Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 703–716 | Cite as

Gaps in seed banking are compromising the GSPC’s Target 8 in a megadiverse country

  • Alberto L. Teixido
  • Peter E. Toorop
  • Udayangani Liu
  • Guilherme V. T. Ribeiro
  • Lisieux F. Fuzessy
  • Tadeu J. Guerra
  • Fernando A. O. Silveira
Original Paper
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Ex-situ conservation

Abstract

Ex situ seed conservation is an effective strategy to help safeguarding plants from extinction. The updated Global Strategy for Plant Conservation’s (GSPC) Target 8 aims to include 75% of threatened plant species in ex situ collections by 2020, preferably in the country of origin. Halfway through the updated GSPC program, we evaluate the current state of knowledge and practice of ex situ seed conservation of threatened species from megadiverse Brazilian flora, contributing to this Target. We identify knowledge gaps and costs to achieve Target 8 through seed banking in Brazil within the time constraints of the GSPC and in a scenario of recent science budget funding cuts. Knowledge on seed storage behavior is available only for 24 Brazilian species (1.3%). Seed desiccation tolerance was concluded for 175 of 228 species, feasibly allowing safe storage of most Brazilian species at sub-zero temperatures. However, only 26 species (1.3%) are effectively banked in research institutions. Surprisingly, the percentage of banked threatened species hardly increased in the first 5 years since the update of the Target (0.55%, 2011–2015), and Brazil now faces the challenge of banking almost 1500 species during 2016–2020. Despite a major lack of commitment of Brazilian institutions and of knowledge to achieve the Target, the costs for banking the remaining species were estimated to be only US$3.9 million. We call for a nationwide coordinated effort of government agencies, policy makers and research institutions to include ex situ seed conservation in the environmental agenda to pursue achievement of the Target by 2020.

Keywords

Brazil Conservation policy Economic costs Seed storage Threatened species 

Supplementary material

10531_2016_1267_MOESM1_ESM.doc (102 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 102 kb)
10531_2016_1267_MOESM2_ESM.xls (70 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (XLS 69 kb)

References

  1. Alton S, Linington S (2001) The UK Flora Programme of the Millenium Seed Bank Project: the outcome of a collaboration between volunteers and professionals. Plant Genet Resour Newsl 128:1–10Google Scholar
  2. Bernard E, Penna LAO, Araújo E (2014) Downgrading, downsizing, degazettement, and reclassification of protected areas in Brazil. Conserv Biol 28:939–950CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. BGCI (2016) Botanic Gardens Conservation International. http://www.bgci.org. Accessed 19 Apr 2016
  4. Cai J (2015) Seed conservation of China’s flora through the germplasm bank of wild species. BGjournal 12:22–24Google Scholar
  5. CBD (2010) Conference of the Parties 10 Decision X/17. Consolidated update of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation 2011–2020. Convention on Biological Diversity, NagoyaGoogle Scholar
  6. CHABG (2011) Safeguarding Australia’s flora through a national network of native plant seed banks: business plan 2011–2020. The Council of Heads of Australian Botanic Gardens Inc., CanberraGoogle Scholar
  7. Dias BS, Hoft R (2013) Challenges facing implementation of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation in Brazil. In: Martinelli G, Moraes MA (eds) Red Book of Brazilian flora. Nacional Center for Flora Conservation, Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden, Rio de Janeiro, pp 26–39. http://www.cncflora.jbrj.gov.br. Accessed 10 Oct 2016
  8. Ellis RH, Hong TD, Roberts EH (1990) An intermediate category of seed storage behavior? J Exp Bot 41:1167–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feeley KJ, Silman MR (2009) Extinction risks of Amazonian plant species. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:12382–12383CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferreira J, Aragão LEOC, Barlow J, Barreto P, Berenguer E, Bustamante M et al (2014) Brazil’s environmental leadership at risk. Science 346:706–707CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Forzza RC, Baumgratz JFA, Bicudo CEM, Canhos DA, Carvalho AA, Coelho MAN, Lohmann LG (2012) New Brazilian floristic list highlights conservation challenges. Bioscience 62:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fu Y, Ahmed Z, Diederichsen A (2015) Towards a better monitoring of seed ageing under ex situ seed conservation. Conserv Physiol 3:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galluzzi G, Halewood M, López Noriega I, Vernooy R (2016) Twenty-five years of international exchanges of plant genetic resources facilitated by the CGIAR genebanks: a case study on global interdependence. Biodivers Conserv 25:1421–1446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garcia LC, Ribeiro DB, Roque FO, Ochoa-Quintero JM, Laurance WE (2016) Brazil’s worst mining disaster: corporations must be compelled to pay the actual environmental costs. Ecol Applic. doi:10.1002/eap.1461 Google Scholar
  15. Gibney E (2015) Brazilian science paralysed by economic slump. Nature 526:16–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Godefroid S, Vyver AV, Vanderborght T (2010) Germination capacity and viability of threatened species collections in seed banks. Biodivers Conserv 19:1365–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Godefroid S, Rivière S, Waldren S, Boretos N, Eastwood R, Vanderborght T (2011) To what extent are threatened European plant species conserved in seed banks? Biol Conserv 144:1494–1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hardwick KA, Fiedler P, Lee LC, Pavlik B, Hobbs RJ, Aronson J et al (2011) The role of botanic gardens in the science and practice of ecological restoration. Conserv Biol 5:265–275Google Scholar
  19. Havens K, Vitt P, Maunder M, Guerrant EO Jr, Dixon K (2006) Ex-situ plant conservation and beyond. Bioscience 56:525–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hay FR, Probert RJ (2013) Advances in seed conservation of wild plant species: a review of recent research. Conserv Physiol 1:cot030. doi:10.1093/conphys/cot030 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. IUCN (2015) The IUCN Red list of threatened species. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 19 Feb 2016
  22. Kildisheva OA, Erickson TE, Merritt DJ, Dixon KW (2016) Setting the scene for dryland recovery: an overview and key findings from a workshop targeting seed-based restoration. Restor Ecol 24:36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. León-Lobos P, Wayc M, Arandad PD, Lima-Juniore M (2012) The role of ex situ seed banks in the conservation of plant diversity and in ecological restoration in Latin America. Plant Ecol Divers 5:245–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li DZ, Pritchard HW (2009) The science and economics of ex situ plant conservation. Trends Plant Sci 14:1360–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maunder M, Guerrant EO, Havens K, Dixon KW (2004) Realizing the full potential of ex situ contributions to global plant conservation. In: Guerrant EO, Havens K, Maunder M (eds) Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 389–418Google Scholar
  26. MMA (2014) Portaria MMA/443/2014 of 17 December 2014 on the “Lista Nacional de Espécies da Flora Ameaçadas de Extinção”. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  27. MMA (2015) Fifth National Report to the CBD: Brazil. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  28. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Nepstad D, Soares-Filho BS, Merry F, Lima A, Moutinho P, Carter J et al (2009) The end of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 326:1350–1351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Oliveira U, Paglia AP, Brescovit AD, Carvalho CJB, Silva DP, Rezende DT, Leite FSF et al (2016) The strong influence of collection bias on biodiversity knowledge shortfalls of Brazilian terrestrial biodiversity. Divers Distrib. doi:10.1111/ddi.12489 Google Scholar
  31. Pritchard HW, Moat JF, Ferraz JBS, Marks TM, Camargo JLC, Nadarajan J, Ferraz IDK (2014) Innovative approaches to the preservation of forest trees. For Ecol Manag 333:88–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ribeiro GVT, Teixido AL, Barbosa NPU, Silveira FAO (2016) Assessing bias and knowledge gaps on seed ecology research: implications for conservation agenda and policy. Ecol Appl 26:2033–2043CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Roberts EH (1973) Predicting the storage life of seeds. Seed Sci Technol 1:499–514Google Scholar
  34. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew (2016) Seed information database (SID). Version 7.1. http://data.kew.org/sid/. Accessed 11 July 2016
  35. Scarano F, Guimarães A, da Silva JM (2012) Rio+20: lead by example. Nature 486:25–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Schoen DJ, Brown AH (2001) The conservation of wild plant species in seed banks attention to both taxonomic coverage and population biology will improve the role of seed banks as conservation tools. Bioscience 51:960–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sharrock S, Oldfield S, Wilson O (2014) Plant Conservation Report 2014: A review of progress in implementation of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation 2011–2020. CBD, Montréal, and BGCI, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  38. Soares-Filho B, Rajão R, Macedo M, Carneiro A, Costa W, Coe M et al (2014) Cracking Brazil’s forest code. Science 344:363–364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sousa-Baena MS, Garcia LC, Peterson AT (2014) Knowledge behind conservation status decisions: data basis for “Data Deficient” Brazilian plant species. Biol Conserv 173:80–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. ter Steege H, Pitman NC, Killeen TJ, Laurance WF, Peres CA, Guevara JE (2015) Estimating the global conservation status of more than 15,000 Amazonian tree species. Sci Adv 1:e1500936CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Walters C, Wheeler LJ, Grotenhuis JM (2005) Longevity of seeds stored in a genebank: species characteristics. Seed Sci Res 15:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Walters C, Berjak P, Pammenter N, Kennedy K, Raven P (2013) Preservation of recalcitrant seeds. Science 339:915–916CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Weigand Jr R, Silva DC, Silva DO (2011) Metas de Aichi: situação atual no Brasil. UICN, WWF-Brasil and IPÊ, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de BotânicaUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil
  2. 2.Comparative Plant and Fungal Biology DepartmentRoyal Botanic Gardens Kew, Wakehurst PlaceArdinglyUK
  3. 3.Collections DepartmentRoyal Botanic Gardens Kew, Wakehurst PlaceArdinglyUK
  4. 4.Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Conservação e Manejo da Vida SilvestreUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil

Personalised recommendations