Skip to main content
Log in

Inter-annual abundance variation in some genera of diatom and zooplankton in a mangrove ecosystem

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents data for the abundance of phytoplankton and zooplankton and related habitat parameters for Lothian Island mangrove ecosystem located at the coastal boundary of the Ganges River delta. Over the 3 study years, total abundance of phytoplankton and zooplankton was lowest during the monsoon period. In 2008, the most common diatom genera (by % relative abundance) were Skeletonema cf. costatum (14.2), Thalassiothrix (9.36), Nitzschia sigma (8.16), Coscinodiscus radiatus (7.65), Chaetoceros (6.64), Pleurosigma (3.05), Thalassionema (1.77), Ditylum brightwellii (1.71), and Cyclotella (1.0), whereas in 2010 they were Skeletonema cf. costatum (41.7), Chaetoceros (11.1), Thalassiothrix (6.04), Nitzschia sigma (4.49), Coscinodiscus radiatus (3.96), Cyclotella (2.61), Thalassionema (2.11), Pleurosigma (1.22) and, Ditylum brightwellii (1.01). Relative abundance of the zooplankton size classes typically followed the order meso > micro > macro and Copepods were the most abundant taxa (54.6 % of total zooplankton abundance). Total abundance of both phyto and zooplankton almost doubled in 2010 relative to 2008 although the ratio of the two remained constant (Zooplankton: phytoplankton = 0.002). The N:P ratio of water did not change much over the study and did not seem to be responsible for phytoplankton abundance changes; rather interannual variations in phytoplankton abundance could be explained by a simple predator–prey-relationship with zooplankton.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alongi DM (2009) The energetics of mangrove forests, Springer, New York, p 78

  • Alory G, Wijffels S, Myers G (2007) Observed temperature trends in the Indian Ocean over 1960–1999 and associated mechanisms. Geophys Res Lett 34:L02606. doi:10.1029/2006GL028044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APHA (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water, 20005. APHA, Washington, pp 5–15

  • Bhattathiri PMA (2001) Features at some significant Estuaries of India. In: Sengupta R, Desai E (eds) The Indian Ocean: a perspective, vol. 1. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata, pp 271–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas H, Mukhopadhyay SK, De TK, Sen S, Jana TK (2004) Biogenic controls on the air-water carbon dioxide exchange in the Sundarban mangrove environment, northeast coast of Bay of Bengal, India. Limnol Oceanogr 49:95–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas H, Dey M, Ganguly D, De TK, Ghosh S, Jana TK (2010) Comparative analysis of phytoplankton composition and abundance over a two-decade period at the land-ocean boundary of a tropical mangrove ecosystem. Estuar Coast. 33:384–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borkman DG, Smayda T (2009) Multidecadal (1959–1997) changes in Skeletonema abundance and seasonal bloom patterns in Narragansett Bay, USA. J Sea Res 61:84–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloern JE (1996) Phytoplankton bloom dynamics in coastal ecosystem: A review with some general lessons from sustained investigation of San Rancisco Bay, California. Rev Geophys 34:2 96G00986, pp 127–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Cociasu A, Dorogan L, Humborg C, Popa L (1996) Long-term ecological changes in Romanian coastal waters of the Black Sea. Mar Pollut Bull 32:32–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dame RF, Prins TC (1998) Bivalve carrying capacity in coastal ecosystems. Aquat Ecol 31:409–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganguly D, Dey M, Mandal SK, De TK, Jana TK (2008) Energy dynamics and its implication to biosphere-atmosphere exchange of CO2, H2O and CH4 in a tropical mangrove forest canopy. Atmos Environ 42:4172–4184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GEMS (Global Environment Monitoring System, Gems Data Base), 2002. http://wwwgemswater.org

  • Godhantaraman N (2001) Seasonal variations in taxonomic composition, abundance and food web relationship of microzooplankton in estuarine and mangrove waters, Parangipettai region, Southeast coast of India. Indian J Mar Sci 30:151–160

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DC Jr, Boudreau PR, Mann KH, Ong KH, Silvert WL, Smith SV, Wattayakorn G, Wulff F, Yanagi T (1996) LOICZ biogeochemical modelling guidelines. LOICZ reports and studies No. 5. LOICZ, Texel, p 96

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasshoff K, Ehrhardt MM, Kremling K (1983) Methods of seawater analysis, 2nd edn. Verleg Chemie, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah L (2011) Climate change biology. Academic Press, Amsterdam, p 307

  • Jyothibabu R, Madhu NV, Jayalakshmi KV, Balachandran KK, Shiyas CA, Martin GD, Nair KKC (2006) Impact of freshwater influx on microzooplankton mediated food web in a tropical estuary (Cochin backwaters-India). Estuar Coast Shelf S 69:505–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller PE, Paulson SA, Paulson LJ (1980) Methods for biological, chemical and physical analysis in reservoirs. In: Tech Rep. 5, Lake Mead Limnological Res. Centre, Univ. Nevada

  • May RM (1973) On relationships among various types of population model. Am Nat 107:46–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mckinnon AD, Klumpp DW (1998) Mangrove zooplankton of North Queensland, Australia. Hydrobiologia 362:127–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meybeck M (1982) Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus transport by world rivers. Am J Sci 282:401–450. doi:10.2475/ajs.282.4.401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Micheli F (1999) Eutrophication, fisheries, and consumer-resource dynamics in marine pelagic ecosystems. Scince 285:1396–1398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay SK, Biswas H, De TK, Jana TK (2006) Fluxes of nutrients from the tropical River Hooghly at the land-ocean boundary of Sundarbans. NE Coast of Bay of Bengal, India J Marine Syst 62:9–21

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (2000) Clean coastal waters: understanding the effects of nutrient pollution. National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Omori M, Ikeda T (1984) Methods in marine zooplankton ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Padmavati G, Goswami SC (1996) Zooplankton ecology in the Mandovi-Zuari estuarine system of Goa, West Coast of India. Indian J Mar Sci 25:268–273

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pahlow M, Riebesell U (2001) Temporal trends in deep ocean Redfield ratios. Science 287:831–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahm L, Conley D, Sanden P, Wulff F, Stalnacke P (1996) Time series analysis of nutrient inputs to the Baltic Sea and changing D Si:DIN ratios. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 130:221–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ray R, Ganguly D, Chowdhury C, Dey M, Das S, Dutta MK, Mandal SK, Majumder N, De TK, Mukhopadhyay SK, Jana TK (2011) Carbon sequestration and annual increase of carbon stock in a mangrove forest. Atmos Env. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.074

    Google Scholar 

  • Roelke DL, Eldridge PM, Cifuentes LA (1999) A model of phytoplankton competition for limiting and nonlimiting nutrients: implications for development of estuarine and nearshore management schemes. Estuaries 22:92–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarma VVSS, Prasad VR, Kumar BSK, Rajeev K, Devi BMM, Reddy NPC, Sarma VV, Kumar MD (2010) Intra-annual variability in nutrient in the Godavari estuary. India, Cont Shelf Res 30:2005–2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seitzinger SP, Harrison JA, Dumont F, Bensen AHW, Bouwman AF (2005) Sources and delivery of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorous to the coastal zone: an overview of global nutrient export from watersheds (NEWS) models and their application. Global Biogeochem Cy 19 GB4S01. doi:10.1029/2005GB002606

  • Sipura J, Lores EM, Zinder RA (2003) Effect of copepods on estuarine microbial plankton in short-term microcosms. Aquat Microbs Ecol 33:181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomas CR (1997) Identifying marine phytoplankton. Academic press, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh JJ (1991) Importance of the continental margins in the marine biogeochemical cycling of carbon and nitrogen. Nature 350:53–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the funding agency, Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi. We are grateful to Dr. Anett Trebitz, U S. EPA Mid Continent Ecology Division, 6201 Congdon Blvd, Duluth MN 5584 for her kind and generous help to improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tapan Kumar Jana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chowdhury, C., Majumder, N., Ray, R. et al. Inter-annual abundance variation in some genera of diatom and zooplankton in a mangrove ecosystem. Biodivers Conserv 21, 2029–2043 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0295-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0295-1

Keywords

Navigation