Skip to main content
Log in

Biodiversity trends are as bad as expected

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Clavel J, Julliard R, Devictor V (2011) Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization? Front Ecol Environ 9:222–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devictor V, Robert A (2009) Measuring community responses to large-scale disturbance in conservation biogeography. Divers Distrib 15:122–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirzo R, Young HS, Galetti M et al (2014) Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science 345:401–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dornelas M, Gotelli NJ, McGill B et al (2014) Assemblage time series reveal biodiversity change but not systematic loss. Science 344:296–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma DJ, Moreno J (1988) The evolution of ecological specialization. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 19:207–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galetti M, Guevara R, Côrtes MC et al (2013) Functional extinction of birds drives rapid evolutionary changes in seed size. Science 340:1086–1090

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1957) Concluding remarks. Com Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 22:415–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney H, Larigauderie A, Cesario M et al (2009) Biodiversity, climate change and ecosystem services. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 1:46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olden JD, Poff NL, Douglas MR et al (2004) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization. Trends Ecol Evol 19:18–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (2001) The four questions: what does the introduction of exotic species do to biodiversity? Ecol Evol Res 3:361–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Sax DF, Gaines SD (2003) Species diversity: from global decreases to local increases. Trends Ecol Evol 18:561–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teyssèdre A, Robert A (2014) Contrasting effects of habitat reduction, conversion and alteration on neutral and non neutral biological communities. Oikos 123:857–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, May R, Lehman C, Nowak M (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Teyssèdre.

Additional information

Communicated by David Hawksworth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Teyssèdre, A., Robert, A. Biodiversity trends are as bad as expected. Biodivers Conserv 24, 705–706 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0839-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0839-7

Keywords

Navigation