Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Conserving plant diversity in Europe: outcomes, criticisms and perspectives of the Habitats Directive application in Italy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Habitat Directive is the core strategy of nature conservation in Europe aiming at halting biodiversity loss. In this study the results of the third Italian assessment regarding the conservation status (CS) of plants listed in the Habitat Directive (Flora of community interest—FCI) was presented. Data was collected from several sources related to plant distribution, population data, habitats and pressures. Following the official European procedure, all parameters were evaluated and combined to give the CS of each taxon in each biogeographical region of presence. A comparison between the recent Italian IUCN and Reporting assessments was performed in order to evaluate the consistency between these two assessments. The official EU checklist comprises 113 Italian plant taxa, 107 of which were examined in this study. Our results showed a critical situation with only 34% of favourable CS, while 50% were unfavourable (40% inadequate plus 10% bad) and 16% unknown, in particular in the Mediterranean bioregion, where the unfavourable assessments reach the 65%. The results of the Report were consistent with those of the IUCN assessment, in which 41.9% of plants were threatened with extinction. This report highlighted some benefits and criticisms at national level, but it may have a wider significance. Although a general advance of knowledge, a great effort is needed to reach the Habitats Directive goals. Despite the limited resources, monitoring activities needs to be improved in order to close information gaps for several plants. A positive outcome was the development of a specific national project funded by the Italian Ministry of Environment, with the ambitious target to set future monitoring activities for FCI and optimize monitoring efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CS:

Conservation status

HD:

Habitats Directive

FCI:

Flora of community interest

References

  • Aeschimann D, Lauber K, Moser M, Theurillat JP (2004) Flora alpina, (3 voll.). Zanichelli, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleffi M, Tacchi R, Cortini Pedrotti C (2008) Check-list of the hornworts, liverworts and mosses of Italy. Bocconea 22:5–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchetta G, Fenu G, Mattana E (2012) A checklist of the exclusive vascular flora of Sardinia with priority rankings for conservation. An Jard Bot Madr 69:81–89. doi:10.3989/ajbm.2289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmford A, Bennun L, ten Brink B et al (2005) The convention on biological diversity’s 2010 target. Science 307:212–213. doi:10.1126/science.1106281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bellard C, Cassey P, Blackburn TM (2016) Alien species as a driver of recent extinctions. Biol Lett 12(2):20150623. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2015.0623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beresford AE, Buchanan GM, Sanderson FJ, Jefferson R, Donald PF (2016) The contributions of the EU nature directives to the CBD and other multilateral environmental agreements. Conserv Lett. doi:10.1111/conl.12259

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilz M, Kell SP, Maxted N, Lansdown RV (2011) European red list of vascular plants. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock M, Rossner G, Wissen M, Remm K, Langanke T, Lang S, Klug H, Blaschke T, Vrscaj B (2005) Spatial indicators for nature conservation from European to local scale. Ecol Indic 5:322–338. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.03.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B et al (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328:1164–1168. doi:10.1126/science.1187512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Barnosky AD, García A, Pringle RM, Palmer TM (2015) Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: entering the sixth mass extinction. Sci Adv 1:e1400253. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1400253

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Collen B, Dulvy NK, Gaston KJ et al (2016) Clarifying misconceptions of extinction risk assessment with the IUCN Red List. Biol Lett 12:20150843. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2015.0843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conti F, Abbate G, Alessandrini A, Blasi C (2005) An annotated checklist of the Italian vascular flora. Palombi Editori, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Conti F, Conti F, Alessandrini A et al (2007) Integrazioni alla checklist della flora vascolare italiana. Nat Vicentina 10:5–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey PO, Richardson DM (2016) Alien plant invasions and native plant extinctions: a six-threshold framework. AoB plants 8:plw047. doi:10.1093/aobpla/plw047

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • EEA, European Environment Agency (2015) State of nature in the EU: results from reporting under the nature directives 2007–2012. EEA Technical Report No 2/2015

  • Epstein Y, López-Bao JV, Chapron G (2015) A legal-ecological understanding of favorable conservation status for species in Europe. Conserv Lett 9:81–88. doi:10.1111/conl.12200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercole S, Giacanelli V (2014) Flora. In: Genovesi P, Angelini P, Bianchi E, Dupré E, Ercole S, Giacanelli V, Ronchi F, Stoch F. (eds) Specie e habitat di interesse comunitario in Italia: distribuzione, stato di conservazione e trend. ISPRA, Serie Rapporti 194/2014.

