Skip to main content
Log in

More topics from the tropics: additional thoughts to Mammides et al.

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript


Most studies on tropical conservation questions are conducted by researchers of developed countries from the north. This geographic disconnection was recently criticised by Mammides et al. Here, we reflect on their findings and add further views from scientist’s and journal editor’s perspectives. We argue that journals are, a priori, most strongly interested in research questions and approaches that will likely increase their scientific impact and prestige. This is rarely compatible with publishing articles on questions with restricted global impact or based on single taxa. We question whether small changes in the editorial policy of international conservation journals will considerably improve the geographic diversity in key conservation publications. Rather, thematic scopes of the leading conservation journals should be modified, preferably in close collaboration with leading conservationists from the south. We are convinced that long-term investments in the tropics will create a stronger local scientific community, thus bolstering academic morale, and finally may lead to an increase in the submission and acceptance rate of articles written from scientists from these regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others


  • Arlettaz R, Schaub M, Fournier J, Reichlin TS, Sierro A, Watson JEM, Braunisch V (2010) From publications to public actions: when conservation biologists bridge the gap between research and implementation. BioScience 60:835–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brancalion PHS, Garcia LC, Loyola R, Rodrigues RR, Pillar VD, Lewinsohn TM (2016a) A critical analysis of the Native Vegetation Protection Law of Brazil (2012): updates and ongoing initiatives. Nat Conserv 14:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brancalion PHS, Garcia LC, Loyola R, Rodrigues RR, Pillar VD, Lewinsohn TM (2016b) Análise crítica da Lei de Proteção da Vegetação Nativa (2012), que substituiu o antigo Código Florestal: atualizações e ações em curso. Nat Conserv 14:e1–e16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Githiru M, Lens L (2007) Application of fragmentation research to conservation planning for multiple stakeholders: an example from the Taita Hills, southeast Kenya. Biol Conserv 134:271–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Githiru M, Lens L, Adriaensen F, Mwang’ombe J, E Matthysen (2011) Using science to guide conservation: from landscape modelling to increased connectivity in the Taita Hills, SE Kenya. J Nat Conserv 19:263–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habel JC, Gossner MM, Meyer ST, Eggermont H, Lens L, Dengler J, Weisser WW (2013) Mind the gaps when using science to address conservation concerns. Biodivers Conserv 22:2413–2427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mammides C, Goodale UM, Corlett RT, Chena J, Bawa KS, Hariya H, Jarrad F, Primack RB, Ewing H, Xia X, Goodale E (2016) Increasing geographic diversity in the international conservation literature: a stalled process? Biol Conserv 198:78–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Christian Habel.

Additional information

Communicated by David Hawksworth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Habel, J.C., Lens, L., Eggermont, H. et al. More topics from the tropics: additional thoughts to Mammides et al.. Biodivers Conserv 26, 237–241 (2017).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: