Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 925–951 | Cite as

Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity?

  • Eckehard G. Brockerhoff
  • Hervé Jactel
  • John A. Parrotta
  • Christopher P. Quine
  • Jeffrey Sayer
Original Paper

Abstract

Losses of natural and semi-natural forests, mostly to agriculture, are a significant concern for biodiversity. Against this trend, the area of intensively managed plantation forests increases, and there is much debate about the implications for biodiversity. We provide a comprehensive review of the function of plantation forests as habitat compared with other land cover, examine the effects on biodiversity at the landscape scale, and synthesise context-specific effects of plantation forestry on biodiversity. Natural forests are usually more suitable as habitat for a wider range of native forest species than plantation forests but there is abundant evidence that plantation forests can provide valuable habitat, even for some threatened and endangered species, and may contribute to the conservation of biodiversity by various mechanisms. In landscapes where forest is the natural land cover, plantation forests may represent a low-contrast matrix, and afforestation of agricultural land can assist conservation by providing complementary forest habitat, buffering edge effects, and increasing connectivity. In contrast, conversion of natural forests and afforestation of natural non-forest land is detrimental. However, regional deforestation pressure for agricultural development may render plantation forestry a ‘lesser evil’ if forest managers protect indigenous vegetation remnants. We provide numerous context-specific examples and case studies to assist impact assessments of plantation forestry, and we offer a range of management recommendations. This paper also serves as an introduction and background paper to this special issue on the effects of plantation forests on biodiversity.

Keywords

Afforestation Biodiversity conservation Certification Context Deforestation Forest management Impact assessment Land use change Landscape ecology 

References

  1. Allan DG, Harrison JA, Navarro RA, van Wilgen BW, Thompson MW (1997) The impact of commercial afforestation on bird populations in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa—insights from bird-atlas data. Biol Conserv 79:173–185. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00098-5 Google Scholar
  2. Allen RB, Platt KH, Coker REJ (1995) Understorey species composition patterns in a Pinus radiata D. Don plantation on the central North Island volcanic plateau, New Zealand. N Z J For Sci 25:301–317Google Scholar
  3. Anderson AR (2001) Deforesting and restoring peat bogs: a review. Technical paper 32, Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong AJ, van Hensbergen HJ (1996) Impacts of afforestation with pines on assemblages of native biota in South Africa. South Afr For J 175:35–42Google Scholar
  5. Barbaro L, Pontcharraud L, Vetillard F, Guyon D, Jactel H (2005) Comparative responses of bird, carabid, and spider assemblages to stand and landscape diversity in maritime pine plantation forests. Ecoscience 12:110–121. doi:10.2980/i1195-6860-12-1-110.1 Google Scholar
  6. Barbaro L, Rossi JP, Vetillard F, Nezan J, Jactel H (2007) The spatial distribution of birds and carabid beetles in pine plantation forests: the role of landscape composition and structure. J Biogeog 34:652–664Google Scholar
  7. Barbaro L, Couzi L, Bretagnolle V, Nezan J, Vetillard F (2008) Landscape complementation for breeding and foraging in the declining Eurasian hoopoe (Upupa epops). Biodivers Conserv (this issue)Google Scholar
  8. Barlow J, Gardner TA, Araujo IS, Bonaldo AB, Costa JE, Esposito MC, Ferreira LV, Hawes J, Hernandez MIM, Leite RN, Lo-Man-Hung NF, Malcolm JR, Martins MB, Mestre LAM, Nunes-Gutjahr AL, Overal WL, Parry L, Peters SL, Ribeiro-Junior MA, da Silva Motta C, da Silva MNF, Peres CA (2007) Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary and plantation forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:18555–18560. doi:10.1073/pnas.0703333104 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Barlow J, Araujo IS, Overal WL, Gardner TA, Da Silva Mendes F, Lake I, Peres CA (2008) Diversity and composition of fruit-feeding butterflies in tropical Eucalyptus plantations. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9240-0
  10. Benedick H, Hill K, Mustaffa N, Chey VK, Maryati M, Searle B, Schilthuizen M, Hamer KC (2006) Impacts of rain forest fragmentation on butterflies in northern Borneo: species richness, turnover and the value of small fragments. J Appl Ecol 43:967–977. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01209.x Google Scholar
  11. Berndt L, Brockerhoff E, Jactel H (2008) Can exotic plantation forests provide surrogate habitat for carabid beetles where native forest is rare? Biodivers Conserv (this issue)Google Scholar
  12. Bernhard-Reversat F (ed) (2001) Effect of exotic tree plantations on plant diversity and biological soil fertility in the Congo savanna: with special reference to eucalypts. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, p 71Google Scholar
  13. Bettinger P, Sessions J, Boston K (1997) Using Tabu search to schedule timber harvests subject to spatial wildlife goals for big game. Ecol Model 94:111–123. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(96)00007-5 Google Scholar
  14. Bills D (2001) The UK Government and certification. Int For Rev 3:323–326Google Scholar
  15. Brockerhoff EG, Ecroyd CE, Langer ER (2001) Biodiversity in New Zealand plantation forests: policy trends, incentives, and the state of our knowledge. N Z J For 46:31–37Google Scholar
  16. Brockerhoff EG, Ecroyd CE, Leckie AC, Kimberley MO (2003) Diversity and succession of adventive and indigenous vascular understorey plants in Pinus radiata plantation forests in New Zealand. For Ecol Manage 185:307–326Google Scholar
  17. Brockerhoff EG, Berndt LA, Jactel H (2005) Role of exotic pine forests in the conservation of the critically endangered ground beetle Holcaspis brevicula (Coleoptera: Carabidae). N Z J Ecol 29:37–43Google Scholar
  18. Brook BW, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL (2003) Catastrophic extinctions follow deforestation in Singapore. Nature 424:420–423. doi:10.1038/nature01795 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Buscardo E, Smith GF, Kelly DL, Freitas H, Iremomger S, Mitchell F, O’Donoghue S, Mckee A-M (2008) The early effects of afforestation on biodiversity of grasslands in Ireland. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9275-2
  20. Carle J, Vuorinen P, Del Lungo A (2002) Status and trends in global forest plantation development. For Prod J 52(7/8):12–23Google Scholar
  21. Carnevale NJ, Montagnini F (2002) Facilitating regeneration of secondary forests with the use of mixed and pure plantations of indigenous tree species. For Ecol Manage 163:217–227Google Scholar
  22. Carnus J-M, Parrotta J, Brockerhoff EG, Arbez M, Jactel H, Kremer A, Lamb D, O’Hara K, Walters B (2006) Planted forests and biodiversity. J For 104(2):65–77Google Scholar
  23. Carrere R, Lohmann L (1996) Pulping the south: industrial tree plantations and the world paper economy. WRM and Zed Books Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Chan-McLeod ACA, Moy A (2007) Evaluating residual tree patches as stepping stones and short-term refugia for red-legged frogs. J Wildlife Manage 71:1836–1844. doi:10.2193/2006-309 Google Scholar
  25. Clapp RA (2001) Tree farming and forest conservation in Chile: do replacement forests leave any originals behind? Soc Nat Resour 14:341–356Google Scholar
  26. Clout MN, Gaze PD (1984) Effects of plantation forestry on birds in New Zealand. J Appl Ecol 21:795–815. doi:10.2307/2405048 Google Scholar
  27. Coote L, Kelly DL, Dowding P, Smith GF (2008) Epiphytes of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) plantations in Ireland and the effects of open spaces. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9302-3
  28. Cossalter C, Pye-Smith C (2003) Fast-wood forestry—myths and realities. Center for International Forestry Research, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  29. Cummings J, Reid N (2008) Stand-level management of plantations to improve biodiversity values. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-008-9362-z