  • European Commission (1992) Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, 1992L0043. The Council of the European Communities, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004) Report from the Commission on the implementation of the Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. COM/2003/0845. Brussels. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52003DC0845. Accessed 25 Mar 2016

  • European Commission (2009) Composite Report on the Conservation Status of Habitat Types and Species as required under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive. COM/2009/0358 final. Brussels. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52009DC0358. Accessed 25 Mar 2016

  • European Commission (2015) Natura 2000 Barometer European Commission, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/barometer/index_en.htm. Accessed 08 Mar 2016

  • Evans D, Arvela M (2011) Assessment and reporting under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive. Explanatory Notes & Guidelines for the period 2007–2012. European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity. https://circabc.europa.eu/faces/jsp/extension/wai/navigation/container.jsp. Accessed 25 Mar 2016

  • Falcucci A, Maiorano L, Boitani L (2007) Changes in land-use/landcover patterns in Italy and their implications for biodiversity conservation. Landsc Ecol 22:617–631. doi:10.1007/s10980-006-9056-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenu G, Mattana E, Bacchetta G (2011) Distribution, status and conservation of a critically endangered, extremely narrow endemic: Lamyropsis microcephala (Asteraceae) in Sardinia. Oryx 42:180–186. doi:10.1017/S0030605310001122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenu G, Fois M, Cañadas EM, Bacchetta G (2014) Using endemic-plant distribution, geology and geomorphology in biogeography: the case of Sardinia (Mediterranean Basin). Syst Biodivers 12:181–193. doi:10.1080/14772000.2014.894592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenu G, Cogoni D, Sulis E, Bacchetta G (2015a) Ecological response to human trampling and conservation status of Helianthemum caput-felis (Cistaceae) at the eastern periphery of its range. Acta Bot Gall 162:191–201. doi:10.1080/12538078.2015.1060898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenu G, Fois M, Cogon D, Porceddu M et al (2015b) The Aichi Biodiversity Target 12 at regional level: an achievable goal? Biodiversity 16:120–135. doi:10.1080/14888386.2015.1062423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flather CH, Hayward GD, Beissinger SR, Stephens PA (2011) Minimum viable populations: is there a ‘magic number’ for conservation practitioners? Trends Ecol Evol 26:307–316. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier P, Debussche M, Thompson JD (2010) Regional priority setting for rare species based on a method combining three criteria. Biol Conserv 143:1501–1509. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genovesi P, Angelini P, Bianchi E, Dupré E, Ercole S, Giacanelli V, Ronchi F, Stoch F (2014) Specie e habitat di interesse comunitario in Italia: distribuzione, stato di conservazione e trend. ISPRA, Serie Rapporti 194/2014

  • Gentili R, Abeli T, Rossi G, Li M, Varotto C, Sgorbati S (2010) Population structure and genetic diversity of the threatened quillwort Isoëtes malinverniana and implication for conservation. Aquat Bot 93:147–152. doi:10.1016/j.aquabot.2010.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez JM, González-Megías A, Lorite J, Abdelaziz M, Perfectti F (2015) The silent extinction: climate change and the potential hybridization-mediated extinction of endemic high-mountain plants. Biodivers Conserv 24:1843–1857. doi:10.1007/s10531-015-0909-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood VH, Iriondo JM (2003) Plant conservation: old problems, new perspectives. Biol Conserv 113:321–335. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00121-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List categories v. 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission Reintroduction Specialist Group, IUCN, Gland

  • IUCN (2003) IUCN red list of threatened species. IUCN, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumschick S, Gaertner M, Vilà M et al (2015) Ecological impacts of alien species: quantification, scope, caveats, and recommendations. Bioscience 65:55–63. doi:10.1093/biosci/biu193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical Ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Sharry B (2012) User Manual for Range Tool for Article 12 (Birds Directive) & Article 17 (Habitats Directive). Version 1.2. European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity (ETC/BD)

  • Maiorano L, Falcucci A, Garton EO, Boitani L (2007) Contribution of the Natura 2000 network to biodiversity conservation in Italy. Conserv Biol 21:1433–1444. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00831.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza-Fernández AJ, Mota JF (2016) Red Lists versus nature protection Acts: new analytical and numerical method to test threat trends. Biodivers Conserv 25:239–260. doi:10.1007/s10531-015-1040-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MATTM, Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare (2008) Attuazione della Direttiva Habitat e stato di conservazione di habitat e specie in Italia. 2° Rapporto Nazionale. Palombi Editori

  • Moreno Saiz JC (2008) Lista roja 2008 de la flora vascular Española. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser D, Ellmauer T, Evans D, Zulka KP, Adam M, Dullinger S, Essl F (2016) Weak agreement between the species conservation status assessments of the European habitats directive and red lists. Biol Conserv 198:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.03.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novacek MJ, Cleland EE (2001) The current biodiversity extinction event: scenarios for mitigation and recovery. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:5466–5470. doi:10.1073/pnas.091093698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Peruzzi L, Conti F, Bartolucci F (2014) An inventory of vascular plants endemic to Italy. Phytotaxa 168:1–75. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.168.1.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peruzzi L, Domina G, Bartolucci F et al (2015) An inventory of the names of vascular plants endemic to Italy, their loci classici and types. Phytotaxa 196:1–217. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.196.1.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL, Russel GJ, Gittleman JL, Brooks TM (1995) The future of Biodiversity. Science 269:347–350. doi:10.1126/science.269.5222.347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pullin AS, Baldi A, Can OE, Dieterich M, Kati V, Livoreil B, Lovei G, Mihók B, Nevin O, Selva N, Sousa-Pinto I (2009) Conservation focus on Europe: major conservation policy issues that need to be informed by conservation science. Conserv Biol 23:818–824. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01283.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ravera S, Isocrono D, Nascimbene J, Giordani P, Benesperi R, Tretiach M, Montagnani C (2016) Assessment of the conservation status of the mat-forming lichens Cladonia subgenus Cladina in Italy. Plant Biosyst 150(5):1010–1022. doi:10.1080/11263504.2014.1000422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues ASL, Pilgrim JD, Lamoreux JL, Hoffmann M, Brooks TM (2006) The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 21:71–76. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.10.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ros M, Mazimpaka V, Abou-Salama U et al (2013) Mosses of the Mediterranean, an annotated checklist. Cryptogam Bryol 34:99–283. doi:10.782/cryb.v34.iss2.2013.99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi G, Montagnani C, Abeli T et al (2014) Are red lists really useful for plant conservation? The new red list of the Italian flora in the perspective of national conservation policies. Plant Biosyst 148:187–190. doi:10.1080/11263504.2013.868375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi G, Orsenigo S, Montagnani C et al (2016) Is legal protection sufficient to ensure plant conservation? The Italian red list of policy species as a case study. Oryx 50(3):431–436. doi:10.1017/S003060531500006X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoppola A, Spampinato G. (2005) Atlante delle specie a rischio di estinzione. Versione 1.0. CD-Rom In: Scoppola A, Blasi C (eds) Stato delle conoscenze sulla flora vascolare d’Italia. Palombi Editori. Roma

  • Sipkova Z, Balzer S, Evans D, Ssymank A (2011) Assessing the conservation status of European Union habitats–results of the Community Report with a case study of the German National Report. Ann Bot 1:19–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Thuiller W (2007) Biodiversity: climate change and the ecologist. Nature 448(7153):550–552. doi:10.1038/448550a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Velázquez J, Tejera R, Hernando A, Núñez MV (2010) Environmental diagnosis: integrating biodiversity conservation in management of Natura 2000 forest spaces. J Nat Conserv 18:309–317. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2010.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the Italian botanists who provided their unpublished data, expert judgments and general support for the third Italian Report of the Habitats Directive. The authors thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments that improved the previous versions of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Orsenigo.

Additional information

Communicated by Daniel Sanchez Mata.

This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Biodiversity protection and reserves.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fenu, G., Bacchetta, G., Giacanelli, V. et al. Conserving plant diversity in Europe: outcomes, criticisms and perspectives of the Habitats Directive application in Italy. Biodivers Conserv 26, 309–328 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1244-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1244-1

Keywords

Navigation