Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Acridids as indicators of disturbance in dry deciduous forest of West Bengal in India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Acridid communities are sensitive to anthropogenic disturbance and the community structure of acridids plays vital role in functioning the forest ecosystem. They are potentially useful bioindicators for conservation planning and habitat disturbances. Acridid assemblages of three different habitat types based on degree of disturbance as follows five natural sites, five moderately disturbed sites and five highly disturbed sites in Chaupahari forest, West Bengal, India were studied. Diversity, abundance, equitability and species richness of acridid were observed in respect to undisturbed and disturbed habitats. The species richness and diversity of the sites tracked the intensity of disturbance, the greatest value being associated with the natural site followed by the moderately disturbed site and highly disturbed site. The highest species richness and diversity index indicate the suitable habitat for acridid population. Statistical analysis infers that different species show different behavior and the sites are also different in relation to different habitat types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen AN (1999) My bioindicator or yours? Making the selection. J Insect Conserv 3:61–64. doi:10.1023/A:1017202329114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN, Ludwig JA, Lowe LM, Rentz DCF (2001) Grasshopper biodiversity and bioindicators in Australian tropical Savannas: responses to disturbance in kakudu National Park. Austral Ecol 26:213–222. doi:10.1046/j.1442-9993.2001.01106.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong AJ, Van Hensbergen HJ (1997) Evaluation of afforestable montane grasslands for wildlife conservation in the North-Eastern Cape, South Africa. Biol Conserv 81:179–190. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00034-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldi A, Kisbenedek T (1997) Orthopteran assemblages as indicators of grassland naturalness in Hungary. Agric Ecosyst Environ 66(2):121–129. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(97)00068-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castrezana S, Markow TA (2001) Arthropod diversity in necrotic tissue of three species of columnar cacti (Cactaceae). Can Entomol 133(3):301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesson P, Pacala S, Neuhauser C (2002) Environmental niches and ecosystem functioning. In: Kinzig AP, Pacala SW, Tilman D (eds) The functional consequences of biodiversity: empirical progress and theoretical extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 213–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding DJ, Bruseven MA (1993a) Grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) community composition and ecological disturbance on southern Inaho rangeland. Environ Entomol 22:71–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding DJ, Bruseven MA (1993b) Spatial analysis of grasshopper density and ecological disturbance on southern Indaho rangeland. Agric Ecosyst Environ 43:31–47. doi:10.1016/0167-8809(93)90004-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding DJ, Bruseven MA (1995) Grasshopper densities on grazed and ungrazed rangeland under drought conditions in Southern Idaho. Great Basin Nat 55(4):352–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo Z, Li H, Gan Y (2006) Grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) biodiversity and grassland ecosystems. Insect Sci 13:221–227. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7917.2006.00086.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Groves R, Hopper SD, Lambeck RJ, Lamont BB, Lavorel S, Main AR, Majer JD, Saunders DA (1995) Function of biodiversity in Mediterranean ecosystems in Australia. In: Davis GW, Richardson DM (eds) Mediterranean-type ecosystems, the function of biodiversity. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 233–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston MA (1994) Biological diversity. The coexistence of species on changing landscapes Cambridge University press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Joern A, Gaines SB (1990) Population dynamics and regulation in grasshoppers. In: Chapman RF, Joern A (eds) Biology of grasshoppers. Wiley, New York, pp 415–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi PC, Lockwood JA, Vashishth N, Singh A (1999) Grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acridoidea) community dynamics in a moist deciduous forest in India. J Orthoptera Res 8:17–23. doi:10.2307/3503420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp WP (1992) Temporal variation in rangeland grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) communities in the steppe region of Montana, USA. Can Entomol 124:437–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp WP, Harvey SJ, O’Neill KM (1990a) Patterns of vegetation and grasshopper community composition. Oecologia 83:299–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp WP, Harvey SJ, O’Neill KM (1990b) Habitat and insect biology revisited. Am Entomol 36:44–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JA (1997) Rangeland grasshopper ecology. In: Gangwere SK, Muralirangan MC, Muralirangan M (eds) Bionomics of grasshoppers, katydids and their kin. CAB International, London, pp 83–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal SK, Dey A, Hazra AK (2007) Pictorial hand book on Indian short-horn grasshopper pests (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, p 58

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller RH, Onsager JA (1991) Grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) and plant relationships under different grazing intensities. Environ Entomol 20:807–814

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmenter RR, MacMahon JA, Gilbert CAB (1991) Early successional patterns of arthropods recolonization on reclaimed Wyoming strip mines: the grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) and allied faunas (Orthoptera: Gryllacrididae, Tettigoniidae). Environ Entomol 20:135–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson G, Allen CR, Holling CS (1998) Biological resilience, biodiversity and Scale. Ecosystems I:6–18. doi:10.1007/s100219900002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ (1997) Conservation biology of Orthoptera. In: Gangwere SK, Muralirangan MC, Muralirangan M (eds) The bionomics of grasshoppers, katydids and their kin. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 481–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ, Sergeev MG (1997) Orthoptera and landscape change. In: Gangwere SK, Muralirangan MC, Muralirangan M (eds) The bionomics of grasshoppers katydids and their kin. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 147–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE, Weaner W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Vats Lk, Mittal K (1991) Population density, biomass and secondary productivity of Orthoptera of forest floor vegetation. Indian J For 14:61–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker B (1995) Conserving biological diversity through ecosystem resilience. Conserv Biol 9:747–752. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09040747.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yachi S, Loreau M (1999) Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:57–64. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.4.1463

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors are thankful to the Ministry of Environment and Forest, New Delhi for the financial assistance. We thank Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata for confirming the identification of different acridids species. Our thanks are also due to Prof. P. Nath, Head, Dept. of Zoology, Visva- Bharati University for providing laboratory facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parimalendu Haldar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saha, H.K., Haldar, P. Acridids as indicators of disturbance in dry deciduous forest of West Bengal in India. Biodivers Conserv 18, 2343–2350 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9591-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9591-9

Keywords

Navigation