Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 1365–1380 | Cite as

Biodiversity of man-made open habitats in an underused country: a class of multispecies abundance models for count data

  • Yuichi Yamaura
  • J. Andrew Royle
  • Naoaki Shimada
  • Seigo Asanuma
  • Tamotsu Sato
  • Hisatomo Taki
  • Shun’ichi Makino
Original Paper

Abstract

Since the 1960s, Japan has become highly dependent on foreign countries for natural resources, and the amount of managed lands (e.g. coppice, grassland, and agricultural field) has declined. Due to infrequent natural and human disturbance, early-successional species are now declining in Japan. Here we surveyed bees, birds, and plants in four human-disturbed open habitats (pasture, meadow, young planted forest, and abandoned clear-cut) and two forest habitats (mature planted forest and natural old-growth). We extended a recently developed multispecies abundance model to accommodate count data, and used the resulting models to estimate species-, functional group-, and community-level state variables (abundance and species richness) at each site, and compared them among the six habitats. Estimated individual-level detection probability was quite low for bee species (mean across species = 0.003; 0.16 for birds). Thirty-two (95% credible interval: 13–64) and one (0–4) bee and bird species, respectively, were suggested to be undetected by the field survey. Although habitats in which community-level abundance and species richness was highest differed among taxa, species richness and abundance of early-successional species were similar in the four disturbed open habitats across taxa except for plants in the pasture habitat which was a good habitat only for several exotic species. Our results suggest that human disturbance, especially the revival of plantation forestry, may contribute to the restoration of early-successional species in Japan.

Keywords

Count data Functional group Hierarchical community model Human disturbance Plantation forestry Species richness 

Supplementary material

10531_2012_244_MOESM1_ESM.doc (5.9 mb)
Supplementary appendix material 1 (DOC 6058 kb)
10531_2012_244_MOESM2_ESM.zip (17 kb)
Supplementary appendix material 2 (ZIP 17 kb)

References

  1. Askins RA (2001) Sustaining biological diversity in early successional communities: the challenge of managing unpopular habitats. Wildl Soc Bull 29:407–412Google Scholar
  2. Asner GP, Rudel TK, Aide TM, DeFries R, Emerson R (2009) A contemporary assessment of change in humid tropical forests. Conserv Biol 23:1386–1395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlow J, Gardner TA, Araujo IS, Avila-Pires TC, Bonaldo AB, Costa JE, Esposito MC, Ferreira LV, Hawes J, Hernandez MIM, Hoogmoed MS, Leite RN, Lo-Man-Hung NF, Malcolm JR, Martins MB, Mestre LAM, Miranda-Santos R, Nunes-Gutjahr AL, Overal WL, Parry L, Peters SL, Ribeiro-Junior MA, da Silva MNF, da Silva Motta C, Peres CA (2007) Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:18555–18560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck J, Schwanghart W (2010) Comparing measures of species diversity from incomplete inventories: an update. Methods Ecol Evol 1:38–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Betts MG, Hagar JC, Rivers JW, Alexander JD, McGarigal K, McComb BC (2010) Thresholds in forest bird occurrence as a function of the amount of early-seral broadleaf forest at landscape scales. Ecol Appl 20:2116–2130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bibby CJ, Aston N, Bellamy PE (1989) Effects of broadleaved trees on birds of upland conifer plantations in north Wales. Biol Conserv 49:17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA, Mustoe SH (2000) Bird census techniques. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  8. Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L (2001) Introduction to distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Chandler RB, Royle JA, King DI (2011) Inference about density and temporary emigration in unmarked populations. Ecology 92:1429–1435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Department of Population Dynamics Research (2006) Population projections for Japan: 2001–2050 with long-range population projections: 2051–2100. National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, Tokyo. http://www.ipss.go.jp/pp-newest/e/ppfj02/top.html
  11. Dorazio RM, Royle JA, Söderström B, Glimskär A (2006) Estimating species richness and accumulation by modeling species occurrence and detectability. Ecology 87:842–854PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellis EC, Ramankutty N (2008) Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world. Front Ecol Environ 6:439–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellis EC, Goldewijk KK, Siebert S, Lightman D, Ramankutty N (2010) Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700–2000. Global Ecol Biogeogr 19:589–606Google Scholar
  14. FAO (2006) Global planted forests thematic study: results and analysis. Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  15. FAO (2010) Global forest resources assessment 2010. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  16. Fischer J, Stott J, Law BS (2010) The disproportionate value of scattered trees. Biol Conserv 143:1564–1567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forestry Agency (2007) Status of forest resources. Forestry Agency, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. http://www.rinya.maff.go.jp/j/keikaku/genkyou/index.html
  18. Franklin JF, Maeda T, Ohsumi Y, Matsui M, Yagi H, Hawk GM (1979) Subalpine coniferous forests of central Honshu, Japan. Ecol Monogr 49:311–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fretwell SD, Lucas HLJ (1969) On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheor 19:16–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gardner B, Royle JA, Wegan MT, Rainbolt RE, Curtis PD (2010) Estimating black bear density using DNA data from hair snares. J Wildl Manag 74:318–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaston KJ, Fuller RA (2008) Commonness, population depletion and conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol 23:14–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gelman A, Hill J (2007) Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Inoue T (2005) Causes of butterfly decline in Japan. Jpn J Entomol (New Ser) 8:43–64 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  24. JBOSC (2010) Japan biodiversity outlook. Japan Biodiversity Outlook Science Committee (JBOSC), Ministry of the Environment, Tokyo. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  25. Kauppi PE, Ausubel JH, Fang J, Mather AS, Sedjo RA, Waggoner PE (2006) Returning forests analyzed with the forest identity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:17574–17579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kéry M (2010) Introduction to WinBUGS for ecologists: a Bayesian approach to regression, ANOVA, mixed models and related analysis. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  27. Kéry M, Spillmann JH, Truong C, Holderegger R (2006) How biased are estimates of extinction probability in revisitation studies? J Ecol 94:980–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kéry M, Dorazio RM, Soldaat L, van Strien A, Zuiderwijk A, Royle JA (2009) Trend estimation in populations with imperfect detection. J Appl Ecol 46:1163–1172Google Scholar
  29. Lawton JH, Bignell DE, Bolton B, Bloemers GF, Eggleton P, Hammond PM, Hodda M (1998) Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest. Nature 391:72–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lehner B, Liermann CR, Revenga C, Vörösmarty C, Fekete B, Crouzet P, Döll P, Endejan M, Frenken K, Magome J, Nilsson C, Robertson JC, Rödel R, Sindorf N, Wisser D (2011) High-resolution mapping of the world’s reservoirs and dams for sustainable river-flow management. Front Ecol Environ 9:494–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lunn D, Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N (2009) The BUGS project: evolution, critique and future directions. Stat Med 28:3049–3067PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Royle JA, Pollock KH, Bailey LL, Hines JE (2006) Occupancy estimation and modeling: inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence. Academic Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  33. Meyfroidt P, Rudel TK, Lambin EF (2010) Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:20917–20922PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miyawaki A. 1994. Handbook of Japanese vegetation. Revised New Ed. Shibundo Pub, Tokyo. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  35. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nagaike T, Hayashi A, Kubo M, Abe M, Arai N (2006) Plant species diversity in a managed forest landscape composed of Larix kaempferi plantations and abandoned coppice forests in central Japan. For Sci 52:324–332Google Scholar
  37. Okuda S (1997) Wild plants of Japan. Shogakukan, Tokyo. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  38. Ovaskainen O, Soininen J (2011) Making more out of sparse data: hierarchical modeling of species communities. Ecology 92:289–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ralph CJ, Geupel GR, Pyle P, Martin TE, DeSante DF (1993) Handbook of field methods for monitoring landbirds. USDA For Serv Gen Tech Rep PSW-GTR-144Google Scholar
  40. Royle JA, Dorazio RM (2008) Hierarchical modeling and inference in ecology: the analysis of data from populations, metapopulations and communities. Academic Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  41. Royle JA, Dorazio RM, Link WA (2007) Analysis of multinomial models with unknown index using data augmentation. J Comput Graph Stat 16:67–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ruiz-Gutiérrez V, Zipkin EF, Dhondt AA (2010) Occupancy dynamics in a tropical bird community: unexpectedly high forest use by birds classified as non-forest species. J Appl Ecol 47:621–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sauer JR, Link WA (2002) Hierarchical modeling of population stability and species group attributes from survey data. Ecology 83:1743–1751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schaffers AP, Raemakers IP, Sýkora KV, ter Braak CJF (2008) Arthropod assemblages are best predicted by plant species composition. Ecology 89:782–794PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scherber C, Eisenhauer N, Weisser WW, Schmid B, Voigt W, Fischer M, Schulze E-D, Roscher C, Weigelt A, Allan E, Beszler H, Bonkowski M, Buchmann N, Buscot F, Clement LW, Ebeling A, Engels C, Halle S, Kertscher I, Klein A-M, Koller R, Konig S, Kowalski E, Kummer V, Kuu A, Lange M, Lauterbach D, Middelhoff C, Migunova VD, Milcu A, Muller R, Partsch S, Petermann JS, Renker C, Rottstock T, Sabais A, Scheu S, Schumacher J, Temperton VM, Tscharntke T (2010) Bottom-up effects of plant diversity on multitrophic interactions in a biodiversity experiment. Nature 468:553–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schieck J (1997) Biased detection of bird vocalizations affects comparisons of bird abundance among forested habitats. Condor 99:179–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Steffan-Dewenter I, Münzenberg U, Bürger C, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2002) Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83:1421–1432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sturtz S, Ligges U, Gelman A (2010) R2OpenBUGS: a package for running OpenBUGS from R. http://openbugs.info/w/UserContributedCode
  49. Swanson ME, Franklin JF, Beschta RL, Crisafulli CM, DellaSala DA, Hutto RL, Lindenmayer DB, Swanson FJ (2011) The forgotten stage of forest succession: early-successional ecosystems on forest sites. Front Ecol Environ 9:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tscharntke T, Gathmann A, Steffan-Dewenter I (1998) Bioindication using trap-nesting bees and wasps and their natural enemies: community structure and interactions. J Appl Ecol 35:708–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Violle C, Navas M-L, Vile D, Kazakou E, Fortunel C, Hummel I, Garnier E (2007) Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116:882–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Winfree R, Griswold T, Kremen C (2007) Effect of human disturbance on bee communities in a forested ecosystem. Conserv Biol 21:213–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yamagawa H, Ito S, Nakao T (2010) Restoration of semi-natural forest after clearcutting of conifer plantations in Japan. Landsc Ecol Eng 6:109–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yamaura Y, Amano T, Koizumi T, Mitsuda Y, Taki H, Okabe K (2009) Does land-use change affect biodiversity dynamics at a macroecological scale? A case study of birds over the past 20 years in Japan. Anim Conserv 12:110–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yamaura Y, Royle JA, Kuboi K, Tada T, Ikeno S, Makino S (2011) Modelling community dynamics based on species-level abundance models from detection/nondetection data. J Appl Ecol 48:67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuichi Yamaura
    • 1
    • 6
  • J. Andrew Royle
    • 2
  • Naoaki Shimada
    • 3
  • Seigo Asanuma
    • 4
  • Tamotsu Sato
    • 5
  • Hisatomo Taki
    • 1
  • Shun’ichi Makino
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forest EntomologyForestry and Forest Products Research InstituteTsukubaJapan
  2. 2.U. S. Geological SurveyPatuxent Wildlife Research CenterLaurelUSA
  3. 3.Faculty of Policy StudiesIwate Prefectural UniversityTakizawaJapan
  4. 4.Study Club on Regional Environment Planning in TohokuTakizawaJapan
  5. 5.Department of Forest VegetationForestry and Forest Products Research InstituteTsukubaJapan
  6. 6.Division of Environmental ResourcesGraduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations