Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 171–185 | Cite as

A phylogenetically-informed trait-based analysis of range change in the vascular plant flora of Britain

  • Gary D. Powney
  • Giovanni Rapacciuolo
  • Christopher D. Preston
  • Andy Purvis
  • David B. Roy
Original Paper

Abstract

Species distributions are changing, and knowing whether certain character traits predispose species to decline or increase during times of environmental change can shed light on the main drivers of distribution change. Here we conduct a trait-based analysis of range change in the flora of Britain since the 1930s using some of the best plant distribution and trait data available in Europe. We use phylogenetically-informed models based on a recently published, dated, species level plant phylogeny. Traits associated with habitat specialism and competitive ability were related to range change, with more competitive habitat generalists faring better than habitat specialists. We attribute this result to the greater ability of generalists to adapt to environmental perturbation, but also to the negative impacts of agricultural intensification on the flora of Britain, in particular the loss of open, dry habitats. We discovered spatial variation in the main drivers of plant range change and find support for previous evidence that agricultural intensification has been a major driver of distribution change in the flora of Britain over the past 70 years, particularly in southern England.

Keywords

Agricultural intensification Comparative analysis Distribution change Phylogeny Plant traits 

Supplementary material

10531_2013_590_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (208 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 207 kb)

References

  1. Angert AL, Crozier LG, Rissler LJ, Gilman SE, Tewksbury JJ, Chunco AJ (2011) Do species’ traits predict recent shifts at expanding range edges? Ecol Lett 14:677–689PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APG III (2009) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot J Linn Soc 161:105–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barton KA (2010) MuMIn: R package for model selection and multi-model inference, version 1.9.8Google Scholar
  4. Bennie J, Hill MO, Baxter R, Huntley B (2006) Influence of slope and aspect on long-term vegetation change in British chalk grasslands. J Ecol 94:355–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braithwaite ME, Ellis RW, Preston CD (2006) Change in the British flora 1987–2004. Bot Soc Br Isles, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference, 2nd edn. Springer Science, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Cardillo M, Mace GM, Jones KE, Bielby J, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Sechrest W, Orme CDL, Purvis A (2005) Multiple causes of high extinction risk in large mammal species. Science 309:1239–1241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen I-C, Hill JK, Ohlemuller R, Roy DB, Thomas CD (2011) Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333:1024–1026PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Devictor V, Julliard R, Couvet D, Jiguet F (2008) Birds are tracking climate warming, but not fast enough. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 275:2743–2748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Durka W, Michalski SG (2012) Daphne: a dated phylogeny of a large European flora for phylogenetically informed ecological analyses. Ecology 93:2297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans PA, Evans IM, Rothero GP (2002) Flora of Assynt. Privately publishedGoogle Scholar
  12. Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fisher DO, Owens IPF (2004) The comparative method in conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol 19:391–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Franco AMA, Hill JK, Kitschke C, Collingham YC, Roy DB, Fox R, Huntley B, Thomas CD (2006) Impacts of climate warming and habitat loss on extinctions at species’ low-latitude range boundaries. Glob Chang Biol 12:1545–1553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freckleton RP, Harvey PH, Pagel M (2002) Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am Nat 160:712–726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fritz SA, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Purvis A (2009) Geographical variation in predictors of mammalian extinction risk: big is bad, but only in the tropics. Ecol Lett 12:538–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grime JP (2001) Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties, 2nd edn. Wiley, West SussexGoogle Scholar
  18. Godefroid S (2001) Temporal analysis of the Brussels flora as indicator for changing environmental quality. Landsc Urban plan 54:203–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haines-Young R, Barr CJ, Firbank LG, Furse M, Howard DC, McGowan G, Petit S, Smart SM, Watkins JW (2003) Changing landscapes, habitats and vegetation diversity across Great Britain. J Environ Manag 67:161–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Hill MO (2012) Local frequency as a key to interpreting species occurrence data when recording effort is not known. Methods Ecol Evol 3:195–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hill MO, Preston CD, Roy DB (2004) PLANTATT Attributes of British and Irish plants: status, size, life history, geography and habitats. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, HuntingdonGoogle Scholar
  23. Hodgdon JG (1989) What is happening to the British flora—an investigation of commonness and rarity. Plants Today 2:26–32Google Scholar
  24. Hulme PE (2009) Relative roles of life-form, land use and climate in recent dynamics of alien plant distributions in the British Isles. Weed Res 49:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria—Version 3.1. Gland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  26. Jetz W, Wilcove DS, Dobson AP (2007) Projected impacts of climate and land-use change on the global diversity of birds. PLoS Biol 5:1211–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koh LP, Sodhi NS, Brook BW (2004) Ecological correlates of extinction proneness in tropical butterflies. Conserv Biol 18:1571–1578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Landsberg J, Crowley G (2004) Monitoring rangeland biodiversity: plants as indicators. Aust Ecol 29:59–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liem ASN, Hendriks A, Kraal H, Loenen M (1985) Effects of de-icing salt on roadside grasses and herbs. Plant Soil 84:299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mace GM, Masundire H, Baillie JEM (2005) Biodiversity. In: Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (eds) Millennium ecosystem assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: Current state and trends. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 77–122Google Scholar
  31. Mace GM, Collen B, Fuller RA, Boakes EH (2010) Population and geographic range dynamics: implications for conservation planning. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 365:3743–3751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McCollin D, Moore L, Sparks T (2000) The flora of a cultural landscape: environmental determinants of change revealed using archival sources. Biol Conserv 92:249–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Menéndez R, Megías AG, Hill JK, Braschler B, Willis SG, Collingham Y, Fox R, Roy DB, Thomas CD (2006) Species richness changes lag behind climate change. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273:1465–1470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Montoya JM, Raffaelli D (2010) Climate change, biotic interactions and ecosystem services. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 365:2013–2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Orme CDL (2012) The caper package: comparative analysis of phylogenetics and evolution in R. http://caper.r-forge.r-project.org. Accessed 1 Aug 2013
  36. Pagel M (1999) Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877–884PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pearman DA, Preston CD (2000) A flora of Tiree, Gunna and Coll. Privately publishedGoogle Scholar
  39. Pearman DA, Preston CD, Rothero GP, Walker KJ (2008) The flora of rum: an Atlantic Island reserve. Privately publishedGoogle Scholar
  40. Pereira HM, Daily GC, Roughgarden J (2004) A framework for assessing the relative vulnerability of species to land-use change. Ecol Appl 14:730–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Perring FH, Walters SM (eds) (1962) Atlas of the British flora. T. Nelson and Sons, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Pilgrim E, Crawley MJ, Dolphin K (2004) Patterns of rarity in the native British flora. Biol Conserv 120:161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pocock MJO, Hartley S, Telfer MG, Preston CD, Kunin WE (2006) Ecological correlates of range structure in rare and scarce British plants. J Ecol 94:581–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pöyry J, Luoto M, Heikkinen RK, Kuussaari M, Saarinen K (2009) Species traits explain recent range shifts of Finnish butterflies. Glob Chang Biol 15:732–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Prendergast JR, Wood SN, Lawton JH, Eversham BC (1993) Correcting for variation in recording effort in analyses of diversity hotspots. Biodivers Lett 1:39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Preston CD (2000) Engulfed by suburbia or destroyed by the plough, the ecology of extinction in Middlesex and Cambridgeshire. Watsonia 23:59–81Google Scholar
  47. Preston CD, Croft JM (1997) Aquatic plants in Britain and Ireland. Harley Books, ColchesterGoogle Scholar
  48. Preston CD, Pearman DA, Dines TD (eds) (2002a) New atlas of the British and Irish flora. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  49. Preston CD, Telfer MG, Arnold HR, Carey PD, Cooper JM, Dines TD, Hill MO, Pearman DA, Roy DB, Smart SM (2002b) The changing flora of the UK. DEFRA, Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Purvis A (2008) Phylogenetic approaches to the study of extinction. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:301–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. R Development Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  52. Root TL, Price JT, Hall KR, Schneider SH, Rosenzweig C, Pounds JA (2003) Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421:57–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sala OE, Chapin FS III, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smart S, Bunce R, Marrs R, Leduc M, Firbank L, Maskell L, Scott W, Thompson K, Walker K (2005) Large-scale changes in the abundance of common higher plant species across Britain between 1978, 1990 and 1998 as a consequence of human activity: tests of hypothesised changes in trait representation. Biol Conserv 124:355–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stevens CJ, Dise NB, Mountford JO, Gowing DJ (2004) Impact of nitrogen deposition on the species richness of grasslands. Science 303:1876–1879PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stoate C, Boatman ND, Borralho RJ, Carvalho CR, de Snoo GR, Eden P (2001) Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. J Environ Manage 63:337–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Suding KN, Collins SL, Gough L, Clark C, Cleland EE, Gross KL, Milchunas DG, Pennings S (2005) Functional- and abundance-based mechanisms explain diversity loss due to N fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:4387–4392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tamis W, Vantzelfde M, Vandermeijden R, Groen C, Udodehaes H (2005) Ecological interpretation of changes in the dutch flora in the 20th century. Biol Conserv 125:211–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Telfer MG, Preston CD, Rothery P (2002) A general method for measuring relative change in range size from biological atlas data. Biol Conserv 107:99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thomas CD (2010) Climate, climate change and range boundaries. Divers Distrib 16:488–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thomas CD, Lennon JJ (1999) Birds extend their ranges northwards. Nature 399:213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Travis JMJ (2003) Climate change and habitat destruction: a deadly anthropogenic cocktail. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 270:467–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. UK National Ecosystem Assessment (2011) In: Watson R, Albon S (eds) The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: synthesis of the key findings. UNEP-WCMC, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  64. Van Calster H, Vandenberghe R, Ruysen M, Verheyen K, Hermy M, Decocq G (2008) Unexpectedly high 20th century floristic losses in a rural landscape in northern France. J Ecol 96:927–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Van Landuyt W, Vanhecke L, Hoste I, Hendrickx F, Bauwens D (2008) Changes in the distribution area of vascular plants in Flanders (northern Belgium): eutrophication as a major driving force. Biodivers Conserv 17:3045–3060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Walker KJ, Preston CD (2006) Ecological predictors of extinction risk in the flora of lowland England, UK. Biodivers Conserv 15:1913–1942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Walker KJ, Preston CD, Boon CR (2009) Fifty years of change in an area of intensive agriculture: plant trait responses to habitat modification and conservation, Bedfordshire, England. Biodivers Conserv 18:3597–3613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Walther G-R (2010) Community and ecosystem responses to recent climate change. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 365:2019–2024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Walther G-R, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee TJC, Fromentin J-M, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bairlein F (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wilson RJ, Gutierrez D, Gutierrez J, Martinez D, Agudo R, Monserrat VJ (2005) Changes to the elevational limits and extent of species ranges associated with climate change. Ecol Lett 8:1138–1146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary D. Powney
    • 1
    • 2
  • Giovanni Rapacciuolo
    • 3
  • Christopher D. Preston
    • 1
  • Andy Purvis
    • 4
  • David B. Roy
    • 1
  1. 1.NERC Centre for Ecology & HydrologyWallingfordUK
  2. 2.Department of Life SciencesImperial College LondonAscotUK
  3. 3.Berkeley Initiative in Global Change BiologyUniversity of California BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA
  4. 4.Department of Life SciencesNatural History MuseumLondonUK

Personalised recommendations