Abstract
Management strategies for the conservation of biodiversity can be developed only with precise information on the spatial distribution of organisms on relevant, mostly regional, spatial scales. Current surrogates for approximating the distribution of biodiversity are habitats mapped within a number of national and international frameworks (e.g., Natura 2000), even though conventional habitat mapping is time consuming and requires well-trained personnel. Here we evaluated the use of light detection and ranging (LiDAR) to map forest habitat types to simplify the process. We used available data of habitat types for the Bavarian Forest National Park as a basis to predict habitat types with LiDAR-derived variables. Furthermore, we compared these results with predictions based on extensive ground-based climate, soil and vegetation data. Using linear and flexible discriminant analyses, we found that LiDAR is able to predict forest habitat types with the same overall accuracy as the extensive ground data for climate, soil and vegetation composition. Subtle differences in the vegetation structure between habitat types, particularly in the vertical and horizontal vegetation profiles, were captured by LiDAR. These differences in the physiognomy were in part caused by changes in altitude, which also influence tree species composition. We propose that the most-efficient way to identify forest habitat types according Natura 2000 is to combine remote-sensing LiDAR data with well-directed field surveys.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Axelsson P (2000) DEM generation from laser scanner data using adaptive TIN-Models. ISPRS J Photogramm 33:110–117
Balmford A, Bennun L, ten Brink B et al (2005) The convention in biological diversity’s 2010. Target Sci 14:212–213
Bässler C (2004) Das Klima im Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald – Darstellung, Entwicklung und Auswirkung Nationalparkverwaltung Bayerischer Wald. Grafenau, Germany
Bässler C, Förster B, Moning C et al (2008) The BIOKLIM-Project: biodiversity research between climate change and wilding in a temperate montane forest—the conceptual framework. For Ecol Landsc Res Nat Conserv 7:21–33
Bässler C, Müller J, Hothorn T et al (2010) Estimation of the extinction risk for high- montane species as a consequence of global warming and assessment of their suitability as cross-taxon indicators. Ecol Indic 10:341–352
Bater CW, Coops NC, Gergel SE et al (2009) Estimation of standing dead tree class distributions in northwest coastal forests using lidar remote sensing. Can J For Res 39:1080–1091
Becker A, Klöcking B, Lahmer W et al (2002) The hydrological modeling system ArcEGMO. In Singh VP, Frevert DK (eds) Mathematical models of large watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publikations Littleton, Colorado, pp 321–384
Bergen KM, Goetz SJ, Dubayah RO et al (2009) Remote sensing of vegetation 3-D structure for biodiversity and habitat: review and implications for lidar and radar spaceborne missions. J Geophys Res 114:G00E06
Bibby CJ, Collar MJ, Crosby MF et al (1992) Putting biodiversity on the map: priority areas for global conservation, International Council for Bird Preservation, Girton, Cambridge, 90 pp
Böhner J, McCloy KR, Strobl J (2006) SAGA—analysis and modelling applications. Göttinger Geographische Abhandlungen 115:1–130
Collin A, Long B, Archambault P (2010) Salt-marsh characterization, zonation assessment and mapping through a dual-wavelength LiDAR. Remote Sens Environ 114:520–530
Currie DJ (2007) Regional-to global patterns of biodiversity, and what they have to say about mechanisms. In: Storch D, Marquet PA, Brown JH (eds) Scaling biodiversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 258–282
European Commission (2000) Managing Natura 2000 sites. The provisions of Article 6 of the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC
European Commission (2009) Natura 2000 Barometer Natura 2000 Newsletter 23, Environment Directorate General (DG ENV) of the European Commission
Ewald J, Reuther M, Nechwatal J et al (2000) Monitoring von Schäden in Waldökosystemen des bayerischen Alpenraumes Umwelt und Entwicklung Bayern Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Landesentwicklung und Umweltfragen. Materialien 155:3–243
Falkowski MJ, Evans JS, Martinuzzi S et al (2009) Characterizing forest succession with lidar data: an evaluation for the Inland Northwest. USA Remote Sens Environ 113:946–956
Fukunaga K, Hummels DM (1989) Leave-one-out procedures for nonparametric error estimates. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2:421–423
Hall RK, Watkins RL, Heggem DT et al (2009) Quantifying structural physical habitat attributes using LIDAR and hyperspectral imagery. Environ Monit Assess 159:63–83
Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Hinsley SA, Hill RA, Bellamy PE et al (2006) The application of lidar in woodland bird ecology: climate, canopy structure, and habitat quality. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 72:1399–1406
Hudson WD, Ramm CW (1987) Correct formulation of the kappa coefficient of agreement. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 53:421–422
Kati V, Devillers P, Dufrêne M et al (2004) Testing the value of six taxonomic groups as biodiversity indicators at a local scale. Conserv Biol 18:667–675
Körner C (2007) The use of ‘altitude’ in ecological research. Trends Ecol Evol 22:569–574
Korpela I, Koskinen M, Vasander H et al (2009) Airborne small-footprint discrete-return LiDAR data in the assessment of boreal mire surface patterns, vegetation, and habitats. Forest Ecol Manag 258:1549–1566
Li Y, Andersen HE, McGaughey R (2008) A comparison of statistical methods for estimating forest biomass from light detection and ranging data. West J Appl For 23:223–231
Lohberger E, Leitl R, Hofmeister J et al (2008) Natura 2000 Managementplan im Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald, Nationalparkverwaltung Grafenau
Londo G (1976) The decimal scale for releves of permanent quadrats. Vegetatio 33:1–64
Luehr B, Böhmer A (2000) Comparison between percolation and extraction with 1 M NH4Cl solution to determine the effective cation exchange capacity (CECeff) of soils. J Plant Nutr 163:555–557
Magnussen S, Næsset E, Gobakken T (2010) Reliability of LiDAR derived predictors of forest inventory attributes: A case study with Norway spruce. Remote Sens Environ 114:700–712
Maiorano L, Falcucci A, Garton EO et al (2007) Contribution of the Natura 2000 network to biodiversity conservation in Italy. Conserv Biol 21:1433–1444
Miura N, Jones SD (2010) Characterizing forest ecological structure using pulse types and heights of airborne laser scanning. Remote Sens Environ 114:1069–1076
Müller J, Brandl R (2009) Assessing biodiversity by remote sensing in mountainous terrain: the potential for LiDAR to predict forest beetle assemblages. J Appl Ecol 46:897–905
Müller J, Moning C, Bässler C et al (2009) Using airborne laser scanning to model potential abundance and assemblages of forest passerines. Basic Appl Ecol 10:671–681
Müller J, Vierling K, Bässler C et al (in press) Spinning a laser web: predicting spider distributions using lidar. doi:10.1890/09-2155.1
Næsset E (2009) Effects of different sensors, flying altitudes, and pulse repetition frequencies on forest canopy metrics and biophysical stand properties derived from small-footprint airborne laser data. Remote Sens Environ 113:148–159
Næsset E, Gobakken T, Holmgren J et al (2004) Laser scanning of forest resources: the Nordic experience. Can J For Res 19:482–499
Ojeda RA, Stadler J, Brandl R (2003) Diversity of mammals in the tropical-temperate Neotropics: hotspots on a regional scale. Biodivers Conserv 12:1431–1444
Pesonen A, Maltamo M, Eerikainen K et al (2008) Airborne laser scanning-based prediction of coarse woody debris volumes in a conservation area. For Ecol Manag 255:3288–3296
Pringle RM, Webb JK, Shine R et al (2003) Canopy structure, microclimate, and habitat selection by a nocturnal snake, Hoplocephalus bungaroides. Ecology 84:2668–2679
Quian H, Ricklefs RE (2008) Global concordance in diversity patterns of vascular plants and terrestrial vertebrates. Ecol Lett 11:547–553
Rahbeck C, Graves GR (2001) Multiscale assessment of patterns of avian species Richness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:4534–4539
Reutebuch SE, Andersen H-E, Gaughey RJ (2005) Light detection and ranging (LIDAR): an emerging tool for multiple resource inventory. J For 103:286–292
Ricklefs RE (2003) A comprehensive framework for global patterns in biodiversity. Ecol Lett 7:1–15
Schweiger O, Settele J, Kudrna O et al (2008) Climate change can cause spatial mismatch of trophically interacting species. Ecology 89:3472–3479
Standortskartierung, A (1996) Forstliche Standortsaufnahme, 5 Auflage, Eching bei München
Story M, Congalton RG (1986) Accuracy assessment: a users’s perspective. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 52:397–399
Vehmas M, Eerikäinen K, Peuhkurinen J et al (2009) Identification of boreal forest stands with high herbaceous plant diversity using airborne laser scanning. For Ecol Manag 257:46–53
Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New York
Vierling KT, Vierling LA, Gould WA et al (2008) Lidar: shedding new light on habitat characterization and modelling. Front Ecol Environ 6:90–98
Walentowski H, Ewald J, Fischer A et al (2004) Handbuch der natürlichen Waldgesellschaften in Bayern Geobotanica, Freising
Zimblea DA, Evans DL, Carlson GC et al (2003) Characterizing vertical forest structure using small-footprint airborne LiDAR. Remote Sens Environ 87:171–182
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Bavarian State Ministry of the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection. We are grateful to Ernst Lohberger for mapping the habitat types in the Bavarian Forest National Park, the fundamental basis for our study, and to Karen A. Brune for linguistic revision of the manuscript. All images were taken by Ernst Lohberger.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bässler, C., Stadler, J., Müller, J. et al. LiDAR as a rapid tool to predict forest habitat types in Natura 2000 networks. Biodivers Conserv 20, 465–481 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9959-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9959-x