Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 867–881 | Cite as

Assessing regional variation in conservation value using fine-grained bird atlases

  • Sergi HerrandoEmail author
  • Lluís Brotons
  • Santi Guallar
  • Javier Quesada
Original Paper


In this study we developed a simple quantitative method to assist in the decision making process of the landscape planning by integrating information of species occurrence and their individual IUCN extinction risks. We applied this method in Catalonia (north-east Iberian Peninsula) using bird atlas data to create an Index of Cumulative Threat Status (ICUTS). We employed a heuristic approach derived from qualitative scores provided by 10 experts on the avifauna of the region to choose the final index among a group of candidates. This index was used to generate two maps of conservation value at 10 × 10 km resolution, one comprising all breeding bird species in the study region (219 species), and a second one with only those bird species for which fine-grained maps (500 × 500 m) were also available (182 species). In spite of the difference in the number of species included in the two 10 × 10 km maps, we found similar geographical patterns and therefore we considered that the pattern shown by the second group of species (at 500 × 500 m resolution) represented a good proxy of the whole breeding avifauna for landscape planning purposes. The approach developed in this study may be particularly helpful in landscape planning outside protected areas because of its spatial continuity, fine-grained resolution and easy interpretation.


Bird atlas Fine-grained maps Landscape planning Off-reserve conservation Threat status 



The conceptual basis of this article was promoted by the Barcelona provincial council in the framework of the SITxell project. We greatly thank the support given by Carles Castell and his collaborators from the very beginning of the project. This approach would have not been possible without the efforts of our colleagues Joan Estrada and Vittorio Pedrocchi on the Catalan Breeding Bird Atlas 1999–2002. The Government of Catalonia and the private foundation Obra Social Caixa Catalunya provided financial support for this Atlas. We thank the contribution of the experts that helped to calibrate the ICUTS at its best: Pere Aymerich, Raül Aymí, Gerard Bota, Jordi Camprodon, Diego Garcia, Gabriel Gargallo, Santi Mañosa, Albert Martínez and Jaume Orta. We also thank two anonymous referees who provided interesting comments on previous drafts of the manuscript and Marc Anton for his support in the data management. Finally, we would like to express our warmest thank to the more than 500 field volunteers who collaborated in the first atlas project of the Catalan Ornithological Institute. This work was included in the project CGL2009-08798/BOS, granted by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, and was conducted by the Research Group 2009 SGR 1467, by the Catalan Government.


  1. Araujo MB, Lobo JM, Moreno JC (2007) The effectiveness of Iberian protected areas in conserving terrestrial biodiversity. Conserv Biol 21:1423–1432PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brotons L, Mañosa S, Estrada J (2003) Modelling the effects of irrigation schemes on the distribution of steppe birds in Mediterranean farmland. Biodivers Conserv 13:1039–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brotons L, Herrando S, Pla M (2007) Updating bird species distribution at large spatial scales: applications of habitat modelling to data from long term monitoring programs. Biodivers Distrib 13:276–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown AF, Stillman RA, Gibbons DW (1995) Use of breeding bird atlas data to identify important bird areas: a northern England case study. Bird Study 42:132–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carrascal LM, Seoane J, Palomino D, Alonso CL, Lobo JM (2006) Species-specific features affect the ability of census derived models to map avian distribution. Ecol Res 21(5):681–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ceballos G, Rodríguez P, Medellín RA (1998) Assessing conservation priorities in megadiverse Mexico: mammalian diversity, endemicity, and endangerment. Ecol Appl 8:8–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Estrada J, Pedrocchi V, Brotons L, Herrando S (eds) (2004) Atles dels ocells nidificants de Catalunya 1999–2002. Institut Català d’Ornitologia/Lynx edicions, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferrier S (2002) Mapping spatial pattern in biodiversity for regional conservation planning: where to from here? Syst Biol 51:331–363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gibbons DW, Donald PF, Bauer HG, Fornasari L, Dawson IK (2007) Mapping avian distributions: the evolution of bird atlases. Bird Study 54:324–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gregory RD, van Strien A, Vorisek P, Meyling AWG, Noble DG, Foppen RPB, Gibbons DW (2005) Developing indicators for European birds. Phil Trans R Soc B-Biol Sci 360:269–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hunter ML, Gibbs JP (2007) Fundamentals of conservation biology. Blackwell Publishing, Madden, MAGoogle Scholar
  12. IUCN (2001) The IUCN red list categories and criteria: version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. IUCN (2003) Guidelines for applications of IUCN red list criteria at regional levels: version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN, Gland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson CJ, Gillingham MP (2005) An evaluation of mapped species distribution models used for conservation planning. Environ Conserv 21:117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Noss RF (2000) High-risk ecosystems as foci for conserving biodiversity and ecological integrity in ecological risk assessments. Environ Sci Pol 3:321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. O’Keeffe RM, Balci O, Smith EP (1987) Validating expert system performance. IExpert 2:81–90Google Scholar
  18. Parrish JD, Braun DP, Unnasch RS (2003) Are we conserving what we say we are? Measuring ecological integrity within protected areas. Bioscience 53:851–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pearce J, Ferrier S (2000) Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecol Model 133:225–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Possingham HP, Andelman SJ, Burgman MA, Medelln RA, Master LL, Keith DA (2002) Limits to the use of threatened species lists. Trends Ecol Evol 17:503–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Prendergast JR, Quinn RM, Lawton JH, Eversham BC, Gibbons DW (1993) Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365:335–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rey Benayas JM, de la Montaña E (2003) Identifying areas of high-value vertebrate diversity for strengthening conservation. Biol Conserv 114:357–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rodrigues ASL, Tratt R, Wheeler BD, Gaston KJ (1999) The performance of existing networks of conservation areas in representing biodiversity. Proc R Soc B 266:1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rodriguez JP, Brotons L, Bustamante J, Seoane J (2007) The application of predictive modelling of species distribution to biodiversity conservation. Divers Distrib 13:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Root KV, Akcakaya HR, Ginzburg L (2003) A multispecies approach to ecological valuation and conservation. Conserv Biol 17:196–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sarkar S, Pressey RL, Faith DP, Margules CR, Fuller T, Stoms DM, Moffett A, Wilson KA, Williams KJ, Williams PH, Andelman S (2006) Biodiversity conservation planning tools: present status and challenges for the future. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:123–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sojda RJ (2007) Empirical evaluation of decision support systems: needs, definitions, potential methods, and an example pertaining to waterfowl management. Environ Model Softw 22:277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thogmartin WE, Sauer JR, Knutson MG (2004) A hierarchical spatial model of avian abundance with application to Cerulean Warblers. Ecol Appl 14:1766–1779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Thuiller W, Araujo MB, Pearson RG, Whittaker RJ, Brotons L, Lavorel S (2004) Uncertainty in predictions of extinction risk. Nature 430Google Scholar
  30. van Jaarsveld AS, Freitag S, Chown SL, Muller C, Koch S, Hull H, Bellamy C, ger M, dy-Younga S, Mansell MW, Scholtz CH (1998) Biodiversity assessment and conservation strategies. Science 279:2106–2108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilson KA, Westphal MI, Possingham HP, Elith J (2005) Sensitivity of conservation planning to different approaches to using predicted species distribution data. Biol Conserv 122:99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sergi Herrando
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Lluís Brotons
    • 1
    • 2
  • Santi Guallar
    • 1
  • Javier Quesada
    • 1
  1. 1.Museu de Ciències Naturals de la CiutadellaCatalan Ornithological InstituteBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Centre Tecnològic Forestal de CatalunyaSolsonaSpain
  3. 3.Catalan Ornithological Institute, Technical OfficeBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations