Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 18, Issue 11, pp 2927–2939 | Cite as

Is research effort allocated efficiently for conservation? Felidae as a global case study

Original Paper

Abstract

Some species face greater anthropogenic threats than others, and have increased need for scarce conservation resources. Yet how resources are allocated for conservation remains little known. I examined the distribution of research effort, an index of resource allocation, across Felidae (the cat family), a diverse, widely-distributed, and threatened taxon. I performed complete searches of the published literature for all cat species from 1986 to 2007, collecting a total of 2,462 papers, of which 926 represented in situ studies. Threat status, as ranked by a World Conservation Union report in 1996, was significantly correlated with geographical range size, with narrowly distributed species tending to be more at risk. Unlike in many other taxa, threat status was not correlated with body size. The number of total and in situ publications (“research effort”) per species was significantly and positively related to body size, but not to threat status or geographical range size. Research effort, rather than being distributed according to actual threat status, is highly skewed towards large species. However, the ratio of the number of studies on the 10 smallest cat species to the number on the 10 largest species has increased significantly since 1986. Yet many species remain severely understudied; I identify 14 cat species that are threatened and have <10 in situ publications each. These species critically require a greater share of the conservation research effort.

Keywords

Body size Cats Extinction risk Geographical range size Mismatch Prioritization Research effort Threat status 

References

  1. Baldus RD (2006) A man-eating lion (Panthera leo) from Tanzania with a toothache. Eur J Wildl Res 52:59–62. doi:10.1007/s10344-005-0008-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger J (1996) Population constraints associated with the use of black rhinos as an umbrella species for desert herbivores. Conserv Biol 11:69–78. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95481.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cardillo M, Bromham L (2001) Body size and risk of extinction in Australian mammals. Conserv Biol 15:1435–1440. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00286.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carter MF, Hunter WC, Pashley DN, Rosenbery KV (2000) Setting priorities for landbird conservation in the United States: the partners in flight approach. Auk 117:541–548. doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2000)117[0541:SCPFLI]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR (2006) Global mammal distributions, biodiversity hotspots, and conservation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:19374–19379. doi:10.1073/pnas.0609334103 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark JA, May RM (2002) Taxonomic bias in conservation research. Science 297:191–192. doi:10.1126/science.297.5579.191b PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dinerstein E (1999) Preface. In: Ricketts TH, Dinerstein E, Olson D, Colby J (eds) Terrestrial ecoregions of North America. A conservation assessment. Island Press. Washington, D.C, p xxiGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunn EH (2002) Using decline in bird populations to identify needs for conservation action. Conserv Biol 16:1632–1637. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01250.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fazey I, Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2005) What do conservation biologists publish? Biol Conserv 124:63–67. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fisher DO, Owens PF (2004) The comparative method in conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol 19:391–398. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.05.004 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Halpern BS, Pyke CR, Fox HE, Haney JC, Schlaepfer MA, Zaradic P (2006) Gaps and mismatches between global conservation priorities and spending. Conserv Biol 20:56–64. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00258.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris G, Pimm SL (2008) Range size and extinction risk in forest birds. Conserv Biol 22:163–171. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00798.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hockley NJ, Edwards-Jones G, Healey JR (2007) Maximizing the efficiency of conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 22:286–287. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.02.012 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IUCN (2004) Red list of threatened species. International Union for the Conservation of Nature (World Conservation Union), GlandGoogle Scholar
  15. Jackson RM, Roe JD, Wangchuk R, Hunter DO (2006) Estimating snow leopard population abundance using photography and capture–recapture techniques. Wildl Soc Bull 34:772–781. doi:10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[772:ESLPAU]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson A, Vongkhamheng C, Hedemark M, Saithongdam T (2006a) Effects of human-carnivore conflict on tiger (Panthera tigris) and prey populations in Lao PDR. Anim Conserv 9:421–430. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2006.00049.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson WE et al (2006b) The late Miocene radiation of modern Felidae: a genetic assessment. Science 311:73–77. doi:10.1126/science.1122277 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johst K, Brandl R (1997) Body size and extinction risk in a stochastic environment. Oikos 78:612–617. doi:10.2307/3545624 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Karanth KU (2003) Tiger ecology and conservation in the Indian subcontinent. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 100:169–189Google Scholar
  20. Karanth KU, Nichols JD (1998) Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79:2852–2862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karanth KU, Nichols JD (2002) Monitoring tigers and their prey. Centre for Wildlife Studies, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  22. Karanth KU, Chundawat RS, Nichol JD, Kumar NS (2004a) Estimation of tiger densities in the tropical dry forests of Panna, Central India, using photographic capture–recapture sampling. Anim Conserv 7:285–290. doi:10.1017/S1367943004001477 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karanth KU, Nichols JD, Kumar NS, Link WA, Hines JE (2004b) Tigers and their prey: predicting carnivore densities from prey abundance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:4854–4858. doi:10.1073/pnas.0306210101 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karanth KU, Nichols JD, Kumar NS, Hines JE (2006) Assessing tiger population dynamics using photographic capture–recapture sampling. Ecology 87:2925–2937. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2925:ATPDUP]2.0.CO;2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kareiva P, Levin SA (2002) The importance of species: perspectives on expendability and triage. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  26. Kochin BF, Levin PS (2003) Lack of concern deepens oceans’ problems. Nature 424:723. doi:10.1038/424723a PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lawler JJ et al (2006) Conservation science: a 20-year report card. Front Ecol Environ 4:473–480. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[473:CSAYRC]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McBride MF, Wilson KA, Bode M, Possingham HP (2007) Incorporating the effects of socioeconomic uncertainty into priority setting for conservation investment. Conserv Biol 21:1463–1474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. McIntyre S, Barrett GW, Kitching RL, Recher HF (1992) Species triage-seeing beyond wounded rhinos. Conserv Biol 6:604–606. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06040604.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meir E, Andelman S, Possingham HP (2004) Does conservation planning matter in a dynamic and uncertain world? Ecol Lett 7:615–622. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00624.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mittermeier RA, Myers N, Thomsen JB, da Fonseca GAB, Olivieri S (1998) Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation priorities. Conserv Biol 12:516–520. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.012003516.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morris DJ (1960) An analysis of animal popularity. Int Zoo Yearb 2:60–61. doi:10.1111/j.1748-1090.1960.tb02723.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Murdoch W, Polasky S, Wilson KA, Possingham HP, Kareiva P, Shaw R (2007) Maximizing return on investment in conservation. Biol Conserv 139:375–388. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858. doi:10.1038/35002501 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nowak RM (1999) Walker’s mammals of the world, sixth edn. The John’s Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  36. Nowell K, Jackson P (1996) Wild cats: status survey and conservation action plan. International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, GlandGoogle Scholar
  37. Olson DM, Dinerstein E (1998) The global 200: a representation approach to conserving the Earth’s most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conserv Biol 12:502–515. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.012003502.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Packer C, Ikanda D, Kissui B, Kushnir H (2005) Lion attacks on humans in Tanzania—understanding the timing and distribution of attacks on rural communities will help to prevent them. Nature 436:927–928. doi:10.1038/436927a PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Payne JL, Finnegan S (2007) The effect of geographic range on extinction risk during background and mass extinction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:10506–10511. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701257104 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Regan HM et al (2008) Species prioritization for monitoring and management in regional multiple species conservation plans. Divers Distrib 14:462–471. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00447.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Robbins CS, Sauer JR, Greenberg RS, Droege S (1989) Population declines in North American birds that migrate to the Neotropics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:7658–7662. doi:10.1073/pnas.86.19.7658 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Salom-Perez R, Carrillo E, Saenz JC, Mora JM (2007) Critical condition of the jaguar Panthera onca population in Corcovado National Park, Costa Rica. Oryx 41:51–56. doi:10.1017/S0030605307001615 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Seidensticker J, Christie S, Jackson P (1999) Riding the tiger: tiger conservation in human-dominated landscapes. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  44. Silver SC et al (2004) The use of camera traps for estimating jaguar Panthera onca abundance and density using capture/recapture analysis. Oryx 38:148–154. doi:10.1017/S0030605304000286 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Siriwardena GM, Baillie SR, Buckland ST, Fewster RM, Marchant JH, Wilson JD (1998) Trends in the abundance of farmland birds: a quantitative comparison of smoothed common birds census indices. J Appl Ecol 35:24–43. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.00275.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stattersfield AJ, Crosby MJ, Long AJ, Wege DC (1998) Endemic bird areas of the world. Smithsonian, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  47. Surinova M (1971) An analysis of the popularity of animals. Int Zoo Yearb 11:165–167. doi:10.1111/j.1748-1090.1971.tb01895.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thorne JH, Cameron D, Quinn JF (2006) A conservation design for the central coast of California and the evaluation of mountain lion as an umbrella species. Nat Areas J 26:137–148. doi:10.3375/0885-8608(2006)26[137:ACDFTC]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tisdell C, Swarna Nantha H (2007) Comparison of funding and demand for the conservation of the charismatic koala with those for the critically endangered wombat Lasiorhinus krefftii. Biodivers Conserv 16:1261–1281. doi:10.1007/s10531-006-6735-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tisdell C, Wilson C, Swarna Nantha H (2005) Association of public support for survival of wildlife species with their likeability. Anthrozoos 18:160–174. doi:10.2752/089279305785594216 Google Scholar
  51. Tisdell C, Swarna Nantha H, Wilson C (2007) Endangerment and likeability of wildlife species: how important are they for payments proposed for conservation? Ecol Econ 60:627–633. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Trolle M, Kery M (2003) Estimation of ocelot density in the pantanal using capture–recapture analysis of camera-trapping data. J Mammal 84:607–614. doi:10.1644/1545-1542(2003)084<0607:EOODIT>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. USFWS (1983) Endangered and threatened species listing and recovery priority guidelines. Fed Regist 48:43098–43105Google Scholar
  54. Van Bommel L, de Vaate MDB, de Boer WF, de Iongh HH (2007) Factors affecting livestock predation by lions in Cameroon. Afr J Ecol 45:490–498. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2028.2007.00759.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilson DE, Reeder DM (2005) Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference, 3rd edn. The Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  56. Wilson KA, McBride MF, Bode M, Possingham HP (2006) Prioritizing global conservation efforts. Nature 440:337–340. doi:10.1038/nature04366 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilson KA et al (2007) Conserving biodiversity efficiently: what to do, where, and when. PLoS Biol 5:1850–1861. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Woodroffe R, Ginsberg J (1998) Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas. Science 280:2126–2128. doi:10.1126/science.280.5372.2126 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.David H. Smith Conservation Research Fellow, Wildlife Biology ProgramUniversity of MontanaMissoulaUSA

Personalised recommendations