Exploring the effectiveness of integrated conservation and development interventions in a Central African forest landscape

Abstract

Integrated conservation and development projects (ICDPs) have had limited success in addressing the often conflicting objectives of conservation and development. We developed a model with local participants to explore the trade-offs between conservation and development in southeastern Cameroon, where illegal hunting is regarded as the greatest challenge to conservation. We simulated the effects of different ICDP strategies by varying the degree of focus on antipoaching activities, anticorruption measures and direct development investments, and by varying the overall budget for such activities. Our outcome variables were numbers of selected wildlife species and household incomes. The model outcomes from the different scenarios were used to stimulate debate among stakeholders. Contributing to poverty alleviation while maintaining current animal population sizes will be extremely difficult and will require long-term external financial support. Devoting greater attention to improving local environmental governance emerged as the highest priority for this investment. We used the model outputs to inform some of the major policy makers in the region. Participatory modeling is a valuable means of capturing the complexities of achieving conservation at landscape scales and of stimulating innovative solutions to entrenched problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Abbreviations

ICDP:

Integrated conservation and development project

NGO:

Nongovernmental organization

SE TOU:

South east technical operational unit

References

  1. Agrawal A, Gibson CC (1999) Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource management. World Dev 27:629–649. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alpert P (1996) Integrated conservation and development projects. Bioscience 46:845–855. doi:10.2307/1312970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Assembe-Mvondo S (2006) Decentralized forest resources and access of minorities to environmental justice: an analysis of the case of the Baka in southern Cameroon. Int J Environ Stud 63:681–689. doi:10.1080/00207230600963825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barrett CB, Brandon K, Gibson C, Gjertson H (2001) Conserving topical biodiversity amid weak institutions. Bioscience 51:497–502. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0497:CTBAWI]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barrett CB, Gibson C, Hoffman B, McCubbins MD (2006) The complex links between governance and biodiversity. Conserv Biol 20:1358–1366. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00521.x

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bennett E, Blencowe E, Brandon K, Brown D, Burn RW, Cowlishaw G, Davies G, Dublin H, Fa JE, Milner-Gulland EJ, Robinson JG, Rowcliffe JM, Underwood FM, Wilkie DS (2007) Hunting for consensus: reconciling bushmeat harvest, conservation and development policy in West and Central Africa. Conserv Biol 21:884–887. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00595.x

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bousquet F, Castella J-C, Trébuil G, Barnaud C, Boissau S, Kam SP (2007) Using multi-agent systems in a companion modeling approach for agroecosystem management in South-east Asia. Outlook Agric 36:57–62

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brown K (2002) Innovations for conservation and development. Geogr J 168:6–17. doi:10.1111/1475-4959.00034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Castella J-C, Kam SP, Quang DD, Verburg PH, Hoanh CT (2007) Combing top-down and bottom-up modelling approaches of land use/cover change to support public policies: application to sustainable management of natural resources in Northern Vietnam. Land use policy 24:531–545. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. CBFP (Congo Basin Forest Partnership) (2005) The forests of the Congo basin: a preliminary assessment. Central African Regional Programme for the Environment, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  11. CEFAID (Centre pour l’Education, la Formation et l’Appui aux Initiatives de Développement au Cameroun) (2004) Evaluation des COVAREF UTO/SE. CEFAID, Yokadouma

    Google Scholar 

  12. CEFAID (Centre pour l’Education, la Formation et l’Appui aux Initiatives de Développement au Cameroun) (2005) Etude socio-économique effectuée dans les villages voisins de l’Unité Forestière d’Aménagement 10064. CEFAID, Yokadouma

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cernea MM, Schmidt-Soltau K (2006) Poverty risks and National Parks: policy issues in conservation and development. World Dev 34:1808–1830. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chan KMA, Pringle RM, Ranganathan J, Boggs CL, Chan YL, Ehrlich PR, Haff PK, Heller NE, Al-Khafaji K, Macmynowski DP (2007) When agendas collide: human welfare and biological conservation. Conserv Biol 21:59–68

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chape S (2001) An overview of integrated approaches to conservation and community development in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic. Parks 11:24–32

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chapin M (2004) A challenge to conservationists. Worldwatch magazine Nov/Dec. Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  17. Christensen J (2004) Win-win illusions. Conserv Pract 5:12–19. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4629.2004.tb00079.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cowling RM, Knight AT, Faith DP, Lombard AT, Desmet PG, Driver A, Ferrier S, Maze K, Rouget M (2004) Nature conservation requires more than a passion for species. Conserv Biol 18:1674–1677. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00296.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cowlishaw G, Mendelson S, Rowcliffe JM (2004) The bushmeat commodity chain: patterns of trade and sustainability in a mature urban market in West Africa. ODI wildlife policy brief 7. Overseas Development Institute, London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Duncan CR (2007) Mixed outcomes: the impact of regional autonomy and decentralization on indigenous ethnic minorities in Indonesia. Dev Change 38:711–733. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00430.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ekobo A (1998) Large mammals and vegetation surveys in the Boumba-Bek and Nki project area. World Wildlife Fund, Yokadouma

    Google Scholar 

  22. Emerton L, Bishop J, Thomas L (2006) Sustainable financing of protected areas: a global review of challenges and options. Best practice protected area guidelines series 13. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ferraro P (2001) Global habitat protection: limitations of development interventions and a role for conservation performance payments. Conserv Biol 15:990–1000. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015004990.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ferraro P (2005) Corruption and conservation: the need for empirical analysis. A response to Smith and Walpole. Oryx 39:257–259. doi:10.1017/S003060530500075X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ferraro PJ, Kiss A (2002) Direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science 298:1718–1719. doi:10.1126/science.1078104

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fritzen SA (2007) Can the design of community-driven development reduce the risk of elita capture? Evidence from Indonesia. World Dev 35:1359–1375. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. GFW (Global Forest Watch) (2005) Interactive forestry atlas of Cameroon. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  28. GTZ (German development cooperation) (2001) Etude Socio–économique de l’UTO Sud-est. Rapport Définitif, Yokadouma

    Google Scholar 

  29. Guha R (1997) The authoritarian biologist and the arrogance of anti-humanism: wildlife conservation in the third world. Ecologist 27:14–20

    Google Scholar 

  30. HPS (High Performance Systems) (1996) Stella and Stella research software. HPS, Hanover

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hutton JM, Leader-Williams N (2003) Sustainable use and incentive-driven conservation: realigning human and conservation interests. Oryx 37:215–226. doi:10.1017/S0030605303000395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Janzen D (1986) The future of tropical ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:305–324. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.001513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kaufmann D (2003) Rethinking governance: empirical lessons challenge orthodoxy. World Economic Forum, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2007) Governance matters VI: governance indicators for 1996–2006. In: World Bank policy research working paper No. 4280 World Bank, Washington, DC, USA

  35. Kremen C, Merenlender AM, Murphy DD (1994) Ecological monitoring: a vital need for integrated conservation and development programs in the tropics. Conserv Biol 8:388–397. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08020388.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lynam T, Bousquet F, Le Page C, d’Aquino P, Barreteau O, Chinembiri F, Mombeshora B (2002) Adapting science to adaptive managers: spidergrams, belief models, and multi-agent systems modeling. Conservation Ecology 5: http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art24/

  37. Malleson R (2002) Changing perspectives on forests, people and ‘development’: reflections on the case of the Korup forest. IDS Bull 33:94–101. doi:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2002.tb00011.x (Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, UK)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. McShane T, Wells M (eds) (2004) Getting biodiversity projects to work: towards more effective conservation and development. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  39. MINEFI (Ministry of Economy and Finance) (2005) Programme de sécurisation des recettes forestiers. Rapport annuel provisoire d’activités. Exercise 2005. MINEFI, Yaoundé

  40. Mittermeier RA, Kormos CF, Goettsch-Mittermeier C, Robles-Gil P, Sandwith T, Besancon C (2005) Transboundary conservation: a new vision for protected areas. Conservation International, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  41. Neumann RP (1998) Imposing wilderness: struggles over livelihood and nature preservation in Africa. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nzooh ZL (2003) Suivi écologique dans le Parc National de Lobéké et sa zone périphérique : données de base sur la dynamique des populations de grands et moyens mammifères et des activités anthropiques. World Wildlife Fund, Yokadouma

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nzooh ZL, Bassama C, Ndinga H (2005) Populations des grands et moyens mammifères dans les UFA 10–008, 10–009, 10–010, 10–012: données de base pour l’aménagement durable des conssessions. World Wildlife Fund, Yokadouma

    Google Scholar 

  44. Oates JF (1999) Myth and reality in the rainforest: how conservation strategies are failing in Africa. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  45. Oyono PR, Ribot JC, Larson AM (2006) Green and black gold in rural Cameroon: natural resources for local governance, justice and sustainability. Environmental governance in Africa working papers 22. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

  46. Palmer C (2005) The nature of corruption in forest management. World Econ 6:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ribot JC (2007) Waiting for democracy: the politics of choice in natural resource decentralization. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  48. Robbins P, McSweeney K, Waite T, Rice J (2006) Even conservation rules are made to be broken: implications for biodiversity. Environ Manage 37:162–169. doi:10.1007/s00267-005-0009-5

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Romero C, Andrade G (2004) International conservation organisations and the fate of local tropical forest conservation initiatives. Conserv Biol 18:578–580. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00397.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Salafsky N, Wollenberg E (2000) Linking livelihoods and conservation: a conceptual framework and scale for assessing the integration of human needs and biodiversity. World Dev 28:1421–1438. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00031-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sanderson SE, Redford K (2003) Contested relationships between biodiversity conservation and poverty alleviation. Oryx 37:389–390. doi:10.1017/S003060530300070X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sandker M, Suwarno A, Campbell BM (2007) Will forests remain in the face of oil palm expansion? Simulating change in Malinau, Indonesia. Ecol Soc 12:37. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art37/

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sayer J, Campbell B (2004) The science of sustainable development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  54. Schmidt-Soltau K (2004) The costs of rainforest conservation: local responses towards integrated conservation and development projects in Cameroon. J Contemp Afr Stud 22:93–117. doi:10.1080/0258900042000179625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Smith RJ, Walpole MJ (2005) Should conservationists pay more attention to corruption? Oryx 39:251–256. doi:10.1017/S0030605305000608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Smith RJ, Muir RDJ, Walpole MJ, Balmford A, Leader-Williams N (2003a) Governance and the loss of biodiversity. Nature 426:67–70. doi:10.1038/nature02025

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Smith J, Obidzinski K, Subarudi, Suramenggala I (2003b) Illegal logging, collusive corruption and fragmented governments in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Int For Rev 5:293–302

    Google Scholar 

  58. Terborgh J, van Schaik C, Davenport L, Rao M (2002) Making parks work: strategies for preserving tropical nature. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  59. UN (United Nations) (2006) World urbanization prospects: the 2005 revision. Database. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York

    Google Scholar 

  60. UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund) (2007) Country profiles for population and reproductive health, policy developments and indicators 2005. UNFPA, New York

    Google Scholar 

  61. van Noordwijk M, Tomich TP, Verbist B (2001) Negotiation support models for integrated natural resource management in tropical forest margins. Conservation Ecology 5: http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art21/

  62. Wells M, Guggenheim S, Khan A, Wardojo W, Jepson P (1998) Investing in biodiversity. A review of Indonesia’s integrated conservation and development projects. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wilshusen PR, Brechin SR, Fortwangler CL, West PC (2002) Reinventing a square wheel: critique of a resurgent “protection paradigm” in international biodiversity conservation. Soc Nat Resour 15:17–40. doi:10.1080/089419202317174002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. World Bank (2006) GNI per capita 2005, atlas method and PPP, world development indicators database. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marieke Sandker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sandker, M., Campbell, B.M., Nzooh, Z. et al. Exploring the effectiveness of integrated conservation and development interventions in a Central African forest landscape. Biodivers Conserv 18, 2875–2892 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9613-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cameroon
  • Corruption
  • Environmental governance
  • ICDP
  • Integrated conservation and development project
  • Participatory modeling
  • Trade-offs
  • Simulation models