Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 21, Issue 10, pp 2653–2669 | Cite as

Impacts of Argentine ants on invertebrate communities with below-ground consequences

  • Margaret C. Stanley
  • Darren F. Ward
Original Paper


The Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (Mayr), is an invasive species that has been associated with various negative impacts in native communities around the world. These impacts, as for other invasive ants, are principally towards native ant species, and impacts on below-ground processes such as decomposition remain largely unexplored. We investigated the relationship between Argentine ants and invertebrate fauna, litter decomposition and soil microbial activity between paired invaded and uninvaded sites at two locations in Auckland, New Zealand, where there has been no research to date on their impacts. We examined the diversity and composition of invertebrate and microorganisms communities, and differences in soil and litter components. The composition of invertebrates (Order-level, ant and beetle species) was different between invaded and uninvaded sites, with fewer ants, isopods, amphipods, and fungus-feeding beetles at the invaded sites, whereas Collembola were more abundant at the invaded sites. There were significant differences in soil chemistry, including higher carbon and nitrogen microbial biomass at uninvaded sites. Several litter components were significantly different for Macropiper excelsum. The fibre content of litter was higher, and key nutrients (e.g. nitrogen) were lower, at invaded sites, indicating less breakdown of litter at invaded sites. A greater knowledge of the history of invasion at a site would clarify variation in the impacts of Argentine ants, but their persistence in the ground litter layer may have long-term implications for soil and plant health in native ecosystems.


Linepithema humile Litter decomposition Microbial biomass Collembola Beetle communities 



We thank staff at Auckland and North Shore city councils for permission to carry out this work; Robyn Simcock, Brian Daly, and Graham Sparling for advice on soil and chemical sampling; Chris Winks, Shane Hona, Josie Galbraith, Sarah Harrison, Sarah Knight for field assistance; Jo Rees for sorting invertebrate samples and Stephen Thorpe for identifying beetles; Nick Waipara and Olimpia Timudo for microbial advice, laboratory work and identification; and Guy Forrester for statistical advice; Richard Toft and Nathan Sanders for helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. This work was supported by the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology (FRST C09X0507).


