Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Habitat requirements and niche selection of Maculinea nausithous and M. teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) within a large sympatric metapopulation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Identifying the factors determining the distribution and abundance of species is a fundamental question in population ecology. Based on habitat characteristics, we sought to identify factors affecting the abundance of two vulnerable large blue butterflies, Maculinea teleius and Maculinea nausithous. Both species often occur in sympatry and thus seem to have very similar requirements with regard to their wetland habitats. Even though, M. nausithous is usually far more widespread and abundant than M. teleius in Central Europe. For understanding this difference despite a similar ecology, more data is needed on the niche selection of both species. We have recorded Maculinea numbers, vegetation structure, food-plant abundance and ant community for 120 patches within a large sympatric metapopulation of both species in the Westerwald area (Germany). Unexpectedly (based on previous data), both species were equally common in the study area, reaching high densities of up to 61 (M. teleius) and 58 (M. nausithous) individuals per 50 m². In 116 out of 120 patches both species occurred sympatrically. The preferred habitat was extensively managed grassland, being mown or grazed twice a year. The abundance of both Maculinea species was positively related to vegetation height, food-plant and Myrmica rubra abundance. There was no association between M. teleius and its putative main host-ant Myrmica scabrinodis, indicating that M. rubra may serve as an important host in the Westerwald area. The positive effect of food-plant abundance was more pronounced for M. teleius, coinciding with a higher food-plant abundance at sites dominated by M. teleius compared to those dominated by M. nausithous. Thus, M. teleius seems to be slightly more demanding than M. nausithous in terms of food-plant availability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akino T, Knapp JJ, Thomas JA, Elmes GW (1999) Chemical mimicry and host specifity in the butterfly Maculinea rebeli, a social parasite of Myrmica ant colonies. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 266:1419–1426. doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0796

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Als TD, Vila R, Kandul NP, Nash DR, Yen S-H, Hsu Y-F, Mignault AA, Boomsma JJ, Pierce NE (2004) The evolution of alternative parasitic life histories in large blue butterflies. Nature 432:386–390. doi:10.1038/nature03020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong DP (2005) Integrating the metapopulation and habitat paradigms for understanding broad-scale declines of species. Conserv Biol 19:1402–1410. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00117.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balletto E (1992) Butterflies in Italy: status, problems and prospect. In: Pavlicek-van Beek T, Ovaa AH, van der Made JG (eds) Future of butterflies in Europe: strategies for survival. Proceedings of the International Congress 1989. Agricultural University, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Batary P, Örvössy N, Kőrösi A, Vályi Nagy M, Peregovits L (2007) Microhabitat preferences of Maculinea teleius (Lepidoptera : Lycaenidae) in a mosaic landscape. Eur J Entomol 104:731–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonelli S, Crocetta A, Barbero F, Balletto E (2005) Oviposition behaviour in the myrmecophilous butterfly Maculinea alcon (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). In: Settele J, Kühn E, Thomas JA (eds) Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, vol. 2: species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model. Pensoft, Sofia

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke RT, Thomas JA, Elmes GW, Wardlaw JC, Munguira ML, Hochberg ME (1998) Population modelling of the spatial interaction between Maculinea rebeli, their initial foodplant Gentiana cruciata and Myrmica ants within a site. J Insect Conserv 2:29–37. doi:10.1023/A:1009688622147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobkin DS, Olivieri I, Ehrlich PR (1987) Rainfall and the interaction of microclimate with larval resources in the population dynamics of checkerspot butterflies (Euphydryas editha) inhabiting serpentine grassland. Oecologia 71:161–166. doi:10.1007/BF00377280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert G, Rennwald E (1993) Die Schmetterlinge Baden-Württembergs, vol. 2: Tagfalter II. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Elfferich NW (1998) New facts on the life history of the dusky large blue Maculinea nausithous (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) obtained by breeding Myrmica ants in plaster nests. Deinsea 4:97–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H (1996) Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen, 5th edn. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmes GW, Thomas JA (1987) Die Gattung Maculinea. In: BN S (ed) Tagfalter und ihre Lebensräume, 3rd edn. Fotorotar AG, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmes GW, Thomas JA (1992) Complexity of species conservation in managed habitats: interaction between Maculinea butterflies and their ant hosts. Biodivers Conserv 1:155–169. doi:10.1007/BF00695913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmes GW, Thomas JA, Wardlaw JC, Hochberg ME, Clarke RT, Simcox DJ (1998) The ecology of Myrmica ants in relation to the conservation of Maculinea species. J Insect Conserv 2:67–78. doi:10.1023/A:1009696823965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmes GW, Akino T, Thomas JA, Clarke RT, Knapp JJ (2002) Interspecific differences in cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of Myrmica ants are sufficiently consistent to explain host specificity by Maculinea (large blue) butterflies. Oecologia 130:525–535. doi:10.1007/s00442-001-0857-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler K (1990) New information on the biology of Maculinea nausithous and M. teleius. Nota Lepidopterol 12:246–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Figurny E, Woyciechowsky M (1998) Flowerhead selection for oviposition by females of the sympatric butterfly species Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Entomol Gen 23:215–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Figurny-Puchalska E, Gadeberg RME, Boomsma JJ (2000) Comparison of genetic population structure of the large blue butterflies Maculinea nausithous and M. teleius. Biodivers Conserv 9:419–432. doi:10.1023/A:1008970232079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fric Z, Wahlberg N, Pech P, Zrzavy J (2007) Phylogeny and classification oft he Phengaris-Maculinea clade (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): total evidence and phylogenetic concepts. Syst Entomol 32:558–567. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3113.2007.00387.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes KJ, Dillemuth FP, Anderson BJ, Hakes AS, Jackson HB, Jackson SE, Cronin JT (2007) Landscape context outweighs local habitat quality in its effects on herbivore dispersal and distribution. Oecologia 151:431–441. doi:10.1007/s00442-006-0600-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johst K, Drechsler M, Thomas JA, Settele J (2006) Influence of mowing on the persistence of two endangered large blue butterfly species. J Appl Ecol 43:333–342. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01125.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kőrösi A (2005) Habitat-use of wetland-species—a case study. In: Settele J, Kühn E, Thomas JA (eds) Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, vol. 2: species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model. Pensoft, Sofia

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2004) Landscape occupancy and local population size depends on host plant distribution in the butterfly Cupido minimus. Biol Conserv 120:355–361. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunz M (2000) Zum Vorkommen der Moorbläulinge Maculinea nausithous (Bergsträsser, 1779) und Maculinea teleius (Be5rgsträsser, 1779) im Westerwald (Rheinland-Pfalz) (Lepidoptera:Lycaenidae). Fauna Flora Rheinland-Pfalz 9:583–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouquet N, Thomas JA, Elmes GW, Clarke RT, Hochberg ME (2005) Population dynamics and conservation of a specialized predator: a case study of Maculinea alcon. Ecol Monogr 75:525–542. doi:10.1890/05-0319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musche M, Anton C, Worgan A, Settele J (2006) No experimental evidence for host ant related oviposition in a parasitic butterfly. J Insect Behav 19:631–643. doi:10.1007/s10905-006-9053-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowicki P, Witek M, Skórka P, Settele J, Woyciechowski M (2005) Population ecology of the endangered butterflies Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous and the implication for conservation. Popul Ecol 47:193–202. doi:10.1007/s10144-005-0222-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabel K-J, Fischer E (1992) Boden- und vegetationsgeographische Untersuchungen im Westerwald. Frankfurter geowissenschaftliche Arbeiten 7:1–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert B (1996) Ameisen beobachten, bestimmen. Naturbuch, Augsburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Sliwinska EB, Nowicki P, Nash DR, Witek M, Settele J, Woyciechowski M (2006) Morphology of caterpillars and pupae of European Maculinea species (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) with an identification table. Entomol Fenn 17:351–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankiewicz A, Sielezniew M (2002) Host specificity of Maculinea teleius Bgstr. and M. nausithous Bgstr. (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): the new insight. Ann Zool 52:403–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Landesamt Rheinland-Pfalz (2006) Statistisches Jahrbuch Rheinland-Pfalz. http://www.statistik.rlp.de. Cited Dec 2006

  • Stettmer C, Binzenhöfer B, Hartmann P (2001) Habitatmanagement und Schutzmaßnahmen für die Ameisenbläulinge Glaucopsyche teleius und Glaucopsyche nausithous, Teil 2: Habitatansprüche, Gefährdung und Pflege. Natur Landschaft 76:366–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Tartally A, Varga Z (2005) Host-ant specifity of Maculinea species in Hungary, connections with parasitoids and host plants. In: Settele J, Kühn E, Thomas JA (eds) Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, vol. 2: species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model. Pensoft, Sofia

    Google Scholar 

  • Tartally A, Varga Z (2008) Host ant use of Maculinea teleius in the Carpathian basin (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Acta Zool Acad Sci Hung 54:257–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Tartally A, Rakosy L, Vizauer TC, Goia M, Varga Z (2008) Maculinea nausithous exploits Myrmica scabrinodis in transylvania: unusual host ant species of a myrmecophilous butterfly in an isolated region (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae; Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 51:373–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA (1984) The behaviour and habitat requirements of Maculinea nausithous (the Dusky Large Blue Butterfly) and M. teleius (the Scarce Large Blue) in France. Biol Conserv 28:325–347. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(84)90040-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA (1995) The ecology and conservation of Maculinea arion and other European species of the large blue butterfly. In: Pullin AS (ed) Ecology and conservation of butterflies. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Elmes GW (1998) Higher productivity at the cost of increased host specificity when Maculinea butterfly larvae exploit ant colonies through trophallaxis rather than by predation. Ecol Entomol 23:457–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Elmes GW (2001) Food-plant niche selection rather than the presence of ant nests explain oviposition patterns in the myrmecophilous butterfly genus Maculinea. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:471–477. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Settele J (2004) Butterfly mimics of ants. Nature 432:283–284. doi:10.1038/432283a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Thomas CD, Simcox DJ, Clarke RT (1986) Ecology and declining status of the silver-spotted skipper butterfly (Hesperia comma) in Britain. J Appl Ecol 23:365–380. doi:10.2307/2404023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Elmes GW, Wardlaw JC, Woyciechowski M (1989) Host specifity among Maculinea butterflies in Myrmica ant nests. Oecologia 79:452–457. doi:10.1007/BF00378660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Elmes GW, Wardlaw JC (1998) Polymorphic growth in larvae of the butterfly Maculinea rebeli, a social parasite of Myrmica ant colonies. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265:1895–1901. doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Bourn NAD, Clarke RT, Stewart RT, Simcox DJ, Pearman GS, Curtis R, Goodger B (2001) The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:1791–1796. doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1693

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman T, Lewington R (1998) Die Tagfalter Europas und Nordwestafrikas. Franckh-Kosmos, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyck H, Oostermeijer JGB, Talloen W, Feenstra W, Van der Hidde A, Wynhoff I (2000) Does the presence of ant nests matter for oviposition to a specialised myrmecophilous Maculinea butterfly? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267:861–866. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Swaay CAM (2002) The importance of calcareous grasslands for butterflies in Europe. Biol Conserv 104:315–318. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00196-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Swaay CAM, Warren MS (1999) Red data book of European butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nat Environ 99:129–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Swaay CAM, Warren MS (eds) (2003) Prime butterfly areas in Europe: priority sites for conservation. National Reference Centre for Agriculture, Nature and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management, and Fisheries, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Verburg PH, Schulp CJE, Witte N, Veldkamp A (2006) Downscaling of land use change scenarios to assess the dynamics of European landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 114:39–56. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardlaw JC, Elmes GW (1996) Exceptional colony size in Myrmica species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Entomologist 115:191–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardlaw JC, Elmes GW, Thomas JA (1998) Techniques for studying Maculinea butterflies: I. Rearing Maculinea caterpillars with Myrmica ants in the laboratory. J Insect Conserv 2:79–84. doi:10.1023/A:1009648908035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White TCR (2008) The role of food, weather and climate in limiting the abundance of animals. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 83:227–248. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00041.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Witek M, Nowicki P, Skórka P, Sliwinska E, Woyciechowski M (2005) Host ant specificity and integration rate with Myrmica ants in larvae of Maculinea teleius butterflies. In: Settele J, Kühn E, Thomas JA (eds) Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, vol. 2: species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model. Pensoft, Sofia

    Google Scholar 

  • Woyciechowski M, Slowik J, Muchlenberg M (2006) Hosts of the butterfly, Maculinea teleius, among Myrmica ants in northern Mongolia (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae; Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 48:493–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynhoff I (1998a) The recent distribution of the European Maculinea species. J Insect Conserv 2:15–27. doi:10.1023/A:1009636605309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynhoff I (1998b) Lessons from the reintroduction of Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous in the Netherlands. J Insect Conserv 2:47–57. doi:10.1023/A:1009692723056

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge financial support from the Ministry of Environment and Forestry Rheinland-Pfalz (fellowship to AD) and the German Research Council (grant DFG 846/1-3 to KF). We thank Dr. Roland Schultz for help with determining Myrmica ants. Insightful comments provided by two anonymous reviewers greatly improved the quality of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zoological Institute and Museum, University of Greifswald, Johann-Sebastian-Bach-Str. 11/12, 17489, Greifswald, Germany

    A. Dierks & K. Fischer

Authors
  1. A. Dierks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Fischer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Dierks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dierks, A., Fischer, K. Habitat requirements and niche selection of Maculinea nausithous and M. teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) within a large sympatric metapopulation. Biodivers Conserv 18, 3663–3676 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9670-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9670-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation