Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Market-based mechanisms for biodiversity conservation: a review of existing schemes and an outline for a global mechanism

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Continuous decline of biodiversity over the past decades suggests that efforts to decrease biodiversity loss have been insufficient. One option to deal with this problem is the use of market-based mechanisms for biodiversity conservation. Several studies have analysed such mechanisms individually, but there is no comprehensive review with a comparative assessment of the performance of various mechanisms. This paper presents (i) an analysis of the economic conditions under which markets for biodiversity can be expected to function; (ii) an analysis of the efficiency of five selected biodiversity markets in the light of market and contract theory; and (iii) an assessment of the potential to scale up local or national payment mechanisms for biodiversity conservation. Our analysis shows the difficulties that market-based mechanisms face, among which are the need to ensure long-term conservation and the lack of a standardized unit of measurement for biodiversity. We provide a number of recommendations on how to overcome these difficulties. We argue that the set-up of a global registry embedded within the framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity would facilitate measurement, reporting and verification of biodiversity credits to support market-based mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Quoted prices values for habitat hectare credits and large old tree credits reflect 80 % of agreements in the Victorian bioregions.

  2. Average price of data from 2005 to 2009 for different types of conservation credits. Six unit-based credit price points were not used to obtain the average price.

  3. Average price of data from 2005 to 2009 for different types of credits. Tidal wetland credits and vernal pool wetland credits are not included because their prices are considerably higher than regular wetland credit prices.

  4. This information only considers Conservation Banking and not species compensation through in-lieu fee funds or permittee-responsible mitigation.

  5. This information includes data from In Lieu Fee Programmes, Permittee-Responsible Mitigation and Mitigation Banking.

References

  • Akerlof GA (1970) The market for “Lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q J Econ 84(3):488–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardsley P (2003) Missing environmental markets and the design of “Market based instruments”.1-11

  • Barrett A (2011) [Discussion on buyers and sellers of Bushbroker]. (Personal communication 28 Nov 2011)

  • BBOP (2012) Biodiversity offset design handbook- updated BBOP. Wasington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • BBOP (2013) To no net loss and beyond: an overview of the business and biodiversity offsets programme (BBOP). Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop J, Kapila S, Hicks F, Mitchell P, Vorhies F (2008) Building biodiversity business. Shell international limited and the international union for conservation of nature, London, UK and Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, da Fonseca GAB, Gerlach J, Hoffmann M, Lamoreux JF, Mittermeier CG, Pilgrim JD, Rodrigues ASL (2006) Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313(5783):58–61. doi:10.1126/science.1127609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau E, Glachant JM (2002) The economics of contracts : theory and applications. Cambridge university press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burgin S (2008) BioBanking: an environmental scientist’s view of the role of biodiversity banking offsets in conservation. Biodivers Conserv 17(4):807–816. doi:10.1007/s10531-008-9319-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B, van Strien A, Scharlemann JPW, Almond REA, Baillie JEM, Bomhard B, Brown C, Bruno J, Carpenter KE, Carr GM, Chanson J, Chenery AM, Csirke J, Davidson NC, Dentener F, Foster M, Galli A, Galloway JN, Genovesi P, Gregory RD, Hockings M, Kapos V, Lamarque J-F, Leverington F, Loh J, McGeoch MA, McRae L, Minasyan A, Morcillo MH, Oldfield TEE, Pauly D, Quader S, Revenga C, Sauer JR, Skolnik B, Spear D, Stanwell-Smith D, Stuart SN, Symes A, Tierney M, Tyrrell TD, Vié J-C, Watson R (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328(5982):1164–1168. doi:10.1126/science.1187512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2010) Global biodiversity outlook 3. Montréal, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter R, Ulen T (2003) Law and economics. Pearson addison wesley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • DECC (2007) BioBanking: scheme overview. Department of environment and climate change, Sydney South

    Google Scholar 

  • DECC (2009) Guide to establishing a biobank site. Department of environment, climate change and water NSW, Sydney South

    Google Scholar 

  • DSE (2009a) Landowner agreement-information sheet no. 5. The state of victoria department of sustainability and environment, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • DSE (2009b) Introduction to BushBroker-information sheet No. 1. The state of victoria department of sustainability and environment, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • DSE (2011) BushBroker Website. http://www.dse.vic.gov.au/conservation-and-environment/biodiversity/rural-landscapes/bushbroker. Accessed 21 Nov 2011

  • EcosystemMarketplace (2010) US Wetland Banking [online]. Available at: http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/pages/dynamic/web.page.php?section=biodiversity_market&page_name=uswet_market. Accessed 2 Nov 2011

  • EcosystemMarketplace (2011) US Conservation Banking [online]. Available at: http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/pages/dynamic/web.page.php?section=biodiversity_market&page_name=uscon_market. Accessed 24 Nov 2011

  • FAO, IFAD (2008) Financing Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation in the Agriculture and Forestry Sector. Submission to the AWG-LCA on the elements contained in paragraph 1 of the Bali Action Plan. [online] URL: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2008/smsn/igo/015.pdf. Accessed 23 March 2012

  • Fernandez L, Karp L (1998) Restoring wetlands through wetlands mitigation banks. Environ Resource Econ 12(3):323–344. doi:10.1023/a:1008225021746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox J, Nino-Murcia A (2004) Status of species conservation banking in the United States. Conserv Biol 19(4):996–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goeschl T, Lin T (2004) Biodiversity conservation on private lands: information problems and regulatory choices. (55.2004)

  • Gray WB, Shimshack JP (2011) The effectiveness of environmental monitoring and enforcement: a review of the empirical evidence. Rev of Environmental Economics and Policy 5(1):3–24. doi:10.1093/reep/req017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallwood P (2007) Contractual difficulties in environmental management: the case of wetland mitigation banking (Ecological economics of coastal disasters special section). Ecol Econ 63(2–3):446–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart O (1995) Firms, contracts, and financial structure. Clarendon press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hein L, van der Meer PJ (2012) REDD + in the context of ecosystem management (4/6 Climate systems). Curr Opin in Environmental Sustainability 4(6):604–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hein L, Miller DC, de Groot R (2013) Payments for ecosystem services and the financing of global biodiversity conservation. Curr Opin in Environmental Sustainability 5:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James A, Gaston KJ, Balmford A (2001) Can we afford to conserve biodiversity? (BioScience). Bioscience 51(1):43–52. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0043:cwatcb]2.0.co;2

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeger T, Casey F (2007) An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands (Special section-ecosystem services and agriculture ecosystem services and agriculture). Ecol Econ 64(2):321–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambooy T, Levashova Y (2011) Opportunities and challenges for private sector entrepreneurship and investment in biodiversity, ecosystem services and nature conservation. International J of Biodiversity Science, Ecosyst Services & Management 7(4):301–318. doi:10.1080/21513732.2011.629632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerch A (1998) Property rights and biodiversity. Eur J Law Econ 6(3):285–304. doi:10.1023/a:1008662329540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, Oteng-Yeboah A, Arroyo MTK, Babin D, Barbault R, Donoghue M, Gadgil M, Häuser C, Heip C, Larigauderie A, Ma K, Mace G, Mooney HA, Perrings C, Raven P, Sarukhan J, Schei P, Scholes RJ, Watson RT (2006) Diversity without representation. Nat 442:245–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons B, Mehta J (1997) Private sector business contracts: the text between the lines. In: Deakin S, Michie J (eds) Contracts, Co-operation, and Competition. Oxford university press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World resources institute, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace GM, Norris K, Fitter AH (2012) Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol Evol 27(1):19–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen B, Carroll N, Moore-Brands K (2010a) State of biodiversity markets report: offset and compensation programs worldwide. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen B, Carroll N, Moore-Brands K (2010b) State of biodiversity markets report: offset and compensation programs worldwide-methods appendix. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen B, Carroll N, Kandy D, Bennett G (2011) 2011 Update: state of biodiversity markets. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • MarkitGroup (2011) Markit Environmental Registry Website. Available at: http://www.markit.com/en/products/registry/markit-environmental-registry.pageAccessed 8 Apr 2011

  • McKenney B, Kiesecker J (2010) Policy development for biodiversity offsets: a review of offset frameworks. Environmental Management 45(1):165–176. doi:10.1007/s00267-009-9396-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller DC, Agrawal A, Roberts JT (2013) Biodiversity, governance, and the allocation of international aid for conservation. Conservation Letters 6(1):12–20. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00270.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyata Y (2007) Markets for biodiversity. J of Sustainable Forestry 25(3–4):281–307. doi:10.1300/J091v25n03_04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mora C, Sale PF (2011) Ongoing global biodiversity loss and the need to move beyond protected areas: a review of the technical and practical shortcomings of protected areas on land and sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 434:251–266. doi:10.3354/meps09214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MWHCB (2010) Malua Wildlife Habitat Conservation Bank Website. Available at: http://www.maluabank.com/index.htm Accessed 16 Feb 2011

  • Nijkamp P, Vindigni G, Nunes PALD (2008) Economic valuation of biodiversity: a comparative study (Special Section: Biodiversity and Policy). Ecol Econ 67(2):217–231

    Google Scholar 

  • NSW (2006) Threatened Species Conservation Amendment (Biodiversity Banking) [online]. Available at: http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/sessionalview/sessional/TITLE/Threatened%20Species%20Conservation%20Amendment%20(Biodiversity%20Banking)%20Act%202006%20No%20125.pdf.vol 125. Accessed 16 Sept 2011

  • O’Connor-NRM Pty (2009) BushBroker implementation: evaluation after two years of operations. O’Connor-NRM Pty Ltd, Maylands

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2004) Handbook of Market Creation for Biodiversity: issues in Implementation. OECD Publishing, Paris. doi:10.1787/9789264018624-en

    Google Scholar 

  • OEH (2011) BioBanking Credit Calculator [online]. Available at: http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/biobanking/calculator.htm. Accessed 21 Nov 2011

  • OEH (2012a) BioBanking review: a summary of themes and issues. Office of environment and heritage, Sydney South

    Google Scholar 

  • OEH (2012b) Biodiversity credit transactions and sales register [online]. Available at: http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/bimsprapp/BiobankingPR.aspx. Accessed 20 Nov 2012

  • OEH (2012c) BioBanking review: discussion paper. Office of environment and heritage, Sydney South

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom V, Ostrom E (1977) Public goods and public choices. In: Savas ES (ed) Alternatives for delivering public services: toward improved performance. Westerview press, Boulder CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagano M (1989) Endogenous market thinness and stock price volatility. The Rev of Economic Stud 56(2):269–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce D (2007) Do we really care about biodiversity? Environ Resour Econ 37(1):313–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piqqo (2012) Protect Malua Website. Available at: http://www.protectmalua.com/ Accessed 1 Dec 2012

  • Salles JM (2011) Valuing biodiversity and ecosystem services: why put economic values on Nature? (Biodiversity in face of human activities/La biodiversite face aux activites humaines). CR Biol 334(5–6):469–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson RD (2004) Conserving biodiversity through markets: a better approach. PERC Policy series PS-32

  • Slangen LHG, Loucks LA, Slangen AHL (2008) Institutional economics and economic organisation theory: an integrated approach. Wageningen academic publishers, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • SpeciesBanking (2011) US Wetland and Stream Bank Dataset and Analysis [online]. Available at: http://www.speciesbanking.com/pages/us_wetland_stream_banks. Accessed 22 Nov 2011

  • TEEB (2010) The economics for ecosystems and biodiversity- TEEB for business. New York

  • UN (1992) Convention on Biological Diversity. United Nations, Rio de Janeiro [online]. Available at: http://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf. Accessed 18 March 2011

  • UNEP (2011) International Year of Biodiversity Website. Available at: http://www.unep.org/iyb/About_iyb.asp. Accessed 18 Oct 2011

  • USFWS (2003) Guidance for the establishment, use, and operation of conservation banks. Washington, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • USFWS (2011) Conservation banking-incentives for stewardship

  • Walker S, Brower AL, Stephens RTT, Lee WG (2009) Why bartering biodiversity fails. Conservation Letters 2(4):149–157. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00061.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams LG (2013) Putting the pieces together for good governance of REDD + : an analysis of 32 REDD + country readiness proposals

  • Wotherspoon D, Burgin S (2008) The consultant ecologist’s role in the New South Wales (Australia) approach to biodiversity offsets: “BioBanking”. Local Environment 14(1):61–71. doi:10.1080/13549830802522533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunder S (2007) The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conserv Biol 21(1):48–58. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00559.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank E.C. van Ierland and an anonymous reviewer for constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irene Alvarado-Quesada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alvarado-Quesada, I., Hein, L. & Weikard, HP. Market-based mechanisms for biodiversity conservation: a review of existing schemes and an outline for a global mechanism. Biodivers Conserv 23, 1–21 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0598-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0598-x

Keywords

Navigation