Searching for backyard birds in virtual worlds: Internet queries mirror real species distributions

Abstract

As technology mediates more of human experience, effective conservation will increasingly rely on understanding how wildlife inhabits the real world and how people engage with information about wildlife in the virtual world. We explored how interest in birds—as measured by Internet search activity—was shaped by geographic distributions of bird populations and human social and cultural activities. Searches for the common names of 68 resident bird species were positively associated with estimates of bird population densities across the United States. Additional social and cultural predictors that we expected to influence state-level interest in local bird species explained little geographic variation in search activity. Results were congruent across analyses that focused on different bird groups and geographic regions within the United States. Our findings suggest that Americans are attuned to the avifauna that reside in their state and search for information about local species on the Internet. To the extent that searches reflect public values, abundant and easily accessible search activity data can be used to increase the relevance of conservation messaging and the likelihood of conservation action.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Bollen J, Mao H, Zeng X (2011) Twitter mood predicts the stock market. J Comput Sci 2:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, da Fonseca GAB, Gerlach J, Hoffmann M, Lamoreux JF, Mittermeier CG, Pilgrim JD, Rodrigues ASL (2006) Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313:58–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. CDC (U.S. Centers for Disease Control) (2013) Leisure-time physical inactivity prevalence. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/atlas/obesityrisk/State_EXCELstatelistLTPIA.html

  4. Choi H, Varian H (2012) Predicting the present with google trends. Econ Rec 88(s1):2–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Erasmus BFN, Freitag S, Gaston KJ, Erasmus BH, van Jaarsveld AS (1999) Scale and conservation planning in the real world. Proc R Soc B 266:315–319. doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0640

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ficetola GF (2013) Is interest toward the environment really declining? The complexity of analysing trends using internet search data. Biodivers Conserv 22:2983–2988. doi:10.1007/s10531-013-0552-y

  7. Ginsberg J et al (2009) Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature 457:1012–1014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goel S, Hofman JM, Lahaie S, Pennock D, Watts DJ (2010) Predicting consumer behavior with Web search. Proc Nat Acad Sci 107:17486–17490

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hunter ML Jr, Hutchinson A (1994) The virtues and shortcomings of parochialism: conserving species that are locally rare, but globally common. Cons Biol 8:1163–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kratky A (2012) Playing nature–a short history of our mediated relationship to Nature. In: Cipolla-Ficarra F, de Castro Lozano C, Nicol E, Kratky A, Cipolla-Ficarra M (eds) Human-computer interaction, tourism and cultural heritage. Springer, Berlin

  11. Louv R (2012) The nature principle. Algonquin Books, Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  12. Malcevschi S, Marchini A, Savini D, Facchinetti T (2012) Opportunities for web-based indicators in environmental sciences. PLoS ONE 7(8):e42128

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McCallum ML, Bury GW (2013) Google search patterns suggest declining interest in the environment. Biodivers Conserv 22:1355–1367. doi:10.1007/s10531-013-0476-6 

  14. McCallum ML, Bury GW (2014) Public interest in the environment is falling: a response to Ficetola (2013). Biodivers Conserv 23:1057–1062. doi:10.1007/s10531-014-0640-7

  15. Nekaris KAI, Campbell N, Coggins TG, Rode EJ, Nijman V (2013) Tickled to death: analysing public perceptions of ‘cute’ videos of threatened species (Slow Lorises—Nycticebus spp.) on Web 2.0 Sites. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/annotation/7afd7924-ca2b-4b9c-ac1b-2cc656b3bf42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pergams ORW, Zaradic PA (2006) Is love of nature in the US becoming love of electronic media? 16-year downtrend in national park visits explained by watching movies, playing video games, internet use, and oil prices. J Environ Manag 80:387–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pergams ORW, Zaradic PA (2008) Evidence for a fundamental and pervasive shift away from nature-based recreation. Proc Nat Acad Sci 105:2295–2300

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pew Internet and the American Life Project (2013) Trend data (adults). http://www.pewinternet.org/Static-Pages/Trend-Data-(Adults)/Usage-Over-Time.aspx

  19. Rich TD et al (2004) Partners in flight North American landbird conservation plan. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  20. Robison KK, Ridenour D (2012) Whither the love of hunting? Explaining the decline of a major form of rural recreation as a consequence of the rise of virtual entertainment and urbanism. Hum Dimens Wildl 17:418–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sauer JR, Hines JE, Fallon J (2008) The North American breeding bird survey, results and analysis 1966–2007. USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel

    Google Scholar 

  22. US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, US Department of Commerce, US Census Bureau (2006) 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation

  23. US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, US Department of Commerce, US Census Bureau (2009) Birding in the United States: A Demographic and Economic Analysis, Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-4

  24. Wilde GR, Pope KL (2012) Worldwide trends in fishing interest indicated by internet search volume. Fish Manag Ecol 20:211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank G. Frost and two anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin Schuetz.

Additional information

Communicated by Danna J Leaman.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 431 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schuetz, J., Soykan, C.U., Distler, T. et al. Searching for backyard birds in virtual worlds: Internet queries mirror real species distributions. Biodivers Conserv 24, 1147–1154 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0847-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Birds
  • Conservation
  • Google trends
  • Internet query
  • Local