Abstract
Anthropogenic development has great potential to affect fragile desert environments. Large-scale development of renewable energy infrastructure is planned for many desert ecosystems. Development plans should account for anthropogenic effects to distributions and abundance of rare or sensitive wildlife; however, baseline data on abundance and distribution of such wildlife are often lacking. We surveyed for predatory birds in the Sonoran and Mojave Deserts of southern California, USA, in an area designated for protection under the “Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan”, to determine how these birds are distributed across the landscape and how this distribution is affected by existing development. We developed species-specific models of resight probability to adjust estimates of abundance and density of each individual common species. Second, we developed combined-species models of resight probability for common and rare species so that we could make use of sparse data on the latter. We determined that many common species, such as red-tailed hawks, loggerhead shrikes, and especially common ravens, are associated with human development and likely subsidized by human activity. Species-specific and combined-species models of resight probability performed similarly, although the former model type provided higher quality information. Comparing abundance estimates with past surveys in the Mojave Desert suggests numbers of predatory birds associated with human development have increased while other sensitive species not associated with development have decreased. This approach gave us information beyond what we would have collected by focusing either on common or rare species, thus it provides a low-cost framework for others conducting surveys in similar desert environments outside of California.

Similar content being viewed by others
References
Averill-Murray RC, Darst CR, Strout N, Wong M (2013) Conserving population linkages for the Mojave desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii). Herpetol Conserv Biol 8:1–15
Barrows CW, Allen MF, Rotenberry JT (2006) Boundary processes between a desert sand dune community and an encroaching suburban landscape. Biol Conserv 131:486–494
Boal CW, Estabrook TS, Duerr AE (2003) Productivity and breeding habitat of loggerhead shrikes in a southwestern urban environment. Southwest Nat 48:557–562
Boarman WI, Patten MA, Camp RJ, Collis SJ (2006) Ecology of a population of subsidized predators: common ravens in the central Mojave Desert, California. J Arid Environ 67(Supplement):248–261
Brownie C, Hines JE, Nichols JD, Pollock KH, Hestbeck JB (1993) Capture-recapture studies for multiple strata including non-Markovian transitions. Biometrics 49:1173–1187
Buckland ST, Burnham KP, Augustin NH (1997) Model selection: an integral part of inference. Biometrics 53:603–608
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York
Coates PS, Connelly JW, Delehanty DJ (2008) Predators of Greater Sage-Grouse nests identified by video monitoring. J Field Ornithol 79:421–428
Commission for Environmental Cooperation (1997) Ecoregions of North America, level i, ii, and iii maps. [http://www.epa.gov/wed/pages/ecoregions/na_eco.htm] from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division, Corvallis, Oregon, USA and at [http://www.cec.org/pubs_docs/documents/index.cfm?varlan=english&id=344] from the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC), Montréal (Québec), Canada. Accessed 28 July 2014
Concepción ED, Moretti M, Altermatt F, Nobis MP, Obrist MK (2015) Impacts of urbanisation on biodiversity: the role of species mobility, degree of specialisation and spatial scale. Oikos. doi:10.1111/oik.02166
Cornell K, Donovan T (2010) Effects of spatial habitat heterogeneity on habitat selection and annual fecundity for a migratory forest songbird. Landsc Ecol 25:109–122
Davis FW, Stoms DM, Hollander AD, Thomas KA, Stine PA, Odion D, Borchert MI, Thorne JH, Gray MV, Walker RE, Warner K, Graae J (1998) The California gap analysis project—final report. University of California, Santa Barbara
DUDEK, ICF International (2011) Preliminary conservation strategy desert renewable energy conservation plan (DRECP). Aspen Environmental Group, Sacramento
Esque TC, Nussear KE, Drake KK, Walde AD, Berry KH, Averill-Murray RC, Woodman AP, Boarman WI, Medica PA, Mack J, Heaton JS (2010) Effects of subsidized predators, resource variability, and human population density on desert tortoise populations in the Mojave Desert, USA. Endan Species Res 12:167–177
Fujiwara M, Caswell H (2002) A general approach to temporary emigration in mark-recapture analysis. Ecology 83:3266–3275
Hoffman SW, Smith JP (2003) Population trends of migratory raptors in western North America, 1977–2001. Condor 105:397–419
Inman RD, Esque TC, Nussear KE, Leitner P, Matocq MD, Weisberg PJ, Dilts TE, Vandergast AG (2013) Is there room for all of us? Renewable energy and Xerospermophilus mohavensis. Endan Species Res 20:1–18