  1. Allen R (1993) A permanent plot method for measuring changes in indigenous forests: a field manual. Landcare Research Ltd, ChristchurchGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen AN (1997) Functional groups and patterns of organization in North American ant communities: a comparison with Australia. J Biogeogr 24:433–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen AN, Sparling GP (1997) Ants as indicators of restoration success: relationship with soil microbial biomass in the Australian seasonal tropics. Restor Ecol 5:109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bending GD, Turner MK, Rayns F, Marxc MC, Wood M (2004) Microbial and biochemical soil quality indicators and their potential for differentiating areas under contrasting agricultural management regimes. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1785–1792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg B, Laskowski R (2006) Litter decomposition: a guide to carbon and nutrient turnover. Advances In ecological research 38. Academic Press, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. Berg B, McClaugherty C (2008) Plant litter: decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. Blancafort X, Gomez C (2005) Consequences of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (Mayr), invasion on pollination of Euphorbia characias (L.) (Euphorbiaceae). Acta Oecol 28:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burton J, Chen C, Xu Z, Ghadiri H (2010) Soil microbial biomass, activity and community composition in adjacent native and plantation forests of subtropical. J Soil Sed 10:1267–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cammeraat ELH, Risch AC (2008) The impact of ants on mineral soil properties and processes at different spatial scales. J Appl Entomol 132:285–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christian CE (2001) Consequences of a biological invasion reveal the importance of mutualism for plant communities. Nature 413:635–638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2005) Change in marine communities. An approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edn. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  12. Cole FR, Medeiros AC, Loope LL, Zuehlke WW (1992) Effects of the Argentine ant on arthropod fauna of Hawaiian high-elevation shrubland. Ecology 73:1313–1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coleman DC, Crossley DA, Hendrix PF (2004) Fundamentals of soil ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  14. de Kock AE, Giliomee JH (1989) A survey of the Argentine ant, Iridomymrex humilis (Mayr), (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in South African fynbos. J Entomol Soc S Afr 52:157–164Google Scholar
  15. Don W (2007) Ants of New Zealand. Otago University Press, DunedinGoogle Scholar
  16. Dóstal P, Breznova M, Kozlickova V, Herben T, Kovar P (2005) Ant-induced soil modification and its effect on plant below-ground biomass. Pedobiologia 49:127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duncan KW (1994) Terrestrial Talitridae (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Fauna of New Zealand series 31. Manaaki Whenua Press, LincolnGoogle Scholar
  18. Dunham AE, Mikheyev AS (2010) Influence of an invasive ant on grazing and detrital communities and nutrient fluxes in a tropical forest. Divers Distrib 16:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Friend JA, Richardson AMM (1986) Biology of terrestrial amphipods. Annu Rev Entomol 31:25–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gotelli NJ, Arnett AE (2000) Biogeographic effects of red fire ant invasion. Ecol Lett 3:257–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Green OL (1990) Entomologist sets new record at Mt Smart for Iridomyrmex humilis established in New Zealand. Weta 13:14–16Google Scholar
  22. Green PT, Lake PS, O’Dowd DJ (1999) Monopolization of litter processing by a dominant land crab on a tropical oceanic island. Oecologia 119:435–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Green PT, O’Dowd DJ, Lake PS (2008) Recruitment dynamics in a rainforest seedling community: context-independent impact of a keystone consumer. Oecologia 156:373–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hartley S, Harris R, Lester PJ (2006) Quantifying the uncertainty in the potential distribution of an invasive species: climate and the Argentine ant. Ecol Lett 9:1068–1079PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heller NE, Gordon DM (2006) Seasonal spatial dynamics and causes of nest movement in colonies of the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile). Ecol Entomol 31:499–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoffmann BD, Andersen AN, Hill GJE (1999) Impact of an introduced ant on native rain forest invertebrates: Pheidole megacephala in monsoonal Australia. Oecologia 120:595–604Google Scholar
  27. Holway DA (1998) Effect of Argentine ant invasions on ground-dwelling arthropods in northern California riparian woodlands. Oecologia 116:252–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holway DA, Suarez AV (2006) Homogenization of ant communities in Mediterranean California: the effects of urbanization and invasion. Biol Conserv 127:319–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holway DA, Lach L, Suarez A, Tsutsui N, Case TJ (2002) The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:181–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Human KG, Gordon DM (1997) Effects of Argentine ants on invertebrate biodiversity in Northern California. Conserv Biol 11:1242–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kenis M, Auger-Rozenberg MA, Roques A, Timms L, Pere C, Cock M, Settele J, Augustin S, Lopez-Vaamonde C (2009) Ecological effects of invasive alien insects. Biol Invasions 11:21–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krushelnycky PD, Gillespie RG (2010) Correlates of vulnerability among arthropod species threatened by invasive ants. Biodivers Conserv 19:1971–1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lafleur B, Hooper-Bu` LM, Mumma EP, Geaghan JP (2005) Soil fertility and plant growth in soils from pine forests and plantations: effect of invasive red imported fire ants Solenopsis invicta (Buren). Pedobiologia 49:415–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Landcare Research (2008) Environmental chemistry laboratory tests. Accessed 28 July 2008
  35. Lavelle E, Lattaud C, Trigo D, Barois I (1995) Mutualism and biodiversity in soils. Plant Soil 170:23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leathwick J, Morgan F, Wilson G, Rutledge D, McLeod M, Johnston K (2003) Land environments of New Zealand technical guide. David Bateman Ltd, AucklandGoogle Scholar
  37. McEwen WM (1987) Ecological districts and regions of New Zealand, 3rd ed. Biological Resources Centre Publication No 5. Department of Conservation, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  38. Melillo JM, Aber JD, Muratore JF (1982) Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 63:621–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moller H (1996) Lessons for invasion theory from social insects. Biol Conserv 78:125–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morrison LW (2002) Long-term impacts of an arthropod-community invasion by the imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Ecology 83:2337–2345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nannipieri P, Ascher J, Ceccherini MT, Landi L, Pietramellara G, Renella G (2003) Microbial diversity and soil functions. Eur J Soil Sci 54:655–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Dowd DJ, Green PT, Lake PS (2003) Invasional ‘meltdown’ on an oceanic island. Ecol Lett 6:812–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Olson JS (1963) Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44:322–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Parker IM, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Goodell K, Wonham M, Kareiva PM, Williamson MH, Von Holle B, Moyle PB, Byers JE, Goldwasser L (1999) Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol Invasions 1:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Roura-Pascual N, Suarez AV, Gomez C, Pons P, Touyama Y, Wild AL, Peterson AT (2004) Geographical potential of Argentine ants (Linepithema humile Mayr) in the face of global climate change. Proc R Soc Lond B 271(1557):2527–2535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roura-Pascual N, Hui C, Ikeda T, Leday G, Richardson DM, Carpintero S, Espadaler X, Gómez C, Guénard B, Hartley S, Krushelnycky P, Lester PJ, McGeoch MA, Menke S, Pedersen J, Pitt J, Reyes J, Sanders NJ, Suarez AV, Touyama Y, Ward DF, Ward P, Worner SP (2011) The relative roles of climatic suitability and anthropogenic influence in determining the pattern of spread in a global invader. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:220–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rowles AD, O’Dowd DJ (2009) Impacts of the invasive Argentine ant on native ants and other invertebrates in coastal scrub in south-eastern Australia. Austral Ecol 34:239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rusek J (1998) Biodiversity of Collembola and their functional role in the ecosystem. Biodivers Conserv 7:1207–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sanders NJ, Suarez AV (2011) Elton’s insights into the ecology of ant invasions: lessons learned and lessons still to be learned. In: Richardson DM (ed) Fifty years of invasion ecology: the legacy of Charles Elton. Blackwell, New York, pp 239–251Google Scholar
  50. Sanders NJ, Gotelli NJ, Heller NE, Gordon DM (2003) Community disassembly by an invasive ant species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:2474–2477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Solaiman K (2007) Measurement of microbial biomass and activity in soil. In: Varman A, Oelmüller R (eds) Soil biology, vol 11., Advanced techniques in microbiologySpringer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 201–211Google Scholar
  52. Standish RJ, Williams PA, Robertson AW, Scott NA, Hedderley DI (2004) Invasion by a perennial herb increases decomposition rate and alters nutrient availability in warm temperate lowland forest remnants. Biol Invasions 6:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Suarez AV, Case TJ (2002) Bottom-up effects on persistence of a specialist predator: ant invasions and horned lizards. Ecol Appl 12:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Suarez AV, Bolger DT, Case TJ (1998) Effects of fragmentation and invasion on native ant communities in coastal Southern California. Ecology 79:2041–2056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Suarez AV, Holway DA, Case TJ (2001) Patterns of spread in biological invasions dominated by long-distance jump dispersal: insights from Argentine ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:1095–1100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Suarez AV, Yeh P, Case TJ (2005) Impacts of Argentine ants on avian nesting success. Insect Soc 52:378–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thomas ML, Holway DA (2005) Condition-specific competition between invasive Argentine ants and Australian Iridomymrex. J Anim Ecol 74:532–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Traveset A, Richardson DM (2006) Biological invasions as disruptors of plant reproductive mutualisms. Trends Ecol Evol 21:208–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Waipara NW, Obanor F, Walter M (2002) Impact of phylloplane management on microbial populations. NZ Plant Prot 56:125–128Google Scholar
  60. Walters AC (2006) Invasion by Argentine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in South Australia: impacts on community composition and abundance of invertebrates in urban parklands. Austral Ecol 31:567–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Walters AC, Mackay DA (2003) The impact of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (Mayr), on native ants and other invertebrates in South Australia. Rec S Aust Mus 7:17–24Google Scholar
  62. Ward DF (2009) The diversity, community composition and seasonality of native ants in northern New Zealand. Myrmecol News 12:195–200Google Scholar
  63. Ward DF, Harris R (2005) Invasibility of native habitats by Argentine ants, Linepithema humile, in New Zealand. NZ J Ecol 29:215–219Google Scholar
  64. Ward DF, New TR, Yen AL (2001) Effects of pitfall trap spacing on the abundance, richness and composition of invertebrate catches. J Insect Conserv 5:47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ward DF, Harris RJ, Stanley MC (2005) Human-mediated range expansion of Argentine ants Linepithema humile (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in New Zealand. Sociobiology 45:401–407Google Scholar
  66. Ward DF, Harris RJ, Hartley S, Lester PJ, Stanley MC, Suckling DM, Toft RJ (2010) Twenty years of Argentine ants in New Zealand: past research and future priorities for applied management. NZ Entomol 33:67–78Google Scholar
  67. Wardle DA (1992) A comparative assessment of factors which influence microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen levels in soil. Biol Rev 67:321–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wardle DA, Hyodo F, Bardgett RD, Yeates GW, Nilsson MC (2011) Long-term aboveground and belowground consequences of red wood ant exclusion in boreal forest. Ecology 92:645–656PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wider RK, Lang GE (1982) A critique of the analytical methods used in examining decomposition data obtained from litter bags. Ecology 63:1636–1642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Williams DF (1994) Exotic ants: biology, impact, and control of introduced species. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  71. Wootton JT (1994) The nature and consequences of indirect effects. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 25:443–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zelikova TJ, Sanders NJ, Dunn RR (2011) The mixed effects of experimental ant removal on seedling distribution, belowground invertebrates, and soil nutrients. Ecosphere 2(5):art63. doi: 10.1890/ES11-00073.1

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Biodiversity and Biosecurity, School of Biological Sciences, Tamaki CampusUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Landcare ResearchAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations