Anthropomorphism has the potential to aid conservation biologist conserve target species by developing empathy among the public, effectively promoting considerate practice. There is a stigma associated with anthropomorphism in research because it often precludes unbiased data and compromises fact based results. However, I propose that anthropomorphism can be a means to accomplish the goals of conservation and management. Developing public support has been notoriously difficult, but encouraging anthropomorphism (i.e., attributing human characteristics to nonhuman animals) could help conservation biologists develop more empathy toward target species. Highlighting research that promotes animals as being similar to humans could cause the public to exhibit more conservation considerate practices. Therefore, anthropomorphism should be encouraged when appropriate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Bartall IBA, Decety J, Mason P (2011) Empathy and pro-social behavior in rats. Science 334:1427–1430
Bekoff M (2000) Animal emotions: exploring passionate natures. Bioscience 50:861–870
Blaisdell AP, Sawa K, Leising KJ, Waldmann MR (2006) Causal reasoning in rats. Science 311:1020–1022
Buss DM (1985) Human mate selection. Am Sci 73:47–51
Eddy TJ, Gallup GG Jr, Povinelli DJ (1993) Attribution of cognitive states to animals: anthropomorphism in comparative perspective. J Soc Issues 49:87–101
Elwood RW, Appel M (2009) Pain experience in hermit crabs? Anim Behav 77:1243–1246
Kennedy JS (1992) The new anthropomorphism. Cambridge University Press, UK
Lethem J, Slade PD, Troup JDG, Bentley G (1983) Outline of a fear-avoidance model of exaggerated pain perception. Behav Res Ther 21:401–408
Marino L (2002) Convergence of complex cognitive abilities in cetaceans and primates. Brain Behav Evol 59:21–32
Meyers OE Jr, Saunders CD, Bexell SM (2009) Fostering empathy with wildlife: factors affecting free-choice learning for conservation concerns and behavior. In: Falk JH, Heimlich JE, Foutz S (eds) Free-choice learning and the environment. AltaMira Press, Plymouth, pp 39–55
Peterson MN, Peterson MJ, Peterson TR (2005) Conservation and the myth of consensus. Conserv Biol 19:762–767
Singer P (2009) Speciesism and moral status. Metaphilosophy 40:567–581
Turvey ST, Pitman RL, Taylor BL, Barlow J, Akamatsu T, Barrett LA, Zhao X, Reeves RR, Stewart BS, Wang K, Wei Z, Zhang X, Pusser LT, Richlen M, Brandon JR, Wang D (2007) First human-caused extinction of a cetacean species. Biol Lett 3:537–540
Wynne CDL (2007) What are animals? Why anthropomorphism is still not a scientific approach to behavior. Comp Cognit Behav Rev 2:125–135
Conflict of interest
I declare no conflict of interest.
About this article
Cite this article
Chan, A.A.Y. Anthropomorphism as a conservation tool. Biodivers Conserv 21, 1889–1892 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0274-6
- Conservation management
- Public support