Abstract
To assess whether imperiled species are covered by existing protections in the biologically-rich state of Nevada, U.S.A., we compared the distribution of reserves with known imperiled species occurrences. For species poorly represented in reserves, we determined whether they were receiving alternate protection under the U.S. Endangered Species Act or voluntary conservation plans. A majority (212, 55%) of Nevada’s 384 imperiled species had fewer than 25% of occurrences in reserves and most (282, 68%) had fewer than 50% of occurrences in reserves. Of imperiled species with less than 25% or fewer than two occurrences in reserves, only 9% are currently receiving alternate protection from the Endangered Species Act or voluntary plans. These results suggest that providing protection for imperiled species in Nevada will require both an expansion of the existing reserve system, which currently covers 14% of the state, and protection of more species under the Endangered Species Act or other programs. By dividing Nevada into equal-sized hexagons and scoring each of these hexagons based on a rarity-weighted richness index of imperiled species occurrences, we identified 19 imperiled species hot spots in Nevada. No imperiled species occurrences were protected in seven (37%) and less than half were protected in 11 (58%) of these hot spots. Protecting these areas could provide important additional protection for imperiled species in Nevada. Evaluations of protective measures for biological diversity should include the full suite of protections, including both reserves and laws and regulations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ESA:
-
Endangered Species Act
References
Ando A (1999) Waiting to be protected under the Endangered Species Act: the political economy of regulatory delay. J Law Econ 42:28–60. doi:10.1086/467417
Bean M, Rowland M (1997) The evolution of national wildlife law, 3rd edn. Praeger, Westport
Cabeza M, Moilanen A (2001) Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol 16:242–248. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01) 02125-5
Chaplin S, Gerrard R, Watson H, Master L, Flack S (2000) The geography of imperilment. In: Stein B, Kutner L, Adams J (eds) Precious heritage: the status of biodiversity in the United States. Oxford University Press, New York
Deacon J, Williams A, Deacon William C, Williams J (2007) Fueling population growth in Las Vegas: how large-scale groundwater withdrawal could burn regional biodiversity. Bioscience 57:688–698. doi:10.1641/B570809
Deguise I, Kerr J (2006) Protected areas and prospects for endangered species conservation in Canada. Conserv Biol 20:48–55. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00274.x
Duffy D, Boggs K, Hagenstein R, Lipkin R, Michaelson J (1999) Landscape assessment of the degree of protection of Alaska’s terrestrial ecosystems. Conserv Biol 13:1332–1343. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98063.x
Fleishman E, Noss R, Noon B (2006) Utility and limitations of species richness metrics for conservation planning. Ecol Indic 6:543–553. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.07.005
Gaston K, Rodrigues L (2003) Reserve selection in regions with poor biological data. Conserv Biol 17:188–195. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01268.x
Gaston K, Charman K, Jackson S, Armsworth P, Bonn A, Briers R, Callaghan C, Catchpole R, Hopkins J, Kunin W, Latham J, Opdam P, Stoneman R, Stroud D, Tratt R (2006) The ecological effectiveness of protected areas: the United Kingdom. Biol Conserv 132:76–87. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.03.013
Greenwald N, Suckling K, Taylor M (2005) The listing record. In: Goble D, Scott M, Davis F (eds) The Endangered Species Act at thirty: renewing the conservation promise volume 1. Island Press, Washington, DC
Margules C, Pressey R (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253. doi:10.1038/35012251
Mote P, Hamlet A, Clark M, Lettenmaier D (2005) Declining mountain snowpack in western North America. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 86:39–49. doi:10.1175/BAMS-86-1-39
Prendergast J, Quinn R, Lawton J (1999) The gaps between theory and practice in selecting nature reserves. Conserv Biol 13:484–492. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97428.x
Pressey R, Whish G, Barrett T, Watts M (2002) Effectiveness of protected areas in north-eastern New South Wales: recent trends in six measures. Biol Conserv 106:57–69. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00229-4
Rodrigues A, Andelman S, Bakarr M, Boitani L, Brooks T, Cowling R, Fishpool L, da Fonseca G, Gaston K, Hoffmann M, Long J, Marquet P, Pilgrim J, Pressey R, Schipper J, Sechrest W, Stuart S, Underhill L, Waller R, Watts M, Yan X (2004) Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428:640–643
Rothley K, Berger C, Gonzalez C, Webster E, Rubenstein D (2004) Combining strategies to select reserves in fragmented landscapes. Conserv Biol 18:1121–1131. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00180.x
Running S (2006) Is global warming causing more, larger wildfires? Science 6 July 2006. doi:10.1126/science.1130370
Scott M, Davis F, McGhie R, Wright R, Groves C, Estes J (2001) Nature reserves: do they capture the full range of American’s biological diversity? Ecol Appl 11:999–1007. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0999:NRDTCT]2.0.CO;2
Siitonen P, Tanskanen A, Lehtinen A (2002) Method for selection of old-forest reserves. Conserv Biol 16:1398–1408. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00322.x
Soulé M, Estes J, Miller B, Honnold D (2005) Strongly interacting species: conservation policy, management, and ethics. Bioscience 55:168–176. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0168:SISCPM]2.0.CO;2
Southern Nevada Water Authority (2007) http://www.snwa.com/html/wr_gdp.html. Accessed August 6, 2007
Stanford Environmental Law Society (2001) The Endangered Species Act. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Stein B, Kutner L, Adams J (2000) Precious heritage: the status of biodiversity in the United States. Oxford University Press, New York
Stewart T, Cayan D, Dettinger M (2005) Changes toward earlier streamflow timing across western North America. J Clim 18:1136–1155. doi:10.1175/JCLI3321.1
Strittholt J, Dellasalla D, Jiang H (2006) Status of mature and old-growth forests in the Pacific Northwest. Conserv Biol 20:363–374. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00384.x
Tobin R (1990) The expendable future: U.S. politics and the protection of biological diversity. Duke University Press, Durham
United States Census Bureau (2007) http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/32000.html. Accessed August 6, 2007
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (2006) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants, 90-day finding on a petition to list the Sand Mountain Blue Butterfly as threatened or endangered with critical habitat. Fed Regist 71:44988–44993
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (2007a) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants, review of native species that are candidates or proposed for listing as endangered or threatened, annual notice of findings on resubmitted petitions, annual description of progress on listing actions. Fed Regist 72:69034–69106
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (2007b) http://www.fws.gov/desertcomplex/ashmeadows/quickfacts.htm. Accessed August 6, 2007
United States Geologic Survey National Gap Analysis Program (2005) Provisional digital land stewardship map for the Southwestern United States, Version 1.0. New Mexico Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, New Mexico State University, Albuquerque
Wilcove D, McMillan M, Winston K (1993) What exactly is an endangered species? An analysis of the U.S. endangered species list: 1985–1991. Conserv Biol 7:87–93. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07010087.x
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank Dr. Dominick DellaSalla, Allison Jones and Dr. Scott Powell for reviewing an early draft of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greenwald, D.N., Bradley, C. Assessing protection for imperiled species of nevada, U.S.A.: are species slipping through the cracks of existing protections?. Biodivers Conserv 17, 2951–2960 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9407-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9407-3