Abstract
Assessing the management effectiveness of nature reserves is an effective way to promote management quality and achieve management targets. Using a questionnaire developed by the World Bank (WB) and the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) as a tool for tracking management effectiveness, we carried out a survey in 535 nature reserves in China to assess the management status quo in 2005. The results indicated that the indices related to management regulation, infrastructure and equipment, monitoring and evaluation, budget and community involvement produced relatively lower scores, while the indices related to management of protection targets and resources, setup of management agency and reserve boundary had better performances. The independent variables of reserve class, time since establishment, distribution region, economic condition and staff number exhibited strong correlations with the effective management of nature reserves. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to measure the association between the 3 assessment indices representing management effectiveness and other 28 assessment indices. Among these 28 assessment indices, the indices of personnel management, resource management, monitoring and evaluation, and management plan had more effects on the management effectiveness of nature reserves than other indices. When the most pressing management issues and influence factors have been identified, countermeasures can be implemented to improve the management of nature reserves.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander M, Rowell TA (1999) Recent developments in management planning and monitoring on protected sites in the UK. Parks 9:50–55
Borrie WT, McCool SF, Stankey GH (1998) Protected area planning principles and strategies. In: Lindberg K, Wood ME, Engeldrum D (eds) Ecotourism: a guide for planners and managers, vol 2. The Ecotourism Society, North Bennignton, VT, pp 133–154
Caro T, Gardner TA, Stoner C, Fitzherbert E, Davenport TRB (2009) Assessing the effectiveness of protected areas: paradoxes call for pluralism in evaluating conservation performance. Divers Distrib 15:178–182
Courrau J (1999) Strategy for monitoring the management of protected areas in Central America. http://pdf.dec.org/pdf_docs/Pnack050.pdf
Danielsen F, Balete DS, Poulsen MK, Enghoff M, Nozawa C, Jensen AE (2000) A simple system for monitoring biodiversity in protected areas of a developing country. Biodivers Conserv 9:1671–1705
Day J, Hockings M, Jones G (2002) Measuring effectiveness in marine protected areas—principles and practice. Paper presented at World Congress on Aquatic Protected Areas, Australia
Dudley N, Hockings M, Stolton S (2004) Options for guaranteeing the effective management of the world’s protected areas. J Environ Policy Plan 6:131–142
Dudley N, Belokurov A, Higgins-Zogib L, Hockings M, Stolton S, Burgess N (2007) Tracking progress in managing protected areas round the world. WWF International, Gland
Ervin J (2003a) Protected area assessments in perspective. Bioscience 53:819–822
Ervin J (2003b) Rapid assessment and prioritization of protected area management methodology. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), Gland
Fischer F (2008) The importance of law enforcement for protected areas: don’t step back! Be honest protect!. GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 17:101–103
Hayes TM (2006) Parks, people, and forest protection: an institutional assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas. World Dev 34:2064–2075
Hockings M (1998) Evaluating management of protected areas: integrating planning and evaluation. Environ Manag 22:337–345
Hockings M (2000) Evaluating protected area management—a review of system for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas. University of Queensland, School of Natural and Rural System Management, Lawes
Hockings M (2003) Systems for assessing the effectiveness of management in protected areas. Bioscience 53:823–832
Hockings M, Stolton S, Dudley N (2002) Evaluating effectiveness—a summary for park managers and policy makers. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) and IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Gland
Hockings M, Stolton S, Dudley N (2004a) Management effectiveness: assessing management of protected areas? J Environ Policy Plan 6:157–174
Hockings M, Ervin J, Vincent G (2004b) Assessing the management of protected areas: the work of the world parks congress before and after Durban. J Int Wildl Law Policy 7:31–42
Hockings M, Stolton S, Leverington F, Dudley N, Courrau J (2006) Evaluating effectiveness: a framework for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas, 2nd edn. IUCN, Gland
Hockings M, Cook CN, Carter RW, James R (2009) Accountability, reporting, or management improvement? Development of a state of the parks assessment system in New South Wales, Australia. Environ Manag 43:1013–1025
Howard PC, Davenport TRB, Kigenyi FW, Viskanic P, Baltzer MC, Dickinson CJ, Lwanga J, Matthews RA, Mupada E (2000) Protected area planning in the tropics: Uganda’s national system of forest nature reserves. Conserv Biol 14:858–875
Jiang L, Miao H, Ouyang Z (2006) An investigation of factors that influence the effects of management of protected areas. Acta Ecol Sin 26:3775–3781 (in Chinese)
Jim CY, Xu SW (2002) Stifled stakeholders and subdued participation: interpreting local responses toward Shimentai nature reserve in South China. Environ Manag 30:327–341
Lacerda L (2004) How effective are protected areas? A preliminary analysis of forest protected areas by WWF—the largest ever global assessment of protected area management effectiveness. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) International, Gland
Liu J, Linderman M, Ouyang Z, An L, Yang J, Zhang H (2001) Ecological degradation in protected areas: the case of Wolong nature reserve for giant pandas. Science 292:98–101
Liu J, Ouyang Z, Pimm SL, Raven PH, Wang X, Miao H, Han N (2003) Protecting China’s biodiversity. Science 300:1240–1241
Liu J, Miao H, Ouyang Z, Xu W, Zheng H (2008) Analyzing the effectiveness of community management in Chinese nature reserves. Biodivers Sci 16:389–398 (in Chinese)
Lv Y (1998) The development and planning eco-tourism. J Nat Resour 13:81–86 (in Chinese)
Margules CR, Pressey Rl (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 40:243–253
Miao H, Ouyang Z, Wang X (2006) Research on community participation mechanism of China’s nature reserves. For Res 7:57–68 (in Chinese)
National Bureau of Statistics of China (2007) China statistical yearbook in 2006. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2006/indexch.htm
Nautiyal S, Kaechele H (2007) Adverse impacts of pasture abandonment in Himalayan protected areas: testing the efficiency of a Natural Resource Management Plan (NRMP). Environ Impact Assess Rev 27:109–125
Nemekhjargal B, Belokurov A (2005) Management effectiveness assessment of the Mongolian Protected Areas System using WWF’ RAPPAM methodology. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), Ulaanbaatar
Ouyang Z, Wang X, Miao H, Han N (2002) Problems of management system of China’s nature preservation zones and their solutions. Sci Technol Rev 22:49–56 (in Chinese)
Ouyang Z, Zheng H, Miao H, Xu W (2006) Research on the fund safeguard for the reserve construction and management in China. For Res 7:53–56 (in Chinese)
Parr CL, Woinarsk JCZ, Pienaar DJ (2009) Cornerstones of biodiversity conservation? Comparing the management effectiveness of Kruger and Kakadu National Parks, two key savanna reserves. Biodivers Conserv 18:3643–3662
Pullin AS, Knight TM (2005) Assessing conservation management's evidence base: a survey of management-plan compilers in the United Kingdom and Australia. Conserv Biol 19:1989–1996
Schwartzman S, Moreira A, Nepstad D (2000) Rethinking tropical forest conservation: perils in parks. Conserv Biol 14:1351–1357
State Environmental Protection Administration of China (2009) Report on the State of Environment in China in 2008. http://www.mep.gov.cn/pv_obj_cache/pv_obj_id_878F9C72F6B6FAF46271BF3E78BDAB3D8CB41000/filename/W020091031514285338571.pdf
Stem C, Margoluis R, Salafsky N, Brown M (2005) Monitoring and evaluation in conservation: a review of trends and approaches. Conserv Biol 19:295–309
Stolton S, Dudley N (1999) A preliminary survey of management status and threats in forest protected areas. Parks 9:27–33
Stolton S, Hockings M, Dudley N, Mackinnon K, Whitten T (2003) Reporting progress in protected areas—a site level management effectiveness tracking tool. World Wide Fund for Nature(WWF) Alliance, Gland
Stolton S, Hockings M, Dudley N, Mackinnon K, Whitten T, Leverington F (2007) Management effectiveness tracking tool—reporting progress at protected area sites, 2nd edn. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), Gland
Struhsaker TT, Struhsaker PJ, Siex KS (2005) Conserving Africa’s rain forests: problems in protected areas and possible solutions. Biol Conserv 123:45–54
Tshering K (2003) Bhutan: management effectiveness assessment of four protected areas using WWF’s RAPPAM methodology. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), Gland
Tyrlyshkin V, Blagovidov A, Belokurov A (2003) Russia case study: management effectiveness assessment of protected areas using WWF’s RAPPAM methodology. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), Gland
Vellak A, Tuvi EL, Reier Ü, Kalamees R, Roosaluste E, Zobel M, Pärtel M (2009) Past and present effectiveness of protected areas for conservation of naturally and anthropogenically rare plant species. Conserv Biol 23:750–757
Xu JC, Melick DR (2007) Rethinking the effectiveness of public protected areas in Southwestern China. Conserv Biol 21:318–328
Yang C (1999) Development and challenge of natural conservation area in China. Environ Prot 2:30–33 (in Chinese)
Yu A (2005) The study development on ecotourism in nature reserves. Territ Nat Resour Study 4:68–71 (in Chinese)
Zhang L, Ma LC, Feng LM (2006) New challenges facing traditional nature reserves: Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) conservation in China. Integr Zool 1:179–187
Zhu G (2001) Development situation and prospect of China’s natural conservation areas. Environ Prot 2:9–31 (in Chinese)
Zhu Q (2004) Eco-tourism and ecological tourism means of nature reserves. Territ Nat Resour Study 1:69–70 (in Chinese)
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by the grant from the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program) (No. 2009CB421104), and the WB/WWF alliance project. We would like to acknowledge the state forestry administration of China, forestry departments of 31 municipalities and provinces, 634 nature reserves administration for finishing the scorecard survey. We also thank the anonymous referees for their constructive suggestions on this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Quan, J., Ouyang, Z., Xu, W. et al. Assessment of the effectiveness of nature reserve management in China. Biodivers Conserv 20, 779–792 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9978-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9978-7