Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Species’ surrogacy for conservation planning: caveats from comparing the response of three arboreal rodents to habitat loss and fragmentation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of surrogate species in conservation planning has been applied with disappointing results on relatively large sets of species. It could still prove useful for optimizing conservation efforts when considering a small set of species with similar ecological requirements, however few field tests of this nature have been carried out. The aim of this research is to compare the response of three arboreal rodent species—the fat dormouse (Glis glis), the hazel dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius) and the red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris)—to habitat loss and fragmentation, with the aim of identifying priorities for conservation and evaluating possible optimization of conservation efforts under different scenarios: habitat restoration and selection of focal patches. We studied the distribution of the three species in a sample of patches in a highly fragmented landscape in central Italy, using a patch-landscape scale approach. The distribution was studied by using hair tubes, nestboxes and nocturnal surveys. The three species showed analogous responses to increasing isolation and decreasing size of habitat patches; what differed however, was the magnitude of responses. Our results show possible application of surrogacy within this restricted group of species, however several caveats arise depending on the conservation strategy and available funding. If habitat restoration is the objective, then the fat dormouse should be the target species for guiding size and isolation of patches. On the other hand, the magnitude of the differences and patch requirements for this species, question the feasibility of these conservation actions. If selection of focal patches for conservation is the objective then selecting the fat dormouse as a focal/umbrella species would overlook areas suitable for the other two species. Feasible optimisation of conservation efforts may be possible only between the red squirrel and the hazel dormouse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Cristina Cervone and Marco Negretto for help with fieldwork; this project was financed by the Province of Siena “Ufficio Risorse Faunistiche e Riserve Naturali”. Thanks to Joyce Keep for language revision.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessio Mortelliti.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Summary of the distribution of three arboreal rodents species (M. avellanarius, G. glis and S. vulgaris) in the sampled sites in the province of Siena central Italy

Patch ID

Nestboxes

Hair tubes

Hectares

Proximity index (1,000 m)

Pn_factor

M. avellanarius

G. glis

S. vulgaris (2nd year)

1

2

1

0.48

0.12

−0.45

0

0

0

2

1

1

0.41

0.23

−0.41

0

0

0

3

2

2

1.38

0.24

−0.31

0

0

0

4

2

2

1.32

0.01

−0.58

0

n/a

0

5

2

0

0.85

0.58

−0.33

0

n/a

n/a

6

2

3

1.15

0.51

−0.25

0

0

0

7

3

2

1.80

0.21

−0.29

0

0

0

8

3

1

2.20

0.01

−0.52

0

0

0

9

2

2

2.24

0.00

−0.59

0

n/a

0

10

2

2

2.22

0.14

−0.33

0

0

0

11

2

3

2.15

0.36

−0.30

0

0

0

12

3

3

4.51

0.14

−0.28

0

0

0

13

5

3

3.86

0.15

−0.27

0

n/a

1

14

5

3

5.09

0.15

−0.28

1

0

1

15

5

3

6.37

0.02

−0.34

0

0

0

16

7

3

8.59

0.25

−0.15

1

n/a

0

17

4

4

8.17

0.08

−0.27

0

0

0

18

8

10

15.65

0.91

−0.04

1

0

1

19

8

14

14.79

0.94

−0.05

1

n/a

1

20

10

14

20.85

1.28

−0.01

1

0

1

21

15

15

27.27

0.13

−0.10

1

0

1

22

16

17

65.56

29.22

0.61

1

1

1

23

14

15

79.86

0.21

−0.01

0

1

1

24

*

20

30,000

30.00

3.33

1

1

1

25

0

2

1.07

0.05

−0.46

n/a

n/a

0

26

0

2

1.39

0.00

−0.63

n/a

0

1

27

3

0

2.43

0.11

−0.33

0

n/a

n/a

28

3

3

3.00

0.06

−0.38

0

0

0

29

4

0

4.43

0.30

−0.21

0

0

n/a

30

*

0

101.72

2.44

0.13

1

0

n/a

31

19

*

8,000

30.00

3.22

1

1

1

32

20

*

27,500

30.00

3.32

1

1

1

  1. n/a = survey not carried out
  2. * Data from occasional sightings or captures

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mortelliti, A., Santulli Sanzo, G. & Boitani, L. Species’ surrogacy for conservation planning: caveats from comparing the response of three arboreal rodents to habitat loss and fragmentation. Biodivers Conserv 18, 1131–1145 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9477-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9477-2

Keywords

Navigation