Knight RL, Kawashima JY (1993) Responses of raven and red-tailed hawk populations to linear right-of-ways. J Wildl Manag 57:266–271
Knight RL, Camp RJ, Boarman WI, Knight HAL (1999) Predatory bird populations in the east Mojave Desert, California. Gt Basin Nat 59:331–338
Kristan WB, Boarman WI (2003) Spatial pattern of risk of common raven predation on desert tortoises. Ecology 84:2432–2443
Kristan WB, Boarman WI (2007) Effects of anthropogenic developments on common raven nesting biology in the west Mojave Desert. Ecol Appl 17:1703–1713
Kristan WB, Boarman WI, Crayon JJ (2004) Diet composition of common ravens across the urban-wildland interface of the west Mojave Desert. Wildl Soc Bull 32:244–253
Kuvlesky WP Jr, Brennan LA, Morrison ML, Boydston KK, Ballard BM, Bryant FC (2007) Wind energy development and wildlife conservation: challenges and opportunities. J Wildl Manag 71:2487–2498
Lebreton JD, Hines JE, Pradel R, Nichols JD, Spendelow JA (2003) Estimation by capture-recapture of recruitment and dispersal over several sites. Oikos 101:253–264
Lennartz S, Bax T, Aycrigg J, Davidson A, Reid M, Congalton R (2008) Final report on land cover mapping methods for California map zones 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, and 13. University of Idaho, Sanborn Map Co, Portland
Leu M, Hanser SE, Knick ST (2008) The human footprint in the west: a large-scale analysis of anthropogenic impacts. Ecol Appl 18:1119–1139
Lovich JE, Bainbridge D (1999) Anthropogenic degradation of the southern California desert ecosystem and prospects for natural recovery and restoration. Environ Manag 24:309–326
Olson DM, Dinerstein E (1998) The global 2000: a representation approach to conserving the earth’s most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conerv Biol 12:502–515
Peterson FF (1981) Landforms of the basin and range province defined for soil survey. Nevada Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 28. University of Nevada, Reno
Prather PR, Messmer TA (2010) Raptor and corvid response to power distribution line perch deterrents in Utah. J Wildl Manag 74:796–800
Renewable Energy Action Team, (California Energy Commission, California Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management, and Fish and Wildlife Service) (2010) Best management practices and guidance manual: Desert renewable energy projects. California Energy Commission, Siting, Transmission and Environmental Protection Division. http://www.drecp.org/documents. Accessed 10 July 2014
Rodríguez-Estrella R, Donázar JA, Hiraldo F (1998) Raptors as indicators of environmental change in the scrub habitat of Baja California Sur, Mexico. Conserv Biol 12:921–925
Sergio F, Newton IAN, Marchesi L, Pedrini P (2006) Ecologically justified charisma: preservation of top predators delivers biodiversity conservation. J Appl Ecol 43:1049–1055
The DRECP Independent Science Panel (2012) Independent science review for the california desert renewable energy conservation plan (DRECP). Prepared for Renewable Energy Action Team. http://www.drecp.org/documents. Accessed 10 July 2014
Turner RM (1994) Mohave desertscrub. In: Brown DE (ed) Biotic Communities Southwestern United States and Northwestern Mexico. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp 157–168
Turner RM, Brown DE (1994) Sonoran desertscrub. In: Brown DE (ed) Biotic Communities Southwestern United States and Northwestern Mexico. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp 181–221
US Census Bureau (2011) 2011 TIGER/Line Shapefiles [machine-readable data files]. Accessed: 1 Jan 2012
US Deparment of Agriculture, Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services (2014) Supplement to the environmental assessment: predator damage management in southern Idaho. US Department of Agriculture, Boise
Vandergast A, Inman R, Barr K, Nussear K, Esque T, Hathaway S, Wood D, Medica P, Breinholt J, Stephen C, Gottscho A, Marks S, Jennings W, Fisher R (2013) Evolutionary hotspots in the Mojave Desert. Diversity 5:293–319
White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program mark: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46:120–138
Acknowledgments
The Bureau of Land Management, California State Office provided funding. This work is Scientific Article No. 3239 of the West Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Morgantown. We thank T. Esque and two anonymous reviewers for their comments that greatly helped to improve this manuscript. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Dirk Sven Schmeller.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duerr, A.E., Miller, T.A., Cornell Duerr, K.L. et al. Landscape-scale distribution and density of raptor populations wintering in anthropogenic-dominated desert landscapes. Biodivers Conserv 24, 2365–2381 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0916-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0916-6


