Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 20, Issue 11, pp 2311–2332 | Cite as

Grassland restoration on former croplands in Europe: an assessment of applicability of techniques and costs

  • Péter Török
  • Enikő Vida
  • Balázs Deák
  • Szabolcs Lengyel
  • Béla Tóthmérész
Review Paper


Grasslands used to be vital landscape elements throughout Europe. Nowadays, the area of grasslands is dramatically reduced, especially in industrial countries. Grassland restoration is widely applied to increase the naturalness of the landscape and preserve biodiversity. We reviewed the most frequently used restoration techniques (spontaneous succession, sowing seed mixtures, transfer of plant material, topsoil removal and transfer) and techniques used to improve species richness (planting, grazing and mowing) to recover natural-like grasslands from ex-arable lands. We focus on the usefulness of methods in restoring biodiversity, their practical feasibility and costs. We conclude that the success of each technique depends on the site conditions, history, availability of propagules and/or donor sites, and on the budget and time available for restoration. Spontaneous succession can be an option for restoration when no rapid result is expected, and is likely to lead to the target in areas with high availability of propagules. Sowing low-diversity seed mixtures is recommended when we aim at to create basic grassland vegetation in large areas and/or in a short time. The compilation of high-diversity seed mixtures for large sites is rather difficult and expensive; thus, it may be applied rather on smaller areas. We recommend combining the two kinds of seed sowing methods by sowing low-diversity mixtures in a large area and high-diversity mixtures in small blocks to create species-rich source patches for the spontaneous colonization of nearby areas. When proper local hay sources are available, the restoration with plant material transfer can be a fast and effective method for restoration.


Grazing Hay transfer Mowing Seed sowing Spontaneous succession Topsoil removal Restoration cost 


  1. Aldrich JH (2002) Factors and benefits in the establishment of modest-sized wildflower plantings: a review. Nat Plants J 3:67–86Google Scholar
  2. Allison M, Ausden M (2004) Successful use of topsoil removal and soil amelioration to create heathland vegetation. Biol Conserv 120:221–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Averett JM, Klips RA, Nave LE et al (2004) Effects of soil carbon amendment on nitrogen availability and plant growth in an experimental tallgrass prairie restoration. Rest Ecol 12:568–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakker JP (1989) Nature management by grazing and cutting. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakker JP, Berendse F (1999) Constraints in the restoration of ecological diversity in grassland and heathland communities. Trends Ecol Evol 14:63–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bakker JP, Poschlod P, Strykstra RJ et al (1996) Seed bank and seed dispersal: important topics in restoration ecology. Acta Bot Neerl 45:461–490Google Scholar
  7. Belsky AJ, Blumenthal DM (1997) Effects of livestock grazing on stand dynamics and soils in upland forests of the interior west. Conserv Biol 11:315–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Billeter R, Peintinger M, Diemer M (2007) Restoration of montane fen meadows by mowing remains possible after 4–35 years of abandonment. Bot Helv 117:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bissels S, Donath TW, Hölzel N et al (2006) Effects of different mowing regimes on seedling recruitment in alluvial grasslands. Basic Appl Ecol 7:433–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bonanomi G, Caporaso S, Allegrezza M (2006) Short-term effects of nitrogen enrichment, litter removal and cutting on a Mediterranean grassland. Acta Oecol 30:419–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bossuyt B, Honnay O (2008) Can the seed bank be used for ecological restoration? An overview of seed bank characteristics in European communities. J Veg Sci 19:875–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bullock JM (1998) Community translocation in Britain: setting objectives and measuring consequences. Biol Conserv 84:199–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Celaya R, Jáuregui BM, García RR, Benavides R, García U, Osoro K (2010) Changes in heathland vegetation under goat grazing: effects of breed and stocking rate. Appl Veg Sci 13:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coulson SJ, Bullock JM, Stevenson MJ et al (2001) Colonization of grassland by sown species: dispersal versus microsite limitation in responses to management. J Appl Ecol 38:204–216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cramer VA, Hobbs RJ (eds) (2007) Old fields: dynamics and restoration of abandoned farmland. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. Cramer VA, Hobbs RJ, Standish RJ (2008) What’s new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly. Trends Ecol Evol 23:104–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Csontos P, Bózsing E, Cseresnyés I, Penksza K (2009) Reproductive potential of the alien species Asclepias syriaca (Asclepiadaceae) in the rural landscape. Pol J Ecol 57:383–388Google Scholar
  18. Diemer M, Oetiker K, Billeter R (2001) Abandonment alters community composition and canopy structure of Swiss calcareous fens. Appl Veg Sci 4:237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Donath TW, Hölzel N, Otte A (2006) Influence of competition by sown grass, disturbance and litter on recruitment of rare flood-meadow species. Biol Conserv 130:315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Donath T, Bissels S, Hölzel N et al (2007) Large scale application of diaspore transfer with plant material in restoration practice-impact of seed and microsite limitation. Biol Conserv 138:224–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dostálek J, Frantík T (2008) Dry grassland plant diversity conservation using low intensity sheep and goat grazing management: case study in Prague (Czech Republic). Biodivers Conserv 17:1439–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Du F, Shao HB, Shan L et al (2007) Secondary succession and its effects on soil moisture and nutrition in abandoned old-fields of hilly-region of Loess Plateau, China. Coll Surf B 58:278–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Edwards AR, Mortimer SR, Lawson CS et al (2007) Hay strewing, brush harvesting of seed and soil disturbance as tools for the enhancement of botanical diversity in grasslands. Biol Conserv 134:372–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Egler FE (1954) Vegetation science concepts. 1. Initial floristic composition, a factor in old-field vegetation development. Vegetatio 4:412–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eschen R, Mortimer SR, Lawson CR et al (2007) Carbon addition alters vegetation composition on ex-arable fields. J Appl Ecol 44:95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fischer SF, Poschlod P, Beinlich B (1996) Experimental studies on the dispersal of plants and animals on sheep in calcareous grasslands. J Appl Ecol 33:1206–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Foster BL, Murphy CA, Keller KR et al (2007) Restoration of prairie community structure and ecosystem function in an abandoned hayfield: a sowing experiment. Rest Ecol 15:652–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gough MW, Marrs RH (1990) A comparison of soil fertility between semi-natural and agricultural plant communities: implications for the creation of species-rich grassland from abandoned arable land. Biol Conserv 51:83–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hayes GF, Holl KD (2003) Cattle grazing impacts on annual forbs and vegetation composition of mesic grasslands in California. Conserv Biol 17:1694–1702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hayward MW (2009) Conservation management for the past, present and future. Biodivers Conserv 18:765–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hedberg P, Kotowski W (2010) New nature by sowing? The current state of species introduction in grassland restoration, and the road ahead. J Nat Conserv 18:304–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hobbs RJ, Walker LR (2007) Old field succession: development of concepts. In: Cramer VA, Hobbs RJ (eds) Old fields–dynamics and restoration of abandoned farmlands. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 17–31Google Scholar
  33. Hölzel N, Otte A (2003) Restoration of a species-rich flood meadow by topsoil removal and diaspore transfer with plant material. Appl Veg Sci 6:131–140Google Scholar
  34. Hrevušová Z, Hejcman M, Pavlů VV, Hakl J, Klaudisová M, Mrkvička J (2009) Long-term dynamics of biomass production, soil chemical properties and plant species composition of alluvial grassland after the cessation of fertilizer application in the Czech Republic. Agr Ecosyst Environ 130:123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Humbert J-Y, Ghazoul J, Walter T (2009) Meadow harvesting techniques and their impacts on field fauna. Agr Ecosyst Environ 130:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jongepierová I, Mitchley J, Tzanopoulos J (2007) A field experiment to recreate species rich hay meadows using regional seed mixtures. Biol Conserv 139:297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kardol P, Van der Wal A, Bezemer TM et al (2008) Restoration of species-rich grasslands on ex-arable land: seed addition outweighs soil fertility reduction. Biol Conserv 141:2208–2217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kiehl K, Thormann A, Pfadenhauer J (2006) Evaluation of initial restoration measures during the restoration of calcareous grasslands on former arable fields. Rest Ecol 14:148–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kiehl K, Kirmer A, Donath TW et al (2010) Species introduction in restoration projects—evaluation of different techniques for the establishment of semi-natural grasslands in Central and Northwestern Europe. Basic Appl Ecol 11:285–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kirmer A, Mahn EG (2001) Spontaneous and initiated succession on unvegetated slopes in the abandoned lignite-mining area of Goitsche, Germany. Appl Veg Sci 4:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kirmer A, Tischew S (eds) (2006) Handbuch; naturnahe Begrünung von Rohböden. Teubner Verlag, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  42. Kleijn D (2003) Can establishment characteristics explain the poor colonization success of late successional grassland species on ex-arable land? Rest Ecol 11:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Klimkowska