Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Deciding when to lend a helping hand: a decision-making framework for seabird island restoration

Biodiversity and Conservation volume 25, pages 467–484 (2016)Cite this article

Abstract

Following the removal of an introduced species, island restoration can follow two general approaches: passive, where no further intervention occurs and the island is assumed to recover naturally, and; active, where recovery of key taxa (e.g. seabirds) is enhanced by manipulating movement and demography. Steps for deciding between these techniques are: (1) outlining an explicit restoration goal; (2) building a conceptual model of the system; (3) identifying the most effective management approach; and (4) implementing and monitoring outcomes. After decades of island restoration initiatives, retrospective analysis of species’ responses to active and passive management approaches is now feasible. We summarize the advantages of incorporating these analyses of past restoration results as an initial step in the decision-making process. We illustrate this process using lessons learned from the restoration of seabird-driven island ecosystems after introduced vertebrate eradication in New Zealand. Throughout seven decades of successful vertebrate eradication projects, the goals of island restoration have shifted from passive to active enhancement of island communities, which are heavily dependent on burrow-nesting petrel population recovery. Using a comparative analysis of petrel response to past predator eradications we built a conceptual model of petrel recovery dynamics and defined key site and species characteristics for use in a stepwise decision tree to select between active or passive seabird population management. Active restoration techniques should be implemented when seabird populations are absent or declining; and on islands with no nearby source colony, small remnant colonies, highly altered habitat with shallow soil and slopes, and with competitive species pairs. As we continue to restore complex island communities, decision-making tools using a logical, step-wise framework informed by previous restoration successes and failures can aid in increasing understanding of ecosystem response.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Armstrong DP, Castro I, Griffiths R (2007) Using adaptive management to determine requirements of re-introduced populations: the case of the New Zealand hihi. J Appl Ecol 44:953–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson IAE, Towns DR (1990). Ecological restoration on islands: prerequisites for success. In Ecological restoration of New Zealand islands. Conservation Sciences Publication No. 2. (Towns, D. R., C. H. Daugherty, and I. A. E. Atkinson). Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand 73–90

  • Bellingham P, Towns DR, Cameron EK, Davis JJ, Wardle DA, Wilmshurst JM, Mulder C (2010) New Zealand island restoration: seabirds, predators, and the importance of history. New Zealand J Ecol 34:115–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Borker AL, McKown MW, Ackerman JT, Eagles-Smith CA, Tershy BR, Croll DA (2014) Vocal activity as a low cost and scalable index of seabird colony size. Conserv Biol 28:1100–1108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Broome K (2009) Beyond Kapiti—a decade of invasive rodent eradications from New Zealand islands. Biodiversity 10:14–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushnell P, Pratt M (2014). Performance review framework: review of the department of conservation (DOC). State Services Commission, the Treasury, and the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. Wellington, New Zealand

  • Buxton RT (2014). Ecological drivers of seabird recovery after the eradication of introduced predators, PhD Thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

  • Buxton RT, Jones IL (2012) Measuring nocturnal seabird activity and status using acoustic recording devices: applications for island restoration. J Field Ornithol 83:47–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buxton RT, Jones CJ, Moller H, Towns DR (2014) Drivers of seabird population recovery on New Zealand islands after predator eradication. Conserv Biol 28:333–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buxton RT, Anderson D, Moller H, Jones CJ, Lyver POB (2015a) Release of constraints on nest-site selection in burrow-nesting petrels following invasive rat eradication. Biol Invasions 17:1453–1470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buxton RT, Jones CJ, Moller H, Lyver POB (2015b) One method does not suit all: variable settlement responses of three procellariid species to vocalisation playbacks. Emu 115:126–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buxton RT, Gormley AM, Jones CJ, Lyver PO (2016a) Monitoring burrowing petrel populations: a sampling scheme for the management of an island keystone species. J Wildlife Manag 80:149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buxton RT, Taylor GA, Jones CJ, Lyver PO, Moller H, Cree A, Towns D (2016b) Spatio-temporal changes in density and distribution of burrow-nesting seabird colonies after rat eradication. New Zealand J Ecol 40:88–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanwai, K, Richardson B (1998) Reworking indigenous customary rights? The case of introduced species. New Zealand J Environ Law 2:157–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Circumpolar Seabird Working Group (2001) Seabird harvest regimes in the circumpolar nations. CAFF Technical, Report No 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Clout M, Russell JC (2006). The eradication of introduced mammals from New Zealand islands. In Assessment and Control of Biological Invasion Risks (Koike, F., M. Clout, M. Kawamichi, M. De Poorter, and K. Iwatsuki). IUCN and Shoukadoh Book Sellers, Gland, Switzerland and Kyoto, Japan 127–141

  • Courchamp F, Chapuis JL, Pascal M (2003) Mammal invaders on islands: impact, control and control impact. Biol Rev 78:347–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Craig J, Anderson S, Clout M, Creese B, Mitchell N, Ogden J, Roberts M, Ussher G (2000) Conservation issues in New Zealand. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:61–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croll DA, Maron JL, Estes JA, Danner EM, Byrd GV (2005) Introduced predators transform subarctic islands from grassland to tundra. Science 307:1959–1961

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Croxall JP, Rothery P (1991). Population regulation of seabirds: implications of their demography for conservation. In Bird population studies: relevance to conservation management (Perrins, C. M., J. D. Lebreton, and G. J. M. Hirons). Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Csada RD, James PC, Espie RHM (1996) The “file drawer problem” of non-significant results: does it apply to biological research. Oikos 76:591–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cubaynes S, Doherty JPF, Schreiber EA, Gimenez O (2011) To breed or not to breed: a seabird’s response to extreme climatic events. Biol Lett 7:303–306

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Daugherty CH, Towns D, Atkinson IAE, Gibbs GW (1990). The significance of the biological resources of New Zealand islands for ecological restoration. In Ecological restoration of New Zealand islands (Towns, D., C. H. Daugherty, and I. A. E. Atkinson). Department of conservation, Wellington

  • Department of Conservation (2010) The island strategy: guidelines for managing islands administered by the Department of Conservation (unpublished). Department of Conservation, Ecosystem Management Group

    Google Scholar 

  • DIISE (2015). The Database of Island Invasive Species Eradications. developed by Island Conservation, Coastal Conservation Action Laboratory UCSC, IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group, University of Auckland and Landcare Research New Zealand. http://diise.islandconservation.org

  • Donlan CJ (2007) The complexities of costing eradications. Anim Conserv 10:156–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy DC (1994). The guano islands of Peru: the once and future management of a renewable resource In Seabirds on Islands, Threats, Case Studies and Action Plans, vol. Birdlife Conservation Series 1 (Nettleship, D. N., J. Burger, and M. Gochfield). Birdlife International and Smithsonian Institute Press, Cambridge, UK Birdlife Conservation Series 168-76

  • Forbes AR, Craig JL (2013) Assessing the role of revegetation in achieving restoration goals on Tiritiri Matangi Island. New Zealand J Ecol 37:343–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgie VP, Horsley, Johnston J (2001). Facilitating community based conservation initiatives. Sci Conserv 169

  • Fukami T, Wardle DA, Bellingham PJ, Mulder CPH, Towns DR, Yeates GW, Bonner KI, Durrett MS, Grant-Hoffman MN, Williamson WM (2006) Above- and below-ground impacts of introduced predators in seabird-dominated island ecosystems. Ecol Lett 9:1299–1307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthreaux SA, Belser CG (2003) Radar ornithology and biological conservation. Auk 120:266–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gummer H, Taylor G, Wilson K-J, Rayner MJ (2015) Recovery of the endangered Chatham petrel (Pterodroma axillaris): A review of conservation management techniques from 1990 to 2010. Global Ecol Conserv 3:310–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haami B (1993). Cultural knowledge and traditions relating to the kiore rat in Aotearoa. Part 1: a Maori perspective. Science and Mathematics Education Papers. Hamilton: University of Waikato

