Skip to main content

Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity?

Abstract

Losses of natural and semi-natural forests, mostly to agriculture, are a significant concern for biodiversity. Against this trend, the area of intensively managed plantation forests increases, and there is much debate about the implications for biodiversity. We provide a comprehensive review of the function of plantation forests as habitat compared with other land cover, examine the effects on biodiversity at the landscape scale, and synthesise context-specific effects of plantation forestry on biodiversity. Natural forests are usually more suitable as habitat for a wider range of native forest species than plantation forests but there is abundant evidence that plantation forests can provide valuable habitat, even for some threatened and endangered species, and may contribute to the conservation of biodiversity by various mechanisms. In landscapes where forest is the natural land cover, plantation forests may represent a low-contrast matrix, and afforestation of agricultural land can assist conservation by providing complementary forest habitat, buffering edge effects, and increasing connectivity. In contrast, conversion of natural forests and afforestation of natural non-forest land is detrimental. However, regional deforestation pressure for agricultural development may render plantation forestry a ‘lesser evil’ if forest managers protect indigenous vegetation remnants. We provide numerous context-specific examples and case studies to assist impact assessments of plantation forestry, and we offer a range of management recommendations. This paper also serves as an introduction and background paper to this special issue on the effects of plantation forests on biodiversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. “Biodiversity and Conservation Biology in Plantation Forests.” Bordeaux, France, 27–29 April 2005. “Biodiversity and Plantation Forests—Oxymoron or Opportunity”, Technical Session at the XXII IUFRO World Congress—Brisbane, Australia, 8 August 2005. “Ecosystem Goods and Services from Planted Forests.” Bilbao, Spain, 3–7 October 2006.

References

  • Allan DG, Harrison JA, Navarro RA, van Wilgen BW, Thompson MW (1997) The impact of commercial afforestation on bird populations in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa—insights from bird-atlas data. Biol Conserv 79:173–185. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00098-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen RB, Platt KH, Coker REJ (1995) Understorey species composition patterns in a Pinus radiata D. Don plantation on the central North Island volcanic plateau, New Zealand. N Z J For Sci 25:301–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson AR (2001) Deforesting and restoring peat bogs: a review. Technical paper 32, Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, UK

  • Armstrong AJ, van Hensbergen HJ (1996) Impacts of afforestation with pines on assemblages of native biota in South Africa. South Afr For J 175:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbaro L, Pontcharraud L, Vetillard F, Guyon D, Jactel H (2005) Comparative responses of bird, carabid, and spider assemblages to stand and landscape diversity in maritime pine plantation forests. Ecoscience 12:110–121. doi:10.2980/i1195-6860-12-1-110.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbaro L, Rossi JP, Vetillard F, Nezan J, Jactel H (2007) The spatial distribution of birds and carabid beetles in pine plantation forests: the role of landscape composition and structure. J Biogeog 34:652–664

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbaro L, Couzi L, Bretagnolle V, Nezan J, Vetillard F (2008) Landscape complementation for breeding and foraging in the declining Eurasian hoopoe (Upupa epops). Biodivers Conserv (this issue)

  • Barlow J, Gardner TA, Araujo IS, Bonaldo AB, Costa JE, Esposito MC, Ferreira LV, Hawes J, Hernandez MIM, Leite RN, Lo-Man-Hung NF, Malcolm JR, Martins MB, Mestre LAM, Nunes-Gutjahr AL, Overal WL, Parry L, Peters SL, Ribeiro-Junior MA, da Silva Motta C, da Silva MNF, Peres CA (2007) Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary and plantation forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:18555–18560. doi:10.1073/pnas.0703333104

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow J, Araujo IS, Overal WL, Gardner TA, Da Silva Mendes F, Lake I, Peres CA (2008) Diversity and composition of fruit-feeding butterflies in tropical Eucalyptus plantations. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9240-0

  • Benedick H, Hill K, Mustaffa N, Chey VK, Maryati M, Searle B, Schilthuizen M, Hamer KC (2006) Impacts of rain forest fragmentation on butterflies in northern Borneo: species richness, turnover and the value of small fragments. J Appl Ecol 43:967–977. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01209.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt L, Brockerhoff E, Jactel H (2008) Can exotic plantation forests provide surrogate habitat for carabid beetles where native forest is rare? Biodivers Conserv (this issue)

  • Bernhard-Reversat F (ed) (2001) Effect of exotic tree plantations on plant diversity and biological soil fertility in the Congo savanna: with special reference to eucalypts. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, p 71

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettinger P, Sessions J, Boston K (1997) Using Tabu search to schedule timber harvests subject to spatial wildlife goals for big game. Ecol Model 94:111–123. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(96)00007-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Bills D (2001) The UK Government and certification. Int For Rev 3:323–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockerhoff EG, Ecroyd CE, Langer ER (2001) Biodiversity in New Zealand plantation forests: policy trends, incentives, and the state of our knowledge. N Z J For 46:31–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockerhoff EG, Ecroyd CE, Leckie AC, Kimberley MO (2003) Diversity and succession of adventive and indigenous vascular understorey plants in Pinus radiata plantation forests in New Zealand. For Ecol Manage 185:307–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockerhoff EG, Berndt LA, Jactel H (2005) Role of exotic pine forests in the conservation of the critically endangered ground beetle Holcaspis brevicula (Coleoptera: Carabidae). N Z J Ecol 29:37–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook BW, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL (2003) Catastrophic extinctions follow deforestation in Singapore. Nature 424:420–423. doi:10.1038/nature01795

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buscardo E, Smith GF, Kelly DL, Freitas H, Iremomger S, Mitchell F, O’Donoghue S, Mckee A-M (2008) The early effects of afforestation on biodiversity of grasslands in Ireland. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9275-2

  • Carle J, Vuorinen P, Del Lungo A (2002) Status and trends in global forest plantation development. For Prod J 52(7/8):12–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale NJ, Montagnini F (2002) Facilitating regeneration of secondary forests with the use of mixed and pure plantations of indigenous tree species. For Ecol Manage 163:217–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnus J-M, Parrotta J, Brockerhoff EG, Arbez M, Jactel H, Kremer A, Lamb D, O’Hara K, Walters B (2006) Planted forests and biodiversity. J For 104(2):65–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrere R, Lohmann L (1996) Pulping the south: industrial tree plantations and the world paper economy. WRM and Zed Books Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan-McLeod ACA, Moy A (2007) Evaluating residual tree patches as stepping stones and short-term refugia for red-legged frogs. J Wildlife Manage 71:1836–1844. doi:10.2193/2006-309

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapp RA (2001) Tree farming and forest conservation in Chile: do replacement forests leave any originals behind? Soc Nat Resour 14:341–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Clout MN, Gaze PD (1984) Effects of plantation forestry on birds in New Zealand. J Appl Ecol 21:795–815. doi:10.2307/2405048

    Google Scholar 

  • Coote L, Kelly DL, Dowding P, Smith GF (2008) Epiphytes of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) plantations in Ireland and the effects of open spaces. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9302-3

  • Cossalter C, Pye-Smith C (2003) Fast-wood forestry—myths and realities. Center for International Forestry Research, Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings J, Reid N (2008) Stand-level management of plantations to improve biodiversity values. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-008-9362-z

  • Curran LM, Caniago I, Paoli GD, Astianti D, Kusneti M, Leighton M, Nirarita CE, Haeruman H (1999) Impact of El Nino and logging on canopy tree recruitment in Borneo. Science 286:2184–2188. doi:10.1126/science.286.5447.2184

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curran LM, Trigg SN, McDonald AK, Astiani D, Hardiono YM, Siregar P, Caniago I, Kasischke E (2004) Lowland forest loss in protected areas of Indonesian Borneo. Science 303:1000–1003. doi:10.1126/science.1091714

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cyranoski D (2007) Logging: the new conservation. Nature 446:608–610. doi:10.1038/446608a

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deans AM, Malcolm JR, Smith SM, Bellocq MI (2005) Edge effects and the responses of aerial insect assemblages to structural-retention harvesting in Canadian boreal peatland forests. For Ecol Manage 204:249–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Decocq G, Aubert M, Dupont F, Bardat J, Wattez-Franger A, Saguez R, De Foucault B, Alard D, Delelis-Dusoliier A (2005) Silviculture-driven vegetation change in a European temperate deciduous forest. Ann For Sci 62:313–323. doi:10.1051/forest:2005026

    Google Scholar 

  • Denyer K, Burns B, Ogden J (2006) Buffering of native forest edge microclimate by adjoining tree plantations. Austral Ecol 31:478–489. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2006.01609.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Didham RK, Hammond PM, Lawton JH, Eggleton P, Stork NE (1998) Beetle species responses to tropical forest fragmentation. Ecol Monogr 68:295–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donald PF, Fuller RJ, Evans AD, Gough SJ (1998) Effects of forest management and grazing on breeding bird communities in plantations of broadleaved and coniferous trees in western England. Biol Conserv 85:183–197. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00114-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Bus de Warnaffe G, Deconchat M (2008) Impact of four silvicultural systems on birds in the Belgian Ardenne: implications for plantation management. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-008-9364-x

  • Ecroyd CE, Brockerhoff EG (2005) Floristic changes over 30 years in a Canterbury Plains kanuka forest remnant, and comparison with adjacent vegetation types. N Z J Ecol 29:279–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewers RM, Didham RK (2006) Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol Rev 81:117–142. doi:10.1017/S1464793105006949

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ewers RM, Didham RK (2007) The effect of fragment shape and species’ sensitivity to habitat edges on animal population size. Conserv Biol 21:926–936. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00720.x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eycott AE, Watkinson AR, Dolman PM (2006) Ecological patterns of plant diversity in a plantation forest managed by clearfelling. J Appl Ecol 43:1160–1171. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01235.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahy O, Gormally M (1998) A comparison of plant and carabid beetle communities in an Irish oak woodland with a nearby conifer plantation and clearfelled site. For Ecol Manage 110:263–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang W, Peng SL (1997) Development of species diversity in the restoration process of establishing a tropical man-made forest ecosystem in China. For Ecol Manage 99:185–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2001) How much habitat is enough? Biol Conserv 100:65–74. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00208-1

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2001) Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000. Main report. FAO Forestry Paper 140, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy

  • FAO (2006a) Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005—Progress towards sustainable forest management. FAO Forestry Paper 147, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy

  • FAO (2006b) Planted Forests and Trees Working Paper FP37E. Responsible Management of Planted Forests, Voluntary Guidelines. FAO, Rome, Italy

  • FAO (2007) The State of the World’s Forests. ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/009. FAO, Rome, Italy

  • FERN (2007) www.fern.org/publications. Accessed 22 April 2007

  • Ferreras P (2001) Landscape structure and asymmetrical inter-patch connectivity in a metapopulation of the endangered Iberian lynx. Biol Conserv 100:125–136. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00213-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2006) Beyond fragmentation: the continuum model for fauna research and conservation in human-modified landscapes. Oikos 112:473–480. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14148.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB, Manning AD (2006) Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and resilience: ten guiding principles for commodity production landscapes. Front Ecol Environ 4:80–86. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2006)004[0080:BEFART]2.0.CO;2

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest Stewardship Council (2004) Perspectives on plantations. A review of the issues facing plantation management. Background paper to the FSC plantations review. FSC, Bonn, Germany. www.fsc.org/plantations/content/en/home.htm. Accessed 19 June 2007

  • Forest Stewardship Council (2006) The FSC plantations review policy working group final report. FSC, Bonn, Germany. www.fsc.org/plantations/content/en/home.htm. Accessed 19 June 2007

  • Forest Stewardship Council (2007a) FSC principles and criteria of forest stewardship. http://www.fsc.org/en/about/policy_standards/princ_criteria. Accessed 19 June 2007

  • Forest Stewardship Council (2007b) FSC and Plantations: the link with responsible forest management. FSC, Bonn, Germany.www.fscus.org . Accessed 22 April 2007

  • Forest Stewardship Council (2007c) Plantations review. FSC, Bonn, Germany. www.fsc.org/plantations/content/en/home.htm. Accessed 19 June 2007

  • Fuller RJ, Smith KW, Grice PV, Currie FA, Quine CP (2007) Habitat change and woodland birds in Britain: implications for management and future research. Ibis 149(Suppl. 2):261–268. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00775.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Gascon C, Lovejoy TE, Bierregaard RO Jr, Malcolm JR, Stouffer PC, Vasconcelos HL, Laurance WF, Zimmerman B, Tocher M, Borges S (1999) Matrix habitat and species richness in tropical forest remnants. Biol Conserv 91:223–229. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00080-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Geldenhuys CJ (1997) Native forest regeneration in pine and eucalypt plantations in Northern Province, South Africa. For Ecol Manage 99:101–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulding CJ (2006) Forest Stewardship Council certification of industrial plantation forests. Allg Forst-Jagdzeitung 177(3–4):42–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullison RE (2003) Does forest certification conserve biodiversity? Oryx 37(2):153–165. doi:10.1017/S0030605303000346

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampson AM, Peterken GF (1998) Enhancing the biodiversity of Scotland’s forest resource through the development of a network of forest habitats. Biodivers Conserv 7:179–192. doi:10.1023/A:1008832401731

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper KA, Macdonald SE, Burton PJ, Chen J, Brosofske KD, Saunders SC, Euskirchen ES, Roberts D, Jaiteh MS, Esseen P-A (2005) Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conserv Biol 19:768–782. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00045.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris LD (1984) The fragmented forest: Island biogeography theory and the preservation of biotic diversity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley MJ (2002) Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests. For Ecol Manage 155:81–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Henle K, Davies KF, Kleyer M, Margules C, Settele J (2004) Predictors of species sensitivity to fragmentation. Biodivers Conserv 13:207–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Hock B, Hay E (2003) Forest certification in New Zealand: how are we going? N Z J For 47:17–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey JW (2005) Benefits to biodiversity from developing old-growth conditions in British upland spruce plantations: a review and recommendations. Forestry 78:33–53. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpi004

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey JW, Newton AC, Peace AJ, Holden E (2000) The importance of conifer plantations in northern Britain as a habitat for native fungi. Biol Conserv 96:241–252. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00077-X

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey JW, Ferris R, Quine CP (eds) (2003) Biodiversity in Britain’s planted forests: results from the Forestry Commission’s Biodiversity assessment project. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey JW, Quine CP, Watts K (2006) The influence of forest and woodland management on biodiversity in Scotland: recent findings and future prospects. In: Davison R, Galbraith CA (eds) Farming, forestry and the natural heritage: towards a more integrated approach. Scottish Natural Heritage, Edinburgh, pp 59–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter M (1990) Wildlife, forest and forestry: principles of managing for biological diversity. Prentice Hill, Engelwood Cliffs, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyvarinen E, Kouki J, Martikainen P, Lappalainen H (2005) Short-term effects of controlled burning and green-tree retention on beetle (Coleoptera) assemblages in managed boreal forests. For Ecol Manage 212:315–332

    Google Scholar 

  • IBGE (2007) Instituto Brasileiro de Geographia e Estatistica. http://www.ibge.gov.br. Accessed 18 July 2007

  • Indonesian Ministry of Forestry (2007) Program Kehutanan, Nasional, 2005–2025. http://www.dephut.go.id/content.php?id=229. Accessed 15 August 2007

  • Innes J, Calder B, Williams D (1991) Native meets exotic—kokako and pine forest. What’s new in forest research, no. 209. Forest Research Institute, Rotorua

    Google Scholar 

  • Jactel H, Brockerhoff EG (2007) Tree diversity reduces herbivory by forest insects. Ecol Lett 10:835–848. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01073.x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jukes MR, Peace AJ, Ferris R (2001) Carabid beetle communities associated with coniferous plantations in Britain: the influence of site, ground vegetation and stand structure. For Ecol Manage 148:271–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanowski J, Catterall CP, Wardell-Johnson GW (2005) Consequences of broadscale timber plantations for biodiversity in cleared rainforest landscapes of tropical and subtropical Australia. For Ecol Manage 208:359–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan R, Lamb D, Woldring O, Irvine T, Jensen R (1997) Restoration of plant biodiversity beneath tropical tree plantations in Northern Australia. For Ecol Manage 99:117–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinpaste R (1990) Kiwis in a pine forest habitat. In: Fuller E (ed) Kiwis, a monograph of the family Apterygidae. SeTo Publishing, Auckland, pp 97–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupfer JA, Malanson GP, Franklin SB (2006) Not seeing the ocean for the islands: the mediating influence of matrix-based processes on forest fragmentation processes. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:8–20. doi:10.1111/j.1466-822X.2006.00204.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb D (1998) Large-scale ecological restoration of degraded tropical forest lands: the potential role of timber plantations. Restor Ecol 6:271–279. doi:10.1046/j.1526-100X.1998.00632.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb D, Parrotta JA, Keenan R, Tucker NIJ (1997) Rejoining habitat remnants: restoration of degraded tropical landscapes. In: Laurance WF, Bierregaard RO Jr (eds) Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management and conservation of fragmented communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 366–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb D, Erskine P, Parrotta JA (2005) Restoration of degraded tropical forest landscapes. Science 310:1628–1632. doi:10.1126/science.1111773

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lantschner MV, Rusch V, Peyrou C (2008) Bird assemblages in pine plantations replacing native ecosystems of N.W. Patagonia, Argentina. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9243-x

  • Larsson T-B (ed) (2001) Biodiversity evaluation tools for European forests. Ecological Bulletins 50, Blackwell Science, Oxford

  • Laurance WF (2007) Have we overstated the tropical biodiversity crisis? Trends Ecol Evol 22:65–70. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.014

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ledgard N (2001) The spread of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl.) in New Zealand. For Ecol Manage 141:43–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Franklin JF (2002) Conserving forest biodiversity: a comprehensive multiscaled approach. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Hobbs RJ (2004) Fauna conservation in Australian plantation forests—a review. Biol Conserv 119:151–168. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2003.10.028

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Pope ML (2000) The design of exotic softwood plantations to enhance wildlife conservation: preliminary lessons from the Tumut fragmentation experiment. In: Craig J, Mitchell N, Saunders DA (eds) Nature conservation. 5: Nature conservation in production environments: managing the matrix. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Sydney, pp 44–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Cunningham RB, Pope ML (1999) A large-scale “experiment” to examine the effects of landscape context and habitat fragmentation on mammals. Biol Conserv 88:387–403. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00111-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez G, Moro MJ (1997) Birds of Aleppo Pine plantations in south-east Spain in relation to vegetation composition and structure. J Appl Ecol 34:1257–1272. doi:10.2307/2405236

    Google Scholar 

  • Loumeto JJ, Huttel C (1997) Understory vegetation in fast-growing tree plantations on savanna soils in Congo. For Ecol Manage 99:65–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Magura T (2002) Carabids and forest edge: spatial pattern and edge effect. For Ecol Manage 157:23–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Magura T, Tothmeresz B, Bordan Z (2000) Effects of nature management practice on carabid assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a non-native plantation. Biol Conserv 93:95–102. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00073-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Matveinen-Huju K, Niemela J, Rita H, O’Hara RB (2006) Retention-tree groups in clear-cuts: do they constitute ‘life-boats’ for spiders and carabids? For Ecol Manage 230:119–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason WL (2007) Changes in the management of British forests between 1945 and 2000 and possible future trends. Ibis 149(Suppl. 2):41–52. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00696.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijaard E, Sheil D, Nasi R, Augeri D, Rosenbaum B, Iskandar D, Setyawati T, Lammertink M, Rachmatika I, Wong A, Soehartono T, Stanley S, O’Brien T (2005) Life after logging. Reconciling wildlife conservation and production forestry in Indonesian Borneo. CIFOR and UNESCO, Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijaard E, Sheil D (2007) A logged forest in Borneo is better than no forest at all. Nature 446:974. doi:10.1038/446974a

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Findings of the condition and trends working group. In: Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (eds) Millenium ecosystem assessment series. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture, Fishery (2005) ISMFF—indicators for the sustainable management of French forests. Paris, France

  • Moore SE, Allen HL (1999) Plantation forestry. In: Hunter ML Jr (ed) Maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 400–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Murcia C (1995) Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 10:58–62. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(00)88977-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858. doi:10.1038/35002501

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nasi R, Koponen P, Poulsen JG, Buitenzorgy B, Rusmantoro W, Ladjar LN, Efendy R (2008) Impact of landscape and corridor design on primates in a large-scale industrial tropical plantation landscape. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9237-8

  • Norton DA (1998) Indigenous biodiversity conservation and plantation forestry: options for the future. N Z For 43(2):34–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberhauser U (1997) Secondary forest regeneration beneath pine (Pinus kesiya) plantations in the northern Thai highlands: a chronosequence study. For Ecol Manage 99:171–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrotta JA (1993) Secondary forest regeneration on degraded tropical lands: the role of plantations as ‘foster ecosystems’. In: Lieth H, Lohmann M (eds) Restoration of tropical forest ecosystems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 63–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrotta JA (1999) Productivity, nutrient cycling and succession in single- and mixed-species plantations of Casuarina equisetifolia, Eucalyptus robusta and Leucaena leucocephala in Puerto Rico. For Ecol Manage 124:45–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrotta JA, Turnbull J (eds) (1997) Catalyzing native forest regeneration on degraded tropical lands. For Ecol Manage (special issue) 99:1–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrotta JA, Turnbull J, Jones N (1997a) Catalyzing native forest regeneration on degraded tropical lands. For Ecol Manage 99:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrotta JA, Knowles OH, Wunderle JM (1997b) Development of floristic diversity in 10-year-old restoration forests on a bauxite mined site in Amazonia. For Ecol Manage 99:21–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen A (2004) Analysis of corrective actions issued to existing plantation certificates. FSC, Bonn, Germany. www.fsc.org/plantations/content/en/home.htm. Accessed 19 June 2007

  • Pawson S, Brockerhoff E, Meenken E, Didham R (2008) Non-native plantation forests as alternative habitat for native forest beetles in a heavily modified landscape. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-008-9363-y

  • PEFC (2007) www.pefc.org. Accessed 31 July 2007

  • Peterken GF, Ausherman D, Buchenau M, Forman RTT (1992) Old-growth conservation within British upland conifer plantations. Forestry 65:127–144. doi:10.1093/forestry/65.2.127

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M, Kramer MR (2006) Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review (December 2006. www.hbr.org)

  • Quine CP, Humphrey JW, Watts K (2004) Biodiversity in the UK’s forests—recent policy developments and future research challenges. In: Paivanen R, Franc A (eds) Towards the sustainable use of Europe’s forests—forest ecosystem and landscape research: scientific challenges and opportunities. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, pp 237–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine CP, Fuller RJ, Smith KW, Grice PV (2007) Stand management: a threat or opportunity for birds in British woodland? Ibis 149(Suppl. 2):161–174. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00742.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman TRS (2006) Effects of habitat structure and adjacent habitats on birds in tropical rainforest fragments and shaded plantations in the Western Ghats, India. Biodivers Conserv 15:1577–1607. doi:10.1007/s10531-005-2352-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Renjifo LM (2001) Effect of natural and anthropogenic landscape matrices on the abundance of sub-Andean bird species. Ecol Appl 11:14–31. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0014:EONAAL]2.0.CO;2

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosoman G (1994) The plantation effect. Greenpeace, Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  • Sax DF (2002) Equal diversity in disparate species assemblages: a comparison of native and exotic woodlands in California. Global Ecol Biogeogr 11:49–57. doi:10.1046/j.1466-822X.2001.00262.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer-Lorenzen M, Körner C, Schulze E-D (2005) The functional significance of forest diversity: a synthesis. In: Scherer-Lorenzen M, Körner C, Schulze E-D (eds) Forest diversity and function: temperate and boreal systems. Ecological Studies, vol 176. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 377–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour RS, Hunter ML Jr (1999) Principles of ecological forestry. In: Hunter ML Jr (ed) Maintaining biodiversity in forested ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 22–61

    Google Scholar 

  • SFI (2007) Sustainable Forestry Initiative. www.aboutsfi.org. Accessed 31 July 2007

  • Shaw K (1997) Biodiversity position statement. N Z For 42(3):5–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd KR (1993) Significance of plantations in a global forestry strategy. Austral For 56:237–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith GF, Gittings T, Wilson M, French L, Oxbrough A, O’Donoghue S, O’Halloran J, Kelly DL, Mitchell FJG, Kelly T, Iremonger S, O’Donnell V, McKee A-M, Giller P (2008) Identifying practical indicators of biodiversity for stand-level management of plantation forests. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9274-3

  • Snyder S, ReVelle C (1997) Dynamic selection of harvests with adjacency restrictions: the SHARe model. For Sci 43:213–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Spellerberg IF, Sayer JWD (1996) Standards for biodiversity: a proposal based on biodiversity standards for forest plantations. Biodivers Conserv 5:447–459. doi:10.1007/BF00056390

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanturf JA, Kellison RC, Broerman ES, Jones SB (2003) Innovation and forest industry: domesticating the pine forests of the southern United States, 1920–1999. For Pol Econ 5:407–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki N, Olson DH (2008) Options for biodiversity conservation in managed forest landscapes of multiple ownerships in Oregon and Washington, USA. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9301-4

  • Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677. doi:10.1038/nature01014

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ree R, Bennett AF, Gilmore DC (2004) Gap-crossing by gliding marsupials: thresholds for use of isolated woodland patches in an agricultural landscape. Biol Conserv 115:241–249. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00142-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Deusen P (2001) Scheduling spatial arrangement and harvest simultaneously. Silva Fenn 35:85–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Halder I, Barbaro L, Corcket E, Jactel H (2008) Importance of semi-natural habitats for the conservation of butterfly communities in landscapes dominated by pine plantations. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9264-5

  • Vergara PM, Schlatter RP (2006) Aggregate retention in two Tierra del Fuego Nothofagus forests: short-term effects on bird abundance. For Ecol Manage 225:213–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson JEM, Whittaker RJ, Dawson TP (2004) Habitat structure and proximity to forest edge affect the abundance of forest-dependent birds in tropical coastal forests of southeastern Madagascar. Biol Conserv 120:311–327. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.004

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenhua L (2004) Degradation and restoration of forest ecosystems in China. For Ecol Manage 201:33–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Wethered R, Lawes MJ (2005) Nestedness of bird assemblages in fragmented Afromontane forest: the effect of plantation forestry in the matrix. Biol Conserv 123:125–137. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.10.013

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigley TB, Roberts TH (1997) Landscape-level effects of forest management on faunal diversity in bottomland hardwoods. For Ecol Manage 90:141–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1988) Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • World Rainforest Movement (2007) www.wrm.org.uy. Accessed 23 April 2007

  • Wunderle JM Jr (1997) The role of animal seed dispersal in accelerating native forest regeneration on degraded tropical lands. For Ecol Manage 99:223–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates ED, Levia DF, Williams CL (2004) Recruitment of three non-native invasive plants into a fragmented forest in southern Illinois. For Ecol Manage 190:119–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Yirdaw E (2001) Diversity of naturally regenerated native woody species in forest plantations in the Ethiopian highlands. New For 22:159–177. doi:10.1023/A:1015629327039

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuang X (1997) Rehabilitation and development of forests on degraded hills of Hong Kong. For Ecol Manage 99:197–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuidema P, Sayer JA, Dijkman W (1997) Forest fragmentation and biodiversity: the case for intermediate sized conservation areas. Environ Conserv 23(4):290–297

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all authors for their contributions to this special issue and the three conferences or conference sessions that spawned this initiative. Many thanks also to David Hawksworth (Editor of Biodiversity and Conservation), Raphael Didham (Associate Editor), and all the staff in the Springer journal office who provided invaluable support with this special issue. This article was partly funded by the New Zealand Foundation for Research Science and Technology (contract C04X0214).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eckehard G. Brockerhoff.

Additional information

An ‘oxymoron’ is a figure of speech using an intended combination of two apparently contradictory terms.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brockerhoff, E.G., Jactel, H., Parrotta, J.A. et al. Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity?. Biodivers Conserv 17, 925–951 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9380-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9380-x

Keywords

  • Afforestation
  • Biodiversity conservation
  • Certification
  • Context
  • Deforestation
  • Forest management
  • Impact assessment
  • Land use change
  • Landscape ecology