Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Conservation status of tropical dry forest remnants in Nicaragua: Do ecological indicators and social perception tally?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intensive deforestation is reducing dry tropical forest areas worldwide and increasing its fragmentation. Forest remnants can be the basis for the future recovery of this forest type if appropriate management practices are applied. This requires a better knowledge of their conservation status and the assessment of their perceived value by land users. In this study we compare the structure, species richness and diversity of different types of tropical dry forest remnants in Nicaragua and we assess their conservation status based on a new index: Social simplified Importance Value Index (SsIVI). This index summarizes both ecological indicators and the perception by local stakeholders of the conservation status of the tree species present. Results show that gallery and hillslope forest remnants have higher species richness and diversity than isolated vestigial patches. In all remnants, species richness and diversity is higher in the tree layer than in the regeneration layer. No differences are observed in valorisation among different types of remnants either for the tree layer or for the regeneration layer. In the hillslope forests, where several degrees of disturbance are present, the valorisation decreases with increasing degradation. Results of species composition and forest structure indicate a strong degradation of dry tropical forest remnants in Nicaragua. However, the similar social valorisation of the three types of remnants suggests that they face similar threats but also similar opportunities to be preserved. A decrease in valorisation with increasing degradation warns about the potential loss of the most degraded areas, unless forest restoration is applied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler GH (1994) Tropical forest fragmentation and isolation promote asynchrony among populations of a frugivorous rodent. Ecology 63:903–911

    Google Scholar 

  • Aizen MA, Feinsinger P (1994) Forest fragmentation, pollination, and plant reproduction in a Chaco dry forest, Argentina. Ecology 75:330–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker JR, Ringold PL, Bollman M (2002) Patterns of tree dominance in coniferous riparian forests. For Ecol Manag 166:311–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks TM, Pimm SL, Oyugi JO (1999) Time lag between deforestation and bird extinction in tropical forest fragments. Conserv Biol 13:1140–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA (2000) Linking forest edge structure to edge function: mediation of herbivore damage. J Ecol 88:31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro-Marín G, Nygård R, Rivas BG, Oden PC (2005) Stand dynamics and basal area change in a tropical dry forest reserve in Nicaragua. For Ecol Manag 208:63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (1997) Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. Intermediate Technology Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Correa Do Carmo AP (2000) Evaluación de un paisaje fragmentado para la conservación y recuperación de biodiversidad en el área demostrativa Miraflor-Moropotente, Estelí, Nicaragua. Turrialba, Costa Rica, 148 pp

  • Didham RK, Ghazoul J, Stork NE, Davis AJ (1996) Insects in fragmented forests: a functional approach. Trends Ecol Evol 11:255–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on bidiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 34:487–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio 31:437–440

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser EDG, Dougill AJ, Mabee W, Reed M, McAlpine P (2006) Bottom up and top down: analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. J Environ Manag 78:114–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredericksen TS, Putz FE (2003) Silvicultural intensification for tropical forest conservation. Biodivers Conserv 12:1445–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs EJ, Lobo JÁ, Quesada M (2003) Effects of forest fragmentation and flowering phenology on the reproductive success and mating patterns of the tropical dry forest tree Pachira quinata. Conserv Biol 17:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geist HJ, Lambin EF (2002) Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Bioscience 52:143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie TW, Grijalva A, Farris CN (2000) Diversity, composition, and structure of tropical dry forests in Central America. Plant Ecol 147:37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie TW, Nicholson KE, McCrary J (2001) Patterns of vertebrate species richness and conservation in Nicaragua. Nat Areas J 21(2):159–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Rivas B, Tigabu M, Gerhardt K, Castro-Marin G, Oden PC (2006) Species composition, diversity and local uses of tropical dry deciduous and gallery forests in Nicaragua. Biodivers Conserv 15:1509–1527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell SP (1979) Tree dispersion, abundance, and diversity in a tropical dry forest. Science 203:1299–1309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin A (2001) Sociology and environment: a critical introduction of society, nature and knowledge. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2001) IUCN red list categories and criteria: version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH (1987) Insect diversity of a Costa Rican dry forest: why keep it, and how? Biol J Linn Soc 30:343–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH (1988) Tropical dry forests: the most endangered major tropical ecosystem. In: Wilson EO (ed) Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaimowitz D (1996) Livestock and deforestation in Central America in the 1980s and 1990s: a policy perspective. Center For International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamprecht H (1989) Silviculture in the tropics: tropical forest ecosystems and their tree species. Dt. Ges. für Techn. Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH, Eschborn

  • Lawrence D, D’Odorico P, Diekmann L, De Longe M, Das R, Eaton J (2007) Ecological feedbacks following deforestation create the potential for a catastrophic ecosystem shift in tropical dry forests. PNAS 104:20696–20701

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maass JM, Balvanera P, Castillo A, Daily GC, Mooney HA, Ehrlich P, Quesada M, Miranda A, Jaramillo VJ, Garcia-Oliva F, Martinez-Yrizar A, Cotler H, Lopez-Blanco J, Perez-Jimenez A, Burquez A, Tinoco C, Ceballos G, Barraza L, Ayala R, Sarukhan J (2005) Ecosystem services of tropical dry forests: insights from long-term ecological and social research on the Pacific Coast of Mexico. Ecol Soc 10:17

    Google Scholar 

  • Masera O, Saatkamp BD, Kammen DM (2000) From linear fuel switching to multiple cooking strategies: a critique and alternative to the energy ladder model. World Dev 28:2083–2103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Monge MD (1995) Deforestación del bosque tropical humedo y frontera agrícola en Nicaragua: Una caracterización. Working paper, Instituto Centroamericano de Administración de Empresas (INCAE), Managua

  • Murphy PG, Lugo AE (1986) Ecology of tropical dry forest. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:67–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy PG, Lugo AE (1995) Dry forests of Central America and the Caribbean. In: Bullock S, Mooney H, Medina E (eds) Seasonally dry tropical forests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 9–34

  • Nygren A (1999) Local knowledge in the environment-development discourse. Crit Anthropol 19:267–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson DM, Dinerstein E (2002) The Global 200: priority ecoregions for global conservation. Ann Mo Bot Gard 89:199–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters CM (1994) Sustainable harvest of non-timber plant resources in tropical moist forest: an ecological primer. Biodiversity Support Program, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimbert M (2004) Institutionalising participation and people-centered processes in natural resource management. International Institute for Environment and Development, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty JN, Guijt I, Thompson J, Scoones I (1995) Participatory learning and action. A trainer’s guide. IIED, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravera F, Tarrasón D, Andrés P, and Grasa R (accepted) Proceso y métodos de evaluación integrada participativa de sostenibilidad en agroecosistemas semi-áridos. Un caso de estudio en un área protegida en el trópico seco nicaragüense. REVIBEC

  • Rico-Gray V, Puch A, Simá P (1988) Composition and structure of a tropical dry forest in Yucatan, Mexico. Int J Ecol Environ Sci 14:21–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabogal C (1992) Regeneration of tropical dry forest in Central America with examples from Nicaragua. J Veg Sci 3:407–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabogal C, Valerio L (1998) Forest composition, structure and regeneration in a dry forest of the Nicaraguan Pacific Coast. In: Dallmeier F, Comiskey JA (eds) Forest biodiversity in North Central and South America, and the Caribbean: research and monitoring. Man and the biosphere series, vol 21. UNESCO, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Azofeifa GA, Kalacska M, Quesada M, Calvo-Alvarado JC, Nassar JM, Rodriguez JP (2005a) Need for integrated research for a sustainable future in tropical dry forests. Conserv Biol 19:285–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Azofeifa GA, Quesada M, Rodriguez JP, Nassar JM, Stoner KE, Castillo A, Garvin T, Zent EL, Calvo-Alvarado JC, Kalacska MER, Fajardo L, Gamon JA, Cuevas-Reyes P (2005b) Research priorities for tropical secondary dry forests. Biotropica 37:477–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoones I, Thompson J (1994) Beyond farmer first. Rural People’s knowledge, agricultural research and extension practice: towards a theoretical framework, research series, vol 1, nº 1. IIED (International Institute for Environment and Development), London

  • Stattersfield AJ, Crosby MJ, Long AJ, Wege DC (1998) Endemic bird areas of the world: priorities for biodiversity conservation. Birdlife International. Birdlife Conservation Series no. 7, Cambridge

  • Stephan-Dewenter I, Tscharnike T (1999) Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set. Oecologia 121:432–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens WD, Ulloa C, Pool A, Montiel OM (eds) (2001) Flora de Nicaragua. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaine MD (1992) Characteristics of dry forest in west Africa and the influence of fire. J Veg Sci 3:365–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DSG, Twyman C (2004) Good or bad rangeland? Hybrid knowledge, science, and local understandings of vegetation dynamics in the Kalahari. Land Degrad Dev 15:215–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirth R, Meyer ST, Leal IR, Tabarelli M (2008) Plant herbivore interactions at the forest edge. Prog Bot 69:423–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to the local people from the Miraflor-Moropotente area who participated in the interviews, focus groups and forest inventories. This study was funded by the Catalan Agency for Development and Cooperation (ACCD) and by the project D/7592/07 of the Spanish Agency for International Development and Cooperation (AECID).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Tarrasón.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 4, 5.

Table 4 List of tree species for the two layers (T = tree, R = regeneration) recorded in the inventories of forest remnants (H = hillslope, G = gallery forest, V = vestigial patch)
Table 5 Mean ± ES values for structural variables, species richness and diversity (Shannon–Weiner index) in the tree layer and natural regeneration layer of the three types of remnants (gallery forest, hillslope forest and vestigial patches) in the tropical dry forest of Miraflor-Moropotente

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tarrasón, D., Urrutia, J.T., Ravera, F. et al. Conservation status of tropical dry forest remnants in Nicaragua: Do ecological indicators and social perception tally?. Biodivers Conserv 19, 813–827 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9736-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9736-x

Keywords

Navigation