Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 21, Issue 7, pp 1893–1899 | Cite as

Do invasive rodents impact endangered insular iguana populations?

  • William K. Hayes
  • John B. Iverson
  • Charles R. Knapp
  • Ronald L. Carter
Brief Communication

Abstract

Ample evidence confirms that large invasive mammalian competitors and predators can devastate endangered insular iguana populations. However, the impact of invasive rodents, particularly rats (Rattus rattus), has remained elusive. Tail autotomy occurs frequently in lizards, often as an antipredator tactic, but sometimes from intraspecific aggression. Tail autotomy can incur substantial locomotor, behavioral, energetic, and survival costs. Furcation (i.e., dividing into branches) of regenerated tails may also result from attempted predation but occurs much more rarely, and with unknown costs. To evaluate the potential impact of invasive rodents—primarily rats—on West Indian rock iguanas (genus Cyclura), we compared tail-break and tail-furcation frequencies among 19 insular iguana populations (3,537 individuals) representing three species in the Bahamian Archipelago (including the Turks and Caicos Islands). The findings supported our three hypotheses: (1) that tail-break and tail-furcation frequencies are significantly higher in populations coexisting with invasive rodents; (2) that tail-furcation results primarily from failed predation attempts rather than intraspecific aggression; and (3) that frequencies of tail breaks and tail furcation are associated with each other, suggesting a degree of commonality in cause-effect (i.e., failed predation attempts). Tail furcation, in contrast to tail breakage, never occurred on islands lacking invasive mammalian predators. We conclude that invasive rodents, particularly rats, may have a greater impact on endangered insular iguana species than previously recognized.

Keywords

Invasive mammals Rats Lizards Tail autotomy Tail furcation Predation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the many students and colleagues without whose support this work could not have been accomplished. Research by Hayes and Carter was supported by the Bahamas Ministry of Agriculture, Chicago Zoological Society, Denver Zoological Society, Disney Foundation, Insular Species Conservation Society, and International Iguana Foundation. Iverson’s studies were funded by the Test Fund, the Cope Fund, and the Professional Development Fund, all of Earlham College. Knapp’s work was funded by the John G. Shedd Aquarium’s citizen scientist iguana research program. All authors were also supported by their host institution(s), with research approved by their respective institutional animal care and use committees, and authorized by Bahamas research permits.

References

  1. Arnold EN (1984) Evolutionary aspects of tail shedding in lizards and their relatives. J Nat Hist 18:127–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bateman PW, Fleming PA (2009) To cut a long tail short: a review of lizard caudal autotomy studies carried out over the last 20 years. J Zool 277:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bateman PW, Fleming PA (2011) Frequency of tail loss reflects variation in predation levels, predator efficiency, and the behaviour of three populations of brown anoles. Biol J Linn Soc 103:648–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates MF (1990) Bifid, trifid and branched tails in lizards. African Herp News 14:19–22Google Scholar
  5. Bellairs Ad’A, Bryant SV (1985) Autotomy and regeneration in reptiles. In: Gans C, Billett F (eds) Biology of the reptilia, vol 15., Development B. Wiley, NY, pp 301–410Google Scholar
  6. Carter RL, Hayes WK (2004) Conservation of an endangered Bahamian iguana. II. Morphological variation and conservation recommendations. In: Alberts AC, Carter RL, Hayes WK, Martins EP (eds) Iguanas: biology and conservation. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 258–273Google Scholar
  7. Clause AR, Capaldi EA (2006) Caudal autotomy and regeneration in lizards. J Exp Zool 305A:965–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  9. Haneke B (1995) A study of Mona rock iguana (Cyclura cornuta stejnegeri) nesting sites on Mona Island, Puerto Rico. J Int Iguana Soc–Iguana Times 4(4):61–71Google Scholar
  10. Hare KM, Miller KA (2010) Frequency of tail loss does not reflect innate predisposition in temperate New Zealand lizards. Naturwissenschaften 97:197–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hayes WK, Carter RL, Cyril S, Thornton B (2004) Conservation of an endangered Bahamian iguana. I. Population assessments, habitat restoration, and behavioral ecology. In: Alberts AC, Carter RL, Hayes WK, Martins EP (eds) Iguanas: biology and conservation. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 232–257Google Scholar
  12. Henderson RW (1992) Consequences of predator introductions and habitat destruction on amphibians and reptiles in the post-Columbus West Indies. Caribb J Sci 28:1–10Google Scholar
  13. Iverson JB (1979) Behavior and ecology of the rock iguana Cyclura carinata. Bull Florida State Mus 24:173–356Google Scholar
  14. Iverson JB, Smith GR, Pieper L (2004) Factors affecting long-term growth of the Allen Cays rock iguana in the Bahamas. In: Alberts AC, Carter RL, Hayes WK, Martins EP (eds) Iguanas: biology and conservation. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 176–192Google Scholar
  15. Jones HP, Tershy BR, Zavaleta ES, Croll DA, Keitt BS, Finkelstein ME, Howald GR (2008) Severity of the effects of invasive rats on seabirds: a global review. Conserv Biol 22:16–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Knapp CR (2000) Home range and intraspecific interactions of a translocated iguana population (Cyclura cychlura inornata Barbour and Noble). Caribb J Sci 36:250–257Google Scholar
  17. Loveridge A (1923) Notes on East African lizards collected 1920–1923, with the description of two new races of Agama lionotus Blgr. Proc Zool Soc London 93:935–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maginnis TL (2006) The costs of autotomy and regeneration in animals: a review and framework for future research. Behav Ecol 17:857–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mata-Silva V, Rocha A, Gandara A, Johnson JD (2010) Cophosaurus texanus (Greater Earless Lizard). multiple tails. Herpetol Rev 41:352–353Google Scholar
  20. Mitchell NC (1999) Effect of introduced ungulates on density, dietary preferences, home range, and physical condition of the iguana Cyclura pinguis on Anegada. Herpetologica 55:7–17Google Scholar
  21. Mitchell N, Fulford M, Haeffner R (2000) Turks and Caicos iguana (Cyclura carinata carinata). West Indian Iguana Specialist Group News 3(1):7–13Google Scholar
  22. Pafilis P, Foufopoulos J, Poulakakis N, Lymberakis P, Valakos ED (2009) Tail shedding in island lizards [Lacertidae, Reptilia]: decline of antipredator defenses in relaxed predation environments. Evolution 63:1262–1278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sood MS (1939) A peculiar case of caudal abnormality in Hemidactylus flaviviridis Rüppell. Proc Plant Sci 9:316–322Google Scholar
  24. Tolson PJ (2000) Control of introduced species. In: Alberts AC (ed), West Indian iguanas: status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN—the World Conservation Union, Gland, pp 86–89Google Scholar
  25. Towns DR (2011) Invasive mammal eradications: the value of an ecosystem view. Anim Conserv 14:466–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Towns DR, Atkinson IAE, Daugherty CH (2006) Have the harmful effects of introduced rats on islands been exaggerated? Biol Invasions 8:863–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Towns DR, Parrish GR, Tyrrell CL, Ussher GT, Cree A, Newman DG, Whitaker AH, Westbrooke I (2007) Responses of tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus) to removal of introduced Pacific rats from islands. Conserv Biol 21:1021–1031PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wanless RM, Angel A, Cuthbert RJ, Hilton GM, Ryan PG (2007) Can predation by invasive mice drive seabird extinctions? Biol Lett 3:241–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • William K. Hayes
    • 1
  • John B. Iverson
    • 2
  • Charles R. Knapp
    • 3
    • 4
  • Ronald L. Carter
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Earth and Biological SciencesLoma Linda UniversityLoma LindaUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyEarlham CollegeRichmondUSA
  3. 3.Daniel P. Haerther Center for Conservation and Research, John G. Shedd AquariumChicagoUSA
  4. 4.San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation ResearchEscondidoUSA

Personalised recommendations