Skip to main content

Can engaging local people’s interests reduce forest degradation in Central Vietnam?

Abstract

Governments in tropical countries are still responding to increasing forest degradation by implementing different types of protected areas. In general, due to their negative image as causes of deforestation, local communities are being excluded from any management role in these conservation areas. However, in Vietnam, since 1986 various incentives have been proposed for alternative conservation models. Our surveys used a multidisciplinary combination of methods to work with one Pahy ethnic minority around the degraded forests of the proposed Phong Dien Nature Reserve in Central Vietnam. From the results of these surveys we obtained clear indication that conservation can be enhanced if local priorities, perspectives and wishes are better identified and taken into account. The local communities identified the need for, at least, limited extractive activities in the protected area. They also frequently stressed their willingness to participate in the monitoring and control of the area, and in the selection of local species for reforestation programmes. Communities can and should be actively involved in building a shared understanding of what the forest provides, how it can be conserved and the benefits to be obtained. Conservation in Vietnam has much to gain from local participation. However, suitable safeguards and incentives need to be in place to insure sustainable use of the forest resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. The 53 ethnic minorities officially account for 14% of Vietnam’s population, according to the 1999 census: http://www.gso.gov.vn/default_en.aspx?tabid=476&idmid=4&ItemID=1841.

  2. http://www.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk/vhi/sen/papers/ikemoto.pdf (20/10/2006).

  3. Buffer zones are managed by District and Commune People Committee, State-Forest Enterprises, provincial Departments of Agricultural and Rural Development, and the Department of Land Administration. This complex co-management leads to confusion (ICEM 2003a, b; EASRD 2005).

  4. In this paper, we use the term “forest/s” alone when all three categories are included, and “natural forest” when plantations are not included.

  5. According to the People’s Committee of Thua Thien Hue Province, Steering Committee of Flood and Storm Resistance (Vietnam/Review of protected areas and development in the four countries of the Lower Mekong), severe floods and storms have occurred since 1980. In 1999, these were responsible for the death of more than 300 people in the province.

Abbreviations

5MHRP:

Five Million Hectares Reforestation Plan

CIFOR:

Center for International Forestry Research

CIRAD:

Centre de coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement

FPD:

The Forest Protection Department

ICEM:

International Centre for Environmental Management

LUC:

Land Use Certificates

MARD:

Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development

NGO:

Non-Governmental Organization

NTFP:

Non-Timber Forest Product

PDNR:

Phong Dien Nature Reserve

CPC:

Commune-level People’s Committees

References

  • Anonymous (2002) Field study: Vietnam. Thua Thien Hue Province. http://www.iucn.org/places/vietnam/our_work/ecosystems/assets/vietnam_field%20study.pdf#search=‘vietnam%20field%20study. Cited 18 October 2006, 44 pp

  • Barney K (2005) Central plans and global exports: tracking Vietnam’s forestry commodity chains and export links to China. Forest Trends, http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/publications/Vietnam%20Final%20Report%207-1-05.pdf. Cited 20 October 2006, 77 pp

  • Boissière M, Liswanti N (2006) Biodiversity in a Batak village of Palawan (Philippines): a multidisciplinary assessment of local perceptions and priorities. Report. CIFOR, Bogor, 51 pp

  • Boissière M, Basuki I, Koponen P, Wan M, Sheil D (2006) Biodiversity and local perceptions on the edge of a conservation area, Khe Tran village, Vietnam. CIFOR, Bogor, 106 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Boissière M, Liswanti N, Padmanaba M, Sheil D (2007) People priorities and perceptions: towards conservation partnership in Mamberamo. Report. CIFOR, Bogor, 162 pp

  • De Jong W, Sam DD, Hung TV (2006) Forest rehabilitation in Vietnam. Histories, realities and future. CIFOR, Bogor, 90 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Do Q-T, Iyer L (2006) Land titling and rural transition in Vietnam. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 05-067, 35 pp

  • EASRD (2005) State forest enterprise reform in Vietnam. Review of policy and implementation framework for decree 200. Technical note, 50 pp

  • Evans K, de Jong W, Miranda P, Cronkleton P (2006) Evaluating and adapting multidisciplinary landscape assessment in forest-dependent communities in the northern Bolivian Amazon. CIFOR, Bogor, 36 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour D, Malla Y, Nurse M (2004) Linkages between community forestry and poverty. RECOFTC, Thailand 12 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon Jr, Gordon RG (eds) (2005) Ethnology: languages of the world, 15th edn. SIL International, Dallas

    Google Scholar 

  • ICEM (2003a) Field study: Vietnam. Thua Thien Hue Province, Queensland, Australia, http://www.mekong-protected-areas.org/vietnam/docs/field.htm Cited 28 March 2007, 40 pp

  • ICEM (2003b) Vietnam national report on protected areas and development. Review of protected areas and development in the lower Mekong River region, Indooroopilly. ISBN: 0 975033 24 7, 60 pp

  • Le TT, Tran HM, Tran QN, Tran QD, Hughes R (2001) An investment plan for the establishment of Phong Dien Nature Reserve, Thua Thien Hue Province, Vietnam. BirdLife International Vietnam Program and the Forest Inventory and Planning Institute, Hanoi, 95 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather AS (2007) Recent Asian forest transitions in relation to forest-transition theory. Int For Rev 9(1):491–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyfroidt P, Lambin EF (2008) The causes of the reforestation in Vietnam. Land use policy 25:182–197. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD) (2001) International Cooperation Department, 5MHRP Partnership Secretariat, Five million hectare reforestation program partnership: synthesis report, 138 pp

  • Morris J, Ingles A (2003) Assessing the “enabling environment” in Vietnam for linking forest conservation with poverty reduction. A policy analysis for Vietnam. IUCN/MARD, Gland/Vietnam, p 13

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller D (2003) Land-use change in the Central Highlands of Vietnam. A spatial econometric model combining satellite imagery and village survey data, PhD thesis, Institute of Rural Development, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, 165 pp

  • Nepal SK (2002) Involving indigenous peoples in protected area management: comparative perspectives from Nepal, Thailand, and China. Environ Manag 30(6):748–763. doi:10.1007/s00267-002-2710-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen HD, Vu VV (2002) A survey and assessment of community forest management in several national parks and nature reserves. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. Department for Forestry Development. National Working Group on Community Forestry Management, Hanoi

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberndorf RB (2004) Comparative analysis of policy and legislation related to watershed management in Cambodia, Lao PDR and Vietnam. Consultancy report, MRC-GTZ cooperation program, 95 pp

  • Pham XP (2000) People’s participation in forest management in Vietnam. In: Enters T, Durst PB, Victor M (eds) Decentralization and devolution of forest management in Asia and the Pacific. RECOFTC Report No. 18 and RAP Publication 2000/1. Bangkok

  • Rambaldi G, Bugna S, Geiger M (2001) Review of the protected area system of Vietnam. Special Report. Asean Biodiversity, pp 43–51

  • Sassen M, Wan M (2006) Biodiversity and local priorities in a community near the Ivindo National Park, Makokou, Gabon, Report. CIFOR, IRET, Bogor, 87 pp

  • Sheil D et al (2003a) Local priorities and biodiversity in tropical forest landscapes: asking people what matters. Trop For Update 13(1):16–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheil D et al (2003b) Exploring biological diversity, environment and local people’s perspectives in forest landscapes, 2nd revised and updated edn. Center for International for Forestry Research, Ministry of Forestry and International Tropical Timber Organization, Bogor, 93 pp

  • Sheil D, Lawrence A (2004) Tropical biologists, local people and conservation: new opportunities for collaboration. Trends Ecol Evol 19:634–638. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheil D, Liswanti N (2006) Scoring the importance of tropical forest landscapes with local people: patterns and insights. Environ Manag 38(1):126–136. doi:10.1007/s00267-005-0092-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheil D et al (2006) Recognizing local people’s priorities for tropical forest biodiversity. Ambio 35(1):17–25 report

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sunderlin WD (2006) Poverty alleviation through community forestry in Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam: an assessment of the potential. For Policy Econ 8:386–396. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2005.08.008

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunderlin WD, Ba HT (2005) Poverty alleviation and forest in Vietnam. CIFOR, Bogor, 84

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo VM (2001) Indigenous peoples and biodiversity. In: Levin S et al (eds) Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, Academic Press, 20 pp

  • Vu HM, Warfvinge H (2002) Issues in management of natural forests by households and local communities of three provinces in Vietnam: Hoa Binh, Nghe An, and Thua Thien Hue. Working Paper Series vol 5. Asia Forest Network, Santa Barbara, 47 pp

  • Vuong XT (2001) Changing land policies and its impacts on land tenure of ethnic minorities in Vietnam, Hanoi, http://www2.eastwestcenter.org/environment/CBFM/Tinh2.pdf. Cited 28 March 2007, pp 260–275

  • Warne S, Phong TL (2002) Biodiversity planning in Asia—Vietnam. IUCN—The World Conservation Union, Gland, 26 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Writenet (2006) Viet Nam: situation of indigenous minority groups in the central highlands. Writenet, 62 pp

  • Yukio I (2001) Poverty alleviation policies and ethnic minority people in Vietnam. Conference justice and poverty: examining Sen’s capability approach, Cambridge, 5–7 June 2001, 8 pp

  • Zingerli C (2005) Colliding understanding of biodiversity conservation in Vietnam: global claims, national interests, and local struggles. Soc Nat Resour 18:733–747. doi:10.1080/08941920591005151

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank first the villagers of Khe Tran for their participation in our surveys and all the scientists who took part in the data collection. We are also grateful to Glen Mulcahy for her editing and valuable comments. We thank the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, which funded this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Boissière.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boissière, M., Sheil, D., Basuki, I. et al. Can engaging local people’s interests reduce forest degradation in Central Vietnam?. Biodivers Conserv 18, 2743–2757 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9627-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9627-1

Keywords

  • Central Vietnam
  • Degraded forest
  • Local people
  • Natural resources
  • Perceptions
  • Protected areas