A, van Diggelen R, Bakker JP et al (2007) Wet meadow restoration in Western Europe: a quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of several techniques. Biol Conserv 140:318–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Klimkowska A, Kotowski W, van Diggelen R, Grootjans AP, Dzierża P, Brzezińska K (2010a) Vegetation re-development after fen meadow restoration by topsoil removal and hay transfer. Restor Ecol 18:924–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Klimkowska A, Dzierża P, Brzezińska K, Kotowski W, Mędrzycki P (2010b) Can we balance the high costs of nature restoration with the method of topsoil removal? Case study from Poland. J Nat Conserv 18:202–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Krautzer B, Wittman H (2006) Restoration of alpine ecosystems. In: van Andel J, Aronson J (eds) Restoration ecology: the new frontier. Blackwell, Malden, pp 208–223Google Scholar
  47. Lawson CS, Ford MA, Mitchley J (2004) The influence of seed addition and cutting regime on the success of grassland restoration on former arable land. Appl Veg Sci 7:259–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Leather GR (1987) Weed control using allelopathic sunflowers and herbicide. Plant Soil 97:17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lepš J, Brown VK, Diaz Len TA et al (2001) Separating the chance effect from other diversity effects in the functioning of plant communities. Oikos 92:123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lepš J, Doležal J, Bezemer TM et al (2007) Long-term effectiveness of sowing high and low diversity seed mixtures to enhance plant community development on ex-arable fields. Appl Veg Sci 10:97–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lindborg R (2006) Recreating grasslands in Swedish rural landscapes—effects of seed sowing and management history. Biodivers Conserv 15:957–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Manchester SJ, McNally S, Treweek JR et al (1999) The cost and practicality of techniques for the reversion of arable land to lowland wet grassland—an experimental study and review. J Environ Manage 55:91–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mann S, Tischew S (2010) Role of megaherbivores in restoration of species-rich grasslands on former arable land in floodplains. Waldökologie, Landschaftsforschung und Naturschutz 10:7–15Google Scholar
  54. Marrs RH (1985) Techniques for reducing soil fertility for nature conservation purposes: a review in relation to research at Roper’s Heath, Suffolk, England. Biol Conserv 34:307–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Marrs RH, Snow CSR, Evans CE (1998) Heathland and acid grassland creation on arable soils at Minsmere: identification of potential problems and a test of cropping to impoverish soils. Biol Conserv 85:69–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mijnsbrugge K, Bischoff A, Smith B (2010) A question of origin: where and how to collect seed for ecological restoration. Basic Appl Ecol 11:300–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Molnár Z, Botta-Dukát Z (1998) Improved space-for-time substitution for hypothesis generation: secondary grasslands with documented site history in SE-Hungary. Phytocoenologia 28:1–29Google Scholar
  58. Mouissie AM, Lengkeek W, van Diggelen R (2005) Endozoochory by free-ranging, large herbivores—ecological correlates and perspectives for restoration. Basic Appl Ecol 19:478–486Google Scholar
  59. Öster M, Ask K, Cousins SAO et al (2009) Dispersal and establishment limitation reduces the potential for successful restoration of semi-natural grassland communities on former arable fields. J Appl Ecol 46:1266–1274Google Scholar
  60. Owen KM, Marrs RH (2000) Acidifying arable soils for the restoration of acid grasslands. Appl Veg Sci 3:105–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Patzelt A (1998) Vegetationsökologische und populationsbiologische Grundlagen für die Etablierung von Magerwiesen in Niedermooren. Diss Bot 297:1–154Google Scholar
  62. Patzelt A, Wild U, Pfadenhauer J (2001) Restoration of wet fen meadows by topsoil removal: vegetation development and germination biology of fen species. Rest Ecol 9:127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Piper JK, Schmidt ES, Janzen AJ (2007) Effects of species richness on resident and target species components in a prairie restoration. Rest Ecol 15:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Prach K, Hobbs RJ (2008) Spontaneous succession versus technical reclamation in the restoration of disturbed sites. Rest Ecol 16:363–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Prach K, Pyšek P (2001) Using spontaneous succession for restoration of human-disturbed habitats: experience from Central Europe. Ecol Eng 17:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Prach K, Řehounková K (2008) Spontaneous vegetation succession in gravel–sand pits: a potential for restoration. Rest Ecol 16:305–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pullin AS, Báldi A, Can OE et al (2009) Conservation focus on Europe: major conservation policy issues that need to be informed by conservation science. Conserv Biol 23:818–824PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pywell RF, Webb NR, Putwain PD (1995) A comparison of techniques for restoring heathland on abandoned farmland. J Appl Ecol 32:400–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pywell RF, Bullock JM, Hopkins A et al (2002) Restoration of species-rich grassland on arable land: assessing the limiting processes using a multi-site experiment. J Appl Ecol 39:294–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ramankutty N, Foley JA (1999) Estimating historical changes in global land cover: croplands from 1700 to 1992. Global Biogeochem Cycle 13:997–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rasran L, Vogt K, Jensen K (2006) Seed content and conservation evaluation of hay material of fen grasslands. J Nat Conserv 14:34–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Reever MKJ, Seastedt TR (1999) Effects of soil nitrogen reduction on non-native plants in restored grasslands. Rest Ecol 7:51–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rejmánek M, van Katwyk KP (2005) Old field succession: A bibliographic review (1901–1991). Cited 10 Jun 2010
  74. Ruprecht E (2006) Successfully recovered grassland: a promising example from Romanian old-fields. Rest Ecol 14:473–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schäffer B, Attinger W, Schulin R (2007) Compaction of restored soil by heavy agricultural machinery—soil physical and mechanical aspects. Soil Tillage Res 93:28–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sendžikaite J, Pakalnis R (2006) Extensive use of sown meadows—a tool for restoration of botanical diversity. J Env Engine Landsc Man 14:149–158Google Scholar
  77. Simmering D, Waldhardt R, Otte A (2006) Quantifying determinants contributing to plant species richness in mosaic landscapes: a single- and multi-patch perspective. Landscape Ecol 21:1233–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Skrindo AB, Pedersen PA (2004) Natural revegetation of indigenous roadside vegetation by propagules from topsoil. Urb Forest Urb Green 3:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stadler J, Trefflich A, Brandl R et al (2007) Spontaneous regeneration of dry grasslands on set-aside fields. Biodivers Conserv 16:621–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stevenson MJ, Bullock JM, Ward LK (1995) Recreating semi-natural communities, effects of sowing rate on establishment of calcareous grasslands. Rest Ecol 3:279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stoate C, Boatman ND, Borralho RJ, Carvalho CR, Snoo GR, Eden P (2001) Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. J Environ Manage 63:337–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Török K, Szili-Kovács T, Halassy M et al (2000) Immobilization of soil nitrogen as a possible method for the restoration of sandy grassland. Appl Veg Sci 3:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Török P, Matus G, Papp M et al (2009) Seed bank and vegetation development of sandy grasslands after goose breeding. Folia Geobot 44:31–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Török P, Kelemen A, Valkó O, Deák B, Lukács B, Tóthmérész B (2010a) Lucerne-dominated fields recover native grass diversity without intensive management actions. J Appl Ecol. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01903.x
  85. Török P, Deák B, Vida E et al (2010b) Restoring grassland biodiversity: sowing low-diversity seed mixtures can lead to rapid favourable changes. Biol Conserv 143:806–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. van der Putten WH, Mortimer SR, Hedlund K et al (2000) Plant species diversity as a driver of early succession in abandoned fields: a multi-site approach. Oecologia 124:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Vécrin MP, Muller S (2003) Top-soil translocation as a technique in the re-creation of species-rich meadows. Appl Veg Sci 6:271–278Google Scholar
  88. Vécrin MP, van Diggelen R, Grévilliot F et al (2002) Restoration of species-rich flood-plain meadows from abandoned arable fields in NE France. Appl Veg Sci 5:263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Verhagen R, Klooker J, Bakker JP et al (2001) Restoration success of low-production plant communities on former agricultural soils after top-soil removal. Appl Veg Sci 4:75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Walker KJ, Stevens PA, Stevens DP et al (2004) The restoration and re-creation of species-rich lowland grassland on land formerly managed for intensive agriculture in the UK. Biol Conserv 119:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wang KH, McSorley R, Bohlen P et al (2006) Cattle grazing increases microbial biomass and alters soil nematode communities in subtropical pastures. Soil Biol Biochem 38:1956–1965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Warren J, Christal A, Wilson F (2002) Effects of sowing and management on vegetation succession during grassland habitat restoration. Agr Ecosyst Environ 93:393–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Zechmeister HG, Schmitzberger I, Steurer B et al (2003) The influence of land-use practices and economics on plant species richness in meadows. Biol Conserv 114:165–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Péter Török
    • 1
  • Enikő Vida
    • 1
  • Balázs Deák
    • 2
  • Szabolcs Lengyel
    • 1
  • Béla Tóthmérész
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EcologyUniversity of DebrecenDebrecenHungary
  2. 2.Hortobágyi National Park DirectorateDebrecenHungary

Personalised recommendations