Skip to main content

Matrix composition and landscape heterogeneity structure multiple dimensions of biodiversity in temperate forest birds

Biodiversity and Conservation volume 25, pages 2687–2708 (2016)Cite this article

Abstract

Quantifying how human-modified landscapes shape the distribution of biodiversity is critical for developing effective conservation strategies. To address this, we evaluated three hypotheses (habitat area, habitat configuration and matrix heterogeneity hypotheses) that predict responses of biodiversity to landscape structure in human-modified landscapes. We compared characteristics of landscape structure that influence taxonomic (TD), functional (FD), and phylogenetic (PD) dimensions of biodiversity of breeding birds in temperate forests. Relationships between biodiversity and landscape structure were assessed at multiple spatial scales for 20 forest interior sites in northeastern USA. We assessed if relationships with landscape structure were consistent among dimensions and assemblages of different groups (residents, migrants and all birds). Relationships between dimensions of biodiversity and landscape structure were more prevalent for FD and PD than for TD. Forest amount and configuration were rarely associated with any dimensions of biodiversity. In contrast, the identity of the matrix and heterogeneity of the landscape were frequently associated with biodiversity, but relationships differed among groups of birds. For example, FD of all birds was associated positively with landscape diversity but FD of residents was associated negatively with landscape diversity, suggesting that landscape diversity surrounding forests may increase overall FD of birds but that not all groups of species respond similarly. Indeed, biodiversity of migrants was only weakly related to landscape structure. Differences among relationships to landscape structure for bird groups and spatial scales suggests that management plans should consider local decisions within a regional framework to balance potentially conflicting needs of species groups in human-dominated landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Anderson SH, Kelly D, Ladley JJ, Molloy S, Terry J (2011) Cascading effects of bird functional extinction reduce pollination and plant density. Science 331:1068–1071

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barbaro L, Giffard B, Charbonnier Y, van Halder I, Jactel H (2014) Bird functional diversity enhances insectivory at forest edges: a transcontinental experiment. Divers Distrib 20:149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blancher PJ, Phoenix RD, Badzinski DS, Cadman MD, Crew TL, Downes CM, Fillman D, Francis CM, Hughes J, Hussell DJT, Lepage D, McCracken JD, McNicol DK, Pond BA, Ross RK, Russell R, Venier LA, Weeber RC (2009) Population trend status of Ontario’s forest birds. For Chron 85:184–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botta-Dukát Z (2005) Rao’s quadratic entropy as a measure of functional diversity based on multiple traits. J Veg Sci 16:533–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brotons L, Herrando S, Martin JL (2004) Bird assemblages in forest fragments within Mediterranean mosaics created by wild fires. Landsc Ecol 19:663–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler BJ (2013) Connecticut’s forest resources, 2012. Research Note NRS-188. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square

  • Cadotte MW, Cavender-Bares J, Tilman D, Oakley TH (2009) Using phylogenetic, functional and trait diversity to understand patterns of plant community productivity. PLoS One 4:e5695

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cavender-Bares J, Kozak KH, Fine PVA, Kembel SW (2009) The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol Lett 12:693–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chesser RT, Banks RC, Barker FK, Cicero C, Dunn JL, Kratter AW, Lovette IJ, Rasmussen PC, Remsen JV, Rising JD, Stotz DF, Winker K (2013) Fifty-fourth supplement to the American Ornithologists’ Union Check-List of North American birds. Auk 130:558–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevan A, Sutherland M (1991) Hierarchical partitioning. Am Stat 45:90–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Cisneros LM, Burgio KR, Dreiss LM, Klingbeil BT, Patterson BD, Presley SJ, Willig MR (2014) Multiple dimensions of bat biodiversity along an extensive tropical elevational gradient. J Anim Ecol 83:1124–1136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CLEAR (2010a) Landscape fragmentation tool (LFT) version 2.0. University of Connecticut, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources. http://clear.uconn.edu/tools/lft/lft2/index.htm. Accessed Feb 2013

  • CLEAR (2010b) Long Island Sound watershed’s changing landscape. 2010 Data. University of Connecticut, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources. http://clear.uconn.edu/projects/landscapeLIS/index.htm. Accessed Feb 2013

  • Cumming GS, Child MF (2009) Contrasting spatial patterns of taxonomic and functional richness offer insights into potential loss of ecosystem services. Philos Trans R Soc B 364:1683–1692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bello F, Lavergne S, Meynard CN (2010) The partitioning of diversity: showing Theseus a way out of the labyrinth. J Veg Sci 21:992–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devictor V, Mouillot D, Meynard C, Jiguet F, Thuiller W, Moquet N (2010) Spatial mismatch and congruence between taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity: the need for integrative conservation strategies in a changing world. Ecol Lett 13:1030–1040

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz S, Lavorel S, de Bello F, Quétier F, Grigulis K, Robson TM (2007) Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:20684–20689

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dray S, Dufour AB (2007) The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. J Stat Softw 22:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreiss LM, Burgio KR, Cisneros LM, Klingbeil BT, Patterson BD, Presley SJ, Willig MR (2015) Taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic dimensions of rodent biodiversity along an extensive tropical elevational gradient. Ecography 38:876–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drummond MA, Loveland TR (2010) Land-use pressure and a transition to forest-cover loss in the eastern United States. Bioscience 60:286–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewers RM, Didham RK (2006) Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol Rev 81:117–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faaborg J, Brittingham M, Donovan T, Blake J (1993) Habitat fragmentation in the temperate zone: a perspective for managers. In: Finch DM, Stangel PW (eds) Status and management of neotropical migratory birds. General Technical Report RM-229. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest Experimental Station, Fort Collins, p 331–339

  • Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2013) Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis. J Biogeogr 40:1649–1663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L, Baudry J, Brotons L, Burel FG, Crist TO, Fuller RJ, Sirami C, Siriwardena GM, Martin JL (2011) Functional heterogeneity and biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Lett 14:101–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faith DP (1992) Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol Conserv 61:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faith DP (2008) Threatened species and the potential loss of phylogenetic diversity: conservation scenarios based on estimated extinction probabilities and phylogenetic risk analysis. Conserv Biol 22:1461–1470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2006) Beyond fragmentation: the continuum model for fauna research and conservation in human-modified landscapes. Oikos 112:473–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flather CH, Sauer JR (1996) Using landscape ecology to test hypotheses about large-scale abundance patterns in migratory birds. Ecology 77:28–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn DFB, Gogol-Prokurat M, Nogeire T, Molinari N, Richers BT, Lin BB, Simpson N, Mayfield MM, DeClerck F (2009) Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. Ecol Lett 12:22–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn DFB, Mirotchnick N, Jain M, Palmer MI, Naeem S (2011) Functional and phylogenetic diversity as predictors of biodiversity–ecosystem–function relationships. Ecology 92:1573–1581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forest F, Grenyer R, Rouget M, Davies TJ, Cowling RM, Faith DP, Balmford A, Manning JC, Proches S, van der Bank M, Reeves G, Hedderson TAJ, Savolainen V (2007) Preserving the evolutionary potential of floras in biodiversity hotspots. Nature 445:757–760

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Francis CM, Blancher PJ, Phoenix RD (2009) Bird monitoring programs in Ontario: What have we got and what do we need? For Chron 85:202–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell SD (1972) Populations in a seasonal environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell SD, Lucas HL (1970) On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheor 19:16–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frishkoff LO, Karp DS, M’Gonigle LK (2014) Loss of avian phylogenetic diversity in neotropical agricultural systems. Science 345:1343–1346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM (1997) Evolutionary age and risk of extinction in the global avifauna. Evol Ecol 11:557–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill MO (1973) Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54:427–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson HB, Fahrig L (2014) Are ecologists conducting research at the optimal scale? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 24:52–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jetz W, Thomas GH, Joy JB, Hartmann K, Mooers AO (2012) The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491:444–448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jost L (2006) Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113:363–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klingbeil BT, Willig MR (2015) Bird biodiversity assessments in temperate forest: the value of point count versus acoustic monitoring protocols. PeerJ 3:e973

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Klingbeil BT, Willig MR (2016) Community assembly in temperate forest birds: habitat filtering, interspecific interactions and priority effects. Evol Ecol 30:703–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupfer JA, Malanson GP, Franklin SB (2006) Not seeing the ocean for the islands: the influence of matrix-based processes on forest fragmentation effects. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lislevand T, Figuerola J, Székely T (2007) Avian body sizes in relation to fecundity, mating system, display behavior and resource sharing. Ecology 88:1605–1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losos JB (2008) Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. Ecol Lett 11:995–1003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lovette IJ, Bermingham E (1999) Explosive speciation in the New World Dendroica warblers. Proc R Soc B 266:1629–1636

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH (1958) Population ecology of some warblers of northeastern coniferous forests. Ecology 39:599–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNally R (2000) Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology. The distinction between—and reconciliation of—‘predictive’ and ‘explanatory’ models. Biodivers Conserv 9:655–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNally R (2002) Multiple regression and inference in ecology and conservation biology: further comments on identifying important predictor variables. Biodivers Conserv 11:1397–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maechler M, Rousseeuw P, Struyf A, Hubert M, Hornik K (2014) Cluster: cluster analysis basics and extensions. R package version 1.15.3. http://www.r-project.org/

  • McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Ene E (2012) FRAGSTATS v4: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html

  • McLaughlin DW (2011) Land, food, and biodiversity. Conserv Biol 25:1117–1120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meynard CN, Devictor V, Mouillot D, Thuiller W, Jiguet F, Mouquet N (2011) Beyond taxonomic diversity patterns: How do α, β and γ components of bird functional and phylogenetic diversity respond to environmental gradients across France? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20:893–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouchet MA, Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D (2010) Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules. Funct Ecol 24:867–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North American Bird Conservation Initiative, and US Committee (2011) The state of the birds 2011. In: Report on public lands and waters. US Department of Interior, Washington, DC, p 48

  • Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pavoine S, Bonsall MB (2011) Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: a unified approach. Biol Rev 86:792–812

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2006) Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecol Lett 9:741–758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poole AE (2005) The birds of North America online. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/BNA/

  • Pyle P (1997) Identification guide to North American birds. Part 1. Slate Creek Press, Bolinas

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph CJ, Sauer JR, Droege S (1995) Monitoring bird populations by point counts. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-149. USDA Forest Service Station Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany

  • Reiss J, Bridle JR, Montoya JM, Woodward G (2009) Emerging horizons in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research. Trends Ecol Evol 24:505–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts TH (2001) The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat 158:87–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ries L, Fletcher RJ, Battin J, Sisk TD (2004) Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:491–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolland J, Jiguet F, Jønsson KA, Condamine FL, Morlon H (2014) Settling down of seasonal migrants promotes bird diversification. Proc R Soc B 281:20140473

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer JR, Fallon JE, Johnson R (2003) Use of North American Breeding Bird Survey data to estimate population change for bird conservation regions. J Wildl Manag 67:372–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmiegelow FK, Mönkkönen M (2002) Habitat loss and fragmentation in dynamic landscapes: avian perspectives from the boreal forest. Ecol Appl 12:375–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekercioglu CH (2006) Increasing awareness of avian ecological function. Trends Ecol Evol 21:464–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sekercioglu CH (2007) Conservation ecology: area trumps mobility in fragment bird extinctions. Curr Biol 17:R283–R286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AC, Fahrig L, Francis CM (2011) Landscape size affects the relative importance of habitat amount, habitat fragmentation, and matrix quality on forest birds. Ecography 34:103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielbörger K, Wichmann MC, Schwager M, Jeltsch F (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31:79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (2001) Functional diversity. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopedia of biodiversity. Academic, San Diego, pp 109–120

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T, Sekercioglu CH, Dietsch TV, Sodhi NS, Hoehn P, Tylianakis JM (2008) Landscape constraints on functional diversity of birds and insects in tropical agroecosystems. Ecology 89:944–951

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Bael SA, Brawn JD, Robinson SK (2003) Birds defend trees from herbivores in a Neotropical forest canopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8304–8307

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Villard MA, Metzger JP (2014) Beyond the fragmentation debate: a conceptual model to predict when habitat configuration really matters. J Appl Ecol 51:309–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villard MA, Trzcinski MK, Merriam G (1999) Fragmentation effects on forest birds: relative influence of woodland cover and configuration on landscape occupancy. Conserv Biol 13:774–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ (2002) Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:475–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiher E (2011) A primer of trait and functional diversity. In: Magurran AE, McGill BJ (eds) Biological diversity: frontiers in measurement and assessment. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 175–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (1983) Avian community ecology: an iconoclastic view. In: Brush AH, Clark GA Jr (eds) Perspectives in ornithology. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 355–403

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (1995) Habitat fragmentation: island v landscape perspectives on bird conservation. Ibis 137:S97–S104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winger BM, Lovette IJ, Winkler DW (2012) Ancestry and evolution of seasonal migration in the Parulidae. Proc R Soc B 279:610–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by set-up funds from the Office of the Vice President for Research (MRW), an IBA Small Grants Program Award from Audubon Connecticut (MRW, BTK, and S. Presley) and Multiple Intramural Awards to BTK (Center for Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and Connecticut Museum of Natural History at the University of Connecticut). Funding for the synthetic portion of this Project was provided by a National Science Foundation Grant to S. Andelman and J. Parrish entitled “The Dimensions of Biodiversity Distributed Graduate Seminar” (DEB-1050680). K. Burgio, L. Cisnersos, C. Elphick, S. Presley and two anonymous reviewers provided comments that improved the content and composition of the manuscript. We thank S. Adamson, R. Hall, J. Lech, and C. Roberts for assistance with acoustic libraries and fieldwork.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Center for Environmental Sciences & Engineering, University of Connecticut, 75 N. Eagleville Rd. Unit 3043, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA

    Brian T. Klingbeil & Michael R. Willig

Authors
  1. Brian T. Klingbeil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael R. Willig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian T. Klingbeil.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Donald C. Franklin.

This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Forest and plantation biodiversity.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 822 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klingbeil, B.T., Willig, M.R. Matrix composition and landscape heterogeneity structure multiple dimensions of biodiversity in temperate forest birds. Biodivers Conserv 25, 2687–2708 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1195-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1195-6

Keywords

  • Aves
  • Functional diversity
  • Habitat–matrix
  • Habitat-mosaic
  • Phylogenetic diversity
  • Scale-dependence