Advertisement

Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 865–881 | Cite as

Colonization and shift of mollusc assemblages as a restoration indicator in planted mangroves in the Philippines

  • Severino G. SalmoIIIEmail author
  • Ian Tibbetts
  • Norman C. Duke
Original Paper

Abstract

We compared the mollusc assemblages of planted mono-specific Rhizophora mangroves of known different ages. As forest age increased, there was a shift in species composition, abundance and biomass of mollusc assemblages for all faunal types (infauna, epifauna and arboreal fauna). This shift was correlated with the changes in vegetation (increasing forest cover and above-ground biomass) and sediment characteristics (increasing organic matter and decreasing sand content). Some species dominate in young plantations (<10 years old; Pirenella cingulata) and in intermediate plantations (10–15 years old; Nerita polita), while other species only occur in mature plantations and natural mangrove stands (>15 years; Terebralia sulcata, Nerita planospira). The two former groups of species are mostly species of infaunal and epifaunal habitats, while the latter group is mainly composed of arboreal species. The shift in mollusc species composition and dominance may serve as a useful indicator of restoration patterns in planted mangroves.

Keywords

Mangrove Mangrove plantation Mollusc Philippines Restoration indicator Sediment Vegetation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial assistance throughout the study period was kindly provided to SS by the Ford Foundation International Fellowship Program (FORD-IFP), the International Foundation for Science (IFS; D/4667-1) and a University of Queensland Research Scholarship Grant. The administrators and staff of the University of the Philippines Marine Science Institute (UPMSI), particularly at the Bolinao Marine Laboratory, assisted and provided SS laboratory space in Bolinao. We thank the local government units and mangrove managers at all sites for allowing us access to mangrove areas and assisting us in the field sampling.

