Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What is the impact of wind farms on birds? A case study in southern Spain

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wind farming is a relatively new form of obtaining energy that does not cause air pollution or other forms of environmental degradation associated with fossil fuel technologies. However, their use impacts on the environment, and the current rate at which they are being put into operation, combined with poor understanding of their medium- and long-term impact, is a cause of concern. Wind farms represent a new source of impact and disturbance for birds that adds to the long list of disturbance factors caused by human activity, such as power lines, radio and television towers, highways, glass windows, the practice of poisoning, illegal hunting and overexploitation. Due to the precarious situation of several bird species and their decline, any additional cause of mortality may be significant and should give rise to increased attention and research. The aim of the present work is to analyse the effect of the “Sierra de Aguas” wind farm on bird density and abundance, flight behaviour, and bird mortality. Mortality rates did not increase due to the presence of the wind turbines. The results suggest that the presence and operation of the wind turbines did not have a clearly negative effect on passerine birds present in the region where wind farm is located. However, raptors used the space around the wind farm with lower frequency than prior to its existence, which represented a displacement of the home range of these species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F (eds) Proceedings of the second international symposium on information theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary, pp 267–281

  • Alonso JA, Alonso JC (1999) Mitigation of bird collisions with transmisión lines through groundwire marking. In: Ferrer M, Janss GFE (eds) Birds and power lines: collision electrocution and breeding. Quercus, Madrid, pp 121–132

    Google Scholar 

  • American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) (1995) Avian interactions with wind energy facilities: a summary. Prepared by Colson & Associates for AWEA, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrios L, Rodríguez A (2004) Behavioural and environmental correlates of soaring-bird mortality at on-shore wind turbines. J Appl Ecol 41:72–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernis F (1980) La migración de las aves en el Estrecho de Gibraltar. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Bildstein K, Zalles JL (eds) (2000) Raptor watch: a global directory of raptor migration sites. Birdlife Conservation, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L (2001) Introduction to distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 432

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lucas M, Janss G, Ferrer M (2004) The effects of a wind farm on birds in a migration point: the Strait of Gibraltar. Biodivers Conserv 13:395–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lucas M, Janss G, Ferrer M (2005) A bird and small mammal BACI and IG design studies in a wind farm in Malpica (Spain). Biodivers Conserv 14:3289–3303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lucas M, Janss G, Ferrer M (2007) Wind farm effects on birds in the Strait of Gibraltar. In: de Lucas M, Janss GFE, Ferrer M (eds) Birds and wind farms: risk assessment and mitigation. Quercus, Madrid, pp 219–227

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lucas M, Janss G, Whitfield DP, Ferrer M (2008) Collision fatality of raptors in wind farms does not depend on raptor abundance. J Appl Ecol 45:1695–1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devereux CL, Denny MJH, Whittingham MJ (2008) Minimal effects of wind turbines on the distribution of wintering farmland birds. J Appl Ecol 45:1698–1694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz M (2003) Cogujada montesina, Galerida theklae. En: Atlas de las Aves Reproductoras de España. In: Martí R, del Moral JC (eds) Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza-Sociedad Española de Ornitología. Madrid, pp 374–375

  • Dirksen S, Winden JVD, Spaans AL (1998) Nocturnal collisions risks of birds with wind turbines in tidal and semi-offshore areas. In: Ratto CF, Solari G (eds) Wind energy and landscape. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 99–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Drewitt AL, Langston RHW (2006) Assessing the impacts of wind farms on birds. Ibis 148:29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson WP, Johnson GD, Stricland MD, Young DP, Sernka KJ, Good RE (2001) Avian collisions with wind turbines: a summary of existing studies and comparisons to other sources of avian collisions mortality in the united states. Resource Document, National Wind Coordinating Committee, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajardo I, Pividal V, Trigo M, Jiménez M (1998) Habitat selection, activity peaks and strategies to avoid road mortality by the little owl Athene noctua. A new methodology on owls research. Alauda 66:49–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer M, Riva MDL, Castroviejo J (1991) Electrocution of raptors on power lines in southwestern Spain. J Field Ornithol 62:181–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox AD, Desholm M, Kahlert J, Christensen TK, Krag Petersen IB (2006) Information needs to support environmental impact assessments of the effects of European marine offshore wind farms on birds In: Wind, fire and water: renewable energy and birds. Ibis 148(Suppl. 1):129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen P, Grand B, Lange N (1992) Power to spare in the upper Midwest. Izaak Walton League of America, Minneapolis, p 30

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmata AR, Montopoli GJ, Oakleaf B, Harmata PJ, Restan M (1999) Movements and survival of Bald Eagles banded in the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem. J Wildl Manage 63:781–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover SI, Morrison ML (2005) Behavior of Red-tailed Hawks in a wind turbine development. J Wildl Manage 69:150–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International BirdLife (2004) State of the World’s birds indicators for our changing world. BirdLife International, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Janss GFE, Ferrer M (1998) Rate of bird collision with power lines: effects of conductor-marking and static wire-marking. J Field Orniythol 69:8–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Junta de Andalucía (2001) Libro rojo de los vertebrados amenazados de Andalucía. Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Sevilla. 336 pp

  • Klem D (1990a) Bird injuries, cause of death, and recuperation from collision with windows. J Field Ornithol 61:115–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Klem D (1990b) Collisions between birds and windows: mortality and prevention. J Field Ornithol 61:120–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Langston RHW, Pullan JD (2003) Wind farms and birds: an analysis of the effects of wind farm on birds, and guidance on environmental assessment criteria and site selection issues. Report written by Birdlife International on behalf of the Bern Convention. Council Europe Report T, PVS/inf

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen JK, Guillemette M (2007) Effects of wind turbines on flight behaviour of wintering common eiders: implications for habitat use and collision risk. J Appl Ecol 44:516–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen JK, Madsen J (2000) Effects of wind turbines and other physical elements on field utilization by pink-footed geese (Anser brachyrhynchus): A landscape perspective. Landscape Ecol 15:755–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leddy KL, Higgins KF, Naugle DE (1999) Effects of wind turbine on uplan nesting birds in conservation reserve program grasslands. Wilson Bull 111:100–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucio A, Purroy FJ (1992) Caza and conservación de aves en España. Ardeola 39(2):85–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Madders M, Whitfield DP (2006) Upland raptors and the assessment of wind farm impacts. Ibis 148:43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manville A (2000) Briefing statement published on the World Wide Web dated 04/07/00. Fish and Wildlife Service, US

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison ML, Sinclair K (1998) Avian risk and fatality protocol national renewable energy laboratory (NREL). Golden, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson HK, Curry RC (1995) Assessing avian interactions with windplant development and operation. Translations 60th North American Wildlife and Nature Resource Conferences, pp 266–277

  • Orloff S, Flannery A (1992) Wind turbine effects on avian activity habitat use, and mortality in the altamont pass and solano county wind resource areas. California Energy Commission (CEC), Sacramento, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn RG, Higgins KF, Usgaard RE, Dieter CD, Neiger RD (2000) Bird mortality associated with wind turbines at the Buffalo Ridge Wind Resource Area, Minnesota. Am Midl Nat 143:41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penteriani V (1998) Birds and wind power lines. W.W.F, Tuscany Region

    Google Scholar 

  • Percival SM (2000) Birds and wind turbines in Britain. Br Wildl 12:8–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood KS, Thelander CG (2004) Developing methods to reduce bird mortality in the almont pass wind resource area. Final report by to the California energy comission. Public interest energy research-environmental area, Contract no. 500-01-019. Bio Resource Consultants, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JC (1985) Perching and roosting patterns of raptors on power transmission towers in Southeast Idaho and Southwest Wyoming. Raptor Res 19:135–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahlecker DL (1979) Raptor use of nest boxes and platforms on transmission towers. Wildl Soc Bull 7:59–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart GB, Coles CF, Pullin AS (2004) Effects of wind turbines on bird abundance. Systematic review no. 4. Centre for Evidence-based Conservation, Birmingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellería JL (1986) Manual para el censo de los vertebrados terrestres. Raíces, Madrid, p 278

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas L, Laake JL, Strindberg S, Marques FFC, Buckland ST, Borchers DL, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Hedley SL, Pollard JH, Bishop JRB, Marques TA (2006) Distance 5.0. Release 2. Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment, University of St. Andrews, UK. http://www.ruwpa.st-and.ac.uk/distance/

  • Vargas JM (2002) Alerta cinegética. Reflexiones sobre el futuro de la caza en España. Editorial Otero, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Villafuerte RJ, Viñuela J, Blanco JC (1998) Extensive predator persecution caused by population crash in a game species: the case of red kites and rabbits in Spain. Biol Conserv 84:181–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker D, McGrady M, McCluskie A, Madders M, McLeod DRA (2005) Resident Golden Eagle ranging behaviour before and after construction of a wind farm in Argyll. Scot. Birds 25:24–40

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Gonzalo Zubieta, the property developer of the “Sierra de Aguas” wind farm, for allowing us to use and publish the information contained in the present study. This work was conducted as part of the project CGL2006-09567/BOS (I + D project) funded by the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (Spain), financed jointly by the FEDER; and the project P05-RNM-00935, funded by the Consejería de Innovación, Ciencia y Empresa (Junta de Andalucía, Spain).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. Vargas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farfán, M.A., Vargas, J.M., Duarte, J. et al. What is the impact of wind farms on birds? A case study in southern Spain. Biodivers Conserv 18, 3743–3758 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9677-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9677-4

Keywords

Navigation