns. P Natl Acad Sci USA 174:82–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetetla-Rangel E, Hernández-Stefanoni JL, Dupuy JM (2013) Patterns of rare woody species richness: the influence of environment, landscape attributes and spatial structure across different spatial scales. Biodivers Conserv 22:1435–1450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdez-Hernández M (2015) Vegetative and reproductive plant phenology. In: Islebe GA, Calmé S, León-Cortés JL, Schmook B (eds) Biodiversity and conservation of the Yucatan Peninsula. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 57–96

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rensburg B, Chown S, Gaston K (2002) Species richness, environmental correlates, and spatial scale: a test using South African birds. Am Nat 159:566–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walther BA, Moore JL (2005) The concepts of bias, precision and accuracy, and their use in testing the performance of species richness estimators, with a literature review of estimator performance. Ecography 28:815–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the ejidos of Xkobenhaltún, Xul and Yaxhachén for allowing us to work in their lands and for their assistance with fieldwork and determination of stand age. James Callaghan and Kaxil Kiuic A.C. provided logistic support. We thank Filigonio May-Pat and Fernando Tun-Dzul for their help with field work, species identification and GIS processing. We also acknowledge the financial support of the Fondo Mixto-Yucatan (YUC-2008-C06-108863), and of the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología to ETR. Guillermo Ibarra-Manríquez and Danilo Neves provided insightful comments that improved the clarity and quality of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Manuel Dupuy.

Additional information

Communicated by Daniel Sanchez Mata.

This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Forest and plantation biodiversity.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tetetla-Rangel, E., Dupuy, J.M., Hernández-Stefanoni, J.L. et al. Patterns and correlates of plant diversity differ between common and rare species in a neotropical dry forest. Biodivers Conserv 26, 1705–1721 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1327-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1327-7

Keywords