References

  1. Alongi DM (2002) Present state and future of the world’s mangrove forests. Environ Conserv 29(3):331–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alongi DM, Sasekumar A (1992) Benthic communities. In: Robertson AI, Alongi DM (eds) Tropical marine ecosystems. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp 137–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46Google Scholar
  4. Ashton EC, Macintosh DJ, Hogarth PJ (2003) A baseline study of the diversity and community ecology of crab and molluscan macrofauna in the Semantan mangrove forest, Sarawak, Malaysia. J Trop Ecol 19:127–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbier EB (2006) Natural barriers to natural disasters: replanting mangroves after the tsunami. Front Ecol Environ 4(3):124–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bosire JO, Dahdouh-Guebas F, Kairo JG, Cannicci S, Koedam N (2004) Spatial variations in macrobenthic fauna recolonization in a tropical mangrove bay. Biodivers Conserv 13:1059–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bosire JO, Dahdouh-Guebas F, Walton M, Crona BI, Lewis RR III, Field C, Kairo JG, Koedam N (2008) Functionality of restored mangroves—a review. Aquat Bot 89:251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cairns J, Heckman JR (1996) Restoration ecology: the state of an emerging field. Ann Rev Energy Environ 21:167–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cannicci S, Burrows D, Fratini S, Smith TJ III, Offenberg J, Dahdouh-Guebas F (2008) Faunal impact on vegetation structure and ecosystem function in mangrove forests: a review. Aquat Bot 89:186–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapman MG, Tolhurst TJ (2004) The relationship between invertebrate assemblages and bio-dependant properties of sediment in urbanized temperate mangrove forests. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 304:51–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapman MG, Tolhurst TJ (2007) Relationships between benthic macrofauna and biogeochemical properties of sediments at different spatial scales and among different habitats in mangrove forests. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 343:96–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2006) PRIMER v6: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarke KR, Warwick R (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edn. Primer-E, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  14. Crona BI, Ronnback P (2007) Community structure and temporal variability of juvenile fish assemblages in natural and replanted mangroves, Sonneratia alba Sm. of Gazi Bay, Kenya. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 74:44–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dance SP (2002) Shells (Smithsonian Handbooks). DK Publishing, New York, p 256Google Scholar
  16. Dittman S (2002) Benthic fauna in tropical tidal flats: a comparative perspective. Wetlands Ecol Manage 10:189–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duke NC (2001) Gap creation and regenerative processes driving diversity and structure of mangrove ecosystems. Wetlands Ecol Manage 9:257–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellison AM (2000) Mangrove restoration: do we know enough? Restor Ecol 8(3):219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ellison AM (2008) Managing mangroves with benthic diversity in mind: moving beyond banditry. J Sea Res 59:2–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Evans J (1999) Planted forests of the wet and dry tropics: their variety, nature, and significance. In: Boyle JR, Winjum JK, Kavanagh K, Jensen EC (eds) Planted forests: contributions to the quest for sustainable societies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Field CD (1999) Mangrove rehabilitation: choice and necessity. Hydrobiologia 413:47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fondo EN, Martens EE (1998) Effects of mangrove deforestation on macrofaunal densities, Gazi Bay, Kenya. Mangroves and Salt Marshes. 2:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fortes MD (1995) Causes of failure (and success?) of mangrove restoration in the Philippines. In: Khenmark C (ed) Ecology and management of mangrove restoration and regeneration in East and Southeast Asia: proceedings of the ECOTONE IV 18-22 January 1995. Wang Tai Hotel, Surat Thani, pp 129–141Google Scholar
  24. Green RH (1979) Sampling design and statistical methods for environmental biologists. Wiley, New York, p 257Google Scholar
  25. Hogarth P (2007) The biology of mangroves and seagrasses. Oxford University Press, New York, p 272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaly UL, Jones GP (1998) Mangrove restoration: a potential tool for coastal management in tropical developing countries. Ambio 27(8):656–661Google Scholar
  27. Kathiresan K, Bingham BL (2001) Biology of mangroves and mangrove ecosystems. Adv Mar Biol 40:81–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Katon BM, Pomeroy RS, Garces LR, Ring MW (2000) Rehabilitating the mangrove resources of Cogtong Bay, Philippines: a co-management perspective. Coast Manag 28(1):29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lantican RM (2001) The science and practice of crop production. College, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines. SEAMEO SEARCA and UPLB, p 330Google Scholar
  30. Laureta LV (2008) Compendium of the economically important seashells in Panay. University of the Philippines Press, Quezon City, p 147Google Scholar
  31. Lawton JH, Gaston KJ (2001) Indicator species. In: Levin S (ed) Encyclopedia of biodiversity. San Diego: Academic. pp 437–450Google Scholar
  32. Lewis RR III (2005) Ecological engineering for successful management and restoration of mangrove forests. Ecol Eng 24:403–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lozouet P, Plaziat J-C (2008) Mangrove environments and molluscs: Abatan River, Bohol and Panglao Islands, Central Philippines. Conchbooks, Hackenheim, Germany, pp 160Google Scholar
  34. Macintosh DJ, Ashton EC, Havanon S (2002) Mangrove rehabilitation and intertidal biodiversity: a study in the Ranong mangrove ecosystem, Thailand. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 55:331–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Macnae W (1968) A general account of the fauna and flora of mangrove swamps and forests in the Indo West Pacific region. In: Russel SFS, Yonge SM (eds) Advances in marine biology. Academic Press, London, pp 73–270Google Scholar
  36. Matthes H, Kapetsky JM (1988) Worldwide compendium of mangrove-associated aquatic species of economic importance. FAO, Rome FAO Fishery Circular No. 814. p 328Google Scholar
  37. McKee KL, Faulkner PL (2000) Biogeochemical functioning of restored and natural mangrove forests in Southwest Florida, USA. Restor Ecol 8:247–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Michener WK (1997) Quantitatively evaluating restoration experiments: research design, statistical analysis, and data management considerations. Restor Ecol 5(4):324–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morrisey DJ, Skilleter GA, Ellis JI, Burns BR, Kemp CE, Burta K (2003) Differences in benthic fauna and sediment among mangrove (Avicennia marina var. australasica) stands of different ages in New Zealand. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 56:581–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nagelkerken I, Blaber SJM, Bouillon S, Green P, Haywood M, Kirton LG, Meynecke J-O, Pawlik J, Penrose HM, Sasekumar A, Somerfield PJ (2008) The habitat function of mangroves for terrestrial and marine fauna: a review. Aquat Bot 89:155–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Netto SA, Galucci F (2003) Meiofauna and macrofauna communities in a mangrove from the islands of Santa Catalina, South Brazil. Hydrobiologia 505:159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Noon BR, Spies TA, and Raphael MG (1999) Conceptual basis for designing an effectiveness monitoring program. In: Mulder BS. et al. (eds) The strategy and design of the effectiveness monitoring program for the Northwest Forest Plan. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-437, Portland, OR, pp 21–48Google Scholar
  43. Palomares MLD, Pauly D (2015) SeaLifeBase, world wide web electronic publication (www.sealifebase.org), version 10/2015
  44. Pickett STA (1989) Space-for-time substitution as an alternative to long-term studies. In: Likens GE (ed) Long-term studies in ecology: approaches and alternatives. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 110–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Plaziat JC (1984) Mollusc distribution in the mangal. In: Por FD, Dor I (eds) Hydrobiology of the mangal. W. Junk, The Hague, pp 111–143Google Scholar
  46. Primavera JH, Esteban JMA (2008) A review of mangrove rehabilitation in the Philippines: successes, failures and future prospects. Wetlands Ecol Manage 16(5):345–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Printrakoon C, Wells FE and Chitramvong Y (2008) Distribution of molluscs in mangroves at six sites in the Upper Gulf of Thailand. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 18(S):247–257Google Scholar
  48. Ruiz-Jaen MC, Aide TM (2005) Restoration success: how is it being measured? Restor Ecol 13(3):569–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Salmo SG III, Duke NC (2010) Establishing mollusk colonization and assemblage patterns in planted mangrove stands of different ages in Lingayen Gulf, Philippines. Wetl Ecol Manag 18(6):745–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Salmo III SG, Carranza R, Meñez MAJ and Estepa NG (1999) Mangrove reforestation program in Bolinao, Pangasinan: partnerships among local and government institutions. In: Community-Based Strategies in Natural Resources Management, Voluntary Service Overseas—Philippines. pp 146–151Google Scholar
  51. Salmo SG III, Torio DD, Esteban JMA (2007) Evaluation of rehabilitation strategies and management schemes for the improvement of mangrove management programs in Lingayen Gulf. Sci Diliman 19(1):24–34Google Scholar
  52. Salmo SG III, Lovelock CE, Duke NC (2013) Vegetation and soil characteristics as indicators of restoration trajectories in restored mangroves. Hydrobiologia 720:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Salmo SG III, Lovelock CE, Duke NC (2014) Assessment of vegetation and soil conditions in restored mangroves interrupted by severe tropical typhoon ‘Chan-hom’ in the Philippines. Hydrobiologia 733:85–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Samson MS, Rollon RN (2008) Growth performance of planted mangroves in the Philippines: revisiting forest management strategies. Ambio 37(4):234–240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Sasekumar A (1974) Distribution of macrofauna on a Malayan mangrove shore. J Anim Ecol 43:51–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sasekumar A, Chong VC (1998) Faunal diversity in Malaysian mangroves. Global Ecol Biogeogr Lett 7:57–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1997) Biometry, the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. WH Freeman and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. Tabuchi R (2004) The rehabilitation of mangroves in Southeast Asia. In: Saxena KG, Liang L, Kono Y and Miyata S (eds.). Small-Scale Livelihoods and Natural Resources Management in Marginal Areas: Case Studies in Monsoon Asia. Proceedings of an International Symposium. Tokyo, Japan, 29-30 October 2003. pp 121–128Google Scholar
  59. Tolhurst TJ, Chapman MG (2007) Patterns in biogeochemical properties of sediments and benthic animals among different habitats in mangrove forests. Austral Ecol 32:775–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Twilley RR, Rivera-Monroy VH, Chen R, Botero L (1998) Adapting an ecological mangrove model to simulate trajectories in restoration ecology. Mar Pollut Bull 37(8–12):404–419Google Scholar
  61. Walters BB (2004) Local management of mangrove forests in the Philippines: successful conservation or efficient resource exploitation? Hum Ecol 32(2):177–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Walton LE, Le Vay L, Lebata JH, Binas J, Primavera JH (2007) Assessment of the effectiveness of mangrove rehabilitation using exploited and non-exploited indicator species. Biol Conserv 138:180–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Weilhoefer CL (2010) A review of indicators of estuarine tidal wetland condition. Ecol Ind 11(2):514–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wells FE, Lalli CM (2003) Aspects of the ecology of the mudwhelks Terebralia palustris and T. semistriata in northwestern Australia. In: Wells FE, Walker DI, Jones DS (eds) The marine flora and fauna of dampier, Western Australia. Western Australian Museum, Perth, pp 193–208Google Scholar
  65. WoRMS Editorial Board (2016) World Register of Marine Species. http://www.marinespecies.org at VLIZ. Accessed 9 September 2016. doi:10.14284/170

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental ScienceAteneo de Manila UniversityQuezon CityPhilippines
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesThe University of QueenslandSt. LuciaAustralia
  3. 3.TropWATER CentreJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations