Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ethnobotanic garden design in the Ecuadorian Amazon

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study focuses on the documentation of traditional plant usage among Kichwa, the indigenous people from Canton Loreto, Ecuador. The relationship between people, plants and the natural environment is demonstrated in an ethnobotanical garden at the Capacity Building Centre of the town. The construction site for the ethnobotanical garden is a 1.5 ha secondary forest. The forest was analyzed with a local key informant and 150 different useful species were found. The plant species recorded are mainly used for medicinal purposes, followed by edible plants, and finally by food sources for animals. Open-ended interviews were conducted with the aim of identifying the most commonly used plant species among the Kichwas. The results showed that Ilex guayusa ranked most popular, followed by Myroxylon balsamum, Cedrela odorata, Banisteriopsis caapi, and Urera caracasana. Focus groups were held and the most important plant applications were evaluated. The collected data illustrated that Kichwas attach great importance to medicinal and ritual plants, followed by plants used for handcraft. Edible plants rank afterwards, followed by dye plants and plants used for hunting. The above findings serve as the backbone of the design for the ethnobotanical garden. The garden acts as a tool to preserve and promote the knowledge of plants, focusing mainly on medicinal plants. The growing areas for the plant species were determined according to their importance to the Kichwas. The concept of the ethnobotanical garden conveys the holistic picture drawn from the investigation on people and plants of the Kichwas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennett BC (1992) Plants and people of the Amazonian rainforests. The role of ethnobotany in sustainable development. Bioscience 42(8):599–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloor M, Frankland J, Thomas M, Robson K (2001) Focus groups in social research. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourbonnais-Spear N, Poissant J, Cal V, Arnason TJ (2006) Culturally important plants from southern Belize: domestication by Q’eqchi’ Maya healers and conservation. Ambio 35(3):138–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breckling B, Birkenmeier P (2000) Landnutzungsalternativen im Regenwald. Praxis und Theorie der ökosystemkonformen Landnutzung. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Cañadas ÁG (2005) Providing information about natural resources as a base to support the decentralization of the forest sector in Canton Loreto—Ecuador. Dissertation, Universität Göttingen

  • Cerón CE (ed) (1996) Etnobotánica Quichua en la vía Hollín-Loreto, provincia del Napo. Hombre y Ambiente 25:131–170

  • Cerón CE, Montalvo C, Reyes C, Andi D (2005) Etnobotánica Quichua Limoncocha, Sucumbíos-Ecuador. Cinchonia 6(1):29–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham AB (2001) Applied ethnobotany. People, wild plant use and conservation. People and plants conservation manual. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins B (2008) Plants for life: medicinal plant conservation and botanic gardens. Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Richmond

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich M, Ankli A, Frei B, Weimann C, Sticher O (1998) Medicinal plants in Mexico: healers’ consensus and cultural importance. Soc Sci Med 47:1859–1871

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias G (1989) Sacha Jambi. El uso de las plantas en la medicina tradicional de los Quichuas del Napo. Abya Yala, Quito

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones SB, Hoversten ME (2004) Attributes of a successful ethnobotanical garden. Landsc J 23(2):153–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macía MJ (2004) Multiplicity in palm uses by the Huaorani of Amazonian Ecuador. Bot J Linn Soc 144:149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maffi L (ed) (2001) On biocultural diversity. Linking language, knowledge, and the environment. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin GJ (1995) Ethnobotany. A methods manual. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Maunder M (2008) Botanical garden design. It’s about plants and people. Topos 62:15–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Puri R, Vogl C (2005) A methods manual for ethnobotanical research and cultural domain analysis with analysis using ANTHROPAC. University of Bodenkultur, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Revelo N, Palacios W (2005) Avances silviculturales en la amazonía ecuatoriana: Ensayos en la Estación Biológica Jatun Sacha. Fundación Jatun Sacha & Proyecto CAIMAN, Quito

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-García V (2001) Indigenous people—ethnobotanical knowledge and market economy. A case study of the Tsimane’ amerindians in lowland Bolivia. Dissertation, University of Florida

  • Shippmann U, Leaman DJ, Cunningham AB (2002) Impact of cultivation and gathering of medicinal plants on biodiversity: global trends and issues. Paper presented at the satellite event on the occasion of the ninth regular session of the commission on genetic resources for food and agriculture, FAO, Rome, 12–13 October 2002

  • Valencia R, Balslev H, Paz y Miño G (1994) High tree alpha diversity in Amazonian Ecuador. Biodivers Conserv 3:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valencia R, Pitman N, León-Yánez S, Jørgensen PM (eds) (2000) Libro rojo de las plantas endémicas del Ecuador 2000. Herbario QCA. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito

    Google Scholar 

  • Varea A, Barrera C, Maldonado AM, Endara L, Real LB (1997) Ecologismo Ecuatorial. Abya-Yala, Quito

    Google Scholar 

  • Willison J (2004) Education for sustainable development: guidelines for action in botanic gardens. Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Richmond

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the University of Bodenkultur, Vienna and the Office of International Relations. The authors wish to acknowledge FONAKIN, Paz y Desarollo and Horizont 3000 for the possibility of working within their organisation and their support. The authors are grateful to P. Alvarado and C. Cerón who identified numerous species. Thanks are equally due to A. Amores and A. Albán for accommodation and research support. Thanks to all those who participated in the interviews, to L. Aínda for his work of interpreting into Kichwa and to P. Alvarado for his support in the field work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne Innerhofer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Innerhofer, S., Bernhardt, KG. Ethnobotanic garden design in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Biodivers Conserv 20, 429–439 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9984-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9984-9

Keywords

Navigation