Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 735–755 | Cite as

Paying the colonization credit: converging plant species richness in ancient and post-agricultural forests in NE Germany over five decades

Original Paper
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Forest and plantation biodiversity


Massive historical land cover changes in the Central European lowlands have resulted in a forest distribution that now comprises small remnants of ancient forests and more recently established post-agricultural forests. Here, land-use history is considered a key driver of recent herb-layer community changes, where an extinction debt in ancient forest remnants and/or a colonization credit in post-agricultural forests are being paid over time. On a regional scale, these payments should in theory lead toward a convergence in species richness between ancient and post-agricultural forests over time. In this study, we tested this assumption with a resurvey of 117 semi-permanent plots in the well-studied deciduous forests of the Prignitz region (Brandenburg, NE Germany), where we knew that the plant communities of post-agricultural stands exhibit a colonization credit while the extinction debt in ancient stands has largely been paid. We compared changes in the species richness of all herb layer species, forest specialists and ancient forest indicator species between ancient and post-agricultural stands with linear mixed effect models and determined the influence of patch connectivity on the magnitude of species richness changes. Species richness increased overall, but the richness of forest specialists increased significantly more in post-agricultural stands and was positively influenced by higher patch connectivity, indicating a convergence in species richness between the ancient and post-agricultural stands. Furthermore, the richness of ancient forest indicator species only increased significantly in post-agricultural stands. For the first time, we were able to verify a gradual payment of the colonization credit in post-agricultural forest stands using a comparison of actual changes in temporal species richness.


Herb layer Land-use history Land-use legacy Long-term change Resurvey Temperate forest 

Supplementary material

10531_2016_1271_MOESM1_ESM.docx (23 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 22 kb)
10531_2016_1271_MOESM2_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 14 kb)


  1. Baeten L, Bauwens B, De Schrijver A, De Keersmaeker L, Van Calster H, Vandekerkhove K, Roelandt B, Beekman H, Verheyen K (2009) Herb-Layer changes (1954-2000) related to the conversion of coppice-with-standards forest and soil acidification. Appl Veg Sci 12:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baeten L, Hermy M, Van Daele S, Verheyen K (2010) Unexpected understory community development after 30 years in ancient and post-agricultural forests. J Ecol 98:1447–1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) lme4: Linear mixed-effect models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-8,
  4. Bernhardt-Römermann M, Baeten L, Craven D, De Frenne P, Hédl R, Lenoir J, Bert D, Brunet J, Chudomelová M, Decocq G, Dierschke H, Dirnböck T, Dörfler I, Heinken T, Hermy M, Hommel P, Jarozewicz B, Keczyński A, Kelly DJ, Kirby K, Kopecký M, Macek M, Máliš F, Mirtl M, Mitchell FJG, Naaf T, Newman M, Peterken G, Petřík P, Schmidt W, Standovár T, Tóth Z, Van Calster H, Verstraeten G, Vladovič J, Vild O, Wulf M, Verheyen K (2015) Drivers of temporal changes in temperate forest plant diversity vary across spatial scales. Glob Change Biol 21:3726–3737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brunet J, Valtinat K, Lajos Mayr M, Felton A, Lindbladh M, Bruun HH (2011) Understory succession in post-agricultural oak forests: habitat fragmentation affects forest specialists and generalists differently. For Ecol Manag 262:1863–1871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brunet J, De Frenne P, Holmström E, Lajos Mayr M (2012) Life-history traits explain rapid colonization of young post-agricultural forests by understory herbs. For Ecol Manag 278:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butaye J, Jacquemyn H, Hermy M (2001) Differential colonization causing non-random forest plant community structure in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Ecography 24:369–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cronk Q (2016) Plant extinctions take time. Science 353:446–447CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. De Frenne P, Baeten L, Graae B, Brunet J, Wulf M, Orczewska A, Kolb A, Jansen I, Jamoneau A, Jacquemyn H, Hermy M, Diekmann M, De Schrijver A, De Sanctis M, Decocq G, Cousins SAO, Verheyen K (2011) Interregional variation in the floristic recovery of post-agricultural forests. J Ecol 99:600–609Google Scholar
  10. De Schrijver A, Vesterdal L, Hansen K, De Frenne P, Augusto L, Achat DL, Staelens J, Baeten L, De Keersmaeker L, De Neve S, Verheyen K (2012) Four decades of post-agricultural forest development have caused major redistributions of soil phosphorous fractions, Oecologia 169: 221–234Google Scholar
  11. Dullinger S, Gattringer A, Thuiller W, Moser D, Zimmermann NE, Guisan A, Willner W, Plutzar C, Leitner M, Mang T, Caccianiga M, Dirnboeck T, Ertl S, Fischer A, Lenoir J, Svenning J, Psomas A, Schmatz DR, Silc U, Vittoz P, Huelber K (2012) Extinction debt of high-mountain plants under twenty-first-century climate change. Nat Clim Chang 2:619–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dzwonko Z, Loster S (1992) Species richness and seed dispersal to secondary woods in southern Poland. J Biogeogr 19:195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Etienne D, Ruffaldi P, Dupouey JL, Georges-Leroy M, Ritz F, Dambrine E (2013) Searching for ancient forests: a 2000 year history of land use in northeastern French forests deduced from the pollen composition of closed depressions. Holocene 23:678–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2007) Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:265–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flinn KM, Marks PL (2007) Agricultural legacies in forest environments: tree communities, soil properties, and light availability. Ecol Appl 17:452–463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Flinn KM, Vellend M (2005) Recovery of Forest Plant Communities in Post-Agricultural Landscapes. Front Ecol Environ 3:243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. IUSS Working Group (2014) World reference base for soil resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  18. Hanski I (1994) A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J Anim Ecol 63:151–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanski I (2000) Extinction debt and species credit in boreal forests: modelling the consequences of different approaches to biodiversity conservation. Ann Zool Fennici 37:271–280Google Scholar
  20. Helm A, Hanski I, Partel M (2006) Slow response of plant species richness to habitat loss and fragmentation. Ecol Lett 9:72–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Heráult B, Honnay O (2005) The relative importance of local, regional and historical factors determining the distribution of plants in fragmented riverine forests: an emergent group approach. J Biogeogr 32:2069–2081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hermy M, Verheyen K (2007) Legacies of the past in the present-day forest biodiversity: a review of past land-use effects on forest plant species composition and diversity. Ecol Res 22:361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hermy M, Honnay O, Firbank L, Grashof-Bokdam C, Lawesson JE (1999) An ecological comparison between ancient and other forest plant species of Europe, and the implications for forest conservation. Biol Conserv 91:9–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Honnay O, Degroote B, Hermy M (1998) Ancient-forest plants in Western Belgium: a species list and possible ecological mechanisms. Belgian Bot 130:139–154Google Scholar
  25. IFS (1960) Ergebnisse der standortserkundung im staatlichen forstbetrieb perleberg (Erläuterung zu den Standartskarten). Institut für Forsteinrichtung und Standortserkundung, SchwerinGoogle Scholar
  26. Jackson ST, Sax DF (2010) Balancing biodiversity in a changing environment: extinction debt, immigration credit and species turnover. Trends Ecol Evol 25:153–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jacquemyn H, Butaye J, Hermy M (2001) Forest plant species richness in small, fragmented mixed deciduous forest patches: the role of area, time and dispersal limitation. J Biogeogr 28:801–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jacquemyn H, Butaye J, Hermy M (2003) Impacts of restored patch density and distance from natural forests on colonization success. Restor Ecol 11:417–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaplan JO, Krumhardt KM, Zimmermann N (2009) The prehistoric and preindustrial deforestation of Europe. Quat Sci Rev 28:3016–3034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Keith SA, Newton AC, Morecroft MD, Bealey CE, Bullock JM (2009) Taxonomic homogenization of woodland plant communities over 70 years. Proc R Soc B 276:3539–3544CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Kokarēviča I, Brumelis G, Kasparinskis R, Rolava A, Nikodemus O, Grods J, Elfert D (2016) Vegetation changes in boreo-nemoral forest stands depending on soil factors and past land use during an 80 year period of no human impact. Can J For Res 46:376–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kolk J, Naaf T (2015) Herb-layer extinction debt in highly fragmented temperate deciduous forests—completely paid after 160 years? Biol Conserv 182:164–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kuussaari M, Bommarco R, Heikkinen RK, Helm A, Krauss J, Lindborg R, Öckinger E, Pärtel M, Pino J, Rodà F, Stefanescu C, Teder T, Zobel M, Steffan-Dewenter I (2009) Extinction debt: a challenge for biodiversity conservation. TREE 24:564–571PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. LBGR (2007) Landesamt für bergbau, geologie und rohstoffe (LBGR) Brandenburg bodenübersichtskarte des landes Brandenburg 1: 300,000 (BÜK300). LBGR, KleinmachnowGoogle Scholar
  35. Lepš J, Hadincová V (1992) How reliable are our vegetation analysis? J Veg Sci 3:119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. LGBR (2008) Landesamt für bergbau, geologie und rohstoffe (LBGR) Brandenburg, landkreis prignitz, geologische übersichtskarte 1:100,000. LBGR, BrandenburgGoogle Scholar
  37. LGBR (2009) Landesamt für bergbau, geologie und rohstoffe (LBGR) Brandenburg, landkreis ostprignitz-ruppin, geologische übersichtskarte 1:100,000. LBGR, BrandenburgGoogle Scholar
  38. Lindborg R, Eriksson O (2004) Historical landscape connectivity affects present plant species diversity. Ecology 85:1840–1845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ling KA (2003) Using environmental and growth characteristics of plants to detect long-term changes in response to atmospheric pollution: some examples from British beechwoods. Sci Total Environ 310:203–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Manly BFJ (2007) Randomization, bootstrap and monte carlo methods in biology, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Matlack GR (1994) Plant species migration in a mixed-history forest landscape in eastern North America. Ecology 75:1491–1502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McCollin D, Jackson JI, Bunce RGH, Barr CJ, Stuart R (2000) Hedgerows as habitat for woodland plants. J Environ Manag 60:77–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moilanen A, Nieminen M (2002) Simple connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Ecology 83:1131–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Naaf T, Kolk J (2015) Colonization credit of post-agricultural forest patches in NE Germany remains 130–230 years after reforestation. Biol Conserv 182:155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Naaf T, Kolk J (2016) Initial site conditions and interactions between multiple drivers determine herb-layer changes over five decades in temperate forests. Forest Ecol Manag 366:153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Orczewska A (2009) The impact of former agriculture on habitat conditions and distribution patterns of ancient woodland plant species in recent black alder (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.) woods in south-western Poland. Forest Ecol Manag 258:794–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Paltto H, Norden B, Gotmark F, Franc N (2006) At which spatial and temporal scales does landscape context affect local density of red data book and indicator species? Biol Conserv 133:442–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Perring MP, De Frenne P, Baeten L, Maes SL, Depauw L, Blondeel H, Caron MM, Verheyen K (2016) Global environmental change effects on ecosystems: the importance of land-use legacies. Glob Chang Biol 22:1361–1371CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Peterken GF, Game M (1984) Historical factors affecting the number and distribution of vascular plant-species in the woodlands of central Lincolnshire. J Ecol 72:155–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Petit S, Griffith L, Smart SS, Smith GM, Stuart RC, Wright SM (2004) Effects of area and isolation of woodland patches on herbaceous plant species richness across Great Britain. Landscape Ecol 19:463–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2015) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effect models. R package version 3.1–122,
  52. R Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL
  53. Rogers DA, Rooney TP, Hawbaker TJ, Radeloff VC, Waller DM (2009) Paying the extinction debt in southern wisconsin forest understories. Conserv Biol 23:1497–1506CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000) Biodiversity – global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Schmidt M, Kriebitzsch WU, Ewald J (2011) Waldartenlisten der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen, Moose und Flechten Deutschlands. BfN-Skripten 299:1–111Google Scholar
  56. Singleton R, Gardescu S, Marks PL, Geber MA (2001) Forest herb colonization of post-agricultural forests in central New York State, USA. J Ecol 89:325–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Svenning JC, Baktoft KH, Balslev H (2009) Land-use history affects understory plant species distributions in a large temperate-forest complex, Denmark. Plant Ecol 201:221–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thomaes A, De Keersmaeker L, Van Calster H, De Schrijver A, Vandekerkhove K, Verstraeten G, Verheyen K (2012) Diverging effects of two contrasting tree species on soil and herb layer development in a chronosequence of post-agricultural forest. Forest Ecol Manag 278:90–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vellend M (2003) Habitat loss inhibits recovery of plant diversity as forests regrow. Ecology 84:1158–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vellend M, Verheyen K, Jacquemyn H, Kolb A, van Calster H, Peterken G, Hermy M (2006) Extinction debt of forest plants persists for more than a century following habitat fragmentation. Ecology 87:542–548CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Verheyen K, Guntenspergen G, Biesbrouck B, Hermy M (2003) An integrated analysis oft he effects of past land-use on forest plant species colonization at the landscape scale. J Ecol 91:731–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Verheyen K, Baeten L, De Frenne P, Bernhardt-Römermann M, Brunet J, Cornelis J, Decocq G, Dierschke H, Eriksson O, Hédl R, Heinken T, Hermy M, Hommel P, Kirby K, Naaf T, Peterken G, Petřík P, Pfadenhauer J, Van Calster H, Walther GR, Wulf M, Verstraeten G (2012) Driving factors behind the eutrophication signal in understorey plant communities of deciduous temperate forests. J Ecol 100:352–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vockenhuber EA, Scherber C, Langenbruch C, Meißner M, Seidel D, Tscharntke T (2011) Tree diversity and environmental context predict herb species richness and cover in Germany’s largest connected deciduous forest. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 13:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Walther GR, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee TJC, Fromentin JM, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bairlein F (2002) Ecological responses to climate change. Nature 416:389–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Williams M (2000) Dark ages and dark areas: global deforestation in the deep past. J Hist Geogr 26:28–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wulf M (1997) Plant species as indicators of ancient woodland in northwestern Germany. J Veg Sci 8:635–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wulf M (2004) Auswirkungen des Landschaftswandels auf die Verbreitungsmuster von Waldpflanzen - Konsequenzen für den Naturschutz. Dissertationes Botanicae 392, J. Cramer Berlin, Stuttgart, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  69. Wulf M, Kolk J (2014) Plant species richness of very small forests related to patch configuration, quality, heterogeneity and history. J Veg Sci 25:1267–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wulf M, Rujner H (2011) A GIS-based method for the reconstruction of the late eighteenth century forest vegetation in the Prignitz region (NE Germany). Landsc Ecol 26:153–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Land Use SystemsLeibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF)MünchebergGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of Biochemistry and BiologyPotsdam UniversityPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations