Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Environmental correlates of plant and invertebrate species richness in ponds

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ponds (lentic water bodies <2 ha) constitute a considerable biodiversity resource. Understanding the environmental factors that underlie this diversity is important in protecting and managing the habitat. We surveyed 425 ponds for biological and physical characteristics with 78 of those also surveyed for chemical characteristics. A total of 277 invertebrate species and 265 plant species were found. Species richness varied between 2 and 99 (mean 27.2 ± 0.6 SE) for invertebrates and 1 and 58 (mean 20.8 ± 0.4 SE) for plants. Generalised additive models were used to investigate variables that correlate with the species richness of plants and invertebrates, with additional models to investigate insect, Coleoptera, Odonata, Hemiptera, Trichoptera and Mollusca species richness. Models performed reasonably well for invertebrates in general (R 2 = 30.3%) but varied between lower-order invertebrate taxa (12.7–34.7%). Ponds with lower levels of shading and no history of drying contained higher numbers of species of plants and all invertebrate groups. Aquatic plant coverage positively correlated with species richness in all invertebrate groups apart from Trichoptera and the presence of fish was associated with high invertebrate species richness in all groups apart from Coleoptera. The addition of chemistry variables suggested non-linear relationships between oxygen demand and phosphate concentration and higher-order richness. We demonstrate that the composition of biological communities varies along with their species richness and that less diverse ponds are more variable compared to more diverse ponds. Variables positively correlated with richness of one taxon may be negatively correlated with that of another, making comprehensive management recommendations difficult. Promoting a high landscape-level pond biodiversity will involve the management of a high diversity of pond types within that landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bendell BE, McNicol DK (1987) Fish predation, lake acidity and the composition of aquatic insect assemblages. Hydrobiologia 150:193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendell BE, McNicol DK (1995) Lake acidity, fish predation and the distribution and abundance of some littoral insects. Hydrobiologia 302:133–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs J, Williams P, Whitfield M, Nicolet P, Weatherby A (2005) 15 years of pond assessment in Britain: results and lessons learned from the work of Pond Conservation. Aqua Conserv Mar Fresh Ecosyst 15:693–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenshine SC, Lodge DM, Hodgson JR (2000) Gradient of fish predation alters body size distributions of lake benthos. Ecology 81:374–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Briers RA, Biggs J (2005) Spatial patterns in pond invertebrate communities: separating environmental and distance effects. Aqua Conserv Mar Fresh Ecosyst 15:549–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruun HH (2000) Patterns of species richness in dry grassland patches in an agricultural landscape. Ecography 23:641–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carchini G, Solimini AG, Ruggiero A (2005) Habitat characteristics and odonate diversity in mountain ponds of central Italy. Aqua Conserv Mar Fresh Ecosyst 15:573–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Céréghino R, Biggs J, Oertli B, Declerck S (2008) The ecology of European ponds: defining the characteristics of a neglected freshwater habitat. Hydrobiologia 597:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase JM, Ryberg WA (2004) Connectivity, scale-dependence, and the productivity–diversity relationship. Ecol Lett 7:676–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collinson NH, Biggs J, Corfield A, Hodson MJ, Walker D, Whitfield M, Williams PJ (1995) Temporary and permanent ponds: an assessment of the effects of drying out on the conservation value of aquatic macroinvertebrate communities. Biol Conserv 74:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottenie K, De Meester L (2003) Connectivity and cladoceran species richness in a metacommunity of shallow lakes. Freshw Biol 48:823–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottenie K, Michels E, Nuytten N, De Meester L (2003) Zooplankton metacommunity structure: regional vs. local processes in highly interconnected ponds. Ecology 84:991–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies B, Biggs J, Williams P, Whitfield M, Nicolet P, Sear D, Bray S, Maund S (2008) Comparative biodiversity of aquatic habitats in the European agricultural landscape. Agric Ecosyst Environ 125:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Meester L, Declerck S, Stoks R, Louette G, Van De Meutter F, De Bie T, Michels E, Brendonck L (2005) Ponds and pools as model systems in conservation biology, ecology and evolutionary biology. Aqua Conserv Mar Fresh Ecosyst 15:715–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dengler J (2010) Robust methods for detecting a small island effect. Divers Distrib 16:256–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorn NJ (2008) Colonisation and reproduction of large macroinvertebrates are enhanced by drought-related fish reductions. Hydrobiologia 605:209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing JA, Cole JJ, Middelburg JJ, Striegel RG, Duarte CM, Kortelainen P, Prairie YT and Laube KA (2008) Sediment organic carbon burial in agriculturally eutrophic impoundments over the last century. Global Biogeochem Cycles 22:GB1018

    Google Scholar 

  • Durance I, Ormerod SJ (2008) Trends in water quality and discharge confound long-term warming effects on river macroinvertebrates. Freshw Biol 54:388–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyre MD, Ball SG, Foster GN (1986) An initial classification of the habitats of aquatic Coleoptera in north-east England. J Appl Ecol 23:841–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field R, Hawkins BA, Cornell HV, Currie DJ, Diniz-Filho JAF, Guégan JF, Kaufman DM, Kerr JT, Mittelbach GG, Oberdorff T, O’Brien EM, Turner JRG (2009) Spatial species-richness gradients across scales: a meta-analysis. J Biogeogr 36:132–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiener P, Auerswald K, Weigand S (2005) Managing erosion and water quality in agricultural watersheds by small detention ponds. Agric Ecosyst Environ 110:132–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friday LE (1987) The diversity of macroinvertebrate and macrophyte communities in ponds. Freshw Biol 18:87–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee JHR, Smith BD, Lee KM, Griffiths SW (1997) The ecological basis of freshwater pond management for biodiversity. Aqua Conserv Mar Fresh Ecosyst 7:91–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genkai-Kato M, Carpenter SR (2005) Eutrophication due to phosphorus recycling in relation to lake morphometry, temperature, and macrophytes. Ecology 86:210–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam JF, Fraser DF, Sabat AM (1989) Strong effects of foraging minnows on a stream benthic invertebrate community. Ecology 70:445–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heino J, Tolonen K, Kotanen J, Paasivirta L (2009) Indicator groups and congruence of assemblage similarity, species richness, and environmental relationships in littoral macroinvertebrates. Biodivers Conserv 18:3085–3098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinden H, Oertli B, Menetrey N, Sager L, Lachavanne JB (2005) Alpine pond biodiversity: what are the related environmental variables? Aqua Conserv Mar Fresh Ecosyst 15:613–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson ST, Betancourt JL, Booth RK, Gray ST (2009) Ecology and the ratchet of events: climate variability, niche dimensions, and species distributions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19685–19692

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JK, Resh VH (1989) Distribution and abundance of adult aquatic insects in the forest adjacent to a northern California stream. Environ Entomol 18:278–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries MJ (1991) The ecology and conservation value of forestry ponds in Scotland, United Kingdom. Biol Conserv 58:191–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries MJ (2003) Idiosyncratic relationships between pond invertebrates and environmental, temporal and patch-specific predictors of incidence. Ecography 26:311–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries MJ (2005) Small ponds and big landscapes: the challenge of invertebrate spatial and temporal dynamics for European pond conservation. Aqua Conserv Mar Fresh Ecosyst 15:541–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joye DA, Oertli B, Lehmann A, Juge R, Lachavanne J-B (2006) The prediction of macrophyte species occurrence in Swiss ponds. Hydrobiologia 570:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibold MA, McPeek MA (2006) Coexistence of the niche and neutral perspectives in community ecology. Ecology 87:1399–1410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lomolino MV (2000) Ecology’s most general, yet protean pattern: the species-area relationship. J Biogeogr 27:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomolino MV, Weiser MD (2001) Towards a more general species–area relationship: diversity on all islands, great and small. J Biogeogr 28:431–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAbendroth L, Ramsay PM, Foggo A, Rundle SD, Bilton DT (2005) Does macrophyte fractal complexity drive invertebrate diversity, biomass and body size distributions? Oikos 111:279–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA (1990) Behavioral differences between Enallagma species (Odonata) influencing differential vulnerability to predators. Ecology 71:1714–1726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menetrey N, Sager L, Lachavanne JB, Oertli B (2005) Looking for metrics to assess the trophic state of ponds. Macroinvertebrates and amphibians. Aqua Conserv Mar Fresh Ecosyst 15:653–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oertli B, Joye DA, Castella E, Juge R, Cambin D, Lachavanne J-B (2002) Does size matter? The relationship between pond area and biodiversity. Biol Conserv 104:59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, SolymosP, Stevens MHH and Wagner H (2011) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.17-10. [http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan]. Accessed 10 Apr 2011

  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, The R Development Core Team (2011) nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3:1–100

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2010) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Resetarits W (2001) Colonization under threat of predation: avoidance of fish by an aquatic beetle, Tropisternus lateralis (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Oecologia 129:155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosset V, Lehmann A, Oertli B (2010) Warmer and richer? Predicting the impact of climate warming on species richness in small temperate waterbodies. Global Change Biol 16:2376–2387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer M, Van Geest GJ, Zimmer K, Jeppesen E, Søndergaard M, Butler MG, Hanson MA, Declerck S, De Meester L (2006) Small habitat size and isolation can promote species richness: second-order effects on biodiversity in shallow lakes and ponds. Oikos 112:227–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scher O, Chavaren P, Despreaux M, Thiéry A (2004) Highway stormwater detention ponds as biodiversity islands? Arch Sci 57:121–130

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling EG, Loftin CS, Huryn AD (2009) Macroinvertebrates as indicators of fish absence in naturally fishless lakes. Freshw Biol 54:181–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD (1998) Biological delineation of terrestrial buffer zones for pond-breeding salamanders. Conserv Biol 12:1113–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith VH, Foster BL, Grover JP, Holt RD, Leibold MA, de Noyelles F (2005) Phytoplankton species richness scales consistently from laboratory microcosms to the world’s oceans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:4393–4396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Søndergaard M, Jeppesen E, Jensen JP (2005) Pond or lake: does it make any difference? Arch Hydrobiol 162:143–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh AN, Samways MJ (2005) Significance of temporal changes when designing a reservoir for conservation of dragonfly diversity. Biodivers Conserv 14:165–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ, Pullin AS, Dolman PM, Knight TM (2004) The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 19:305–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielbörger K, Wichmann MC, Schwager M, Jeltsch F (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31:79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjørve E, Tjørve KMC (2011) Subjecting the theory of the small-island effect to Ockham’s razor. J Biogeogr 38:1836–1839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van De Meutter F, Stoks R, De Meester L (2006) Rapid response of macroinvertebrates to drainage management of shallow connected lakes. J Appl Ecol 43:51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams DD (1997) Temporary ponds and their invertebrate communities. Aqua Conserv Mar Fresh Ecosyst 7:105–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams DD (2003) The brackishwater hyporheic zone: invertebrate community structure across a novel ecotone. Hydrobiologia 510:153–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams DD, Williams NE, Cao Y (2000) Road salt contamination of groundwater in a major metropolitan area and development of a biological index to monitor its impact. Water Res 34:127–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams P, Whitfield M, Biggs J, Bray S, Fox G, Nicolet P, Sear DA (2004) Comparative biodiversity of rivers, streams, ditches and ponds in an agricultural landscape in Southern England. Biol Conserv 115:329–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood SN (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with RR. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood PJ, Greenwood MT, Barker SA, Gunn J (2001) The effects of amenity management for angling on the conservation value of aquatic invertebrate communities in old industrial ponds. Biol Conserv 102:17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Pond Life Project is funded by the Life Programme of the European Union and a consortium of partners, including Cheshire County Council, with Warrington and Vale Royal Borough Councils. We are indebted to Jonathan Guest and David Bentley for their efforts in carrying out the pond surveys. CH was supported by a Government of Canada Postdoctoral Research Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Hassall.

Appendix

Appendix

See Figs. 6 and 7.

Fig. 6
figure 6figure 6figure 6figure 6figure 6figure 6figure 6figure 6

Fitted relationships between residuals of the generalised additive mixed-effects models (GAMMs) and each predictor variable from the first analysis (physical and biological predictors, n = 425). Solid lines are fitted splines in the eight continuous variables and fitted values for each of the two categorical variables. Dotted lines are 1SE. Tick marks on the x-axis indicate values of the predictors

Fig. 7
figure 7figure 7figure 7figure 7figure 7figure 7figure 7figure 7

Fitted relationships between residuals of the generalised additive models (GAMs) and each predictor variable from the second analysis (physical, chemical and biological predictors, n = 78). Solid lines are fitted splines in the eight continuous variables and fitted values for each of the two categorical variables. Dotted lines are 1SE. Tick marks on the x-axis indicate values of the predictors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hassall, C., Hollinshead, J. & Hull, A. Environmental correlates of plant and invertebrate species richness in ponds. Biodivers Conserv 20, 3189–3222 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0142-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0142-9

Keywords

Navigation