  30. Curran LM, Caniago I, Paoli GD, Astianti D, Kusneti M, Leighton M, Nirarita CE, Haeruman H (1999) Impact of El Nino and logging on canopy tree recruitment in Borneo. Science 286:2184–2188. doi:10.1126/science.286.5447.2184 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Curran LM, Trigg SN, McDonald AK, Astiani D, Hardiono YM, Siregar P, Caniago I, Kasischke E (2004) Lowland forest loss in protected areas of Indonesian Borneo. Science 303:1000–1003. doi:10.1126/science.1091714 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Cyranoski D (2007) Logging: the new conservation. Nature 446:608–610. doi:10.1038/446608a PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Deans AM, Malcolm JR, Smith SM, Bellocq MI (2005) Edge effects and the responses of aerial insect assemblages to structural-retention harvesting in Canadian boreal peatland forests. For Ecol Manage 204:249–266Google Scholar
  34. Decocq G, Aubert M, Dupont F, Bardat J, Wattez-Franger A, Saguez R, De Foucault B, Alard D, Delelis-Dusoliier A (2005) Silviculture-driven vegetation change in a European temperate deciduous forest. Ann For Sci 62:313–323. doi:10.1051/forest:2005026 Google Scholar
  35. Denyer K, Burns B, Ogden J (2006) Buffering of native forest edge microclimate by adjoining tree plantations. Austral Ecol 31:478–489. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2006.01609.x Google Scholar
  36. Didham RK, Hammond PM, Lawton JH, Eggleton P, Stork NE (1998) Beetle species responses to tropical forest fragmentation. Ecol Monogr 68:295–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Donald PF, Fuller RJ, Evans AD, Gough SJ (1998) Effects of forest management and grazing on breeding bird communities in plantations of broadleaved and coniferous trees in western England. Biol Conserv 85:183–197. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00114-6 Google Scholar
  38. Du Bus de Warnaffe G, Deconchat M (2008) Impact of four silvicultural systems on birds in the Belgian Ardenne: implications for plantation management. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-008-9364-x
  39. Ecroyd CE, Brockerhoff EG (2005) Floristic changes over 30 years in a Canterbury Plains kanuka forest remnant, and comparison with adjacent vegetation types. N Z J Ecol 29:279–290Google Scholar
  40. Ewers RM, Didham RK (2006) Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol Rev 81:117–142. doi:10.1017/S1464793105006949 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Ewers RM, Didham RK (2007) The effect of fragment shape and species’ sensitivity to habitat edges on animal population size. Conserv Biol 21:926–936. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00720.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Eycott AE, Watkinson AR, Dolman PM (2006) Ecological patterns of plant diversity in a plantation forest managed by clearfelling. J Appl Ecol 43:1160–1171. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01235.x Google Scholar
  43. Fahy O, Gormally M (1998) A comparison of plant and carabid beetle communities in an Irish oak woodland with a nearby conifer plantation and clearfelled site. For Ecol Manage 110:263–273Google Scholar
  44. Fang W, Peng SL (1997) Development of species diversity in the restoration process of establishing a tropical man-made forest ecosystem in China. For Ecol Manage 99:185–196Google Scholar
  45. Fahrig L (2001) How much habitat is enough? Biol Conserv 100:65–74. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00208-1 Google Scholar
  46. FAO (2001) Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000. Main report. FAO Forestry Paper 140, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  47. FAO (2006a) Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005—Progress towards sustainable forest management. FAO Forestry Paper 147, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  48. FAO (2006b) Planted Forests and Trees Working Paper FP37E. Responsible Management of Planted Forests, Voluntary Guidelines. FAO, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  49. FAO (2007) The State of the World’s Forests. ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/009. FAO, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  50. FERN (2007) www.fern.org/publications. Accessed 22 April 2007
  51. Ferreras P (2001) Landscape structure and asymmetrical inter-patch connectivity in a metapopulation of the endangered Iberian lynx. Biol Conserv 100:125–136. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00213-5 Google Scholar
  52. Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2006) Beyond fragmentation: the continuum model for fauna research and conservation in human-modified landscapes. Oikos 112:473–480. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14148.x Google Scholar
  53. Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB, Manning AD (2006) Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and resilience: ten guiding principles for commodity production landscapes. Front Ecol Environ 4:80–86. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2006)004[0080:BEFART]2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar
  54. Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  55. Forest Stewardship Council (2004) Perspectives on plantations. A review of the issues facing plantation management. Background paper to the FSC plantations review. FSC, Bonn, Germany. www.fsc.org/plantations/content/en/home.htm. Accessed 19 June 2007
  56. Forest Stewardship Council (2006) The FSC plantations review policy working group final report. FSC, Bonn, Germany. www.fsc.org/plantations/content/en/home.htm. Accessed 19 June 2007
  57. Forest Stewardship Council (2007a) FSC principles and criteria of forest stewardship. http://www.fsc.org/en/about/policy_standards/princ_criteria. Accessed 19 June 2007
  58. Forest Stewardship Council (2007b) FSC and Plantations: the link with responsible forest management. FSC, Bonn, Germany.www.fscus.org . Accessed 22 April 2007
  59. Forest Stewardship Council (2007c) Plantations review. FSC, Bonn, Germany. www.fsc.org/plantations/content/en/home.htm. Accessed 19 June 2007
  60. Fuller RJ, Smith KW, Grice PV, Currie FA, Quine CP (2007) Habitat change and woodland birds in Britain: implications for management and future research. Ibis 149(Suppl. 2):261–268. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00775.x Google Scholar
  61. Gascon C, Lovejoy TE, Bierregaard RO Jr, Malcolm JR, Stouffer PC, Vasconcelos HL, Laurance WF, Zimmerman B, Tocher M, Borges S (1999) Matrix habitat and species richness in tropical forest remnants. Biol Conserv 91:223–229. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00080-4 Google Scholar
  62. Geldenhuys CJ (1997) Native forest regeneration in pine and eucalypt plantations in Northern Province, South Africa. For Ecol Manage 99:101–115Google Scholar
  63. Goulding CJ (2006) Forest Stewardship Council certification of industrial plantation forests. Allg Forst-Jagdzeitung 177(3–4):42–47Google Scholar
  64. Gullison RE (2003) Does forest certification conserve biodiversity? Oryx 37(2):153–165. doi:10.1017/S0030605303000346 Google Scholar
  65. Hampson AM, Peterken GF (1998) Enhancing the biodiversity of Scotland’s forest resource through the development of a network of forest habitats. Biodivers Conserv 7:179–192. doi:10.1023/A:1008832401731 Google Scholar
  66. Harper KA, Macdonald SE, Burton PJ, Chen J, Brosofske KD, Saunders SC, Euskirchen ES, Roberts D, Jaiteh MS, Esseen P-A (2005) Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conserv Biol 19:768–782. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00045.x Google Scholar
  67. Harris LD (1984) The fragmented forest: Island biogeography theory and the preservation of biotic diversity. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  68. Hartley MJ (2002) Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests. For Ecol Manage 155:81–95Google Scholar
  69. Henle K, Davies KF, Kleyer M, Margules C, Settele J (2004) Predictors of species sensitivity to fragmentation. Biodivers Conserv 13:207–251Google Scholar
  70. Hock B, Hay E (2003) Forest certification in New Zealand: how are we going? N Z J For 47:17–23Google Scholar
  71. Humphrey JW (2005) Benefits to biodiversity from developing old-growth conditions in British upland spruce plantations: a review and recommendations. Forestry 78:33–53. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpi004 Google Scholar
  72. Humphrey JW, Newton AC, Peace AJ, Holden E (2000) The importance of conifer plantations in northern Britain as a habitat for native fungi. Biol Conserv 96:241–252. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00077-X Google Scholar
  73. Humphrey JW, Ferris R, Quine CP (eds) (2003) Biodiversity in Britain’s planted forests: results from the Forestry Commission’s Biodiversity assessment project. Forestry Commission, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  74. Humphrey JW, Quine CP, Watts K (2006) The influence of forest and woodland management on biodiversity in Scotland: recent findings and future prospects. In: Davison R, Galbraith CA (eds) Farming, forestry and the natural heritage: towards a more integrated approach. Scottish Natural Heritage, Edinburgh, pp 59–75Google Scholar
  75. Hunter M (1990) Wildlife, forest and forestry: principles of managing for biological diversity. Prentice Hill, Engelwood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  76. Hyvarinen E, Kouki J, Martikainen P, Lappalainen H (2005) Short-term effects of controlled burning and green-tree retention on beetle (Coleoptera) assemblages in managed boreal forests. For Ecol Manage 212:315–332Google Scholar
  77. IBGE (2007) Instituto Brasileiro de Geographia e Estatistica. http://www.ibge.gov.br. Accessed 18 July 2007
  78. Indonesian Ministry of Forestry (2007) Program Kehutanan, Nasional, 2005–2025. http://www.dephut.go.id/content.php?id=229. Accessed 15 August 2007
  79. Innes J, Calder B, Williams D (1991) Native meets exotic—kokako and pine forest. What’s new in forest research, no. 209. Forest Research Institute, RotoruaGoogle Scholar
  80. Jactel H, Brockerhoff EG (2007) Tree diversity reduces herbivory by forest insects. Ecol Lett 10:835–848. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01073.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Jukes MR, Peace AJ, Ferris R (2001) Carabid beetle communities associated with coniferous plantations in Britain: the influence of site, ground vegetation and stand structure. For Ecol Manage 148:271–286Google Scholar
  82. Kanowski J, Catterall CP, Wardell-Johnson GW (2005) Consequences of broadscale timber plantations for biodiversity in cleared rainforest landscapes of tropical and subtropical Australia. For Ecol Manage 208:359–372Google Scholar
  83. Keenan R, Lamb D, Woldring O, Irvine T, Jensen R (1997) Restoration of plant biodiversity beneath tropical tree plantations in Northern Australia. For Ecol Manage 99:117–131Google Scholar
  84. Kleinpaste R (1990) Kiwis in a pine forest habitat. In: Fuller E (ed) Kiwis, a monograph of the family Apterygidae. SeTo Publishing, Auckland, pp 97–138Google Scholar
  85. Kupfer JA, Malanson GP, Franklin SB (2006) Not seeing the ocean for the islands: the mediating influence of matrix-based processes on forest fragmentation processes. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:8–20. doi:10.1111/j.1466-822X.2006.00204.x Google Scholar
  86. Lamb D (1998) Large-scale ecological restoration of degraded tropical forest lands: the potential role of timber plantations. Restor Ecol 6:271–279. doi:10.1046/j.1526-100X.1998.00632.x Google Scholar
  87. Lamb D, Parrotta JA, Keenan R, Tucker NIJ (1997) Rejoining habitat remnants: restoration of degraded tropical landscapes. In: Laurance WF, Bierregaard RO Jr (eds) Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management and conservation of fragmented communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 366–385Google Scholar
  88. Lamb D, Erskine P, Parrotta JA (2005) Restoration of degraded tropical forest landscapes. Science 310:1628–1632. doi:10.1126/science.1111773 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Lantschner MV, Rusch V, Peyrou C (2008) Bird assemblages in pine plantations replacing native ecosystems of N.W. Patagonia, Argentina. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9243-x
  90. Larsson T-B (ed) (2001) Biodiversity evaluation tools for European forests. Ecological Bulletins 50, Blackwell Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  91. Laurance WF (2007) Have we overstated the tropical biodiversity crisis? Trends Ecol Evol 22:65–70. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.014 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Ledgard N (2001) The spread of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl.) in New Zealand. For Ecol Manage 141:43–57Google Scholar
  93. Lindenmayer DB, Franklin JF (2002) Conserving forest biodiversity: a comprehensive multiscaled approach. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  94. Lindenmayer DB, Hobbs RJ (2004) Fauna conservation in Australian plantation forests—a review. Biol Conserv 119:151–168. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2003.10.028 Google Scholar
  95. Lindenmayer DB, Pope ML (2000) The design of exotic softwood plantations to enhance wildlife conservation: preliminary lessons from the Tumut fragmentation experiment. In: Craig J, Mitchell N, Saunders DA (eds) Nature conservation. 5: Nature conservation in production environments: managing the matrix. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Sydney, pp 44–49Google Scholar
  96. Lindenmayer DB, Cunningham RB, Pope ML (1999) A large-scale “experiment” to examine the effects of landscape context and habitat fragmentation on mammals. Biol Conserv 88:387–403. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00111-6 Google Scholar
  97. Lopez G, Moro MJ (1997) Birds of Aleppo Pine plantations in south-east Spain in relation to vegetation composition and structure. J Appl Ecol 34:1257–1272. doi:10.2307/2405236 Google Scholar
  98. Loumeto JJ, Huttel C (1997) Understory vegetation in fast-growing tree plantations on savanna soils in Congo. For Ecol Manage 99:65–81Google Scholar
  99. Magura T (2002) Carabids and forest edge: spatial pattern and edge effect. For Ecol Manage 157:23–37Google Scholar
  100. Magura T, Tothmeresz B, Bordan Z (2000) Effects of nature management practice on carabid assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a non-native plantation. Biol Conserv 93:95–102. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00073-7 Google Scholar
  101. Matveinen-Huju K, Niemela J, Rita H, O’Hara RB (2006) Retention-tree groups in clear-cuts: do they constitute ‘life-boats’ for spiders and carabids? For Ecol Manage 230:119–135Google Scholar
  102. Mason WL (2007) Changes in the management of British forests between 1945 and 2000 and possible future trends. Ibis 149(Suppl. 2):41–52. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00696.x Google Scholar
  103. Meijaard E, Sheil D, Nasi R, Augeri D, Rosenbaum B, Iskandar D, Setyawati T, Lammertink M, Rachmatika I, Wong A, Soehartono T, Stanley S, O’Brien T (2005) Life after logging. Reconciling wildlife conservation and production forestry in Indonesian Borneo. CIFOR and UNESCO, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  104. Meijaard E, Sheil D (2007) A logged forest in Borneo is better than no forest at all. Nature 446:974. doi:10.1038/446974a PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Findings of the condition and trends working group. In: Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (eds) Millenium ecosystem assessment series. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  106. Ministry of Agriculture, Fishery (2005) ISMFF—indicators for the sustainable management of French forests. Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  107. Moore SE, Allen HL (1999) Plantation forestry. In: Hunter ML Jr (ed) Maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 400–433Google Scholar
  108. Murcia C (1995) Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 10:58–62. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(00)88977-6 Google Scholar
  109. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858. doi:10.1038/35002501 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Nasi R, Koponen P, Poulsen JG, Buitenzorgy B, Rusmantoro W, Ladjar LN, Efendy R (2008) Impact of landscape and corridor design on primates in a large-scale industrial tropical plantation landscape. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9237-8
  111. Norton DA (1998) Indigenous biodiversity conservation and plantation forestry: options for the future. N Z For 43(2):34–39Google Scholar
  112. Oberhauser U (1997) Secondary forest regeneration beneath pine (Pinus kesiya) plantations in the northern Thai highlands: a chronosequence study. For Ecol Manage 99:171–183Google Scholar