  • Hamer KC, Schreiber EA, Burger J (2002). Breeding biology, life histories, and life history-environment interactions in seabirds. In Biology of Marine Birds (Schreiber, E. A., and J. Burger). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

  • Hamilton S (2000) How precise and accurate are data obtained using an infra-red scope on burrow-nesting sooty shearwaters Puffinus griseus. Mar Ornithol 28:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396:41–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hardie-Boys N (2010). Valuing community group contributions to conservation. Sci Conserv 299

  • Heemskerk MK, Wilson M, Pavao-Zuckerman (2003). Conceptual models as tools for communication across disciplines. Ecol Soc 7

  • Helmstedt KJ, Shaw JD, Bode M, Terauds A, Springer K, Robinson SA, Possingham HP (2016). Prioritizing eradication actions on islands: it’s not all or nothing. Journal of Applied Ecology:n/a-n/a

  • Hobbs RJ, Hallett LM, Ehrlich PR, Mooney HA (2011) Intervention ecology: applying ecological science in the twenty-first century. Bioscience 61:442–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdaway R, Worthy T (1994) A new fossil species of shearwater Puffinus from the late quaternary of the South Island, New Zealand, and notes on the biogeography and evolution of the Puffinus gavia superspecies. Emu 94:201–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holl KD, Aide TM (2011) When and where to actively restore ecosystems. For Ecol Manage 261:1558–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imber M, West JA, Cooper WJ (2003) Cook’s petrel (Pterodroma cookii): historic distribution, breeding biology and effects of predators. Notornis 50:221–230

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2012)

  • Johnson EA, Miyanishi K (2008) Testing the assumptions of chronosequences in succession. Ecol Lett 11:419–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones HP (2010a) Prognosis for ecosystem recovery following rodent eradication and seabird restoration in an island archipelago. Ecol Appl 20:1204–1216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones HP (2010b) Seabird islands take mere decades to recover following rat eradication. Ecol Appl 20:2075–2080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones HP, Kress SW (2012) A review of the world’s active seabird restoration projects. J Wildlife Manag 76:2–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones C, McNamara L (2014) Usefulness of two bioeconomic frameworks for evaluation of community-initiated species conservation projects. Wildlife Res 41:106–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones HP, Schmitz OJ (2009) Rapid recovery of damaged ecosystems. PLoS ONE 4:e5653

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jones HP, Towns DR, Bodey T, Miskelly CM, Ellis JC, Rauzon MJ, Kress SW, McKown MW (2011). Recovery and restoration on seabird islands. In Seabird Islands: Ecology, Invasion and Restoration (Mulder, C., W. Anderson, D. R. Towns, and P. Bellingham). Oxford University Press, New York, NY 317–357

  • Joseph LN, Maloney RF, Possingham HP (2009) Optimal allocation of resources among threatened species: a project prioritization protocol. Conserv Biol 23:328–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kappes P, Jones H (2014) Integrating seabird restoration and mammal eradication programs on islands to maximize conservation gains. Biodivers Conserv 23:503–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keitt BS, Campbell A, Saunders A, Clout M, Wang YW, Tershy B (2011). The global islands invasive vertebrate eradication database: a tool to improve and facilitate restoration of island ecosystems. In Island invasives: Eradication and Management (Veitch, C. R., M. Clout, and D. R. Towns). IUCN, Gland, Switzerland 74–77

  • Kettenring KM, Adams CR (2011) Lessons learned from invasive plant control experiments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol 48:970–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kier G, Kreft H, Lee TM, Jetz W, Ibisch PL, Nowicki C, Mutke J, Barthlott W (2009) A global assessment of endemism and species richness across island and mainland regions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:9322–9327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kildaw SD, Irons DB, Nysewander DR, Buck CL (2005) Formation and growth of new seabird colonies: the significance of habitat quality. Marine Ornithology 33:49–58

    Google Scholar 

  • King WB (1985). Island birds: will the future repeat the past? In Conservation of Island Birds, vol. 3 (Moors, P. J.). International Council for Bird Preservation Technical Publication 33–15

  • Kitson JC (2004) Harvest rate of sooty shearwaters (Puffinus griseus) by Rakiura Maori: a potential tool to monitor population trends. Wildlife Res 31:319–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitson JC, Moller H (2008) Looking after your ground: resource management practice by Rakiura Maori Titi harvesters. Papers Proc Royal Soc Tasmania 142:161–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress SW (1998). Applying research for effective management: case studies in seabird restoration. In Avian Conservation (Marzluff, J. M., and R. Salabanks). Island Press, Washington, DC 141–154

  • Lawrence HA, Lyver POB, Gleeson DM (2014) Genetic panmixia in New Zealand’s grey-faced petrel: implications for conservation and restoration. Emu 114:249–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee WM, McGlone, Wright E (2005) Biodiversity inventory and monitoring: a review of national and international systems and a proposed framework for future biodiversity monitoring by the Department of Conservation. Landcare Res Contract Report: LC0405/122

  • Lewis RR III (2000) Ecologically based goal setting in mangrove forest and tidal marsh restoration. Ecol Eng 15:191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Likens GE, Haywood A, Miezis L (2011) Adaptive monitoring in the real world: proof of concept. Trends Ecol Evol 26:641–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyver POB, Jones CJ, Doherty J (2009). Flavor or forethought: Tuhoe traditional management strategies for the conservation of kereru (Hemiphaga novaeseelandiae novaeseelandiae) in New Zealand. Ecol Soc14

  • Lyver POB, Ngamane L, Anderson A, Clarkin P (2008) Hauraki Māori mātauranga for the conservation and harvest of tītī, Pterodroma macroptera gouldi. Pap Proc R Soc Tas 142:149–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyver PO, Jones CJ, Belshaw N, Anderson A, Thompson R, Davis J (2015a) Insights to the functional relationships of Māori harvest practices: customary use of a burrowing seabird. J Wildlife Manag 79:969–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyver POB, Wilmshurst JM, Wood JR, Jones CJ, Fromont M, Bellingham PJ, Towns DR, Stone C, Sheehan M, Moller H (2015b) Looking back for the future: local knowledge and paleoecology inform biocultural restoration of New Zealand coastal ecosystems. Human Ecol 43:691–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margoluis R, Stem C, Salafsky N, Brown M (2009) Using conceptual models as a planning and evaluation tool in conservation. Eval Program Plan 32:138–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiopoulos J, Harwood J, Thomas L (2005) Metapopulation consequences of site fidelity for colonially breeding mammals and birds. J Anim Ecol 74:716–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough DR (1996) Metapopulations and wildlife conservation. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Milberg P, Tyrberg T (1993) Naive birds and noble savages—a review of man-caused prehistoric extinctions of island birds. Ecography 16:229–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miskelly CM (2013). Southern black-backed gull. In New Zealand Birds Online (Miskelly, C. M.). www.nzbirdsonline.org.nz

  • Miskelly CM, Powlesland R (2013) Conservation translocations of New Zealand birds, 1863-2012. Notornis 60:3–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Miskelly CM, Taylor GA, Gummer H, Williams R (2009) Translocations of eight species of burrow-nesting seabirds (genera Pterodroma, Pelecanoides, Pachyptila and Puffinus: Family Procellariidae). Biol Conserv 142:1965–1980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier RA, Myers N, Thomsen JB, Da Fonseca GAB, Olivieri S (1998) Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation priorities. Conserv Biol 12:516–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moller H (2006) Are current harvests of seabirds sustainable. Acta Zoologica Sinica 52:649–652

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller H (2009) Matauranga Maori, science and seabirds in New Zealand. New Zealand J Zool 36:203–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moller H (2010). Cross-cultural partnership for seabird conservation and restoration. Talk at Island Invasives: Eradication and Management Conference. Center for Biodiversity and Biosecurity

  • Moller H, Frampton C, Hocken AG, McLean IG, Saffer V, Sheridan L (2000) The importance of seabird research for New Zealand. New Zealand J Zool 27:255–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moller H, Berkes F, Lyver PO, Kislalioglu M (2004) Combining science and traditional ecological knowledge: monitoring populations for co-management. Ecol Soc 9:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder C, Grant-Hoffman M, Towns D, Bellingham P, Wardle D, Durrett M, Fukami T, Bonner K (2009) Direct and indirect effects of rats: does rat eradication restore ecosystem functioning of New Zealand seabird islands. Biol Invasions 11:1671–1688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder CW, Anderson DR, Towns, Bellingham P (2011a). Seabird Islands: Ecol Invasion Restor

  • Mulder CPH, Jones HP, Kameda K, Palmborg C, Schmidt S, Ellis JC, Orrock JL, Wait DA, Wardle DA, Yang L, Young H, et al (2011b). Impact of seabirds on plant and soil properties. In Seabird Islands: Ecology, Invasion and Restoration (Mulder, C. P. H., W. Anderson, D. R. Towns, and P. Bellingham). Oxford University Press, New York, NY

  • Newman J, Moller H (2005) Use of matauranga (Maori traditional knowledge) and science to guide a seabird harvest: getting the best of both worlds. Senri Ethnol Studies 67:303–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman J, Fletcher D, Moller H, Bragg C, Scott D, McKechnie S (2009) Estimates of productivity and detection probabilities of breeding attempts in the sooty shearwater (Puffinus griseus), a burrow-nesting petrel. Wildlife Res 36:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss RS, Nielsen, Vance-Boland K (2009). Chapter 12—prioritizing ecosystems, species, and sites for restoration. In Spatial Conservation Prioritisation: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools (Moilanen, A., K. A. Wilson, and H. P. Possingham). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK 158–170

  • Oro D (2003) Managing seabird metapopulations in the Mediterranean: constraints and challenges. Scientia Marina 67:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oro D, Pradel R (1999) Recruitment of Audouin’s gull to the Ebro Delta colony at metapopulation level in the western Mediterranean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 180:267–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oro D, Pérez-Rodrígueza A, Martínez-Vilaltab A, Bertolero A, Vidal F, Genovart M (2009) Interference competition in a threatened seabird community: a paradox for a successful conservation. Biol Conserv 142:1830–1835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orwin KH, Wardle DA, Towns DR, St MG, John PJ, Bellingham C, Jones BM, Fitzgerald RG, Parrish, Lyver POB (2015) Burrowing seabird effects on invertebrate communities in soil and litter are dominated by ecosystem engineering rather than nutrient addition. Oecologia 180:217–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Ambrose RF, Poff NL (1997) Ecological theory and community restoration ecology. Restor Ecol 5:291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parejo D, Danchin E, Avilés JM (2005) The heterospecific habitat copying hypothesis: can competitors indicate habitat quality. Behav Ecol 16:96–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkes J, Murphy E (2003) Management of introduced mammals in New Zealand. New Zealand J Zool 30:335–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkes JP, Panetta D (2009). Eradication of invasive species: progress and emerging issues in the 21st century. In Invasive Species Management (Clout, M. N., and P. A. Williams). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK 47–62

  • Peters MA, Hamilton D, Eames C (2015) Action on the ground: a review of community environmental groups’ restoration objectives, activities and partnerships in New Zealand. New Zealand J Ecol 39:179–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce RJ (2002). Kiore (Rattus exulans) impact on breeding success of Pycroft’s petrels and little shearwaters

  • Possingham HP, Andelman SJ, Noon BR, Tromblak S, Pulliam HR (2001). Making smart conservation decisions. In Conservation Biology: Research Priorities for the Next Decade (Soule, M. E., and G. H. Orians). Island Press, Washington, DC 225–244

  • Richardson DM, Hellmann JJ, McLachlan JS, Sax DF, Schwartz MW, Gonzalez P, Brennan EJ, Camacho A, Root TL, Sala OE, Schneider SH et al (2009) Multidimensional evaluation of managed relocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:9721–9724

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sandvik H, Erikstad KE, Sæther BE (2012) Climate affects seabird population dynamics both via reproduction and adult survival. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 454:273–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer SL, Fogle SR (2010) Acoustic attraction of Grey-faced Petrels (Pterodroma macroptera gouldi) and Fluttering Shearwaters (Puffinus gavia) to Young Nick’s Head, New Zealand. Notornis 57:166–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott TA, Wehtje W, Wehtje MA (2001) The need for strategic planning in passive restoration of wildlife populations. Restor Ecol 9:262–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seabrook-Davidson MNH, Brunton DH (2014) Public attitude towards conservation in New Zealand and awareness of threatened species. Pac Cons Biol 20:286–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JL, Mulder CPH, Ellis JC (2011). Seabirds as ecosystem engineers: nutrient inputs and physical disturbance. In Seabird Islands: Ecol Invasion Restor (C. P. H. Mulder, W. A., D. R. Towns, and P. Bellingham). Oxford University Press, New York, NY

  • Taiepa T, Lyver P, Horsley P, Davis J, Brag M, Moller H (1997) Co-management of New Zealand’s conservation estate by Maori and Pakeha: a review. Environ Conserv 24:236–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor GA (2000). Action plan for seabird conservation in New Zealand, part A. in Threatened Species Occasional Publication. Department of Conservation, Wellington, NZ

  • Towns DR (2002) Korapuki Island as a case study for restoration of insular ecosystems in New Zealand. J Biogeogr 29:593–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Towns DR (2009) Eradications as reverse invasions: lessons from Pacific rat (Rattus exulans) removals on New Zealand islands. Biol Invasions 11:1719–1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Towns DR (2011). Eradication of vertebrate pests from islands around New Zealand: what have we delivered and what have we learned? In Island Invasives: Eradication and Management (Veitch, C. R., M. Clout, and D. R. Towns). IUCN, Gland, Switzerland 364–371

  • Towns DR, Broome KG (2003) From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands. New Zealand J Zool 30:377–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Towns D, Atkinson IAE, Daugherty CH (1990a). The potential for ecological restoration in the mercury islands. In Ecological restoration of New Zealand islands. Conservation Sciences Publication No. 2 (Towns, D., C. H. Daugherty, and I. A. E. Atkinson). Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand

  • Towns D, Daugherty CH, Atkinson IAE (1990b). Ecological Restoration of New Zealand Islands. Department of Conservation, Conservation Sciences Publication No. 2, Wellington, New Zealand

  • Towns D, Simberloff D, Atkinson IAE (1997) Restoration of New Zealand islands: redressing the effects of introduced species. Pac Conserv Biol 3:99–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Towns DR, Byrd GV, Jones HP, Rauzon MJ, Russell JC, Wilcox C (2011). Impacts of introduced predators on seabirds. In Seabird Islands: Ecology, Invasion and Restoration (Mulder, C., W. Anderson, D. R. Towns, and P. Bellingham). Oxford University Press, New York, NY 56–90

  • Towns DR, Bellingham PJ, Mulder CPH, Lyver POB (2012) A research strategy for biodiversity conservation on New Zealand’s offshore islands. New Zealand J Ecol 36:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Towns DR, West CJ, Broome KG (2013) Purposes, outcomes and challenges of eradicating invasive mammals from New Zealand islands: an historical perspective. Wildlife Res 40:94–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunstall SM, Tapsell SM, Eden S (1999) How stable are public responses to changing local environments? A ‘before’ and ‘after’ case study of river restoration. J Environ Plan Manage 42:527–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veitch CR, Miskelly CM, Harper GA, Taylor GA, Tennyson AJD (2004) Birds of the Kermadec Islands, south-west Pacific. Notornis 51:61–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner RH, Danchin E, Boulinier T, Helfenstein F (2000) Colonies as byproducts of commodity selection. Behav Ecol 11:572–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warham J (1990) The petrels: their ecology and breeding systems. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Was NW, Sullivan WJ, Wilson KJ (2000). Burrow competition between broad-billed prions (Pachyptila vittata) and the endangered Chatham petrel (Pterodroma axillaris)

  • Westgate MJ, Likens GE, Lindenmayer DB (2013) Adaptive management of biological systems: a review. Biol Conserv 158:128–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead A, Lyver POB, Jones CJ, Macleod C, Bellingham PJ, Coleman M, Karl BJ, Drew K, Pairman D, Gormley AM, Duncan RP (2014) Establishing accurate baseline estimates of breeding populations of a burrowing seabird, the Grey-faced Petrel (Pterodroma macroptera gouldi) in New Zealand. Biol Conserv 169:106–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams BK (2011) Adaptive management of natural resources—framework and issues. J Environ Manage 92:1346–1353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmshurst JM, Anderson AJ, Higham TFG, Worthy TH (2008) Dating the late prehistoric dispersal of Polynesians to New Zealand using the commensal Pacific rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:7676–7680

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmshurst JM, Moar NT, Wood JR, Bellingham PJ, Findlater AM, Robinson JJ, Stone C (2014) Use of pollen and ancient DNA as conservation baselines for offshore islands in New Zealand. Conserv Biol 28:202–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RS, Bruskotter JT (2009) Assessing the impact of decision frame and existing attitudes on support for wolf restoration in the United States. Human Dimens Wildlife 14:353–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyant J, Meganck R, Ham S (1995) A planning and decision-making framework for ecological restoration. Environ Manage 19:789–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young RC (2014). Behavior, physiology, biological age, and cultural role of long-lived Bering Sea seabirds. PhD, PhD thesis, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, USA

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank C. Stone, D. Hamon, and H. Moller for helpful discussions and editing. P. Gaze, J. Greenman, E. Dunning for contributing restoration goals and unpublished data. This project was funded by the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Te Hiringa Tangata Ki Te Tai Timu Ki Te Tai Pari—facilitating bicultural restoration of coastal forests using seabirds as ecosystem engineers contract C09X0908) and the University of Otago.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Rachel T. Buxton

    Present address: Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, 1474 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology and Centre for Sustainability: Agriculture, Food, Energy, and Environment, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand

    Rachel T. Buxton

  2. Landcare Research, P.O. Box 69040, Gerald Street, Lincoln, 7640, New Zealand

    Christopher J. Jones & Philip O’Brien Lyver

  3. School of Applied Sciences, Institute for Applied Ecology, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand

    David R. Towns & Stephanie B. Borrelle

  4. Department of Conservation, Private Bag 68908 Newton, Auckland, 1145, New Zealand

    David R. Towns

Authors
  1. Rachel T. Buxton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher J. Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Philip O’Brien Lyver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David R. Towns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Stephanie B. Borrelle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel T. Buxton.

Additional information

Communicated by Stephen Garnett.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 125 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Buxton, R.T., Jones, C.J., Lyver, P.O. et al. Deciding when to lend a helping hand: a decision-making framework for seabird island restoration. Biodivers Conserv 25, 467–484 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1079-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1079-9

Keywords

search

Navigation