Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 17, Issue 12, pp 2821–2832

Butterfly diversity in Mediterranean islands and in Pentadaktylos Pinus brutia forests of Cyprus

  • Özge Özden
  • William M. Ciesla
  • Wayne J. Fuller
  • David J. Hodgson
Original Paper

Abstract

We analysed the influence of contemporary geography on butterfly diversity for islands in the Mediterranean Basin. We found that island size and distance from the mainland has a significant effect on the number of species. We also used butterflies as an indicator group to identify the importance of forest habitats for biodiversity conservation in the island of Cyprus. To understand the relative importance of local vegetation characteristics of butterflies in the Pentadaktylos mountains transect counts were used to assess the abundance and butterfly diversity in two different forest types. A total of 1,602 butterflies and 23 species were recorded during this research. We observed highly significant effects of forest type on abundance and species richness of butterflies. For example, number of butterflies was significantly higher in old forest than young pine forest. Also, the abundance of endemic butterflies was highest in old forest habitats. Therefore, the survival of the majority of endemic butterflies in Cyprus may depend on conservation of old forests and their understorey plants.

Keywords

Butterflies Lepidoptera Diversity Mediterranean islands Forests Cyprus 

References

  1. Balletto E, Monelli S, Cassulo L (2005) Checklist e distribuzione della fauna italiana. 10.000 specie terrestri e delle acque interne: Insecta Lepidoptera Papilionoidea (Rhopalocera). Mem Mus Civ St Natur Verona 16:259–263Google Scholar
  2. Beccaloni GW, Gaston KJ (1995) Predicting the species richness of Neotropical forest butterflies: Ithominae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) as indicators. Biol Conserv 71:77–86. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(94)00023-J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blondel J, Aronson J (2004) Biology and wildlife of the Mediterranean region. Oxford University Press, 328 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Crawley MJ (2002) Statistical computing: An introduction to data analysis using S-PLUS. John Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  5. Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Olivier A, Coutsis JG (2000) Contemporary geography dominates butterfly diversity gradients within the Aegean archipelago (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae, Hesperioidea). J Biogeogr 27:1365–1383. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00514.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. FAO (2007) Forest Health & Biosecurity Working Papers, Overview of Forests Pests of Cyprus. Working Paper FBS/15 E, Rome, Italy, 11 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Grill A, Crnjar R, Casula P, Menken S (2002) Applying the IUCN threat categories to island endemics: Sardinian butterflies (Italy). J Nat Conserv 10:51–60. doi:10.1078/1617-1381-00006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grill A, Knoflach B, Cleary DFR, Kati V (2005) Butterfly, spider, and plant communities in different land-use types in Sardinia, Italy. Biodivers Conserv 14:1281–1300. doi:10.1007/s10531-004-1661-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. John E, Parker R (2002) Dispersal of Hipparchia cypriensis (Holik, 1949) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae, Satyridae) in Cyprus, with notes on its ecology and life history. Entomol Gaz 53:3–18Google Scholar
  10. John E, Coutsis JG, Makris C (2006) A review of records for Colias erate (Esper, 1805) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) in Cyprus: were they all yellow forms of Colias croceus (Geoffroy, 1785)? Entomol Gaz 57:3–12Google Scholar
  11. Lopez A, Correas E (2003) Assessment and opportunities of Mediterranean Networks and action plans for the Management of Protected Areas. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. Makris C (2003) Butterflies of Cyprus. Bank of Cyprus Cultural Foundation, Nicosia, 327 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. Myers N (1990) The biodiversity challenge: expanded hotspots analysis. Environmentalists 10:243–256. doi:10.1007/BF02239720 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Olivier A (1993) The butterflies of the Greek island of Rodos. Antwerpen Vlaamse Vereniging Voor EntomologieGoogle Scholar
  15. Oostermeijer JGB, Swaay CAM (1998) The relationships between butterflies and environmental indicator values: a tool for conservation in a changing landscape. Biol Conserv 86:271–280. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00040-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pollard E (1977) A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biol Conserv 12:115–134. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(77)90065-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rahbek C (1995) The elevational gradient of species richness: a uniform pattern? Ecograph 18:200–205. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.1995.tb00341.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shea K, Roxburgh SH, Rauschert ESJ (2004) Moving from pattern to process: coexistence mechanisms under intermediate disturbance regimes. Ecol Lett 7:491–508. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00600.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tolman TW (2001) Photographic guide to the butterflies of Britain and Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 305 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Tsintides TC, Hadjikyriakou GN, Christodolou CS (2002) Trees and shrubs in Cyprus. Anastasios G. Leventis Foundation and Cyprus Forest Association, Lefkosia, 442 ppGoogle Scholar
  21. Wettstein W, Schmid B (1999) Conservation of arthropod diversity in montane wetlands: effect of altitude, habitat quality and habitat fragmentation on butterflies and grasshoppers. J Appl Ecol 36:363–373. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.1999.00404.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wood B, Gillman P (1998) The effects of disturbance on forest butterflies using two methods of sampling in Trinidad. Biodivers Conserv 7:597–616. doi:10.1023/A:1008800317279 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. van Swaay C (2003) Butterfly diversity and land use gradients in Europe. Report VS 2003.020 De Vlinderstichting. Wageningen, Netherlands, 28 ppGoogle Scholar
  24. van Swaay C, Warren M (1999) Red data book of European butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and environment, No. 99. Council of Europe Publishing, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  25. Viney DE (1994) An illustrated flora of North Cyprus. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein, Germany, 697 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Özge Özden
    • 1
  • William M. Ciesla
    • 2
  • Wayne J. Fuller
    • 3
    • 4
  • David J. Hodgson
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and TechnologiesEuropean University of LefkeGuzelyurtCyprus
  2. 2.Forest Health Management InternationalFort CollinsUSA
  3. 3.Centre for Ecology and ConservationUniversity of ExeterCornwallUK
  4. 4.Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and TechnologiesEuropean University of LefkeGuzelyurtCyprus

Personalised recommendations