  113. Parrotta JA (1993) Secondary forest regeneration on degraded tropical lands: the role of plantations as ‘foster ecosystems’. In: Lieth H, Lohmann M (eds) Restoration of tropical forest ecosystems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 63–73Google Scholar
  114. Parrotta JA (1999) Productivity, nutrient cycling and succession in single- and mixed-species plantations of Casuarina equisetifolia, Eucalyptus robusta and Leucaena leucocephala in Puerto Rico. For Ecol Manage 124:45–77Google Scholar
  115. Parrotta JA, Turnbull J (eds) (1997) Catalyzing native forest regeneration on degraded tropical lands. For Ecol Manage (special issue) 99:1–290Google Scholar
  116. Parrotta JA, Turnbull J, Jones N (1997a) Catalyzing native forest regeneration on degraded tropical lands. For Ecol Manage 99:1–8Google Scholar
  117. Parrotta JA, Knowles OH, Wunderle JM (1997b) Development of floristic diversity in 10-year-old restoration forests on a bauxite mined site in Amazonia. For Ecol Manage 99:21–42Google Scholar
  118. Paulsen A (2004) Analysis of corrective actions issued to existing plantation certificates. FSC, Bonn, Germany. www.fsc.org/plantations/content/en/home.htm. Accessed 19 June 2007
  119. Pawson S, Brockerhoff E, Meenken E, Didham R (2008) Non-native plantation forests as alternative habitat for native forest beetles in a heavily modified landscape. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-008-9363-y
  120. PEFC (2007) www.pefc.org. Accessed 31 July 2007
  121. Peterken GF, Ausherman D, Buchenau M, Forman RTT (1992) Old-growth conservation within British upland conifer plantations. Forestry 65:127–144. doi:10.1093/forestry/65.2.127 Google Scholar
  122. Porter M, Kramer MR (2006) Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review (December 2006. www.hbr.org)
  123. Quine CP, Humphrey JW, Watts K (2004) Biodiversity in the UK’s forests—recent policy developments and future research challenges. In: Paivanen R, Franc A (eds) Towards the sustainable use of Europe’s forests—forest ecosystem and landscape research: scientific challenges and opportunities. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, pp 237–248Google Scholar
  124. Quine CP, Fuller RJ, Smith KW, Grice PV (2007) Stand management: a threat or opportunity for birds in British woodland? Ibis 149(Suppl. 2):161–174. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00742.x Google Scholar
  125. Raman TRS (2006) Effects of habitat structure and adjacent habitats on birds in tropical rainforest fragments and shaded plantations in the Western Ghats, India. Biodivers Conserv 15:1577–1607. doi:10.1007/s10531-005-2352-5 Google Scholar
  126. Renjifo LM (2001) Effect of natural and anthropogenic landscape matrices on the abundance of sub-Andean bird species. Ecol Appl 11:14–31. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0014:EONAAL]2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar
  127. Rosoman G (1994) The plantation effect. Greenpeace, AucklandGoogle Scholar
  128. Sax DF (2002) Equal diversity in disparate species assemblages: a comparison of native and exotic woodlands in California. Global Ecol Biogeogr 11:49–57. doi:10.1046/j.1466-822X.2001.00262.x Google Scholar
  129. Scherer-Lorenzen M, Körner C, Schulze E-D (2005) The functional significance of forest diversity: a synthesis. In: Scherer-Lorenzen M, Körner C, Schulze E-D (eds) Forest diversity and function: temperate and boreal systems. Ecological Studies, vol 176. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 377–389Google Scholar
  130. Seymour RS, Hunter ML Jr (1999) Principles of ecological forestry. In: Hunter ML Jr (ed) Maintaining biodiversity in forested ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 22–61Google Scholar
  131. SFI (2007) Sustainable Forestry Initiative. www.aboutsfi.org. Accessed 31 July 2007
  132. Shaw K (1997) Biodiversity position statement. N Z For 42(3):5–6Google Scholar
  133. Shepherd KR (1993) Significance of plantations in a global forestry strategy. Austral For 56:237–335Google Scholar
  134. Smith GF, Gittings T, Wilson M, French L, Oxbrough A, O’Donoghue S, O’Halloran J, Kelly DL, Mitchell FJG, Kelly T, Iremonger S, O’Donnell V, McKee A-M, Giller P (2008) Identifying practical indicators of biodiversity for stand-level management of plantation forests. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9274-3
  135. Snyder S, ReVelle C (1997) Dynamic selection of harvests with adjacency restrictions: the SHARe model. For Sci 43:213–222Google Scholar
  136. Spellerberg IF, Sayer JWD (1996) Standards for biodiversity: a proposal based on biodiversity standards for forest plantations. Biodivers Conserv 5:447–459. doi:10.1007/BF00056390 Google Scholar
  137. Stanturf JA, Kellison RC, Broerman ES, Jones SB (2003) Innovation and forest industry: domesticating the pine forests of the southern United States, 1920–1999. For Pol Econ 5:407–419Google Scholar
  138. Suzuki N, Olson DH (2008) Options for biodiversity conservation in managed forest landscapes of multiple ownerships in Oregon and Washington, USA. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9301-4
  139. Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677. doi:10.1038/nature01014 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Van der Ree R, Bennett AF, Gilmore DC (2004) Gap-crossing by gliding marsupials: thresholds for use of isolated woodland patches in an agricultural landscape. Biol Conserv 115:241–249. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00142-3 Google Scholar
  141. Van Deusen P (2001) Scheduling spatial arrangement and harvest simultaneously. Silva Fenn 35:85–92Google Scholar
  142. Van Halder I, Barbaro L, Corcket E, Jactel H (2008) Importance of semi-natural habitats for the conservation of butterfly communities in landscapes dominated by pine plantations. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9264-5
  143. Vergara PM, Schlatter RP (2006) Aggregate retention in two Tierra del Fuego Nothofagus forests: short-term effects on bird abundance. For Ecol Manage 225:213–224Google Scholar
  144. Watson JEM, Whittaker RJ, Dawson TP (2004) Habitat structure and proximity to forest edge affect the abundance of forest-dependent birds in tropical coastal forests of southeastern Madagascar. Biol Conserv 120:311–327. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.004 Google Scholar
  145. Wenhua L (2004) Degradation and restoration of forest ecosystems in China. For Ecol Manage 201:33–41 Google Scholar
  146. Wethered R, Lawes MJ (2005) Nestedness of bird assemblages in fragmented Afromontane forest: the effect of plantation forestry in the matrix. Biol Conserv 123:125–137. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.10.013 Google Scholar
  147. Wigley TB, Roberts TH (1997) Landscape-level effects of forest management on faunal diversity in bottomland hardwoods. For Ecol Manage 90:141–154Google Scholar
  148. Wilson EO (1988) Biodiversity. National Academy Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  149. World Rainforest Movement (2007) www.wrm.org.uy. Accessed 23 April 2007
  150. Wunderle JM Jr (1997) The role of animal seed dispersal in accelerating native forest regeneration on degraded tropical lands. For Ecol Manage 99:223–235Google Scholar
  151. Yates ED, Levia DF, Williams CL (2004) Recruitment of three non-native invasive plants into a fragmented forest in southern Illinois. For Ecol Manage 190:119–130Google Scholar
  152. Yirdaw E (2001) Diversity of naturally regenerated native woody species in forest plantations in the Ethiopian highlands. New For 22:159–177. doi:10.1023/A:1015629327039 Google Scholar
  153. Zuang X (1997) Rehabilitation and development of forests on degraded hills of Hong Kong. For Ecol Manage 99:197–201Google Scholar
  154. Zuidema P, Sayer JA, Dijkman W (1997) Forest fragmentation and biodiversity: the case for intermediate sized conservation areas. Environ Conserv 23(4):290–297Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eckehard G. Brockerhoff
    • 1
  • Hervé Jactel
    • 2
  • John A. Parrotta
    • 3
  • Christopher P. Quine
    • 4
  • Jeffrey Sayer
    • 5
  1. 1.Scion (New Zealand Forest Research Institute)ChristchurchNew Zealand
  2. 2.INRA, UMR1202 BiodiversityGenes & Communities, Laboratory of Forest Entomology and BiodiversityCestas CedexFrance
  3. 3.U.S. Forest Service, Research & DevelopmentArlingtonUSA
  4. 4.Forest Research, Northern Research StationRoslinUK
  5. 5.The World Conservation Union (IUCN)GlandSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations